Order:
  1. Putting the Burden of Proof in Its Place: When Are Differential Allocations Legitimate?Tim Dare & Justine Kingsbury - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):503-518.
    To have the burden of proof is to be rationally required to argue for or provide evidence for your position. To have a heavier burden than an opponent is to be rationally required to provide better evidence or better arguments than they are required to provide. Many commentators suggest that differential or uneven distribution of the burden of proof is ubiquitous. In reasoned discourse, the idea goes, it is almost always the case that one party must prove the claim at (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  18
    Robust Role-Obligation: How Do Roles Make a Moral Difference?Tim Dare - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (4):703-719.
  3.  52
    Mass Immunisation Programmes: Some Philosophical Issues.Tim Dare - 1998 - Bioethics 12 (2):125–149.
    Most countries promote mass immunisation programmes. The varying policy details raise a raft of philosophical issues. I have two broad aims in this paper. First, I hope to begin to remedy a rather curious philosophical neglect of immunisation. With this in mind, I take a broad approach to the topic hoping to introduce rather than settle a range of philosophical issues. My second aim has two aspects: I argue that the states should have pro-immunisation policies, and I advance a view (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  4.  23
    The Commentaries.Samuel Gorovitz, Michael Loughlin & Tim Dare - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (3):190-199.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  5.  38
    Mere-Zeal, Hyper-Zeal and the Ethical Obligations of Lawyers.Tim Dare - 2004 - Legal Ethics 7 (1):24-38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  77
    Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter? [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (1):43-57.
    This paper argues that significant aspects of the vaccination debate are ‘deep’ in a sense described by Robert Fogelin and others. Some commentators have suggested that such disagreements warrant rather threatening responses. I argue that appreciating that a disagreement is deep might have positive implications, changing our moral assessment of individuals and their decisions, shedding light on the limits of the obligation to give and respond to arguments in cases of moral disagreement, and providing an incentive to seek alternative ways (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  23
    Political Theory for Mortals: Shades of Justice and Images of Death. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):189-191.
    John Seery begins his book with a stirring condemnation of current political theory. He was attracted to the discipline, he reports, because it promised more than a life of idle speculation and disinterested contemplation. Though ensconced in academe, political theorists "at least have one foot out the door." However, political theory has lost its connection to the real world. Much current writing is predictable and formulaic, too much time is spent scoring points, establishing professional authority, and promoting career options: "The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Lawyers, Ethics, and To Kill a Mockingbird.Tim Dare - 2001 - Philosophy and Literature 25 (1):127-141.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  40
    Disagreeing About Disagreement in Law: The Argument From Theoretical Disagreement.Tim Dare - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):1-15.
    Ronald Dworkin argues that disagreement in hard cases is ‘theoretical’ rather than empirical and of central importance to our understanding of law, showing ‘plain fact’ theories such as H. L. A. Hart’s sophisticated legal positivism to be false. The argument from theoretical disagreement targets positivism’s commitment to idea that the criteria a norm must meet to be valid in a given jurisdiction are constituted by a practice of convergent behavior by legal officials. The ATD suggests that in hard cases there (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Raz and Legal Positivism.Tim Dare - unknown - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 8.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Lawyers, Ethics, And.Tim Dare - 2001 - Philosophy and Literature 25 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  12
    Ethics and the Law: An Introduction.Tim Dare - 2016 - Legal Ethics 19 (1):182-185.
  13. Raz, Exclusionary Reasons, and Legal Positivism.Tim Dare - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  17
    3. The Ethics in Legal Ethics.Tim Dare - 2010 - Legal Ethics 13 (2):182.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  7
    What Are Human Rights?Tim Dare - 2017 - Philosophy Now 118:14-17.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  14
    ‘Intergenerational Justice’, by Janna Thompson.Tim Dare - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):407-410.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 90, Issue 2, Page 407-410, June 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  8
    Addressing Child Maltreatment in New Zealand: Is Poverty Reduction Enough?Tim Dare, Rhema Vaithianathan & Irene De Haan - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (9):989-994.
    Jonathan Boston provides an insightful analysis of the emergence and persistence of child poverty in New Zealand. His remarks on why child poverty matters are brief but, as he reports, “[t]here is a large and robust body of research on the harmful consequences of child poverty”. One cost he does not explicitly mention is the increased risk of maltreatment faced by children living in poverty. Given the clear correlation between risk of abuse and poverty, Boston’s recommendations might be expected to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  4
    Commentary on ‘On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data and Baseball’.Tim Dare - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  4
    Can Lawyers Have Integrity? [Book Review].Tim Dare - 2010 - Legal Ethics 13 (2):244.
  20.  8
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1995 - Mind 104 (415):654-658.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law Reviewed By.Tim Dare - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (5):189-192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10:189-192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Professional Ethics and Personal Integrity.Tim Dare & W. Bradley Wendel (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Contemporary Issues in Applied and Professional Ethics (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Volume 15).Marco Grix & Tim Dare (eds.) - 2016
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark