Order:
Disambiguations
William Douglas Woody [3]William D. Woody [1]
  1. A Pluralistic Universe: An Overview and Implications for Psychology.William Douglas Woody & Wayne Viney - 2009 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 30 (3):107-119.
    This article describes some historical precursors that led to William James’s participation in the Hibbert Lectures and his subsequent publication of A Pluralistic Universe. William James viewed the monism–pluralism issue as the greatest issue the human mind can frame, and he returned to this issue again and again in his psychological and philosophical works. The Hibbert Lectures afforded an opportunity to explore the problem of monism and pluralism in a broadly religious or spiritual context. We describe James’s logical and experiential (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  7
    Tracing the career arc of Joost A. M. Meerloo: Prominence, fading, and premonitions of menticide.William Douglas Woody - 2023 - History of the Human Sciences 36 (3-4):55-82.
    This article traces the career arc of Dutch psychoanalyst Joost A. M. Meerloo by examining his biography and his psychology of interrogation and confession. His life story, particularly his experiences during the German occupation of the Netherlands and his escape to England during World War II, shaped his views on these issues, as well as his rise to prominence as an expert on these topics in the United States. His psychoanalytic perspectives on interrogation and confession, including false confession, reflected the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. William James and gestalt psychology.William D. Woody - 1999 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 20 (1):79-92.
    To date, there have been only two scholarly papers devoted to a comparison of Gestalt psychology with the psychology of William James. An early paper by Mary Whiton Calkins called attention to numerous similarities between these two schools of thought. However, a more recent paper by Mary Henle argues that the ideas of William James, as presented in The Principles of Psychology, are irrelevant to Gestalt psychology. In what follows, this claim is evaluated both in terms of The Principles and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation