Results for 'Thalia Gigerenzer'

204 found
Order:
  1.  48
    Is the Ultimatum Game a Three-Body Affair?Gigerenzer Gerd & Gigerenzer Thalia - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):823-824.
    The Ultimatum Game is commonly interpreted as a two-person bargaining game. The third person who donates and may withdraw the money is not included in the theoretical equations, but treated like a neutral measurement instrument. Yet in a cross-cultural analysis it seems necessary to consider the possibility that the thoughts of a player – strategic, altruistic, selfish, or concerned about reputation – are influenced by both an anonymous second player and the non-anonymous experimenter.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  4
    “Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles”: Correction to Kruglanski and Gigerenzer.Arie W. Kruglanski & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (3):522-522.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    "Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic": Clarification on Goldstein and Gigerenzer.Daniel G. Goldstein & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (4):645-645.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2008 - Oup Usa.
    This volume collects Gigerenzer's recent articles on the psychology of rationality. This volume should appeal, like the earlier volumes, to a broad mixture of cognitive psychologists, philosophers, economists, and others who study decision making.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  5.  3
    Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic.Daniel G. Goldstein & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (1):75-90.
    [Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 109 of Psychological Review. Due to circumstances that were beyond the control of the authors, the studies reported in "Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic," by Daniel G. Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer overlap with studies reported in "The Recognition Heuristic: How Ignorance Makes Us Smart," by the same authors and with studies reported in "Inference From Ignorance: The Recognition Heuristic". In addition, Figure 3 in the Psychological Review (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   42 citations  
  6.  77
    Précis of Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.Peter M. Todd & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):727-741.
    How can anyone be rational in a world where knowledge is limited, time is pressing, and deep thought is often an unattainable luxury? Traditional models of unbounded rationality and optimization in cognitive science, economics, and animal behavior have tended to view decision-makers as possessing supernatural powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and endless time. But understanding decisions in the real world requires a more psychologically plausible notion of bounded rationality. In Simple heuristics that make us smart (Gigerenzer et al. 1999), (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
  7.  41
    The Role of Representation in Bayesian Reasoning: Correcting Common Misconceptions.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):264-267.
    The terms nested sets, partitive frequencies, inside-outside view, and dual processes add little but confusion to our original analysis (Gigerenzer & Hoffrage 1995; 1999). The idea of nested set was introduced because of an oversight; it simply rephrases two of our equations. Representation in terms of chances, in contrast, is a novel contribution yet consistent with our computational analysis System 1.dual process theory” is: Unless the two processes are defined, this distinction can account post hoc for almost everything. In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  8.  78
    Towards Competitive Instead of Biased Testing of Heuristics: A Reply to Hilbig and Richter (2011).Henry Brighton & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (1):197-205.
    Our programmatic article on Homo heuristicus (Gigerenzer & Brighton, 2009) included a methodological section specifying three minimum criteria for testing heuristics: competitive tests, individual-level tests, and tests of adaptive selection of heuristics. Using Richter and Späth’s (2006) study on the recognition heuristic, we illustrated how violations of these criteria can lead to unsupported conclusions. In their comment, Hilbig and Richter conduct a reanalysis, but again without competitive testing. They neither test nor specify the compensatory model of inference they argue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  61
    Axiomatizing Bounded Rationality: The Priority Heuristic.Mareile Drechsler, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (2):183-196.
    This paper presents an axiomatic framework for the priority heuristic, a model of bounded rationality in Selten’s (in: Gigerenzer and Selten (eds.) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox, 2001) spirit of using empirical evidence on heuristics. The priority heuristic predicts actual human choices between risky gambles well. It implies violations of expected utility theory such as common consequence effects, common ratio effects, the fourfold pattern of risk taking and the reflection effect. We present an axiomatization of a parameterized version of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
    Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart invites readers to embark on a new journey into a land of rationality that differs from the familiar territory of cognitive science and economics. Traditional views of rationality tend to see decision makers as possessing superhuman powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and all of eternity in which to ponder choices. To understand decisions in the real world, we need a different, more psychologically plausible notion of rationality, and this book provides it. It is about (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   185 citations  
  11.  82
    Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences.Gerd Gigerenzer & Henry Brighton - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1):107-143.
    Heuristics are efficient cognitive processes that ignore information. In contrast to the widely held view that less processing reduces accuracy, the study of heuristics shows that less information, computation, and time can in fact improve accuracy. We review the major progress made so far: the discovery of less-is-more effects; the study of the ecological rationality of heuristics, which examines in which environments a given strategy succeeds or fails, and why; an advancement from vague labels to computational models of heuristics; the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   74 citations  
  12.  21
    Domain-Specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change.Gerd Gigerenzer & Klaus Hug - 1992 - Cognition 43 (2):127-171.
    What counts as human rationality: reasoning processes that embody content-independent formal theories, such as propositional logic, or reasoning processes that are well designed for solving important adaptive problems? Most theories of human reasoning have been based on content-independent formal rationality, whereas adaptive reasoning, ecological or evolutionary, has been little explored. We elaborate and test an evolutionary approach, Cosmides' social contract theory, using the Wason selection task. In the first part, we disentangle the theoretical concept of a “social contract” from that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   132 citations  
  13.  5
    How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (4):684-704.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   99 citations  
  14.  9
    Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality.Gerd Gigerenzer & Daniel G. Goldstein - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (4):650-669.
    Humans and animals make inferences about the world under limited time and knowledge. In contrast, many models of rational inference treat the mind as a Laplacean Demon, equipped with unlimited time, knowledge, and computational might. Following H. Simon's notion of satisficing, the authors have proposed a family of algorithms based on a simple psychological mechanism: one-reason decision making. These fast and frugal algorithms violate fundamental tenets of classical rationality: They neither look up nor integrate all information. By computer simulation, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   89 citations  
  15.  2
    Probabilistic Mental Models: A Brunswikian Theory of Confidence.Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage & Heinz Kleinbölting - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (4):506-528.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   102 citations  
  16. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life.Gerd Gigerenzer, Zeno Swijtink, Theodore Porter, Lorraine Daston, John Beatty & Lorenz Kruger - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
    The Empire of Chance tells how quantitative ideas of chance transformed the natural and social sciences, as well as daily life over the last three centuries. A continuous narrative connects the earliest application of probability and statistics in gambling and insurance to the most recent forays into law, medicine, polling and baseball. Separate chapters explore the theoretical and methodological impact in biology, physics and psychology. Themes recur - determinism, inference, causality, free will, evidence, the shifting meaning of probability - but (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   55 citations  
  17. How (Far) Can Rationality Be Naturalized?Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):243-268.
    The paper shows why and how an empirical study of fast-and-frugal heuristics can provide norms of good reasoning, and thus how (and how far) rationality can be naturalized. We explain the heuristics that humans often rely on in solving problems, for example, choosing investment strategies or apartments, placing bets in sports, or making library searches. We then show that heuristics can lead to judgments that are as accurate as or even more accurate than strategies that use more information and computation, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  18.  2
    Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles.Arie W. Kruglanski & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):97-109.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  19. Heuristic Decision Making.Gerd Gigerenzer & Wolfgang Gaissmaier - 2011 - Annual Review of Psychology 62:451-482.
  20.  6
    On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):592-596.
  21.  3
    The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs.Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ralph Hertwig - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (2):409-432.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  22.  38
    On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3):361-383.
    Can the general public learn to deal with risk and uncertainty, or do authorities need to steer people’s choices in the right direction? Libertarian paternalists argue that results from psychological research show that our reasoning is systematically flawed and that we are hardly educable because our cognitive biases resemble stable visual illusions. For that reason, they maintain, authorities who know what is best for us need to step in and steer our behavior with the help of “nudges.” Nudges are nothing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23. Why Heuristics Work.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2008 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1):20-29.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  24.  7
    Towards Theory Integration: Threshold Model as a Link Between Signal Detection Theory, Fast-and-Frugal Trees and Evidence Accumulation Theory.Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Shenghua Luan, Athanasios Tsalatsanis & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (1):49-65.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  26
    Children Can Solve Bayesian Problems: The Role of Representation in Mental Computation.Liqi Zhu & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):287-308.
  26.  10
    Teaching Bayesian Reasoning in Less Than Two Hours.Peter Sedlmeier & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (3):380.
  27. Moral Satisficing: Rethinking Moral Behavior as Bounded Rationality.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):528-554.
    What is the nature of moral behavior? According to the study of bounded rationality, it results not from character traits or rational deliberation alone, but from the interplay between mind and environment. In this view, moral behavior is based on pragmatic social heuristics rather than moral rules or maximization principles. These social heuristics are not good or bad per se, but solely in relation to the environments in which they are used. This has methodological implications for the study of morality: (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  28.  7
    Environments That Make Us Smart Ecological Rationality.Peter M. Todd & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2007 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (3):167-171.
    Traditional views of rationality posit general-purpose decision mechanisms based on logic or optimization. The study of ecological rationality focuses on uncovering the “adaptive toolbox” of domain-specific simple heuristics that real, computationally bounded minds employ, and explaining how these heuristics produce accurate decisions by exploiting the structures of information in the environments in which they are applied. Knowing when and how people use particular heuristics can facilitate the shaping of environments to engender better decisions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  29. From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic of Discovery in Cognitive Psychology.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (2):254-267.
  30.  2
    Overcoming Difficulties in Bayesian Reasoning: A Reply to Lewis and Keren and Mellers and McGraw.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (2):425-430.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  31.  51
    Visions of Rationality.Valerie M. Chase, Ralph Hertwig & Gerd Gigerenzer - 1998 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (6):206-214.
    The classical view that equates rationality with adherence to the laws of probability theory and logic has driven much research on inference. Recently, an increasing number of researchers have begun to espouse a view of rationality that takes account of organisms' adaptive goals, natural environments, and cognitive constraints. We argue that inference is carried out using boundedly rational heuristics, that is, heuristics that allow organisms to reach their goals under conditions of limited time, information, and computational capacity. These heuristics are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  32.  1
    A Signal-Detection Analysis of Fast-and-Frugal Trees.Shenghua Luan, Lael J. Schooler & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):316-338.
  33.  61
    I Think, Therefore I Err.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2005 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 72 (1):1-24.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  34. Risky Choice with Heuristics: Reply to Birnbaum , Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen , and Rieger and Wang.Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ralph Hertwig - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):281-289.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  35.  3
    Do Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Rely on Two Distinct Neural Systems? A Case Study in Face Processing.Laura F. Mega, Gerd Gigerenzer & Kirsten G. Volz - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  36.  11
    Content-Blind Norms, No Norms, or Good Norms? A Reply to Vranas.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2001 - Cognition 81 (1):93-103.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  37. Fast and Frugal Heuristics Are Plausible Models of Cognition: Reply to Dougherty, Franco-Watkins, and Thomas.Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage & Daniel G. Goldstein - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):230-239.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  38.  7
    Natural Frequencies Improve Bayesian Reasoning in Simple and Complex Inference Tasks.Ulrich Hoffrage, Stefan Krauss, Laura Martignon & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  71
    The Irrationality Paradox.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):336-338.
    In the study of judgmental errors, surprisingly little thought is spent on what constitutes good and bad judgment. I call this simultaneous focus on errors and lack of analysis of what constitutes an error, the irrationality paradox. I illustrate the paradox by a dozen apparent fallacies; each can be logically deduced from the environmental structure and an unbiased mind.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  40.  1
    The Hot Hand Exists in Volleyball and is Used for Allocation Decisions.Markus Raab, Bartosz Gula & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (1):81-94.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  19
    Tools=Theories=Data? On Some Circular Dynamics in Cognitive Science.Gerd Gigerenzer & Thomas Sturm - 2007 - In Mitchell G. Ash & Thomas Sturm (eds.), Psychology’s Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines. Erlbaum.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  42.  32
    Shepard's Mirrors or Simon 's Scissors?Peter M. Todd & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):704-705.
    Shepard promotes the important view that evolution constructs cognitive mechanisms that work with internalized aspects of the structure of their environment. But what can this internalization mean? We contrast three views: Shepard's mirrors reflecting the world, Brunswik's lens inferring the world, and Simon 's scissors exploiting the world. We argue that Simon 's scissors metaphor is more appropriate for higher-order cognitive mechanisms and ask how far it can also be applied to perceptual tasks. [Barlow; Kubovy & Epstein; Shepard].
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  43.  2
    From Perception to Preference and on to Inference: An Approach–Avoidance Analysis of Thresholds.Shenghua Luan, Lael J. Schooler & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (3):501-525.
  44. The Reiteration Effect in Hindsight Bias.Ralph Hertwig, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (1):194-202.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  45. The Psychology of Good Judgment Frequency Formats and Simple Algorithms.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1996 - Medical Decision Making 16 (3):273-280.
    Mind and environment evolve in tandem—almost a platitude. Much of judgment and decision making research, however, has compared cognition to standard statistical models, rather than to how well it is adapted to its environment. The author argues two points. First, cognitive algorithms are tuned to certain information formats, most likely to those that humans have encountered during their evolutionary history. In par ticular, Bayesian computations are simpler when the information is in a frequency format than when it is in a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  46. Do Voters Use Episodic Knowledge to Rely on Recognition.Julian N. Marewski, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Lael J. Schooler, Daniel G. Goldstein & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  3
    Discovery in Cognitive Psychology: New Tools Inspire New Theories.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1992 - Science in Context 5 (2).
  48.  10
    Decision Making: Nonrational Theories.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2001 - In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. pp. 5--3304.
  49.  51
    We Need Statistical Thinking, Not Statistical Rituals.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-200.
    What Chow calls NHSTP is an inconsistent hybrid of Fisherian and Neyman-Pearsonian ideas. In psychology it has been practiced like ritualistic handwashing and sustained by wishful thinking about its utility. Chow argues that NHSTP is an important tool for ruling out chance as an explanation for data. I disagree. This ritual discourages theory development by providing researchers with no incentive to specify hypotheses.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  14
    On Cognitive Illusions and Rationality.Gerd Gigerenzer - 1991 - In Probability and Rationality. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 225-249.
1 — 50 / 204