Results for 'Thomas S��birk Petersen'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  6
    Arguments on Thin Ice: On Non-Medical Egg Freezing and Individualisation Arguments.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):164-168.
    The aim of this article is to provide a systematic reconstruction and critique of what is taken to be a central ethical concern against the use of non-medical egg freezing. The concern can be captured in what we can call the individualisation argument. The argument states, very roughly, that women should not use NMEF as it is an individualistic and morally problematic solution to the social problems that women face, for instance, in the labour market. Instead of allowing or expecting (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2. Being Worse Off: But in Comparison with What? On the Baseline Problem of Harm and the Harm Principle.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):199-214.
    Several liberal philosophers and penal theorists have argued that the state has a reason to prohibit acts that harm individuals. But what is harm? According to one specification of harm, a person P is harmed by an act a iff, as a result of a, P is made worse off in terms of well-being. One central question here involves the baseline against which we assess whether someone is ‘worse off’. In other words, when a person is harmed he is worse (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. What is Legal Moralism?Thomas S.øøbirk Petersen - 2011 - SATS 12 (1):80-88.
    The aim of this critical commentary is to distinguish and analytically discuss some important variations in which legal moralism is defined in the literature. As such, the aim is not to evaluate the most plausible version of legal moralism, but to find the most plausible definition of legal moralism. As a theory of criminalization, i.e. a theory that aims to justify the criminal law we should retain, legal moralism can be, and has been, defined as follows: the immorality of an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  5
    Neuro-Doping and Fairness.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-12.
    In this article, we critically discuss different versions of the fairness objection to the legalisation of neuro-doping. According to this objection, legalising neuro-doping will result in some enjoying an unfair advantage over others. Basically, we assess four versions. These focus on: 1) the unequal opportunities of winning for athletes who use neuro-doping and for those who do not; 2) the unfair advantages specifically for wealthy athletes; 3) the unfairness of athletic advantages not derived from athletes’ own training ; and 4) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.
    The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the plausibility of legal moralism with an emphasis on some central and recent versions. First, this paper puts forward and defends the thesis that recently developed varieties of legal moralism promoted by Robert P. George, John Kekes and Michael Moore are more plausible than Lord Devlin's traditional account. The main argument for this thesis is that in its more modern versions legal moralism is immune to some of the forceful challenges made (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  12
    Should Violent Offenders Be Forced to Undergo Neurotechnological Treatment? A Critical Discussion of the ‘Freedom of Thought’ Objection.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kristian Kragh - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):30-34.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  11
    Should Neurotechnological Treatments Offered to Offenders Always Be in Their Best Interests?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (1):32-36.
    The paper critically discusses the moral view that neurotechnological behavioural treatment for criminal offenders should only be offered if it is in their best interests. First, I show that it is difficult to apply and assess the notion of the offender's best interests unless one has a clear idea of what ‘best interests’ means. Second, I argue that if one accepts that harmful punishment of offenders has a place in the criminal justice system, it seems inconsistent not to accept the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  8
    Age Change, Official Age and Fairness in Health.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen & Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (9):634-635.
    In a recent JME article, Joona Räsänen makes the case for allowing legal age change. We identify three problems with his argument and, on that basis, propose an improved version thereof. Unfortunately, even the improved argument is vulnerable to the objection that chronological age is a better proxy for justice in health than both legal and what we shall call official age.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  9.  12
    Promoting Fairness in Sport Through Performance-Enhancing Substances: An Argument for Why Sport Referees Ought to ‘Be on Drugs’.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Francisco Javier Lopez Frias - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (2):199-207.
    The debate on the use of performance-enhancing substances or methods to improve refereeing is underdeveloped in the sport philosophical literature. This contrast with the attention scholars have de...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  22
    Ethics, Organ Donation and Tax: A Proposal.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):451-457.
    Next SectionFive arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion that there are better alternatives, unacceptable expense, and concerns about the veto (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. Ethics, Organ Donation and Tax: A Proposal.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):451-457.
    Five arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion that there are better alternatives, unacceptable expense, and concerns about the veto of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  48
    Predictions, Dangerousness, and Retributivism.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):137-151.
    Through the criminal justice system so-called dangerous offenders are, besides the offence that they are being convicted of and sentenced to, also punished for acts that they have not done but that they are believe to be likely to commit in the future. The aim of this paper is to critically discuss whether some adherents of retributivism give a plausible rationale for punishing offenders more harshly if they, all else being equal, by means of predictions are believed to be more (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  40
    On the Partiality of Procreative Beneficence: A Critical Note.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9):771-774.
    The aim of this paper is to criticise the well-discussed Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PB) lately refined by Julian Savulescu and Guy Kahane. First, it is argued that advocates of PB leave us with an implausible justification for the moral partiality towards the child (or children) reproducers decide to bring into existence as compared with all other individuals. This is implausible because the reasons given in favour of the partiality of PB, which are based on practical reason and common-sense morality, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  64
    No Offense! On the Offense Principle and Some New Challenges.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):355-365.
    A central aim within criminal justice ethics is to give a plausible justification concerning which type of acts ought to be criminalized by the state. One of the principles of criminalization which has been presented and critically discussed in the philosophical literature is the Offense Principle. The primary aim of this paper is to argue that unless a rather special and implausible objective list theory of well-being is accepted, the Offense Principle should be subsumed in the Harm Principle.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. Good Athlete - Bad Athlete? On the 'Role-Model Argument' for Banning Performance-Enhancing Drugs.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):332-340.
    The paper critically discusses a role-model argument (RMA) in favour of banning performance-enhancing drugs in sport. The argument concludes that athletes should be banned from using performance-enhancing drugs because if they are allowed to use such drugs they will encourage, or cause, youngsters who look up to them to use drugs in a way that would be harmful. In Section 2 the structure of the argument and some versions of it are presented. In Section 3 a critical discussion of RMA (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16. On the Repugnance of the Repugnant Conclusion.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2006 - Theoria 72 (2):126-137.
    The aim of this paper is to discuss the plausibility of a certain position in the philosophical literature within which the Repugnant Conclusion is treated, not as repugnant, but as an acceptable implication of the total welfare principle. I will confine myself to focus primarily on Törbjörn Tännsjö’s presentation. First, I reconstruct Tännsjö’s view concerning the repugnance of the RC in two arguments. The first argument is criticized for (a) addressing the wrong comparison, (b) relying on the controversial claim that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  59
    A Woman's Choice? On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):81 - 90.
    This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion. Having clarified this argument, I conclude that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  17
    The Claim From Adoption.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (4):353–375.
  19.  5
    What Makes a Good Sports Parent?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 4 (1).
  20.  5
    Why Criminalize?: New Perspectives on Normative Principles of Criminalization.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2019 - Springer Verlag.
    The book defines and critically discusses the following five principles: the harm principle, legal paternalism, the offense principle, legal moralism and the dignity principle of criminalization. The book argues that all five principles raise important problems that point to rejections (or at least a rethink) of standard principles of criminalization. The book shows that one of the reasons why we should reject or revise standard principles of criminalization is that even the most plausible versions of the harm principle and legal (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  4
    Brave New Children: Assisted Reproduction and Our Concern for the Child.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 1999 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 34 (1):77-98.
  22.  2
    Sport, Neuro-Doping and Ethics.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-4.
    Apart from a short clarification of what neuro-doping is, the aim of this article is twofold. First to give a few reasons in favour of having a special issue on neuro-doping. Second to present an overview of the articles in this issue. One reason for having this special issue, is that it needs to be established whether methods such as transcranial direct-current stimulation should be added to World Anti-Doping Agency’s prohibited list or not, as it is currently under discussion by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  9
    A Soft Defense of a Utilitarian Principle of Criminalization.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2020 - Res Publica 26 (1):123-141.
    The aim of this paper is to argue that the utilitarian principle of criminalization is sounder than its poor reputation suggests. The paper begins by describing three possible answers to the research question: To what extent should the consequences of criminalization matter morally in a theory of criminalization? Hereafter I explain why I shall discuss only two of these answers. Then follows a detailed and critical specification of UPC. Furthermore, I will argue why criticisms of UPC made by philosophers such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  4
    Doping, Fairness, and Unequal Responsiveness: A Response to Lavazza.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (7):714-717.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Egalitarianism and Repugnant Conclusions.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2003 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 38 (1):115-125.
    Most philosophers discuss the Repugnant Conclusion as an objection to total utilitarianism. But this focus on total utilitarianism seems to be one-sided. It conceals the important fact that other competing moral theories are also subject to the Repugnant Conclusion. The primary aim of this paper is to demonstrate that versions of egalitarianism are subject to the Repugnant Conclusion and other repugnant conclusions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  8
    Ethical Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence and the Challenges From Value Conflicts.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2021 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:25-40.
    The aim of this article is to articulate and critically discuss different answers to the following question: How should decision-makers deal with conflicts that arise when the values usually entailed in ethical guidelines – such as accuracy, privacy, non-discrimination and transparency – for the use of Artificial Intelligence clash with one another? To begin with, I focus on clarifying some of the general advantages of using such guidelines in an ethical analysis of the use of AI. Some disadvantages will also (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Less for Recidivists? Why Retributivists Have a Reason to Punish Repeat Offenders Less Harshly Than First-Time Offenders ∗.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2012 - In Jesper Ryberg Claudio Tamburrini (ed.), Recidivists Punishment: The Philosophers' view. Lextington books.
    About 80 % of all convicted have had a prior record of conviction. But how should the state punish repeat offenders (with a prior conviction) as compared with first-time offenders who are convicted? The law in all jurisdictions, a large swathe of public opinion, and the general trend within criminal justice ethics all seem to accept what we may call: -/- Asymmetry A The punishment of repeat offenders should be harsher than the punishment of first-time offenders. -/- This asymmetry is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  4
    Non-Medical Egg Freezing and Individualisation Arguments: Reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (4):265-266.
    An argument against the use of non-medical egg freezing is that women should not use NMEF as it is an individualistic and morally problematic answer to the social problems that women face, for instance, in the labour market. Instead of allowing or expecting women to deal with these problems individually, we should address them by challenging the patriarchal structure of the labour market—for example, by securing equal pay and affordable childcare. In a recent article in Journal of Medical Ethics, I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  19
    Tuomela, Raimo, The Philosophy of Social Practices – A Collective Acceptance View, Cambridge University Press, 2002, 274 Pp. + Xi. [REVIEW]Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2005 - SATS 6 (1).
  30. What is a Good Sports Parent?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Nordic Journal for Applied Ethics - Etikk I Praksis 4 (1):215-232.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  46
    Poverty Relief: Philanthropy Versus Changing the System: A Critical Discussion of Some Objections to the 'Singer Solution'.Søren Sofus Wichmann & Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2013 - Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1):1-9.
    The aim of this paper is to present and evaluate a specific critical discussion of Peter Singer's view on philanthropy. This critique of Singer's position takes several forms, and here we focus on only two of these. First of all, it is claimed that philanthropy (based upon the giving up of luxury goods) should be avoided, because it harms the poor. As we shall see this is a view defended by Andrew Kuper. However, philanthropy is also accused of harming the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  32
    Ethics, Organ Donation and Tax: A Reply to Quigley and Taylor.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen & Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):463-464.
    A national opt-out system of post-mortem donation of scarce organs is preferable to an opt-in system. Unfortunately, the former system is not always feasible, and so in a recent JME article we canvassed the possibility of offering people a tax break for opting-in as a way of increasing the number of organs available for donation under an opt-in regime. Muireann Quigley and James Stacey Taylor criticize our proposal. Roughly, Quigley argues that our proposal is costly and, hence, is unlikely to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Ross Om Moral Og Sandhed.af Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2006 - In Jakob vH Holtermann & Jesper Ryberg (eds.), Alf Ross: Kritiske Gensyn. Jurist- Og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  26
    Just Diagnosis? Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Injustices to Disabled People.Thomas S. Petersen - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):231-234.
    Most of us want to have children. We want them to be healthy and have a good start in life. One way to achieve this goal is to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis . PGD enables people engaged in the process of in vitro fertilisation to acquire information about the genetic constitution of an early embryo. On the basis of this information, a decision can be made to transfer embryos without genetic defects to the uterus and terminate those with genetic defects.1However, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35.  8
    New Waves in Applied Ethics.Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.) - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
    This volume contains work by the very best young scholars working in Applied Ethics, gathering a range of new perspectives and thoughts on highly relevant topics, such as the environment, animals, computers, freedom of speech, human enhancement, war and poverty. For researchers and students working in or around this fascinating area of the discipline, the volume will provide a unique snapshot of where the cutting-edge work in the field is currently engaged and where it's headed.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  36.  48
    Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment of Criminal Offenders—A Comment on Bomann-Larsen.Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Petersen - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (1):79-83.
    Whether it is morally acceptable to offer rehabilitation by CNS-intervention to criminals as a condition for early release constitutes an important neuroethical question. Bomann-Larsen has recently suggested that such interventions are unacceptable if the offered treatment is not narrowly targeted at the behaviour for which the criminal is convicted. In this article it is argued that Bomann-Larsen’s analysis of the morality of offers does not provide a solid base for this conclusion and that, even if the analysis is assumed to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  37.  31
    Should Athletes Be Allowed to Use All Kinds of Performance-Enhancing Drugs?—A Critical Note on Claudio M. Tamburrini.Thomas S. Petersen & Johannes K. Kristensen - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (1):88-98.
  38.  32
    Surgical Castration, Coercion and Ethics.Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Petersen - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):593-594.
    John McMillan's detailed ethical analysis concerning the use of surgical castration of sex offenders in the Czech Republic and Germany is mainly devoted to considerations of coercion.1 This is not surprising. When castration is offered as an option to offenders and, at the same time, constitutes the only means by which these offenders are likely to be released from prison, it is reasonable—and close to the heart of modern medical ethics—to consider whether the offer involves some kind of coercion. However, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  1
    The Claim From Adoption.Thomas S.Øbirk Petersen - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (4):353-375.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  40.  5
    Individual Solutions to Social Problems.Ole Martin Moen - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):173-174.
    Non-medical egg freezing is egg freezing for the sake of delaying parenthood. The label ‘non-medical’ can be confusing, since the extraction and freezing of eggs is undeniably a medical procedure. The point is that whereas ‘medical egg freezing’ is done in order to retain capacity to procreate despite a potentially threatening medical condition, ‘non-medical egg freezing’ is done for the sake of getting more time to find a suitable partner and/or to establish a career before embarking on parenthood. One type (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41. What is It for a Life to Go Well (or Badly)?: Some Critical Comment of Waynes Sumner's Theory of Welfare.Thomas S. Petersen - 2009 - Journal of Happiness Studies 10:449-458.
    In an effort to construct a plausible theory of experience-based welfare, Wayne Sumner imposes two requirements on the relevant kind of experience: the information requirement and the autonomy requirement. I argue that both requirements are problematic.First, I argue (very briefly) that a well-know case like ‘the deceived businessman’ need not support the information requirement as Sumner believes. Second, I introduce a case designed to cast further doubt on the information requirement. Third, I attend to a shortcoming in Sumner’s theory of (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  8
    David Heyd on the Distinction Between Actual and Possible People.Thomas S. Petersen - 2000 - SATS 1 (1):105-116.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  9
    Fairness, Implicit Bias Testing and Sports Refereeing: An Argument for Why Professional Sports Organisations Ought to Promote Fairness in Sport Through Testing Referees for Implicit Biases.Thomas Søbrik Petersen & Søren Sofus Wichmann - 2020 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (1):97-110.
    Sports referees are not always as unbiased or impartial as they ideally should be. Studies have shown, for example, that in their decisions, referees seem to be biased against people of different r...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  28
    Generocentrism: A Critical Discussion of David Heyd.Thomas S. Petersen - 2001 - Philosophia 28 (1-4):411-423.
  45. Recidivist Punishments: The Philosopher's View.Peter Asp, Christopher Bennett, Peter Cave, J. Angelo Corlett, Richard Dagger, Michael Davis, Anthony Ellis, Thomas S. Petersen, Julian V. Roberts & Torbjörn Tännsjö (eds.) - 2011 - Lexington Books.
    Much has been written about recidivist punishments, particularly within the area of criminology. However there is a notorious lack of penal philosophical reflection on this issue. This book attempts to fill that gap by presenting the philosopher’s view on this matter as a way of furthering the debate on recidivist punishments.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  49
    Normative Ethics: 5 Questions – Edited by Thomas S. Petersen and Jesper Ryberg.Johan Brännmark - 2008 - Theoria 74 (4):363-366.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  20
    Some Ethical Considerations on the Use of Criminal Records in the Labor Market: In Defense of a New Practice.Thomas Petersen - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 139 (3):443-453.
    Employers’ access to and use of criminal records as a selection mechanism in the labor market makes it far more difficult for ex-offenders to find jobs, especially regular, well-paid jobs, than those without criminal convictions. The paper asks whether there is anything morally problematic about this practice. The aims of the paper are twofold. First, arguments based on premises of wrongful discrimination against the current, commonest use of criminal records are critically discussed. It is argued that employers do not necessarily (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48. Modern Physical Fatalism and the Doctrine of Evolution, Including an Examination of ... Herbert Spencer's 'First Principles'.Thomas Rawson Birks & Herbert Spencer - 1876
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  2
    Die Wissenschaftsphilosophie Thomas S. Kuhns: Rekonstruktion Und Grundlagenprobleme.Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Thomas S. Kuhn - 1989 - Springer.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  50. Five Questions About Normative Ethics.Thomas Hurka - 2007 - In Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Peterson (eds.), Normative Ethics: Five Questions. Automatic Press/Vip.
    in Thomas S. Petersen and Jesper Ryberg, eds., Normative Ethics: 5 Questions.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000