30 found
Order:
See also
Tomáš Nejeschleba
Palacky University
  1.  18
    Metaphysica Valeriani Magni.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):361-383.
    The paper deals with the metaphysics of Valerian Magni, a seventeenth-century Capuchin thinker and Church politician. It follows Stanislav Sousedik’s and Paul Richard Blum’s interpretations of Magni’s thought and aims to systematize Magni’s metaphysical notions and present their gradual development. The paper first focuses on Magni’s critique of Aristotelianism, which the Capuchin regards as an atheistic philosophy due to incorrect conceptions of God and the world. Then, Magni’s attempt to create a metaphysical system in his late work Opus philosophicum in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  2
    Petrarch’s Ascent of Mont Ventoux and Philosophy.Tomáš Nejeschleba - forthcoming - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej:81-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  42
    Andreas Osiander v dějinách filosofie, vědy a filosofii vědy.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2016 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 38 (4):405-424.
    The article deals with the position of Lutheran theologian Andreas Osiander sen. in the history of philosophy, history of science and philosophy of science. It works on humanistic foundation of Osiander’s thought and his elaboration of the tradition of the antient wisdom and Christian cabbala of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola in particular in the biblical exegesis. The article deals with Osiander’s edition of Nicolaus Copernicus’ book De revolutionibus orbium caelestium as well and with his edition of the mathematical work of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  9
    Thomas Aquinas and the Early Franciscan School on the Agent Intellect.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2004 - Verbum 6 (1):67-78.
    This paper deals with the differences between the concept of the agent intellect in Thomas Aquinas and in the early Franciscan school with a focus on St. Bonaventure. While according to Aquinas the agent intellect is the faculty of the human soul, in the thought of Alexander of Hales, John of La Rochelle and St. Bonaventure it has a double or even a triple meaning. In the Franciscan Masters the agent intellect is simultaneously considered as a faculty of the human (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  31
    Lutheránský aristotelismus – Philipp Melanchthon: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (1):67-82.
    This article summarises the basic features of Melanchthon’s approach to Aristotle’s philosophy in the areas of logic, ethics and natural philosophy. Although Melanchthon builds upon the humanistic ideal of purifying classical heritage, his Aristotelianism should not be viewed as ‘pure’. His conception of natural knowledge could be regarded as a significant non-Aristotelian element of his philosophy. The view consequently penetrates his logic, ethics as well as epistemology. Primarily, however, the reason behind his reception of Aristotle is a defence of Luther’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Johannes Jessenius, Between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi’s Philosophy.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2014 - In . Up Olomouc. pp. 359-369.
    Scholars dealing with Jessenius’ attitude towards Patrizi’s thoughts differ radically in their assessment of Jessenius’ intentions: Jessenius’ approach has been considered to be badly done plagiarism, a purely opportunistic act, an honest but not long-lasting fascination with Patrizi’s Platonism, or a correct understanding of Patrizi’s grasp of his own philosophy. The reason for the dissimilarities could be said to be the interpretation of the form of Jessenius’ reception of Francesco Patrizi’s philosophy is usually only based on an analysis of his (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  1
    Renaissance Anatomy: The Path From Ars to Scientia with a Focus on Anatomical Works of Johannes Jessenius.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2020 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 42 (1):95-115.
    Johannes Jessenius became known by his contemporaries mostly as an exponent of the Italian anatomical Renaissance in Central Europe at the end of the sixteenth and at the beginning of the seventeenth century. The image of Jessenius in the twentieth century was also created with respect to his activities in the area of anatomy in Wittenberg and Prague in particular. The aim of this article is to put Jessenius into the context of the development of anatomy in the sixteenth century. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Pojetí činného intelektu ve starší františkánské škole.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2005 - Filosoficky Casopis 53 (3):383-400.
    [The conception of the intellect in the older Franciscan school].
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  38
    P. Heinrich Seuse Denifle Op (1844–1905) Zpráva ze slavnostního aktu, Innsbruck, 10. června 2005.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):268-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  12
    Johannes Jessenius and Daniel Sennert on Sympathy.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - Prilozi Za Istrazivanje Hrvatske Filozofske Baštine 2 (82):389-400.
    Johannes Jessenius published the treatise on Causes of Sympathy and Antipathy in 1599 which was defended by his student and disciple Daniel Sennert. This disquisition provides interesting material with respect to the concept of natural philosophy and its development in both Jessenius and Sennert. Although Jessenius proclaims that he deals with the question of sympathy and antipathy generally in the Aristotelian manner, he simultaneously indicates the inspiration and main source of his disquisition, these having been lectures held by the Paracelsian (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  2
    Light and Void. The Philosophical Background of Valerian Magni’s Vacuum Experiments.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (6):767-786.
    The subject of the article is the interpretation of a series of experiments proving the existence of vacuum. This was performed by the Capuchin Valerian Magni in 1647 and described in the treatise Demonstratio ocularis, which is the first printed text referring to successful experiments with vacuum. The work generated great controversy at the time, not only with opponents of void, but also with French scholars, who accused Magni of plagiarism. The article reconstructs both the situation around the work’s publication (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  16
    K jubileu P. Prof. Vladimíra Richtera SJ.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):266-267.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  23
    Jezuité v přírodních vědách a ve filosofii 17. a 18. století.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):195-199.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  3
    Justification of Anatomical Practice in Jessenius’s Prague Anatomy.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2016 - Early Science and Medicine 21 (6):557-574.
    The physician and philosopher Johannes Jessenius, an enthusiastic anatomist in Wittenberg, often had to defend his anatomical practices against Lutheran orthodoxy, as is apparent from the invitations he wrote concerning his dissections. His most systematic defence can be found in the introduction to his description of the dissection performed in Prague in 1600, where he provides three different strategies for the justification of anatomical research. The first method traditionally builds on the use of the ancient dictum ‘know thyself;’ the second (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  5
    Jessenius a Jessen, Johannes.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  10
    Jezuité v přírodních vědách a ve filosofii 17. a 18. století: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism. [REVIEW]Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):195-199.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  4
    Between the Renaissance and the Baroque: Philosophy and Knowledge in the Czech Lands Within the Wider European Context: A Preface.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2016 - Early Science and Medicine 21 (6):509-510.
  18.  2
    Osiander, Andreas.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2017 - In Marco Sgarbi (ed.). Springer Verlag. pp. 1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Bonaventurismus jako svébytný filosofický systém? K recepci středověké filosofické tradice v díle Valeriana Magniho.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - Studia Neoaristotelica:135-14.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Book Review. [REVIEW]Tomas Nejeschleba - 2006 - Acta Comeniana 19:243-248.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Jednota intelektu v renesanční filosofii.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - Aither, Journal for the Study of Greek and Latin Philosophical Tradition 7 (14):140-161.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Johannes Jessenius’s Conception of Method.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2007 - Acta Comeniana 20 (44-45):9-23.
    The problem of method, which became one of the most oft-examined themes in Renaissance philosophy, is likewise the subject of Jan Jessenius' Et Philosophiae et Medicinae Solidae Studiosis. In the context of contemporary discussions which ended up distinguishing between methods of cognition and methods of presentation, it is shown that Jessenius does not avail himself of this distinction - despite the fact that he is considered a student of the Paduan school. On one hand, Jessenius does distance himself from a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Jistota Lidského Poznání Podle Sv. Bonaventury.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2000 - Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Philosophica, Philosophica 4:127-135.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. "Kníže svornosti" Giovanni Pico della Mirandola a jeho filosofické úsilí.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2005 - In . Oikoymenh. pp. 7-50.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Magni, Valerian.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - In Marco Sgarbi (ed.). Springer Verlag.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. "Redukující" povaha filosofie Bonaventury z Bagnoregia.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2003 - In . Oikoymenh. pp. 7-56.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Svatý Bonaventura: Putování mysli do Boha.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 1999 - Filosoficky Casopis 47:148-151.
    [St. Bonaventura: The Mind’s Search for God.].
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. The Relationship Between Johannes Jessenius and Johannes Kepler.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2010 - In Alena Hadravová, Terrence J. Mahoney & Petr Hadrava (eds.). National Technical Museum. pp. 136-142.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Význam Jesseniova Filosofického Díla Wittenberského Období Ve Vztahu K Saskému Kurfiřtovi.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2012 - In Agáta Klimeková & Eva Augustínová (eds.). Slovenská Národná Knižnica. pp. 32-41.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Valerian Magni o Vakuu.Tomáš Nejeschleba - 2015 - Dějiny Vědy a Techniky 48 (3):135-150.
    In July 1647 Valeriano Magni published in Warsaw a description of his experiment proving the existence of vacuum. His treatise called “Demonstratio ocularis, loci sine locato, corporis successive moti in vacuo, luminis nulli corpori inhaerentis” provoked a huge polemic, not only with the opponents of the void but also concerning the authorship of the experiment. The article deals with the circumstances of Magni’s experiment and the polemics with both scholars attacking Magni from the point of Aristotelianism and French scientists who (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark