5 found
Order:
  1.  73
    The Proof That the Standard Transformations of E and B Are Not the Lorentz Transformations.Tomislav Ivezić - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (9):1339-1347.
    In this paper it is exactly proved that the standard transformations of the three-dimensional (3D) vectors of the electric and magnetic fields E and B are not relativistically correct transformations. Thence the 3D vectors E and B are not well-defined quantities in the 4D space-time and, contrary to the general belief, the usual Maxwell equations with the 3D E and B are not in agreement with the special relativity. The 4-vectors E a and B a , as well-defined 4D quantities, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  59
    “True Transformations Relativity” and Electrodynamics.Tomislav Ivezić - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (8):1139-1183.
    Different approaches to special relativity (SR) are discussed. The first approach is an invariant approach, which we call the “true transformations (TT) relativity.” In this approach a physical quantity in the four-dimensional spacetime is mathematically represented either by a true tensor (when no basis has been introduced) or equivalently by a coordinate-based geometric quantity comprising both components and a basis (when some basis has been introduced). This invariant approach is compared with the usual covariant approach, which mainly deals with the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  46
    Four-Dimensional Geometric Quantities Versus the Usual Three-Dimensional Quantities: The Resolution of Jackson's Paradox. [REVIEW]Tomislav Ivezić - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (10):1511-1534.
    In this paper we present definitions of different four-dimensional (4D) geometric quantities (Clifford multivectors). New decompositions of the torque N and the angular momentum M (bivectors) into 1-vectors Ns, Nt and Ms, Mt, respectively, are given. The torques Ns, Nt (the angular momentums Ms, Mt), taken together, contain the same physical information as the bivector N (the bivector M). The usual approaches that deal with the 3D quantities $\varvec{E,\,B,\,F,\,L,\,N}$ etc. and their transformations are objected from the viewpoint of the invariant (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    The Proof That Maxwell Equations with the 3D E and B Are Not Covariant Upon the Lorentz Transformations but Upon the Standard Transformations: The New Lorentz Invariant Field Equations.Tomislav Ivezić - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (9):1585-1615.
  5.  32
    Trouton–Noble Paradox Revisited.Tomislav Ivezić - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (4-5):747-760.
    An apparent paradox is obtained in all previous treatments of the Trouton–Noble experiment; there is a three-dimensional (3D) torque T in an inertial frame S in which a thin parallel-plate capacitor is moving, but there is no 3D torque T′ in S′, the rest frame of the capacitor. Different explanations are offered for the existence of another 3D torque, which is equal in magnitude but of opposite direction giving that the total 3D torque is zero. In this paper, it is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark