85 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Thomas Nickles [88]Thomas Jacob Nickles [1]
See also
Profile: Thomas Nickles (University of Nevada, Reno)
  1. Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction.Thomas Nickles - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (April):181-201.
  2. Modeling and Inferring in Science.Emiliano Ippoliti, Thomas Nickles & Fabio Sterpetti - 2016 - In Emiliano Ippoliti, Fabio Sterpetti & Thomas Nickles (eds.), Models and Inferences in Science. Springer. pp. 1-9.
    Science continually contributes new models and rethinks old ones. The way inferences are made is constantly being re-evaluated. The practice and achievements of science are both shaped by this process, so it is important to understand how models and inferences are made. But, despite the relevance of models and inference in scientific practice, these concepts still remain contro-versial in many respects. The attempt to understand the ways models and infer-ences are made basically opens two roads. The first one is to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  71
    What is a Problem That We May Solve It?Thomas Nickles - 1981 - Synthese 47 (1):85 - 118.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  4.  41
    Life at the Frontier: The Relevance of Heuristic Appraisal to Policy. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 2009 - Axiomathes 19 (4):441-464.
    Economic competitive advantage depends on innovation, which in turn requires pushing back the frontiers of various kinds of knowledge. Although understanding how knowledge grows ought to be a central topic of epistemology, epistemologists and philosophers of science have given it insufficient attention, even deliberately shunning the topic. Traditional confirmation theory and general epistemology offer little help at the frontier, because they are mostly retrospective rather than prospective. Nor have philosophers been highly visible in the science and technology policy realm, despite (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  12
    Heuristic Appraisal: Context of Discovery or Justification?Thomas Nickles - 2006 - In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Springer. pp. 159--182.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  29
    Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate.Thomas Nickles - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):177-206.
    Does the viability of the discovery program depend on showing either (1) that methods of generating new problem solutions, per se, have special probative weight (the per se thesis); or, (2) that the original conception of an idea is logically continuous with its justification (anti-divorce thesis)? Many writers have identified these as the key issues of the discovery debate. McLaughlin, Pera, and others recently have defended the discovery program by attacking the divorce thesis, while Laudan has attacked the discovery program (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  7. Lakatosian Heuristics and Epistemic Support.Thomas Nickles - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):181-205.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8.  14
    A Multi-Pass Conception of Scientific Inquiry.Thomas Nickles - 1997 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 32:11-44.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  9. Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality.Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Mind 91 (363):468-470.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  10.  96
    Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Nickles - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  22
    Discovery Logics.Thomas Nickles - 1990 - Philosophica 45 (1):7-32.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  12.  40
    Remarks on the Use of History as Evidence.Thomas Nickles - 1986 - Synthese 69 (2):253 - 266.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  13.  13
    6 Some Puzzles About Kuhn's Exemplars.Thomas Nickles - 2012 - In Vasō Kintē & Theodore Arabatzis (eds.), Kuhn's the Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Routledge. pp. 112.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Scientific Discovery Case Studies.Thomas Nickles - 1980
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  15.  35
    Deflationary Methodology and Rationality of Science.Thomas Nickles - 1996 - Philosophica 58.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Problem of Demarcation.Thomas Nickles - 2006 - In J. Pfeifer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. Psychology Press. pp. 1--188.
  17.  53
    The Methodological Study of Creativity and Discovery -- Some Background.Joke Meheus & Thomas Nickles - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):231-235.
  18.  17
    Methods of Discovery.Thomas Nickles - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (1):127-140.
  19.  43
    Heuristic Appraisal: A Proposal.Thomas Nickles - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (3):175 – 188.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  6
    Perspectivism Versus a Completed Copernican Revolution.Thomas Nickles - 2016 - Axiomathes 26 (4):367-382.
    I discuss changes of perspective of four kinds in science and about science. Section 2 defends a perspectival nonrealism—something akin to Giere’s perspectival realism but not a realism—against the idea of complete, “Copernican” objectivity. Section 3 contends that there is an inverse relationship between epistemological conservatism and scientific progress. Section 4 casts doubt on strong forms of scientific realism by taking a long-term historical perspective that includes future history. Section 5 defends a partial reversal in the status of so-called context (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  35
    Scientific Problems and Constraints.Thomas Nickles - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:134 - 148.
    In this paper the relation between scientific problems and the constraints on their solutions is explored. First the historical constraints on the solution to the blackbody radiation problem are set out. The blackbody history is used as a guide in sketching a working taxonomy of constraints, which distinguishes various kinds of reductive and nonreductive constraints. Finally, this discussion is related to some work in erotetic logic. The hypothesis that scientific problems can be identified with structured sets of constraints is interesting; (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  17
    Questioning and Problems in Philosophy of Science: Problem-Solving Versus Directly Truth-Seeking Epistemologies.Thomas Nickles - 1988 - In Michel Meyer (ed.), Questions and Questioning. W. De Gruyter. pp. 43--67.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Problem Reduction: Some Thoughts.Thomas Nickles - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):107-133.
    Reduction was once a central topic in philosophy of science. I claim that it remains important, especially when applied to problems and problem-solutions rather than only to large theory-complexes. Without attempting a comprehensive classification, I discuss various kinds of problem reductions and similar relations, illustrating them, inter alia, in terms of the blackbody problem and early quantization problems. Kuhn's early work is suggestive here both for structuralist theory of science and for the line I prefer to take. My central claims (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  19
    The Problem of Demarcation History and Future.Thomas Nickles - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 101.
  25.  8
    Positive Science and Discoverability.Thomas Nickles - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:13 - 27.
    Although seriously defective, 17th-century ideas about discovery, justification, and positive science are not as hopeless, useless, and out of date as many philosophers assume. They appear to underlie modern scientific practice. The generationist view of justification interestingly links justification with discovery issues while employing a concept of empirical support quite foreign to the modern, consequentialist concept, which identifies empirical evidence with favorable test results (predictive/explanatory success). In the generationist sense, justification amounts to potential discovery or "discoverability". A partial defense of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. From Natural Philosophy to Metaphilosophy of Science.Thomas Nickles - 1987 - In P. Achinstein & R. Kagon (eds.), Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics. MIT Press. pp. 507--541.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  31
    Davidson on Explanation.Thomas Nickles - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (February):141-145.
    Davidson's defective defense of the consistency of (1) the causal interaction of mental and physical events, (2) the backing law thesis on causation, (3) the impossibility of lawfully explaining mental events is repaired by closer attention to the description-Relativity of explanation. Davidson wrongly allows that particular mental events are explainable when particular identities to physical events are known. The author argues that such identities are powerless to affect what features a given law can explain. Thus a great intelligence knowing all (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  18
    Truth or Consequences? Generative Versus Consequential Justification in Science.Thomas Nickles - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:393 - 405.
    Pure consequentialists hold that all theoretical justification derives from testing the consequences of hypotheses, while generativists maintain that reasoning (some feature of) the hypothesis from we already know is an important form of justification. The strongest form of justification (they claim) is an idealized discovery argument. In the guise of H-D methodology, consequentialism is widely supposed to have defeated generativism during the 19th century. I argue that novel prediction fails to overcome the logical weakness of consequentialism or to render generative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. Integrating the Science Studies Disciplines.Thomas Nickles - 1989 - In Steve Fuller (ed.), The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30.  4
    Refreshing Perspectives on Kuhn’s Structure at Fifty.Thomas Nickles - 2017 - Metascience 26 (1):75-78.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  38
    Review: Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):344-347.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. The Discovery-Justification (DJ) Distinction and Professional Philosophy of Science: Comments on the First Day's Five Papers.Thomas Nickles - 2002 - In Schickore J. & Steinle F. (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Max-Planck-Institut. pp. 67--78.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  17
    Scientific Problems: Three Empiricist Models.Thomas Nickles - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:3 - 19.
    One component of a viable account of scientific inquiry is a defensible conception of scientific problems. This paper specifies some logical and conceptual requirements that an acceptable account of scientific problems must meet as well as indicating some features that a study of scientific inquiry indicates scientific problems have. On the basis of these requirements and features, three standard empiricist models of problems are examined and found wanting. Finally a constraint inclusion-model of scientific problems is proposed.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  38
    Kuhnian Puzzle Solving and Schema Theory.Thomas Nickles - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):255.
    Looking at Thomas Kuhn's work from a cognitive science perspective helps to articulate and to legitimize, to some degree, his rejection of traditional views of concepts, categorization, theory structure, and rule-based problem solving. Whereas my colleagues focus on the later Kuhn of the MIT years, I study the early Kuhn as an anticipation of case-based reasoning and schema theory. These recent developments in cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence may point toward a more computational version of Kuhn's ideas, but they also (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  29
    Explanation and Description-Relativity.Thomas Nickles - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (3):408-414.
  36.  15
    Kuhn's Philosophical Conception of Science as Evolutionary, Social, and Epistemological.Thomas Nickles - 2014 - Metascience 23 (1):37-42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  10
    Review. [REVIEW]Colin Howson & Thomas Nickles - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (1):87-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  7
    On the Independence of Singular Causal Explanation in Social Science: Archaeology.Thomas Nickles - 1977 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (2):163-187.
  39.  19
    Covering Law Explanation.Thomas Nickles - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):542-561.
    A serious problem for covering law explanation is raised and its consequences for the Hempelian theory of explanation are discussed. The problem concerns an intensional feature of explanations, involving the manner in which theoretical law statements are related to the events explained. The basic problem arises because explanations are not of events but of events under descriptions; moreover, in a sense, our linguistic descriptions outrun laws. One form of the problem, termed the problem of weak intensionality, is apparently solved by (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Justification as Discoverability II.Thomas Nickles - 1984 - Philosophia Naturalis 21 (2/4):563-576.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  15
    Thomas Kuhn's Legacy: Some Remarks.Thomas Nickles - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):253-258.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  14
    Book Review:Science and Hypothesis Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):653-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Finocchiaro, Maurice A., "History of Science as Explanation". [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14:93.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  4
    Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without FoundationsThomas Kuhn's “Linguistic Turn” and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism: Incommensurability, Rationality, and the Search for Truth. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 2011 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 102:205-207.
    Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality without FoundationsThomas Kuhn's “Linguistic Turn” and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism: Incommensurability, Rationality, and the Search for Truth by Stefano Gattei; Stefano Gattei.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  10
    Theory Generalization, Problem Reduction and the Unity of Science.Thomas Nickles - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:33 - 75.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  11
    Book Review:Theory and Meaning David Papineau. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):500-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  4
    Scientific Laws, Principles, and Theories: A Reference Guide. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 2002 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 93:172-173.
    This book is intended as a reference source of “universal scientific laws, physical principles, viable theories, and testable hypotheses” from ancient times to the present. Robert Krebs states that he includes only the physical and biological sciences, including geology, but in fact there are also several mathematical and logical entries ranging from the Greeks to Gödel. The book contains over four hundred entries, in alphabetical order, averaging less than a page each, plus a glossary of nearly four hundred technical terms. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  3
    Social Epistemology by Steve Fuller. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1990 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 81:806-808.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):344-347.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    Matthew Lund, N. R. Hanson: Observation, Discovery, and Scientific Change.Thomas Nickles - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2:364-368.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 85