Results for 'Totte Harinen'

4 found
Order:
  1.  66
    Mutual Manipulability and Causal Inbetweenness.Totte Harinen - 2018 - Synthese 195 (1):35-54.
    Carl Craver’s mutual manipulability criterion aims to pick out all and only those components of a mechanism that are constitutively relevant with respect to a given phenomenon. In devising his criterion, Craver has made heavy use of the notion of an ideal intervention, which is a tool for illuminating causal concepts in causal models. The problem is that typical mechanistic models contain non-causal relations in addition to causal ones, which is why the standard concept of an ideal intervention is not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  22
    Normal Causes for Normal Effects: Reinvigorating the Correspondence Hypothesis About Judgments of Actual Causation.Totte Harinen - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (6):1299-1320.
    There have been several recent attempts to model ordinary intuitions about actual causation by combining a counterfactual definition of the causal relation with an abnormality-based account of causal judgments. In these models, the underlying psychological theory is that people automatically focus on abnormal events when judging the actual causes of an effect. This approach has enabled authors such as Halpern and Hitchcock to capture an impressive array of ordinary causal intuitions. However, in this paper I demonstrate how these abnormality-based accounts (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Nakamura Katsumi. Ronrigaku Risetsu—Kagahuronrigahu Ni Totte—. Baihukan, Tokyo 1942, 3 + 280 Pp.Nakamura Katsumi. Zum Logistischen Gestaltbegriffe. Appendix to the Foregoing, Pp. 257–280. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):61-62.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  97
    Saving the Mutual Manipulability Account of Constitutive Relevance.Beate Krickel - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 68:58-67.
    Constitutive mechanistic explanations are said to refer to mechanisms that constitute the phenomenon-to-be-explained. The most prominent approach of how to understand this constitution relation is Carl Craver’s mutual manipulability approach to constitutive relevance. Recently, the mutual manipulability approach has come under attack (Leuridan 2012; Baumgartner and Gebharter 2015; Romero 2015; Harinen 2014; Casini and Baumgartner 2016). Roughly, it is argued that this approach is inconsistent because it is spelled out in terms of interventionism (which is an approach to causation), (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography