Order:
  1. The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
    More than twenty years after its original publication, The Case for Animal Rights is an acknowledged classic of moral philosophy, and its author is recognized as the intellectual leader of the animal rights movement. In a new and fully considered preface, Regan responds to his critics and defends the book's revolutionary position.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   277 citations  
  2. Animal Rights and Human Obligations.Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.) - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  3. Defending Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2001
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  4.  31
    The Animal Rights Debate.Carl Cohen & Tom Regan - 2001 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Here, for the first time, the world's two leading authorities—Tom Regan, who argues for animal rights, and Carl Cohen, who argues against them—make their respective case before the public at large. The very terms of the debate will never be the same. This seminal moment in the history of the controversy over animal rights will influence the direction of this debate throughout the rest of the century.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5.  18
    Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy.Tom Regan - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Regan provides the theoretical framework that grounds a responsible pro-animal rights perspective, and ultimately explores how asking moral questions about other animals can lead to a better understanding of ourselves.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  6. The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic.Tom Regan - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
    A conception of an environmental ethic is set forth which involves postulating that nonconscious natural objects can have value in their own right, independently of human interests. Two kinds of objection are considered: (1) those that deny the possibility (the intelligibility) of developing an ethic ofthe environment that accepts this postulate, and (2) those.that deny the necessity of constructing such an ethic. Both types of objection are found wanting. The essay condudes with some tentative remarks regarding the notion of inherent (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  7. The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 5:82-90.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (4):305-324.
  9. Rights, Killing, and Suffering.R. G. Frey, Mary Midgley & Tom Regan - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):192-195.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  10.  7
    Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Jeffery Moussaieff Masson - 2005 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Described by Jeffrey Masson as 'the single best introduction to animal rights ever written,' this new book by Tom Regan dispels the negative image of animal rights advocates perpetrated by the mass media, unmasks the fraudulent rhetoric of 'humane treatment' favored by animal exploiters, and explains why existing laws function to legitimize institutional cruelty.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11. The Rights of Humans and Other Animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
    Human moral rights place justified limits on what people are free to do to one another. Animals also have moral rights, and arguments to support the use of animals in scientific research based on the benefits allegedly derived from animal model research are thus invalid. Animals do not belong in laboratories because placing them there, in the hope of benefits for others, violates their rights.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. Animal Rights, Human Wrongs.Tom Regan - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):99-120.
    In this essay, I explore the moral foundations of the treatment of animals. Alternative views are critically examined, including (a) the Kantian account, which holds that our duties regarding animals are actually indirect duties to humanity; (b) the cruelty account, which holds that the idea of cruelty explains why it is wrong to treat animals in certain ways; and (c) the utilitarian account, which holds that the value of consequences for all sentient creatures explains our duties to animals. These views (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. Matters of Life and Death.Tom L. Beauchamp & Tom Regan (eds.) - 1980 - Temple University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14.  93
    The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism.Tom Regan - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):181 - 214.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  15.  48
    Does Environmental Ethics Rest on a Mistake?Tom Regan - 1992 - The Monist 75 (2):161-182.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. Earthcare: An Anthology in Environmental Ethics.Spencer Abraham, Ray Anderson, Nik Ansell, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis of Assisi, William Baxter, Philip J. Bentley, Joachim Blatter, Murray Bookchin, Maya Brennan, Majora Carter, Carl Cohen, Deane Curtin, Herman Daly, David DeGrazia, Bill Devall, Calvin DeWitt, David Ehrenfeld, Paul, Anne Ehrlich, Robert Elliot, Stuart Ewen, Nuria Fernandez, Stephen Gardiner, Ramachandra Guha, Garrett Hardin, Eugene Hargrove, John Hasse, Po-Keung Ip, Ralf Isenmann, Kauser Jahan, Marianne B. Karsh, Andrew Kernohan, Marti Kheel, Kenneth Kraft, Aldo Leopold, Miriam MacGillis, Juan Martinez-Alier, Ed McGaa, Katie McShane, Roberto Mechoso, Arne Naess, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Michael Nelson, Bryan Norton, Philip Nyhus, John O'Neil, Stephen Pacala, Ernest Partridge, Erv Peterson, Tom Regan, Holmes Rolston Iii, Lily-Marlene Russow, Mark Sagoff, Kristin Schrader-Frechette, Erroll Schweizer, George Sessions, Vandana Shiva, Peter Singer, Stephen Socolow, Paul Steidlmeier, Richard Sylvan, Bron Taylor & Paul Taylor - 2009 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Earthcare: Readings and Cases in Environmental Ethics presents a diverse collection of writings from a variety of authors on environmental ethics, environmental science, and the environmental movement overall. Exploring a broad range of world views, religions and philosophies, David W. Clowney and Patricia Mosto bring together insightful thoughts on the ethical issues arising in various areas of environmental concern.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  85
    Singer's Critique of the Market.Tom Regan - 1979 - Analysis 39 (3):115 - 117.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  22
    A Defense of Pacifism.Tom Regan - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):73 - 86.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  19.  42
    19 Animals as Subjects-of-a-Life.Tom Regan - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  38
    An Examination and Defense of One Argument Concerning Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1979 - Inquiry 22 (1-4):189 – 219.
    An argument is examined and defended for extending basic moral rights to animals which assumes that humans, including infants and the severely mentally enfeebled, have such rights. It is claimed that this argument proceeds on two fronts, one critical, where proposed criteria of right-possession are rejected, the other constructive, where proposed criteria are examined with a view to determining the most reasonable one. This form of argument is defended against the charge that it is self-defeating, various candidates for the title, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21. The Thee Generation Reflections on the Coming Revolution.Tom Regan - 1991
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  63
    Frey on Interests and Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):335-337.
  23.  57
    Animal Rights: A Reply to Frey.Dale Jamieson & Tom Regan - 1978 - Analysis 38 (1):32 - 36.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  37
    Fox's Critique of Animal Liberation.Tom Regan - 1978 - Ethics 88 (2):126-133.
    I contest michael fox's criticisms of my position regarding animal rights and our duties to animals on the grounds that he either misunderstands what my position is or, When it is understood, Raises objections that can be met. I also challenge the adequacy of fox's own account of the criteria of possessing basic moral rights.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25. The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  66
    Obligations to Animals Are Based on Rights.Tom Regan - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):171-180.
    Some feminist philosophers criticize the idea of human rights because, they allege, it encapsulates male bias; it is therefore misguided, in their view, to extend moral rights to non-human animals. I argue that the feminist criticism is misguided. Ideas are not biased in favour of men simply because they originate with men, nor are ideas themselves biased in favour of men because men have used them prejudicially. As for the position that women should abandon theories of rights and embrace an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  24
    Cruelty, Kindness, and Unnecessary Suffering.Tom Regan - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (214):532 - 541.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  24
    Feinberg on What Sorts of Beings Can Have Rights.Tom Regan - 1976 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):485-498.
  29.  24
    McCloskey on Why Animals Cannot Have Rights.Tom Regan - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):251-257.
  30.  21
    Poniendo a las personas en su sitio.Tom Regan - 1999 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):17-37.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  40
    A Refutation of Utilitarianism.Tom Regan - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):141 - 159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Matters of Life and Death New Introductory Essays in Moral Philosophy.Tom Regan - 1993
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  12
    The Thee Generation.Tom Regan - 1989 - Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (1-2):31-33.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Earthbound New Introductory Essays in Environmental Ethics.Tom Regan - 1984
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1983 - University of California Press, C1983.
    More than twenty years after its original publication, _The Case for Animal Rights _is an acknowledged classic of moral philosophy, and its author is recognized as the intellectual leader of the animal rights movement. In a new and fully considered preface, Regan responds to his critics and defends the book's revolutionary position.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  23
    On the Right Not to Be Made to Suffer Gratuitously.Tom Regan - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):473 - 478.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Feinberg on What Sorts of Beings Can Have Rights.Tom Regan - 1976 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):485-498.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  26
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Georges Dicker & Tom Regan - 1971 - Journal of Value Inquiry 5 (4):315-318.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  16
    Honey Dribbles Down Your Fur.Tom Regan - 1984 - Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 6:138-155.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  22
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Tom Regan - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):315-318.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Thomas Baldwin, GE Moore Reviewed By.Tom Regan - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (1):13-15.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  22
    Utility and Equality: Some Neglected Problems. [REVIEW]Tom Regan - 1983 - Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (1):33-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  8
    Pigs in Space.Tom Regan - 1987 - Philosophica 39.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. How Not to Answer Moral Questions.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Laboratory Studies.Tom Regan - 2008 - In Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader. Routledge. pp. 303.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. The Case Against Animal Research.Tom Regan - forthcoming - Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. We Are What We Eat.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Bloomsbury's Prophet.Tom Regan & G. E. Moore - 1988 - Mind 97 (385):129-133.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  13
    Ivory Towers Should Not a Prison Make.Tom Regan - 1995 - Social Philosophy Today 10:281-296.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  11
    On the Connection Between Environmental Science and Environmental Ethics.Tom Regan - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):363-367.
    I critically assess Don Marietta’s thesis that obligations are not dictates of reason but rather are imbedded in a person’s “world view.” The notion of “a view of the world” is both vague and leads to consequences common to all forms of subjectivism in ethics, since world views can and sometimes do vary from person to person. Marietta cannot avoid these consequences by arguing that some views of the world are “more reasonable” than others, since counting rationality as an appropriate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 89