14 found
Order:
  1.  1
    Ontologism in Semyon Frank.Teresa Obolevitch - forthcoming - Studies in East European Thought.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  21
    Ontologizm, czyli Siemiona Franka polemika z pokantowskim epistemologizmem.Teresa Obolevitch - 2007 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 55 (2):67-79.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  76
    Negative Theology and Science in the Thought of Semyon Frank.Teresa Obolevitch - 2010 - Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):93-99.
    Semën Frank (1877–1950) considered the Universe as the “all-unity.” According to him, everything is a part of the all-unity, which has a divine character. God is present in the world, but his nature is incomprehensible. In this article I analyze two consequences of Frank’s panentheistic view of the relation between science and theology. Firstly, the limits of scientific knowledge allow recognition of the mystery of the world and the transcendence of God. Secondly, Frank claimed that nature is a “trace” of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  41
    O recepcji teorii ewolucji w filozofii rosyjskiej (W. Sołowjow, M Łosski).Teresa Obolevitch - 2003 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 33.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  48
    Galileo in the Russian Orthodox Context: History, Philosophy, Theology, and Science.Teresa Obolevitch - 2015 - Zygon 50 (4):788-808.
    The trial of Galileo remains a representative example of the alleged incompatibility between science and religion as well as a suggestive case study of the relationship between them from the Western historical and methodological perspective. However, the Eastern Christian view has not been explored to a significant extent. In this article, the author considers relevant aspects of the reception of the teaching of Copernicus and Galileo in Russian culture, especially in the works of scientists. Whereas in prerevolutionary Russia Galileo was (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  26
    Fizyka i metafizyka w ujęciu Mikołaja Łosskiego.Teresa Obolevitch - 2006 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 38.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  22
    W. Sołowjowa głos w obronie metafizyki [z lektury klasyków].Teresa Obolevitch - 2002 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 30.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  10
    Hilarion Alfeyev, The Holy Mystery of the Church Introduction to the History and Problems in the Debates on the Onomatodoxyby Teresa Obolevitch.Teresa Obolevitch - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):385-387.
  9.  10
    All-Unity According to V. Soloviev and S. Frank. A Comparative Analysis.Teresa Obolevitch - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (2):413-425.
    In this article I will present and analyze the concept of all-unity of the two most famous Russian philosophers – Vladimir Soloviev and Semyon Frank . As will be argued, the concept of all-unity is part of an old philosophical tradition. At the same time, it is an original idea of the Russian thought of the Silver Age.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  6
    Związek metafizyki i epistemologii w myśli W. S. Sołowjowa.Teresa Obolevitch - 2006 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (1):107-123.
    In the article the assumptions are analyzed of V. S. Soloviov\\\'s (1853- 1900) metaphysics presented in his Criticism ofPrinciples. When forming a metaphysics Soloviov considers and subjects to criticism two theories: Hegel\\\'s extreme (in the Russian philosopher\\\'s term - \\\"abstract\\\") idealism, and the positivists\\\' radical empiricism. Soloviov perceives resolution of the difficulties seen in these theories in the conception of the so-called all-unity. According to this conception every being has its ontic foundation in the Absolute, which makes possible an inner (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  8
    Review:" The Holy Mystery of the Church: Introduction to the History and Problems in the Debates on the Onomatodoxy," by Hilarion Alfeyev. [REVIEW]Teresa Obolevitch - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):395-397.
  12. Faith and Science in Russian Religious Thought.Teresa Obolevitch - 2019 - Oxford University Press.
    The book brings forth a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between science and faith in Russian religious thought.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Nauka, filozofia i teologia w Rosji nowożytnej.Teresa Obolevitch - 2007 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
    Between the Orthodox Russian Church and modern science were not any serious conflicts. For examples, in XVII century students of Academy of Kiev-Mohyla studied heliocentric system of Copernic and doctrine of Galileo. In 1724 According to the project of Leibniz Tsar Peter I founded Russian Academy of Science in St-Petersburg. There worked D. Bernoulli and L. Euler. The Russian philosophical though presents an attempt of accord of science and theology.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Synteza neopatrystyczna a nauka.Teresa Obolevitch - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).
    The article presents Fr. Georgy Florovsky’s conception of a neo-patristic synthesis (developed by other orthodox theologians) and discusses some polemical aspects of this project. The neo-patristic synthesis is an approach to development of the patristic thought in the contemporary world and application it to the different branches of knowledge, including science. According to Florovsky science has an imperfect character, because to know the empirical world is possible only from the theological point of view. This position is shared by Alexei Nesteruk (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark