Search results for 'analytic philosophy' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  83
    Michael Losonsky (2014). The Preoccupation and Crisis of Analytic Philosophy. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (1):5-20.
    I propose to reconsider Gilbert Ryle’s thesis in 1956 in his introduction to The Revolution of Philosophy that “the story of twentieth-century philosophy is very largely the story of this notion of sense or meaning” and, as he writes elsewhere, the “preoccupation with the theory of meaning is the occupational disease of twentieth-century Anglo-Saxon and Austrian philoso- phy.” Ryle maintains that this preoccupation demar- cates analytic philosophy from its predecessors and that it gave philosophy a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  34
    Michael Beaney (2016). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2):211-234.
    _ Source: _Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 211 - 234 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    Nikolay Milkov (2004). Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology: Common Roots, Related Results. In Sonya Kaneva (ed.), Challenges Facing Philosophy in United Europe: Proceedings, 23rd Session, Varna International Philosophical School, June, 3rd-6th, 2004. Iphr-Bas. pp. 119-126.
    In this paper we shall open a perspective from which the relatedness between the early analytic philosophy and Husserl’s phenomenology is so close that we can call the two programs with one name: “rigorous philosophy”, or “theory of forms”. Moreover, we shall show that the close relatedness between the two most influential philosophical movements of the 20th century has its roots in their common history. At the end of the paper we shall try to answer the question (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    Michael Beaney (forthcoming). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. New Content is Available for Journal of the Philosophy of History.
    _ Source: _Page Count 24 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, and argue for a reinvigorated (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jaime Nubiola (1998). A Plea for a Peircean Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Paideia, Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy.
    Criticisms of analytic philosophy have increased in intensity in the last decade, denouncing specifically its closing in on itself, which results in barrenness and ignorance of real human problems. The thought of C. S. Peirce is proposed as a fruitful way of renewing the analytic tradition and obviating these criticisms. While this paper is largely a reflection on Hilary Putnam’s study of the historical development of analytic philosophy, not only can some of its main roots (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Charles Pigden (2013). Analytic Philosophy (Alternative Title 'Analytic Atheism?'). In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-319.
    Most analytic philosophers are atheists, but is there a deep connection between analytic philosophy and atheism? The paper argues a) that the founding fathers of analytic philosophy were mostly teenage atheists before they became philosophers; b) that analytic philosophy was invented partly because it was realized that the God-substitute provided by the previously fashionable philosophy - Absolute Idealism – could not cut the spiritual mustard; c) that analytic philosophy developed an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Peter Simons (2003). Bocheński and Balance: System and History in Analytic Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 55 (4):281-297.
    Using the work of Józef Bocheski as apositive example, this paper sets out the casefor a balanced use of historical knowledge indoing analytic philosophy. Between the twoextremes of relativizing historicism, whichdenies absolute truth, and arrogant scientism,which denies any constructive role for thehistory of ideas in philosophy, lies a viamedia in which historical reflection onconcepts and their history is placed at theservice of the system of cognitive philosophy.Knowledge of the history of philosophy, whilenot a sine qua (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Fraser MacBride (2014). Analytic Philosophy and its Synoptic Commission: Towards the Epistemic End of Days. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 74:221-236.
    There is no such thing as , conceived as a special discipline with its own distinctive subject matter or peculiar method. But there is an analytic task for philosophy that distinguishes it from other reflective pursuits, a global or synoptic commission: to establish whether the final outputs of other disciplines and common sense can be fused into a single periscopic vision of the Universe. And there is the hard-won insight that thought and language aren't transparent but stand in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  35
    Nikolay Milkov (2007). Russell, Wittgenstein, and the Project for "Analytic Philosophy". Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 15:153-155.
    The paper investigates the history of the introduction of what was later called “analytic philosophy” in October 1911–May 1912. Despite the fact that Russell and Wittgenstein were in full agreement in their antipathy towards the old-style philosophy, for example, that of Bergson, each had his own conception of the New Philosophy. For Russell, it meant “examined philosophy”, or philosophy advanced through “scientific restraint and balance” of our theoretical conjectures, and resulted in a series of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  6
    Michael Beaney (forthcoming). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Brill.
    _ Source: _Page Count 24 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, and argue for a reinvigorated (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Titus Stahl (2008). Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. [REVIEW] Critical Horizons 9 (1):109-112.
    A review of Paul Reddings book "Analytic philosophy and the return of Hegelian thought".
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  42
    Ann Garry (1995). A Minimally Decent Philosophical Method: Analytic Philosophy and Feminism. Hypatia 10 (3):7-30. [REVIEW] Hypatia 10 (3):7-30.
    This essay focuses on the extent to which the methods of analytic philosophy can be useful to feminist philosophers. I pose nine general questions feminist philosophers might ask to determine the suitability of a philosophical method. Examples include: Do its typical ways of formulating problems or issues encourage the inclusion of a wide variety of women's points of view? Are its central concepts gender-biased, not merely in their origin, but in very deep, continuing ways? Does it facilitate uncovering (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  32
    Géza Kállay (2011). At T-Time, the Inchoative Nick of Time, and “Statements About the Past”: Time and History in the Analytic Philosophy of Language. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):322-351.
    The paper, drawing on articles by J. M. E. McTaggart, G. E. Moore, D. Davidson, J. L. Austin, B. Russell, A. J. Ayer and G. E. M. Anscombe, argues that the philosophy of language in the analytic tradition has developed an “inchoative“ view of time, and history is a problem as regards the existence of events in the past and how these events can be known. An alternative view is hinted at through the work of L. Wittgenstein and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  14
    Martijn Boven (2013). Chronopathologies: Time and Politics in Deleuze, Derrida, Analytic Philosophy, and Phenomenology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (2):297-301.
    In Chronopathologies, the Australian philosopher Jack Reynolds gives an exciting analysis of the intimate connection between time and politics in three trajectories of contemporary philosophy: analytic philosophy, poststructuralism and phenomenology. These trajectories are incompatible in the sense that internalizing the norms of any one of them 'makes taking the other(s) seriously very difficult' (p. 225). Given this incompatibility, Reynolds convincingly argues that the only way forward is to draw out the differences between these trajectories, in order to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  29
    Aaron Preston (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future History of Analytic Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):445-465.
    The careful historical and metaphilosophical attention recently bestowed upon analytic philosophy has revealed that traditional ways of defining it are inadequate. In the face of this inadequacy, contemporary authors have proposed new definitions that detach analytic philosophy from its turn of the twentieth century origins. I argue that this contemporary trend in defining analytic philosophy is misguided, and that it diminishes the likelihood of our coming to an accurate historical and metaphilosophical understanding of it. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  11
    Agnaldo Cuoco Portugal (2010). Filosofia Analítica da Religião como Pensamento Pós-"Pós-Metafísico" (Analytic Philosophy of Religion as a Post-'Post-Metaphysical' Thought) - DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2010v8n16p80. [REVIEW] Horizonte 8 (16):80-98.
    Entendendo “pensamento pós-metafísico” no sentido da crítica moderna e positivista à metafísica como forma de conhecimento, o artigo apresenta a filosofia analítica da religião como uma resposta à tese de que a linguagem religiosa não tem sentido porque não se refere a nenhum dado empiricamente verificável ou falseável. Em primeiro lugar, é apresentada a resposta não-realista ao desafio pós-metafísico, especialmente a de D. Z. Phillips, baseada nas ideias de Wittgenstein. Nessa proposta, o sentido da linguagem religiosa não está na referência (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  13
    Nikolay Milkov, What is Analytic Philosophy?
    In trying to answer the question What is analytic philosophy? I shall follow two methodological principles. (i) The first was suggested by Peter Hacker and reads: ‘Any characterisation of “analytic philosophy” which excludes Moore, Russell and the later Wittgenstein, as well as the leading figures of post War analytic philosophy [for us these are John Wisdom, Ryle, Austin, Strawson and Dummett], must surely be rejected.’ (Hacker 1996a, p. 247) The correct definition of analytic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  9
    Andreas Graeser (1993). Analytic Philosophy and Hermeneutic Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:175-188.
    The paper discusses the gap which opened up between the so called Anglo-American, analytic Philosophy and the continental, hermeneutic tradidtion and the mutual reproaches of either side against the other - e.g. the neglect of the historical dimension in philosophy vs. the lack of conceptual and methodological rigor. After an examination of the hermeneutic approach it is suggested that analytically trained philosophers should chng to their techniques and their ideal of clarity but not hesitate to cope with (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Paul Giladi (forthcoming). Hegel: Analytic Philosophy’s Pharmakon. The European Legacy:1-14.
    In this article I argue that Hegel has become analytic philosophy’s “pharmakon”—both its “poison” and its “cure.” Traditionally, Hegel’s philosophy has been attacked by Anglo-American analytical philosophers for its alleged charlatanism and irrelevance. Yet starting from the 1970s there has been a revival of interest in Hegel’s philosophical work, which, I suggest, may be explained by three developments: the revival of interest in Aristotelianism following Saul Kripke’s and Hilary Putnam’s work on natural kinds, and Elizabeth Anscombe’s, Philippa (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  13
    John-Michael Kuczynski (2016). What is Analytic Philosophy? JOHN-MICHAEL KUCZYNSKI.
    Philosophy is the analysis of the categories in terms of which we understand the world. Analytic philosophy is simply philosophy that is pursued with a high degree of awareness of what philosophy is. Contrary to what Wittgenstein alleges, analytic philosophy is not linguistic philosophy; for it is only to the quite limited extent that meaning-analysis takes the form of sentential analysis that the latter falls within the bailiwick of analytic philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jack Reynolds (2010). Common Sense and Philosophical Methodology: Some Metaphilosophical Reflections on Analytic Philosophy and Deleuze. Philosophical Forum 41 (3):231-258.
    On the question of precisely what role common sense (or related datum like folk psychology, trust in pre-theoretic/intuitive judgments, etc.) should have in reigning in the possible excesses of our philosophical methods, the so-called ‘continental’ answer to this question, for the vast majority, would be “as little as possible”, whereas the analytic answer for the vast majority would be “a reasonably central one”. While this difference at the level of both rhetoric and meta-philosophy is sometimes – perhaps often (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Carleton B. Christensen (2008). Self and World - From Analytic Philosophy to Phenomenology. Walter de Gruyter.
    This book draws upon the phenomenological tradition of Husserl and Heidegger to provide an alternative elaboration of John McDowell’s thesis that in order to understand how self-conscious subjectivity relates to the world, perception must be understood as a genuine unity of spontaneity (‘concept’) and receptivity (‘intuition’). Thereby it clarifies McDowell’s critique of Donald Davidson and develops an alternative conception of perceptual experience which gives sense to McDowell’s claim that self-conscious subjectivity is so inherently in touch with its world that scepticism (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Dan Zahavi (2002). First-Person Thoughts and Embodied Self-Awareness: Some Reflections on the Relation Between Recent Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Science. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):7-26.
    The article examines some of the main theses about self-awareness developed in recent analytic philosophy of mind (especially the work of Bermúdez), and points to a number of striking overlaps between these accounts and the ones to be found in phenomenology. Given the real risk of unintended repetitions, it is argued that it would be counterproductive for philosophy of mind to ignore already existing resources, and that both analytical philosophy and phenomenology would profit from a more (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  24. Barry Smith (1989). On the Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 35:153-173.
    Analytic philosophers have until recently been reluctant to pursue historical investigations into the Central European roots of their own philosophical tradition. The most recent book by Michael Dummett, however, entitled Origins of Analytic Philosophy, shows how fruitful such investigations can be, not only as a means of coming to see familiar philosophical problems in a new light, but also as a means of clarifying what, precisely, ‘analytic philosophy’ might mean. As Dummett points out, the newly (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25. Babette E. Babich (2003). On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy : Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy. In C. G. Prado (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Humanity Books.
    On the political nature of the analytic - continental distinction in professional philosophy and the general tendency to discredit continental philosophy while redesignating the rubric as analytically conceived.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Panu Raatikainen (2013). What Was Analytic Philosophy? Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (1).
  27. George Duke, Elena Walsh, Jack Reynolds & James Chase (2010). Post-Analytic Philosophy : Overcoming the Divide. In James Williams, Jack Reynolds, James Chase & Edwin Mares (eds.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
    This essay uses citational analyses to argue that most of the philosophers considered "postanalytic" - Wittgenstein, McDowell, Davidson, and Rorty - are not, in fact, genuine figures of rapprochement, since the particular essays cited, and/or the background literature that is cited, are not shared in common between the standard-bearing analytic and continental journals.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  60
    Amie L. Thomasson (2002). Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (S1):115-142.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  29.  20
    Joel Dittmer (2015). Peter Unger, Empty Ideas: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (6):316-318.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  59
    Maria Alvarez (2011). Glock on Analytic Philosophy and History. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (I).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  60
    Ernest Nagel (1936). Impressions and Appraisals of Analytic Philosophy in Europe. II. Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):29-53.
  32.  35
    Johannes L. Brandl (2002). Gilbert Ryle: A Mediator Between Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (S1):143-151.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  55
    Ernest Nagel (1936). Impressions and Appraisals of Analytic Philosophy in Europe. I. Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):5-24.
  34.  14
    Thomas Baldwin (1992). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy by Peter Hylton. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):51-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  14
    Harry Tarter (1959). Semantics and Necessary Truth; an Inquiry Into the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 56 (2):76-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  13
    V. J. McGill (1950). Elements of Analytic Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 47 (14):411-415.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  20
    Robert Sokolowski (1992). Husserl and Analytic Philosophy and Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):725-730.
  38.  5
    Panayot Butchvarov (2001). Ethical and Religious Thought in Analytic Philosophy of Language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):732-735.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Paul Redding (2013). Hegel and Analytic Philosophy. In Allegra de Lauentiis Jeffrey Edwards (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel. Bloomsbury Academic.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  85
    P. M. S. Hacker (1996). Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
    This text provides a unique and compelling account of Wittgenstein's impact upon twentieth century analytic philosophy, from its inception at the turn of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  41.  11
    Jeremy Barris (2012). The Convergent Conceptions of Being in Mainstream Analytic and Postmodern Continental Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 43 (5):592-618.
    This article argues that there is ultimately a very close convergence between prominent conceptions of being in mainstream Anglo‐American philosophy and mainstream postmodern Continental philosophy. One characteristic idea in Anglo‐American or analytic philosophy is that we establish what is meaningful and so what we can say about what is, by making evident the limits of sense or what simply cannot be meant. A characteristic idea in Continental philosophy of being is that being emerges through contrast (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42. Jack Reynolds (2010). Problems of Other Minds: Solutions and Dissolutions in Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 5 (4):326-335.
    While there is a great diversity of treatments of other minds and inter-subjectivity within both analytic and continental philosophy, this article specifies some of the core structural differences between these treatments. Although there is no canonical account of the problem of other minds that can be baldly stated and that is exhaustive of both traditions, the problem(s) of other minds can be loosely defined in family resemblances terms. It seems to have: (1) an epistemological dimension (How do we (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Max Baker-Hytch (2016). Analytic Theology and Analytic Philosophy of Religion: What's the Difference? Journal of Analytic Theology 4 (1):347-361.
    Analytic theology is often seen as an outgrowth of analytic philosophy of religion. It isn’t fully clear, however, whether it differs from analytic philosophy of religion in some important way. Is analytic theology really just a sub-field of analytic philosophy of religion, or can it be distinguished from the latter in virtue of fundamental differences at the level of subject matter or metholodology? These are pressing questions for the burgeoning field of (...) theology. The aim of this article, then, will be to map out several forms that analytic theology might (and in some cases actually does) take before examining the extent to which each can be thought to be distinct from analytic philosophy of religion. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Mitchell S. Green & Michael Dummett (1995). Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Philosophical Review 104 (4):613.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. David G. Stern & P. M. S. Hacker (1999). Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Philosophical Review 108 (3):449.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  58
    Francois-Igor Pris (2015). Wittgensteinian Pragmatism in Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology (700 pages, in Russian, ISBN-13: 978-3-659-79102-4). Lambert.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Analytic philosophy has become the dominant philosophical tradition in the English-speaking world. This book illuminates that tradition through a historical examination of a crucial period in its formation: the rejection of Idealism by Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore at the beginning of the twentieth century, and the subsequent development of Russell's thought in the period before the First World War.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   53 citations  
  48. Jack Reynolds (2006). Sadism and Masochism: A Symptomatology of Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Parrhesia 1 (1):15.
    There has recently been a plethora of attempts to understand the key differences that separate the analytic and continental traditions of philosophy, often involving either painstaking descriptions of the divergent argumentative techniques and methodologies that concern them, or comparatively examining in detail the work of certain major theorists in both traditions (e.g. Rawls and Derrida, Lewis and Deleuze). While partly drawing on these two approaches, in this particular essay I instead propose a rather more speculative way of teasing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  6
    Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea (eds.) (2009). Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford University Press.
    Philosophy in the English-speaking world is dominated by analytic approaches to its problems and projects; but theology has been dominated by alternative approaches. Many would say that the current state in theology is not mere historical accident, but is, rather, how things ought to be. On the other hand, many others would say precisely the opposite: that theology as a discipline has been beguiled and taken captive by 'continental' approaches, and that the effects on the discipline have been (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  12
    Rafe McGregor (2014). Introduction: The Analytic Engagement with Continental Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (3):307-311.
    This Special Issue of the International Journal of Philosophical Studies originates from ‘A Dangerous Liaison? The Analytic Engagement with Continental Philosophy’, a conference held at the University of York on 9th December 2011 courtesy of the support of The Mind Association, the Aristotelian Society, and the Humanities Research Centre. There were four invited speakers, each with a respondent, and two graduate speakers, with papers presented by four of the six article authors in this volume. The aim of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000