Veikko Launis [6]V. Launis [1]
  1.  49
    Research on ethics in nursing care for older people: A literature review.Riitta Suhonen, Minna Stolt, Veikko Launis & Helena Leino-Kilpi - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (3):337-352.
    The aim of this review was to analyse the empirical studies that focus on ethics in nursing care for older people, scoping the need and areas for further study. A search of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases (earliest to August 2009) was conducted using the the keywords: ethic* and nursing or care or caring and elderly or aged or older. After a four-stage process, 71 empirical articles were included in the review, with informants ranging from elderly people to relatives, caregivers, (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2.  52
    Cosmetic Neurology: Sliding Down the Slippery Slope?Veikko Launis - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):218.
    In an editorial to a recent issue of Neurology, Richard Dees expresses the same criticism in an even more rigorous epistemic tone: Veikko Launis, Ph.D., is Professor of Medical Ethics and Adjunct Professor of Ethics and Social Philosophy at the University of Turku, Finland.FootnotesThis article is part of the Neuroethics of Brainreading research project, directed by myself and funded by the Academy of Finland. I am grateful to Olli Koistinen, Pekka Louhiala, Helena Siipi, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  76
    Human gene therapy and the slippery slope argument.Veikko Launis - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):169-179.
    The article investigates the validity of two different versions of the slippery slope argument construed in relation to human gene therapy: the empirical and the conceptual argument. The empirical version holds that our accepting somatic cell therapy will eventually cause our accepting eugenic medical goals. The conceptual version holds that we are logically committed to accepting such goals once we have accepted somatic cell therapy. It is argued that neither the empirical nor the conceptual version of the argument can provide (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  38
    Solidarity, Genetic Discrimination, and Insurance.Veikko Launis - 2003 - Social Theory and Practice 29 (1):87-111.
  5.  56
    The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
    In the bioethical literature, discrimination in insurance on the basis of genetic risk factors detected by genetic testing has been defended and opposed on various ethical grounds. One important argument in favour of the practice is offered by those who believe that it is not possible to distinguish between genetic and non-genetic information, at least not for practical policy purposes such as insurance decision-making. According to the argument from indistinguishability, the use of genetic test information for insurance purposes should be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  38
    Opposition and Acceptance of GM-food and GM-medicine.Helena Siipi & Veikko Launis - 2009 - Open Ethics Journal 3 (3):97-103.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  28
    Genes and Morality: New Essays.Veikko Launis, Juhani Pietarinen & Juha Räikkä - 1999 - Rodopi.
    Most public discussion has focused on those effects of genetic research that are considered in some way unwanted or unpleasant. For example, there has been much debate concerning the risks and the ethical appropriateness of genetic screening, gene therapy, and agricultural applications based on genetic techniques. It often claimed that genetic research may cause new problems such as genetic discrimination, stigmatization, environmental risks, or mistreatment of animals. Genes and Morality: New Essays adopts a critical attitude toward genetic research, on both (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations