60 found
Order:
See also
Ursula Goldenbaum
Emory University
  1.  36
    Spinoza’s Parrot, Socinian Syllogisms, and Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Leibniz’s Three Strategies of Defending Christian Mysteries.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):551-574.
    This paper intends to show the connection between the theological, logical and epistemological ideas in Leibniz’s thinking. The paper will focus on the reasons for Leibniz’s fundamental decision to defend the Christian mysteries and his three different strategies for doing so. Each of these strategies is an answer to a particular challenge: to the Socinian who claims that the mysteries are contradictory; to the mechanical philosophy which denies the possibility of the mysteries, and to Spinoza’s parrot argument which demands that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Diotima's Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism From Leibniz to Lessing (Review).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):258-259.
  3. Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies Between Leibniz and His Contemporaries.Douglas Jesseph & Ursula Goldenbaum - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  3
    Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796.Ursula Goldenbaum - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  45
    Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?: The Rise of the Claim of Continuity in Leibniz' Philosophy Out of the Ideological Rejection of Spinoza's Impact on Leibniz.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review:107-138.
    In light of the growing interest in the relation between Leibniz and Spinoza in recent years, I would like to draw attention to earlier discussions of this topic in Germany and France during the 19th century. Stein and Erdmann argued that Spinoza had an impact on Leibniz. According to their critics Guhrauer, Trendelenburg and Gerhardt in Germany, as well as Foucher de Careil in France, Leibniz studied Spinoza only after the main points of his system were already developed. I will (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Zwischen Bewunderung Und Entsetzen Leibniz' Frühe Faszination Durch Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2001
  7.  60
    Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
    In light of the growing interest in the relation between Leibniz and Spinoza in recent years, I would like to draw attention to earlier discussions of this topic in Germany and France during the 19th century. Stein and Erdmann argued that Spinoza had an impact on Leibniz. According to their critics Guhrauer, Trendelenburg and Gerhardt in Germany, as well as Foucher de Careil in France, Leibniz studied Spinoza only after the main points of his system were already developed. I will (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. The Affects as a Condition of Human Freedom in Spinoza's Ethics.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Yirmiahu Yovel (ed.). Little Room Press.
  9.  38
    Leibniz' Marginalia on the Back of the Title of Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:269-272.
  10. Geometrical Method.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2015
    The Geometrical Method The Geometrical Method is the style of proof that was used in Euclid’s proofs in geometry, and that was used in philosophy in Spinoza’s proofs in his Ethics. The term appeared first in 16th century Europe when mathematics was on an upswing due to the new science of mechanics. … Continue reading Geometrical Method →.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  11
    A Materialistic Rationalist? Urban Gottfried Bucher’s Defense of Innate Ideas and Mechanism, Added by His Denial of Free Will.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2016 - Quaestio 16:47-73.
    Urban Gottfried Bucher is one of the most surprising authors in early German enlightenment and has been rightly celebrated as a materialist and therefore radical thinker. But he did not teach the same kind of materialism as his contemporary Andreas Rüdiger who leaned toward Locke’s empiricism. Bucher is much closer to Hobbes’ mechanical materialism, to Spinoza’s criticism of free will, and to Tschirnhaus’ extending of the mathematical method to natural science. His explanation of the working of the human soul, while (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  21
    Die Lebensgeschichte Spinozas (Review).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 141-142.
    When Jakob Freudenthal published Die Lebensgeschichte Spinozas in 1899, it was the first collection of biographical documents on Spinoza, who was then still seen as something of an ascetic and isolated philosopher. This view had been suggested by Jarig Jelles’ preface to Spinoza’s Opera posthuma. Bayle had also used Spinoza’s unique vita when arguing for his claim that an atheist could live a virtuous life. While this had offered a pretext for reading Spinoza since the end of the seventeenth century, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  10
    The Gift of Science.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - New Nietzsche Studies 8 (1-2):197-202.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  4
    Freiheit und Notwendigkeit.Ursula Goldenbaum & Peter Heyl - 1993 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 41 (1):148-151.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  2
    Zu einer vermeintlichen Textlücke in Spinozas "Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata".Ursula Goldenbaum - 1984 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 32 (11):1036.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  7
    Die Lebensgeschichte Spinozas.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):141-142.
    When Jakob Freudenthal published Die Lebensgeschichte Spinozas in 1899, it was the first collection of biographical documents on Spinoza, who was then still seen as something of an ascetic and isolated philosopher. This view had been suggested by Jarig Jelles’ preface to Spinoza’s Opera posthuma. Bayle had also used Spinoza’s unique vita when arguing for his claim that an atheist could live a virtuous life. While this had offered a pretext for reading Spinoza since the end of the seventeenth century, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  2
    Introduction.Douglas Jesseph & Ursula Goldenbaum - 2008 - In Douglas Jesseph & Ursula Goldenbaum (eds.), Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies Between Leibniz and His Contemporaries. Walter de Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  4
    Reason light? – Kritische Anmerkungen zu einer neuen Leibnizinterpretation.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - Studia Leibnitiana 36 (1):2 - 21.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  3
    Das Publikum Als Garant der Freiheit der Gelehrtenrepublik: Die Öffentliche Debatte Über den Jugement de L'Académie Royale des Sciences Et Belies Lettres Sur Une Lettre Prétendue de M. De Leibnitz 1752-1753.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 509-652.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  2
    Sovereignty and Obedience.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2011 - In Desmond M. Clarke & Catherine Wilson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press.
    This article examines the treatment of the concepts of sovereignty and obedience in early modern Europe. It explores the conflicting conceptions of the people's right of resistance to the king as they developed in the political upheavals following the Reformation. It describes Thomas Hobbes and Baruch Spinoza's more differentiated and coherent concept of sovereignty and their discussion of civil rights. It also discusses the understanding of sovereignty and obedience that was developed by Samuel Pufendorf, John Locke, and Christian Wolff based (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  2
    Friedrich II. Und Die Berliner Aufklärung.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2006 - In Iwan-M. D.´Aprile & Günther Lottes (eds.), Hofkultur Und Aufgeklärte Öffentlichkeit: Potsdam Im 18. Jahrhundert Im Europäischen Kontext. Akademie Verlag. pp. 123-142.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  1
    Ding und Begriff. Zum Denkeinsatz Spinozas auf dem Hintergrund der Entwicklung neuzeitlicher Naturwissenschaft.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1990 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 38 (8):724.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  1
    Aufklärung in Berlin.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1987 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 35 (9):800.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  1
    Moses Mendelssohn - Bedeutender Repräsentant der Berliner Aufklärung.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1986 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 34 (6):520.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  1
    Thomas Hobbes' Revolution des Naturrechts.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1988 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 36 (5):411.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  1
    Von der Angst des Erkennens Zum 200. Todestag Moses Mendelssohns.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1986 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 34 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  1
    Leibniz’ Marginalia on the Back of the Title of Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:269-272.
  28.  1
    Bildnachweis.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 943-944.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  1
    Die öffentliche Debatte in der deutschen Aufklärung 1697-1796. Einleitung.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 1-118.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  1
    L'Essai de logique de Mariotte. Archéologie des idées d'un savant ordinaire by Sophie Roux (review).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):320-322.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  1
    Teil I. Die erste Phase der Entwicklung der öffentlichen Debatte seit dem Erscheinen der Wertheimer Bibel zur Ostermesse 1735.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 179-269.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  1
    Teil III. Die dritte Phase der öffentliche Debatte bis zum kaiserlichen Verbot im Januar 1737.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 330-384.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  1
    Vorwort.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Ausführliches Inhaltsverzeichnis.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 965-972.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Die Berliner Briefe die neueste Literatur betreffend (Lessing) und ihre Kritik des Kopenhagener Klopstockkreises.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2017 - Berliner Aufklärung 6:11-31.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Doing Without Free Will: Spinoza and Contemporary Moral Problems.Ursula Goldenbaum & Christopher Kluz (eds.) - 2015 - Lexington Books.
    Doing without Free Will: Spinoza and Contemporary Moral Problems introduces Spinoza into the current discussion of the possibility of morality without free will, as it was he who first accomplished such a task. While his contemporaries reacted with shock to his determinist philosophy, today more people are ready to take seriously Spinoza's moral philosophy, which provides a foundation for our understanding of responsibility, akrasia, and moral values without the need for free will.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. “Die Zweisprachigkeit der Deutschen Öffentlichen Debatte Über den Jugement de L’Académie Royale des Sciences Et Belles Lettres Sur Une Lettre Prétendue de M. De Leibnitz Gegen Samuel König 1752-53.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2017 - In Barbara Mahlmann-Bauer (ed.), Gallotropismus und Zivilisationsmodelle im deutschsprachigen Raum (1660–1789)/Gallotropisme et modèles civilisationnels dans l`espace germanophone (1660–1789) / Band 3: Gallotropismus aus helvetischer Sicht/Le gallotropisme dans une perspective helvétique. Heidelberg: Winter. pp. 321-347.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Inhalt.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 176-178.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Kants Parteinahme Für Mendelssohn Im Spinoza-Streit 1786.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2001 - In Ralph Schumacher, Rolf-Peter Horstmann & Volker Gerhardt (eds.), Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des Ix. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Bd. I: Hauptvorträge. Bd. Ii: Sektionen I-V. Bd. Iii: Sektionen Vi-X: Bd. Iv: Sektionen Xi-Xiv. Bd. V: Sektionen Xv-Xviii. De Gruyter. pp. 176-185.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Leibniz Über Toleranz Und Wahrheit.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - In Erich Barke, Rolf Wernstedt & Herbert Breger (eds.), Leibniz Neu Denken. F. Steiner.
  41. Lessing contra Cramer zum Verhältnis von Glauben und Vernunft: Die Grundsatzdebatte zwischen den Literaturbriefen und dem Nordischen Aufseher.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 653-728.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Leibniz’ Marginalia on the Back of the Title of Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:269-272.
  43. Leibniz: Philosophische Schriften und Briefe: 1683-1687.Ursula Goldenbaum, Hansulrich Labuske & Gerhard Müller - 1995 - Studia Leibnitiana 27 (1):122-129.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. MOGENS LÆRKE: Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. La genèse d'une opposition complexe (= Travaux de philosophie 16).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):123.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Namenverzeichnis.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 945-964.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity. [REVIEW]Ursula Goldenbaum - 2008 - Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 16:295-300.
  47. Symposium "Spinoza Und Leibniz" in Hannover, September 1989.Ursula Goldenbaum - 1989 - Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 5:369.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Teil II. Die zweite Phase der öffentlichen Debatte zwischen dem sächsischen Verbot im Januar 1736 und dem preußischen Verbot im Sommer 1736.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 270-329.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Teil IV. Die vierte und letzte Phase: Die Verlagerung der öffentlichen Debatte von der philosophisch-theologischen in die politisch-juristische Diskussion.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2004 - In Appell an Das Publikum: Die Öffentliche Debatte in der Deutschen Aufklärung 1687-1796. Akademie Verlag. pp. 385-508.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. The Impact of Leibniz'Concept of Time on His Conception of History.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2012 - Studia Leibnitiana 44 (1):107-125.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 60