Order:
  1. Putting the Burden of Proof in Its Place: When Are Differential Allocations Legitimate?Tim Dare & Justine Kingsbury - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):503-518.
    To have the burden of proof is to be rationally required to argue for or provide evidence for your position. To have a heavier burden than an opponent is to be rationally required to provide better evidence or better arguments than they are required to provide. Many commentators suggest that differential or uneven distribution of the burden of proof is ubiquitous. In reasoned discourse, the idea goes, it is almost always the case that one party must prove the claim at (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  21
    Robust Role-Obligation: How Do Roles Make a Moral Difference?Tim Dare - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (4):703-719.
  3.  19
    The Philosophical Use and Misuse of Science.Justine Kingsbury & Tim Dare - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (4):449-466.
    Science is our best way of finding out about the natural world, and philosophers who write about that world ought to be sensitive to the claims of our best science. There are obstacles, however, to outsiders using science well. We think philosophers are prone to misuse science: to give undue weight to results that are untested; to highlight favorable and ignore unfavorable data; to give illegitimate weight to the authority of science; to leap from scientific premises to philosophical conclusions without (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  53
    Mass Immunisation Programmes: Some Philosophical Issues.Tim Dare - 1998 - Bioethics 12 (2):125–149.
    Most countries promote mass immunisation programmes. The varying policy details raise a raft of philosophical issues. I have two broad aims in this paper. First, I hope to begin to remedy a rather curious philosophical neglect of immunisation. With this in mind, I take a broad approach to the topic hoping to introduce rather than settle a range of philosophical issues. My second aim has two aspects: I argue that the states should have pro-immunisation policies, and I advance a view (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  5.  24
    The Commentaries.Samuel Gorovitz, Michael Loughlin & Tim Dare - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (3):190-199.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  6.  52
    Mere-Zeal, Hyper-Zeal and the Ethical Obligations of Lawyers.Tim Dare - 2004 - Legal Ethics 7 (1):24-38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  85
    Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter? [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (1):43-57.
    This paper argues that significant aspects of the vaccination debate are ‘deep’ in a sense described by Robert Fogelin and others. Some commentators have suggested that such disagreements warrant rather threatening responses. I argue that appreciating that a disagreement is deep might have positive implications, changing our moral assessment of individuals and their decisions, shedding light on the limits of the obligation to give and respond to arguments in cases of moral disagreement, and providing an incentive to seek alternative ways (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  42
    Disagreeing About Disagreement in Law: The Argument From Theoretical Disagreement.Tim Dare - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):1-15.
    Ronald Dworkin argues that disagreement in hard cases is ‘theoretical’ rather than empirical and of central importance to our understanding of law, showing ‘plain fact’ theories such as H. L. A. Hart’s sophisticated legal positivism to be false. The argument from theoretical disagreement targets positivism’s commitment to idea that the criteria a norm must meet to be valid in a given jurisdiction are constituted by a practice of convergent behavior by legal officials. The ATD suggests that in hard cases there (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  10
    Addressing Child Maltreatment in New Zealand: Is Poverty Reduction Enough?Tim Dare, Rhema Vaithianathan & Irene De Haan - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (9):989-994.
    Jonathan Boston provides an insightful analysis of the emergence and persistence of child poverty in New Zealand. His remarks on why child poverty matters are brief but, as he reports, “[t]here is a large and robust body of research on the harmful consequences of child poverty”. One cost he does not explicitly mention is the increased risk of maltreatment faced by children living in poverty. Given the clear correlation between risk of abuse and poverty, Boston’s recommendations might be expected to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  14
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1995 - Mind 104 (415):654-658.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  6
    Can Lawyers Have Integrity? [Book Review].Tim Dare - 2010 - Legal Ethics 13 (2):244.
  12.  7
    Commentary on ‘On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data and Baseball’.Tim Dare - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  16
    Ethics and the Law: An Introduction.Tim Dare - 2016 - Legal Ethics 19 (1):182-185.
  14.  17
    ‘Intergenerational Justice’, by Janna Thompson.Tim Dare - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):407-410.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 90, Issue 2, Page 407-410, June 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law Reviewed By.Tim Dare - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (5):189-192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10:189-192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Lawyers, Ethics, And.Tim Dare - 2001 - Philosophy and Literature 25 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Professional Ethics and Personal Integrity.Tim Dare & W. Bradley Wendel (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
    Professional roles are often thought to bring role-specific permissions and obligation, which may allow or require role-occupants to do things they would not be permitted or required to do outside their roles, and which as individuals they would rather not do. This feature of professional roles appears to bring them into conflict both with 'ordinary' or non-role morality, and with personal integrity which is often thought to demand some form of personal endorsement of one's conduct. How are we to reconcile (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  25
    Political Theory for Mortals: Shades of Justice and Images of Death. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):189-191.
    John Seery begins his book with a stirring condemnation of current political theory. He was attracted to the discipline, he reports, because it promised more than a life of idle speculation and disinterested contemplation. Though ensconced in academe, political theorists "at least have one foot out the door." However, political theory has lost its connection to the real world. Much current writing is predictable and formulaic, too much time is spent scoring points, establishing professional authority, and promoting career options: "The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Raz and Legal Positivism.Tim Dare - unknown - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 8.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Raz, Exclusionary Reasons, and Legal Positivism.Tim Dare - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  20
    3. The Ethics in Legal Ethics.Tim Dare - 2010 - Legal Ethics 13 (2):182.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  2
    Virtue Ethics, Lawyers and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird.Tim Dare - 2007 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 19 (1-2):81-100.
    Atticus Finch, the lawyer-hero of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, played by Gregory Peck in the classic 1962 film version, has been adopted as an exemplar by advocates of a virtue ethics approach to legal ethics. When Atticus condones a departure from the rules of law in order to spare Boo Radley a trial, these theorists argue, he displays practical wisdom, or phronesis, and shows that the good lawyer gives priority to judgement and character over rules and principles. Yet (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  10
    What Are Human Rights?Tim Dare - 2017 - Philosophy Now 118:14-17.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Contemporary Issues in Applied and Professional Ethics (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Volume 15).Marco Grix & Tim Dare (eds.) - 2016
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Lawyers, Ethics, and To Kill a Mockingbird.Tim Dare - 2001 - Philosophy and Literature 25 (1):127-141.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark