6 found
Order:
  1.  4
    Sensitivity of implicit evaluations to accurate and erroneous propositional inferences.Benedek Kurdi & Yarrow Dunham - 2021 - Cognition 214 (C):104792.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  17
    Evidence for a relationship between trait gratitude and prosocial behaviour.Rachel Yost-Dubrow & Yarrow Dunham - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (2):397-403.
  3.  15
    The emerging causal understanding of institutional objects.Alexander Noyes, Frank C. Keil & Yarrow Dunham - 2018 - Cognition 170 (C):83-87.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  5
    Groups as institutions: The use of constitutive rules to attribute group membership.Alexander Noyes & Yarrow Dunham - 2020 - Cognition 196 (C):104143.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  2
    What can the implicit social cognition literature teach us about implicit social cognition?Benedek Kurdi & Yarrow Dunham - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    We highlight several sets of findings from the past decade elucidating the relationship between implicit social cognition and real-world inequality: Studies focusing on practical ramifications of implicit social cognition in applied contexts, the relationship between implicit social cognition and consequential real-world outcomes at the level of individuals and geographic units, and convergence between individual-level and corpus-based measures of implicit bias.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Problems and mysteries of the many languages of thought.Eric Mandelbaum, Yarrow Dunham, Roman Feiman, Chaz Firestone, E. J. Green, Daniel Harris, Melissa M. Kibbe, Benedek Kurdi, Myrto Mylopoulos, Joshua Shepherd, Alexis Wellwood, Nicolas Porot & Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (12): e13225.
    “What is the structure of thought?” is as central a question as any in cognitive science. A classic answer to this question has appealed to a Language of Thought (LoT). We point to emerging research from disparate branches of the field that supports the LoT hypothesis, but also uncovers diversity in LoTs across cognitive systems, stages of development, and species. Our letter formulates open research questions for cognitive science concerning the varieties of rules and representations that underwrite various LoT-based systems (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark