18 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Victor Rodych [19]Victor Patrick Rodych [1]
  1.  65
    Wittgenstein's Inversion of Gödel's Theorem.Victor Rodych - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):173-206.
  2.  67
    Wittgenstein on Irrationals and Algorithmic Decidability.Victor Rodych - 1999 - Synthese 118 (2):279-304.
  3.  69
    Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics.Victor Rodych - unknown - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  4.  40
    Wittgenstein on Mathematical Meaningfulness, Decidability, and Application.Victor Rodych - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (2):195-224.
    From 1929 through 1944, Wittgenstein endeavors to clarify mathematical meaningfulness by showing how (algorithmically decidable) mathematical propositions, which lack contingent "sense," have mathematical sense in contrast to all infinitistic "mathematical" expressions. In the middle period (1929-34), Wittgenstein adopts strong formalism and argues that mathematical calculi are formal inventions in which meaningfulness and "truth" are entirely intrasystemic and epistemological affairs. In his later period (1937-44), Wittgenstein resolves the conflict between his intermediate strong formalism and his criticism of set theory by requiring (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  5.  84
    Wittgenstein’s Critique of Set Theory.Victor Rodych - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):281-319.
  6.  21
    Wittgenstein on Gdel: The Newly Published Remarks. [REVIEW]Victor Rodych - 2002 - Erkenntnis 56 (3):379 - 397.
  7.  82
    Misunderstanding Gödel: New Arguments About Wittgenstein and New Remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279–313.
    The long‐standing issue of Wittgenstein's controversial remarks on Gödel's Theorem has recently heated up in a number of different and interesting directions [, , ]. In their , Juliet Floyd and Hilary Putnam purport to argue that Wittgenstein's‘notorious’ “Contains a philosophical claim of great interest,” namely, “if one assumed. that →P is provable in Russell's system one should… give up the “translation” of P by the English sentence ‘P is not provable’,” because if ωP is provable in PM, PM is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  11
    Misunderstanding Gödel: New Arguments About Wittgenstein and New Remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279-313.
    The long‐standing issue of Wittgenstein's controversial remarks on Gödel's Theorem has recently heated up in a number of different and interesting directions [,, ]. In their, Juliet Floyd and Hilary Putnam purport to argue that Wittgenstein's‘notorious’ “Contains a philosophical claim of great interest,” namely, “if one assumed. that →P is provable in Russell's system one should… give up the “translation” of P by the English sentence ‘P is not provable’,” because if ωP is provable in PM, PM is ω ‐inconsistent, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9. Popper Versus Wittgenstein on Truth, Necessity, and Scientific Hypotheses.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):323-336.
    Most philosophers of science maintain Confirmationism's central tenet, namely, that scientific theories are probabilistically confirmed by experimental successes. Against this dominant conception of experimental science, Popper's well-known, anti-inductivistic Falsificationism has stood, virtually alone, since 1934. Indeed, it is Popper who tells us that it was he who killed Logical Positivism. It is also pretty well-known that Popper blames Wittgenstein for much that is wrong with Logical Positivism, just as he despises Wittgenstein and Wittgensteinian philosophers for abdicating philosophy's true mission. What (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  31
    Barry Smith (Ed.), John Searle, 2003. [REVIEW]Victor Rodych - 2004 - Philosophy in Review 24 (5):365-367..
  11.  48
    Gödel’s ‘Disproof’ of the Syntactical Viewpoint.Victor Rodych - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):527-555.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  83
    Searle Freed of Every Flaw.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):161-175.
    Strong Al presupposes (1) that Super-Searle (henceforth ‘Searle’) comes to know that the symbols he manipulates are meaningful , and (2) that there cannot be two or more semantical interpretations for the system of symbols that Searle manipulates such that the set of rules constitutes a language comprehension program for each interpretation. In this paper, I show that Strong Al is false and that presupposition #1 is false, on the assumption that presupposition #2 is true. The main argument of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  63
    Review of P. Frascolla, Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics[REVIEW]Victor Rodych - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3).
  14. Who is Wittgenstein's Worst Enemy?: Steiner on Wittgenstein on Godel.Victor Rodych - 2006 - Logique Et Analyse 49 (193):55-84.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Barry Smith, Ed., John Searle. [REVIEW]Victor Rodych - 2004 - Philosophy in Review 24 (5):365-367.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  13
    5. Are Platonism and Pragmatism Compatible?Victor Rodych - 2005 - In Kent A. Peacock & Andrew D. Irvine (eds.), Mistakes of Reason: Essays in Honour of John Woods. University of Toronto Press. pp. 78-92.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  14
    Mathematical Sense: Wittgenstein’s Syntactical Structuralism.Victor Rodych - 2008 - In Herbert Hrachovec & Alois Pichler (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Information: Proceedings of the 30th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2007. De Gruyter. pp. 81-104.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Wittgenstein's Anti-Modal Finitism.Victor Rodych - 2000 - Logique Et Analyse 43:171-172.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation