Order:
  1.  11
    Who Can Recognize Unfamiliar Faces? Individual Differences and Observer Consistency in Person Identification.Markus Bindemann, Meri Avetisyan & Tim Rakow - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (3):277-291.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  12
    Simple Heuristics From the Adaptive Toolbox: Can We Perform the Requisite Learning?Tim Rakow, Neal Hinvest, Edward Jackson & Martin Palmer - 2004 - Thinking and Reasoning 10 (1):1-29.
  3.  24
    Personal Experience in Doctor and Patient Decision Making: From Psychology to Medicine.Simon Y. W. Li, Tim Rakow & Ben R. Newell - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):993-995.
  4.  56
    Rationale and Guidelines for Empirical Adversarial Collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning Initiative.Tim Rakow, Valerie Thompson, Linden Ball & Henry Markovits - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (2):167-175.
  5.  6
    Self-Insight Research as Model Recovery.Tim Rakow - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):37-38.
  6.  5
    Theorize It Both Ways?Tim Rakow - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):425-426.
    Psychologists' lack of methodological uniformity reflects their greater breadth of enquiry than experimental economists. The need for a theoretical understanding of one-shot decisions validates research undertaken without the repetition of trials. Theories tested only with financial incentives may not reliably predict some classes of decision such as those involving health. Undue emphasis on the importance of replication risks the proliferation of theories with limited generalizability.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  11
    If Quantum Probability = Classical Probability + Bounded Cognition; is This Good, Bad, or Unnecessary?Tim Rakow - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):304-305.
    Quantum probability models may supersede existing probabilistic models because they account for behaviour inconsistent with classical probability theory that are attributable to normal limitations of cognition. This intriguing position, however, may overstate weaknesses in classical probability theory by underestimating the role of current knowledge states and may under-employ available knowledge about the limitations of cognitive processes. In addition, flexibility in model specification has risks for the use of quantum probability.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark