Results for 'Thomas E. Hill Jr'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  31
    Reasonable Self-Interest*: THOMAS E. HILL, JR.Thomas E. Hill - 1997 - Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (1):52-85.
    Philosophers have debated for millennia about whether moral requirements are always rational to follow. The background for these debates is often what I shall call “the self-interest model.” The guiding assumption here is that the basic demand of reason, to each person, is that one must, above all, advance one's self-interest. Alternatively, debate may be framed by a related, but significantly different, assumption: the idea that the basic rational requirement is to develop and pursue a set of personal ends in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Respect, Pluralism, and Justice.Tea Logar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15:605-608.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives Reviewed By.Robert B. Louden - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (6):427-429.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. [REVIEW]Robert B. Louden - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21:427-429.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  53
    Thomas E. Hill, Jr. , Virtues, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations . Reviewed By.Christina Drogalis - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (4):298-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. The Message of Affirmative Action: THOMAS E. HILL, JR.Thomas E. Hill - 1991 - Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (2):108-129.
    Affirmative action programs remain controversial, I suspect, partly because the familiar arguments for and against them start from significantly different moral perspectives. Thus I want to step back for a while from the details of debate about particular programs and give attention to the moral viewpoints presupposed in different types of argument. My aim, more specifically, is to compare the “messages” expressed when affirmative action is defended from different moral perspectives. Exclusively forward-looking arguments, I suggest, tend to express the wrong (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  7.  73
    Moral Construction as a Task: Sources and Limits: Thomas E. Hill, Jr.Thomas E. Hill - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):214-236.
    This essay first distinguishes different questions regarding moral objectivity and relativism and then sketches a broadly Kantian position on two of these questions. First, how, if at all, can we derive, justify, or support specific moral principles and judgments from more basic moral standards and values? Second, how, if at all, can the basic standards such as my broadly Kantian perspective, be defended? Regarding the first question, the broadly Kantian position is that from ideas in Kant's later formulations of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  8. Hypothetical Consent in Kantian Constructivism*: THOMAS E. HILL, JR.Thomas E. Hill - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):300-329.
    Epistemology, as I understand it, is a branch of philosophy especially concerned with general questions about how we can know various things or at least justify our beliefs about them. It questions what counts as evidence and what are reasonable sources of doubt. Traditionally, episte-mology focuses on pervasive and apparently basic assumptions covering a wide range of claims to knowledge or justified belief rather than very specific, practical puzzles. For example, traditional epistemologists ask “How do we know there are material (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9. Happiness and Human Flourishing in Kant's Ethics: THOMAS E. HILL, JR.Thomas E. Hill - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1):143-175.
    Ancient moral philosophers, especially Aristotle and his followers, typically shared the assumption that ethics is primarily concerned with how to achieve the final end for human beings, a life of “happiness” or “human flourishing.” This final end was not a subjective condition, such as contentment or the satisfaction of our preferences, but a life that could be objectively determined to be appropriate to our nature as human beings. Character traits were treated as moral virtues because they contributed well toward this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  46
    Beneficence and Self-Love: A Kantian Perspective*: THOMAS E. HILL, JR.Thomas E. Hill - 1993 - Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):1-23.
    What, if anything, are we morally required to do on behalf of others besides respecting their rights? And why is such regard for others a reasonable moral requirement? These two questions have long been major concerns of ethical theory, but the answers that philosophers give tend to vary with their beliefs about human nature. More specifically, their answers typically depend on the position they take on a third-question: To what extent, if any, is it possible for us to act altruistically?
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  8
    Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. [REVIEW]Lara Denis - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (2):339-345.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  36
    Thomas E. Hill,, Jr., Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2009. Pp. 277. $94.95.Helga Varden - 2010 - Ethics 120 (4):860-864.
  13.  51
    Thomas E. Hill, Jr., "Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory". [REVIEW]Allen W. Wood - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):314.
  14.  8
    Reason, Value, and Respect: Kantian Themes From the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr.Mark Timmons (ed.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
    In thirteen specially written essays, leading philosophers explore Kantian themes in moral and political philosophy that are prominent in the work of Thomas E. Hill, Jr., such as respect and self-respect, practical reason, conscience, and duty. In conclusion Hill offers an overview of his work and responses to the preceding essays.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. Servility and Self-Respect.Jr Thomas E. Hill - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):87 - 104.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  16. Moral Purity and the Lesser Evil.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1983 - The Monist 66 (2):213 - 232.
    In a morally perfect world we would not face many of the hard choices which confront us in the real world. If everyone were fully conscientious, moral dilemmas might still be posed by natural circumstances; but many of our most difficult and tragic choices would not arise. In particular, we would never need to decide whether we should ourselves do a lesser evil in order to prevent someone else from doing a greater one. Unfortunately we do not live in such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Kant’s Theory of Practical Reason.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1989 - The Monist 72 (3):363 - 383.
    Contemporary discussions of practical reason often refer vaguely to the Kantian conception of reasons as an alternative to various means-ends theories, but it is rarely clear what this is supposed to be, except that somehow moral concerns are supposed to fare better under the Kantian conception. The theories of Nagel, Gewirth, Darwall, and Donagan have been labeled “Kantian” because they deviate strikingly from standard preference models, but their roots in Kant have not been traced in detail and important differences may (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  18. What Reason Demands by Rudiger Bittner. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (9):497-501.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. The Practice of Moral Judgment by Barbara Herman. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):47-51.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Self-Respect Reconsidered.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1982 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 31:129-137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. Servility and Self-Respect.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):87-104.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  22. Punishment, Conscience, and Moral Worth.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1998 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (Supplement):51-71.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. Punishment and the Moral Emotions: Essays in Law, Morality, and Religion, by Jeffrie G. Murphy. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):490-493.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Moral Purity and the Lesser Evil.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1983 - The Monist 66 (2):213-232.
    In a morally perfect world we would not face many of the hard choices which confront us in the real world. If everyone were fully conscientious, moral dilemmas might still be posed by natural circumstances; but many of our most difficult and tragic choices would not arise. In particular, we would never need to decide whether we should ourselves do a lesser evil in order to prevent someone else from doing a greater one. Unfortunately we do not live in such (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Kant’s Theory of Practical Reason.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1989 - The Monist 72 (3):363-383.
    Contemporary discussions of practical reason often refer vaguely to the Kantian conception of reasons as an alternative to various means-ends theories, but it is rarely clear what this is supposed to be, except that somehow moral concerns are supposed to fare better under the Kantian conception. The theories of Nagel, Gewirth, Darwall, and Donagan have been labeled “Kantian” because they deviate strikingly from standard preference models, but their roots in Kant have not been traced in detail and important differences may (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Kantian Ethics and Utopian Thinking.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2019 - Disputatio 8 (11).
    Is Kantian Ethics guilty of utopian thinking? First, potentially good and bad uses of utopian ideals are distinguished, then an apparent path is traced from Rousseau’s unworkable political ideal to Kant’s ethical ideal. Three versions of Kant’s Categorical Imperative are examined briefly for the ways that they may raise the suspicion that they manifest or encourage bad utopian thinking. In each case Kantians have available responses to counter the suspicion, but special attention is directed to the version that says “Act (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Kant and Race.Thomas E. Hill Jr & Bernard Boxill - 2000 - In Bernard Boxill (ed.), Race and Racism. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28. Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):211-224.
    The moral significance of preserving natural environments is not entirely an issue of rights and social utility, for a person’s attitude toward nature may be importantly connected with virtues or human excellences. The question is, “What sort of person would destroy the natural environment--or even see its value solely in cost/benefit terms?” The answer I suggest is that willingness to do so may well reveal the absence of traits which are a natural basis for a proper humility, self-acceptance, gratitude, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29. Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (4):367-371.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Collected Papers. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (5):269-272.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  13
    Moral Responsibilities of Bystanders.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2010 - Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (1):28-39.
  32.  7
    Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (4):367-371.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):211-224.
    The moral significance of preserving natural environments is not entirely an issue of rights and social utility, for a person’s attitude toward nature may be importantly connected with virtues or human excellences. The question is, “What sort of person would destroy the natural environment--or even see its value solely in cost/benefit terms?” The answer I suggest is that willingness to do so may well reveal the absence of traits which are a natural basis for a proper humility, self-acceptance, gratitude, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  34.  27
    Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. By Thomas E. Hill, Jr. Krettek - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):87-88.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations.E. Hill Jr - 2012 - Oxford University Press UK.
    Thomas E. Hill, Jr., interprets, explains, and extends Kant's moral theory in a series of essays that highlight its relevance to contemporary ethics. The book is divided into four sections. The first three essays cover basic themes: they introduce the major aspects of Kant's ethics; explain different interpretations of the Categorical Imperative; and sketch a 'constructivist' reading of Kantian normative ethics distinct from the Kantian constructivisms of Onora O'Neill and John Rawls. The next section is on virtue, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  29
    Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations, by Thomas E. Hill Jr.: Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Kyla Ebels-Duggan - 2013 - Mind 122 (488):1098-1102.
  37.  24
    Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives, by Thomas E. Hill Jr., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Pp.Xi, 415, ISBN: 019-925-2637 , £16.99. [REVIEW]Howard Williams - 2004 - Kantian Review 8:148-150.
  38.  32
    Book Review:Autonomy and Self-Respect. Thomas E. Hill, Jr. [REVIEW]Marcia Baron - 1993 - Ethics 103 (3):576-.
  39.  16
    Autonomy and Self Respect By Thomas E. Hill Jr. Cambridge University Press, 1991, 218 Pp., £27.50, £9.95 Paper. [REVIEW]Susan Mendus - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (262):561-.
  40.  39
    Gibbard on Morality and Sentiment.Review author[S.]: Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):957-960.
  41. Symbolic Protest and Calculated Silence.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1979 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (1):83-102.
  42. Punishment, Conscience, and Moral Worth.Thomas E. Hill & Jr - 2002 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Kantian Normative Ethics.Thomas E. Hill, Jr & Chapel Hill - 2007 - In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oup Usa.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1989 - Ethics 99 (4):752-770.
  45. Introduction.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2009 - In Thomas E. Hill (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  41
    Review: Darwall on Practical Reason. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1986 - Ethics 96 (3):604-619.
  47. Kant on Virtue: Seeking the Ideal in Human Conditions.Thomas E. Hill, Jr & Adam Cureton - 2018 - In Nancy Snow (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtue. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 263-280.
    Immanuel Kant defines virtue as a kind of strength and resoluteness of will to resist and overcome any obstacles that oppose fulfilling our moral duties. Human agents, according to Kant, owe it to ourselves to strive for perfect virtue by fully committing ourselves to morality and by developing the fortitude to maintain and execute this life-governing policy despite obstacles we may face. This essay reviews basic features of Kant’s conception of virtue and then discusses the role of emotions, a motive (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48. Kant's Argument for the Rationality of Moral Conduct.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1985 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1-2):3.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  49.  65
    Assessing Moral Rules: Utilitarian and Kantian Perspectives.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):158–178.
  50. Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1971 - Kant Studien 62 (1-4):55-76.
1 — 50 / 1000