Yves Larochelle | : Charles De Koninck, qui chercha à réconcilier la lecture thomiste d’Aristote avec la science contemporaine, et Michel Henry, qui voulut rénover la phénoménologie husserlienne et heideggérienne en restituant la place de l’affectivité dans le champ philosophique, ont connu des trajectoires intellectuelles très différentes. Pourtant, leurs parcours respectifs aboutissent ultimement aux deux mêmes conclusions déterminantes : le réductionnisme scientifique ambiant menace l’intégrité spirituelle de l’humanité et seul le constat d’une finalité d’ordre divin à la vie humaine peut (...) restituer un sain équilibre. | : Charles De Koninck, who tried to reconcile the thomistic reading of Aristotle with contemporary science, and Michel Henry, who wanted to renovate Husserlian and Heideggerrian phenomenology by placing affectivity at the center of philosophy, had very different intellectual trajectories. Nonetheless, they both come to two similar conclusions : contemporary scientific reductionism is menacing the spiritual integrity of mankind, and only the recognition of a divine finality to human life can restore a healthy balance. (shrink)

Applying ethical values in scientific research is conditional to the determination of a metaphysical position on human beings as such. The contemporary context of science and technoscience is essentially based on technological fallouts and a modern dogma of efficiency, relegating ethics to a second place at best. This carries possibly dangerous consequences for humanity. The objective of natural sciences worthy or their name is a return to a form of investigation closer to its origin, but also more conscious of the (...) implications of modern technology. Hence, ethics must be at the heart of scientific education and research, not in its margins. (shrink)