Order:
Disambiguations
Zubin Master [29]Z. Master [3]
  1.  52
    Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
    Social scientists have begun elucidating the variables that influence public trust in science, yet little is known about hype in biotechnology and its effects on public trust. Many scholars claim that hyping biotechnology results in a loss of public trust, and possibly public enthusiasm or support for science, because public expectations of the biotechnological promises will be unmet. We argue for the need for empirical research that examines the relationships between hype, public trust, and public enthusiasm/support. We discuss the complexities (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  36
    Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement.Marsha Greene & Zubin Master - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (3):327-335.
    This paper presents an overview of the key ethical questions of performing gene editing research on military service members. The recent technological advance in gene editing capabilities provided by CRISPR/Cas9 and their path towards first-in-human trials has reinvigorated the debate on human enhancement for non-medical purposes. Human performance optimization has long been a priority of military research in order to close the gap between the advancement of warfare and the limitations of human actors. In spite of this focus on temporary (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  19
    Expanding the Scope of Research Ethics Consultation Services in Safeguarding Research Integrity: Moving Beyond the Ethics of Human Subjects Research.David B. Resnik, Brian C. Martinson & Zubin Master - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):55-57.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  6
    Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.Elise Smith, Bryn Williams-Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul-Hus, Min Shi & David B. Resnik - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1967-1993.
    Scientific authorship serves to identify and acknowledge individuals who “contribute significantly” to published research. However, specific authorship norms and practices often differ within and across disciplines, labs, and cultures. As a consequence, authorship disagreements are commonplace in team research. This study aims to better understand the prevalence of authorship disagreements, those factors that may lead to disagreements, as well as the extent and nature of resulting misbehavior. Methods include an international online survey of researchers who had published from 2011 to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  31
    Authorship Ethics in Global Health Research Partnerships Between Researchers From Low or Middle Income Countries and High Income Countries.Elise Smith, Matthew Hunt & Zubin Master - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):42.
    Over the past two decades, the promotion of collaborative partnerships involving researchers from low and middle income countries with those from high income countries has been a major development in global health research. Ideally, these partnerships would lead to more equitable collaboration including the sharing of research responsibilities and rewards. While collaborative partnership initiatives have shown promise and attracted growing interest, there has been little scholarly debate regarding the fair distribution of authorship credit within these partnerships.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  12
    Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.Elise Smith, Bryn Williams-Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul-Hus, Min Shi, Elena Diller, Katie Caudle & David B. Resnik - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1995-2022.
    Authorship is commonly used as the basis for the measurement of research productivity. It influences career progression and rewards, making it a valued commodity in a competitive scientific environment. To better understand authorship practices amongst collaborative teams, this study surveyed authors on collaborative journal articles published between 2011 and 2015. Of the 8364 respondents, 1408 responded to the final open-ended question, which solicited additional comments or remarks regarding the fair distribution of authorship in research teams. This paper presents the analysis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  25
    Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
    Multiple authorship is becoming increasingly common in bioethics research. There are well-established criteria for authorship in empirical bioethics research but not for conceptual research. It is important to develop criteria for authorship in conceptual publications to prevent undeserved authorship and uphold standards of fairness and accountability. This article explores the issue of multiple authorship in bioethics and develops criteria for determining who should be an author on a conceptual publication in bioethics. Authorship in conceptual research should be based on contributing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  8.  16
    Benefits, Risks and Ethical Considerations in Translation of Stem Cell Research to Clinical Applications in Parkinson's Disease.Z. Master, M. McLeod & I. Mendez - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):169-173.
    Stem cells are likely to be used as an alternate source of biological material for neural transplantation to treat Parkinson’s disease in the not too distant future. Among the several ethical criteria that must be fulfilled before proceeding with clinical research, a favourable benefit to risk ratio must be obtained. The potential benefits to the participant and to society are evaluated relative to the risks in an attempt to offer the participants a reasonable choice. Through examination of preclinical studies transplanting (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9.  26
    Authorship Policies of Bioethics Journals.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428.
    Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10.  33
    Bad Moms, Blameless Dads: The Portrayal of Maternal and Paternal Age and Preconception Harm in U.S. Newspapers.Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Laura Beth Santacrose, Zubin Master & Wendy M. Parker - 2016 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):56-63.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  3
    Physicians’ Ethical and Professional Obligations About Right-to-Try Amidst a Pandemic.Zubin Master & Jon Tilburt - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):26-28.
    Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 26-28.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  37
    Incorporating Exclusion Clauses Into Informed Consent for Biobanking.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (2):203-212.
  13.  24
    Selling Translational Research: Is Science a Value-Neutral Autonomous Enterprise?Zubin Master & Vural Özdemir - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):52-54.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  30
    The Global Hla Banking of Embryonic Stem Cells Requires Further Scientific Justification.Zubin Master & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):45 – 46.
  15.  57
    The Ethics of Moral Compromise for Stem Cell Research Policy.Zubin Master & G. K. D. Crozier - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (1):50-65.
    In the US, stem cell research is at a moral impasse—many see this research as ethically mandated due to its potential for ameliorating major diseases, while others see this research as ethically impermissible because it typically involves the destruction of embryos and use of ova from women. Because their creation does not require embryos or ova, induced pluripotent stem cells offer the most promising path for addressing the main ethical objections to stem cell research; however, this technology is still in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  12
    What's Missing? Discussing Stem Cell Translational Research in Educational Information on Stem Cell “Tourism”.Zubin Master, Amy Zarzeczny, Christen Rachul & Timothy Caulfield - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):254-268.
    Stem cell tourism is a form of medical tourism in which patients travel to receive unproven or untested stem cell-based interventions for many different diseases and conditions. A few studies indicate that patients and the public have several reasons for seeking these treatments for themselves or for their loved ones. Among these are the feeling of not having any other clinical options left, distrust of or frustration with their home country’s health care system, and a perception that their home country (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  15
    Can We Really Bypass the Moral Debate for Embryo Research?Zubin Master - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):27 – 28.
  18.  17
    What's Missing? Discussing Stem Cell Translational Research in Educational Information on Stem Cell “Tourism”.Zubin Master, Amy Zarzeczny, Christen Rachul & Timothy Caulfield - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):254-268.
    Stem cell tourism is a growing industry in which patients pursue unproven stem cell therapies for a wide variety of illnesses and conditions. It is a challenging market to regulate due to a number of factors including its international, online, direct-to-consumer approach. Calls to provide education and information to patients, their families, physicians, and the general public about the risks associated with stem cell tourism are mounting. Initial studies examining the perceptions of patients who have pursued stem cell tourism indicate (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  17
    Symbolism and Sacredness of Human Parthenotes.Zubin Master & G. K. D. Crozier - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):37-39.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  55
    A Problematic Principle.Lyle Crawford, Daisy Laforce & Zubin Master - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):40 – 42.
  21.  4
    How to Handle Co-Authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It Into the Paper.William Bülow, Zubin Master & Gert Helgesson - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (2):1-11.
    While much of the scholarly work on ethics relating to academic authorship examines the fair distribution of authorship credit, none has yet examined situations where a researcher contributes significantly to the project, but whose contributions do not make it into the final manuscript. Such a scenario is commonplace in collaborative research settings in many disciplines and may occur for a number of reasons, such as excluding research in order to provide the paper with a clearer focus, tell a particular story, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  2
    Health Misinformation and the Power of Narrative Messaging in the Public Sphere.Timothy Caulfield, Alessandro R. Marcon, Blake Murdoch, Jasmine M. Brown, Sarah Tinker Perrault, Jonathan Jarry, Jeremy Snyder, Samantha J. Anthony, Stephanie Brooks, Zubin Master, Christen Rachul, Ubaka Ogbogu, Joshua Greenberg, Amy Zarzeczny & Robyn Hyde-Lay - 20019 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2 (2):52-60.
    Numerous social, economic and academic pressures can have a negative impact on representations of biomedical research. We review several of the forces playing an increasingly pernicious role in how health and science information is interpreted, shared and used, drawing discussions towards the role of narrative. In turn, we explore how aspects of narrative are used in different social contexts and communication environments, and present creative responses that may help counter the negative trends. As traditional methods of communication have in many (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  14
    In Our Own Words: A Qualitative Exploration of Complex Patient-Provider Interactions in an LGBTQ Population.Saba Malik, Zubin Master, Wendy Parker, Barry DeCoster & Lisa Campo-Engelstein - unknown
    While sexual and gender minorities are at increased risk for poor health outcomes, there is limited data regarding patient-provider interactions. In this study, we explored the perspectives of LGBTQ patients and their encounters with physicians in order to improve our understanding of patient-physician experiences. Using purposive selection of self-identified LGBTQ patients, we performed fourteen in-depth semi-structured interviews on topics of sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as their perceived role in the patient-provider relationship. Coding using a modified grounded theory (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  10
    Balancing Efficiency and the Protection of Research Participants: Canadian Allergy/Asthma Researchers’ Perspectives on the Ethics Review of Multi-Site Health Research.Zubin Master, Nola M. Ries & Timothy Caulfield - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 2 (5).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. BioéthiqueOnline: Moving to Peer-Review / BioéthiqueOnline : Passage À L’Évaluation Par les Pairs.Zubin Master, Carolina Martin, Jason Behrmann, Charles Marsan, Lise Levesque, Maude Laliberté, Charles Dupras, Elise Smith, Renaud Boulanger, Jean-Christophe Belisle Pipon, Bryn Williams-Jones, Christopher McDougall, Ali Okhowat & Sonia Paradis - 2012 - BioéthiqueOnline 1.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  12
    Conflicts of Interest Policies for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors of Bioethics Journals.Zubin Master, Kelly Werner, Elise Smith, David B. Resnik & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):194-205.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  12
    Promoting Public Trust: ESCROs Won't Fix the Problem of Stem Cell Tourism.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):53-55.
  28.  2
    The U.S. National Biobank and (No) Consensus on Informed Consent.Zubin Master - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):63-65.
  29.  20
    Weaponizing Hope: Sources of Hope, Unrealistic Optimism, and Denial.Marsha Michie, Megan Allyse, Katie A. Stoll & Zubin Master - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):25-27.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  6
    Authors' Response.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):449-449.
  31. Bioethics Authorship Guidelines Response.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):449-449.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  4
    The Advantages of Peer Review Over Arbitration for Resolving Authorship Disputes.Evelyn Tenenbaum & Zubin Master - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).
    A recent commentary argued for arbitration to resolve authorship disputes within academic research settings explaining that current mechanisms to resolve conflicts result in unclear outcomes and institutional power vested in senior investigators could compromise fairness. We argue here that arbitration is not a suitable means to resolve disputes among researchers in academia because it remains unclear who will assume the costs of arbitration, the rules of evidence do not apply to arbitration, and decisions are binding and very difficult to appeal. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark