7 found
Order:
  1. Consciousness: Converging Insights From Connectionist Modeling and Neuroscience.Tiago V. Maia & Axel Cleeremans - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (8):397-404.
    Over the past decade, many findings in cognitive about the contents of consciousness: we will not address neuroscience have resulted in the view that selective what might be called the ‘enabling factors’ for conscious- attention, working memory and cognitive control ness (e.g. appropriate neuromodulation from the brain- stem, etc.). involve competition between widely distributed rep-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  2.  18
    The Somatic Marker Hypothesis: Still Many Questions but No Answers.Tiago V. Maia & James L. McClelland - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):162-164.
  3.  66
    A Neurocomputational Approach to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Tiago V. Maia & James L. McClelland - 2012 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):14-15.
  4. Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Cognitive Control: A Theoretical Perspective and a Novel Empirical Approach.Guillermo Horga & Tiago V. Maia - 2012 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.
  5.  9
    Fear Conditioning and Social Groups: Statistics, Not Genetics.Tiago V. Maia - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (7):1232-1251.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. The Somatic Marker Hypothesis: Still Many Questions but No Answers: Response to Bechara Et Al.Tiago V. Maia & James L. McClelland - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):162-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  14
    Developing a Domain-General Framework for Cognition: What is the Best Approach?James L. McClelland, David C. Plaut, Stephen J. Gotts & Tiago V. Maia - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):611-614.
    We share with Anderson & Lebiere (A&L) (and with Newell before them) the goal of developing a domain-general framework for modeling cognition, and we take seriously the issue of evaluation criteria. We advocate a more focused approach than the one reflected in Newell's criteria, based on analysis of failures as well as successes of models brought into close contact with experimental data. A&L attribute the shortcomings of our parallel-distributed processing framework to a failure to acknowledge a symbolic level of thought. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation