Search results for 'competitive exclusion principle' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  33
    Jani Raerinne & Jan Baedke (2015). Exclusions, Explanations, and Exceptions: On the Causal and Lawlike Status of the Competitive Exclusion Principle. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 7 (20150929).
    The basic idea behind the Competitive Exclusion Principle is that species that have similar or identical niches cannot stably coexist in the same place for long periods of time when their common resources are limiting. A more exact definition of the CEP states that, in equilibrium, n number of sympatric species competing for a common set of limiting resources cannot stably coexist indefinitely on fewer than n number of resources. The magnitude or intensity of competition between species (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    E. K. Waters (2012). Aggregation and Competitive Exclusion: Explaining the Coexistence of Human Papillomavirus Types and the Effectiveness of Limited Vaccine Conferred Cross-Immunity. Acta Biotheoretica 60 (4):333-356.
    Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types are sexually transmitted infections that cause a number of human cancers. According to the competitive exclusion principle in ecology, HPV types that have lower transmission probabilities and shorter durations of infection should be outcompeted by more virulent types. This, however, is not the case, as numerous HPV types co-exist, some which are less transmissible and more easily cleared than others. This paper examines whether this exception to the competitive exclusion principle (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Christopher H. Eliot (2011). Competition Theory and Channeling Explanation. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 3 (20130604):1-16.
    The complexity and heterogeneity of causes influencing ecology’s domain challenge its capacity to generate a general theory without exceptions, raising the question of whether ecology is capable, even in principle, of achieving the sort of theoretical success enjoyed by physics. Weber has argued that competition theory built around the Competitive Exclusion Principle (especially Tilman’s resource-competition model) offers an example of ecology identifying a law-like causal regularity. However, I suggest that as Weber presents it, the CEP is (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  34
    Daniel C. Galehouse (2010). Pauli's Exclusion Principle in Spinor Coordinate Space. Foundations of Physics 40 (7):961-977.
    The Pauli exclusion principle is interpreted using a geometrical theory of electrons. Spin and spatial motion are described together in an eight dimensional spinor coordinate space. The field equation derives from the assumption of conformal waves. The Dirac wave function is a gradient of the scalar wave in spinor space. Electromagnetic and gravitational interactions are mediated by conformal transformations. An electron may be followed through a sequence of creation and annihilation processes. Two electrons are branches of a single (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  28
    A. S. Barabash (2010). Experimental Test of the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Foundations of Physics 40 (7):703-718.
    A short review is given of three experimental works on tests of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) in which the author has been involved during the last 10 years. In the first work a search for anomalous carbon atoms was done and a limit on the existence of such atoms was determined, $^{12}\tilde{\mathrm{C}}$ /12C <2.5×10−12. In the second work PEP was tested with the NEMO-2 detector and the limits on the violation of PEP for p-shell nucleons in 12C (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  22
    I. G. Kaplan (2013). The Pauli Exclusion Principle. Can It Be Proved? Foundations of Physics 43 (10):1233-1251.
    The modern state of the Pauli exclusion principle studies is discussed. The Pauli exclusion principle can be considered from two viewpoints. On the one hand, it asserts that particles with half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles with integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. This is a so-called spin-statistics connection. The reasons why the spin-statistics connection exists are still unknown, see discussion in text. On the other hand, according to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  14
    S. Bartalucci, S. Bertolucci, M. Bragadireanu, M. Cargnelli, C. Curceanu, S. Di Matteo, J.-P. Egger, C. Guaraldo, M. Iliescu, T. Ishiwatari, M. Laubenstein, J. Marton, E. Milotti, D. Pietreanu, T. Ponta, A. Romero Vidal, D. L. Sirghi, F. Sirghi, L. Sperandio, O. Vazquez Doce, E. Widmann & J. Zmeskal (2010). The VIP Experimental Limit on the Pauli Exclusion Principle Violation by Electrons. Foundations of Physics 40 (7):765-775.
    In this paper we describe an experimental test of the validity of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (for electrons) which is based on a straightforward idea put forward a few years ago by Ramberg and Snow (Phys. Lett. B 238:438, 1990). We perform a very accurate search of X-rays from the Pauli-forbidden atomic transitions of electrons in the already filled 1S shells of copper atoms. Although the experiment has a very simple structure, it poses deep conceptual and interpretational problems. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Michela Massimi, Pauli's Exclusion Principle: The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle.
    There is hardly another principle in physics with wider scope of applicability and more far-reaching consequences than Pauli's exclusion principle. This book explores the principle's origin in the atomic spectroscopy of the early 1920s, its subsequent embedding into quantum mechanics, and later experimental validation with the development of quantum chromodynamics. The reconstruction of this crucial historic episode provides an excellent foil to reconsider Kuhn's view on incommensurability. The author defends the prospective rationality of the revolutionary transition (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Christian List & Peter Menzies (2009). Nonreductive Physicalism and the Limits of the Exclusion Principle. Journal of Philosophy 106 (9):475-502.
    It is often argued that higher-level special-science properties cannot be causally efficacious since the lower-level physical properties on which they supervene are doing all the causal work. This claim is usually derived from an exclusion principle stating that if a higherlevel property F supervenes on a physical property F* that is causally sufficient for a property G, then F cannot cause G. We employ an account of causation as differencemaking to show that the truth or falsity of this (...)
    Direct download (17 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  71
    Neil Campbell & Dwayne Moore (2009). On Kim's Exclusion Principle. Synthese 169 (1):75 - 90.
    In this paper we explore Jaegwon Kim’s principle of explanatory exclusion. Kim’s support for the principle is clarified and we critically evaluate several versions of the dual explananda response authors have offered to undermine it. We argue that none of the standard versions of the dual explananda reply are entirely successful and propose an alternative approach that reveals a deep tension in Kim’s metaphysics. We argue that Kim can only retain the principle of explanatory exclusion (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  24
    Michela Massimi (2001). Exclusion Principle and the Identity of Indiscernibles: A Response to Margenau's Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):303--30.
    This paper concerns the question of whether Pauli's Exclusion Principle (EP) vindicates the contingent truth of Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) for fermions as H. Weyl first suggested with the nomenclature ‘Pauli–Leibniz principle’. This claim has been challenged by a time-honoured argument, originally due to H. Margenau and further articulated and champione by other authors. According to this argument, the Exclusion Principle—far from vindicating Leibniz's principle—would refute it, since the same (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12. Eric R. Scerri (1995). The Exclusion Principle, Chemistry and Hidden Variables. Synthese 102 (1):165 - 169.
    The Pauli Exclusion Principle and the reduction of chemistry have been the subject of considerable philosophical debate, The present article considers the view that the lack of derivability of the Exclusion Principle represents a problem for physics and denies the reduction of chemistry to quantum mechanics. The possible connections between the Exclusion Principle and the hidden variable debate are also briefly criticised.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  42
    Peter Joseph Hall (1986). The Pauli Exclusion Principle and the Foundations of Chemistry. Synthese 69 (3):267 - 272.
    Despite its importance to Chemistry, the Pauli Exclusion Principle appears as a rather ad hoc addition to quantum mechanics. In this paper a description of its origin is given together with a critical discussion of its use and significance in Chemistry and Quantum Physics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  16
    Antonio F. Rañada (1985). A Geometrical Interpretation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle in Classical Field Theory. Foundations of Physics 15 (1):89-100.
    It is shown that classical Dirac fields with the same couplings obey the Pauli exclusion principle in the following sense: If at a certain time two Dirac fields are in different states, they can never reach the same one. This is geometrically interpreted as analogous to the impossibility of crossing of trajectories in the phase space of a dynamical system. An application is made to a model in which extended particles are represented as solitary waves of a set (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  28
    G. H. Walter (1988). Competitive Exclusion, Coexistence and Community Structure. Acta Biotheoretica 37 (3-4):281-313.
    Studies of coexistence are based ultimately on the assumption that competitive exclusion is a general and accredited phenomenon in nature. However, the ecological and evolutionary impact of interspecific competition is of questionable significance. Review of three reputed examples of competitive exclusion in the field (Aphytis wasps, red and grey squirrels, and triclads) demonstrates that the widely-accepted competition-based interpretations are unlikely, that alternative explanations are overlooked, and that all other reported cases need critical reinvestigation. Although interspecific competition (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  18
    J. C. E. Dekker (1986). The Inclusion-Exclusion Principle for Finitely Many Isolated Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):435-447.
    A nonnegative interger is called a number, a collection of numbers a set and a collection of sets a class. We write ε for the set of all numbers, o for the empty set, N(α) for the cardinality of $\alpha, \subset$ for inclusion and $\subset_+$ for proper inclusion. Let α, β 1 ,...,β k be subsets of some set ρ. Then α' stands for ρ-α and β 1 ⋯ β k for β 1 ∩ ⋯ ∩ β k . For (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  60
    Tuomas K. Pernu (2013). The Principle of Causal Exclusion Does Not Make Sense. Philosophical Forum 44 (1):89-95.
    The principle of causal exclusion is based on two distinct causal notions: causal sufficiency and causation simpliciter. The principle suggests that the former has the power to exclude the latter. But that is problematic since it would amount to claiming that sufficient causes alone can take the roles of causes simpliciter. Moreover, the principle also assumes that events can sometimes have both sufficient causes and causes simpliciter. This assumption is in conflict with the first part of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  25
    Henry Margenau (1944). The Exclusion Principle and its Philosophical Importance. Philosophy of Science 11 (4):187-208.
  19.  9
    Neil Campbell & Dwayne Moore (2009). On Kim’s Exclusion Principle. Synthese 169 (1):75-90.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  2
    J. C. Flores (2016). Competitive Exclusion and Axiomatic Set-Theory: De Morgan’s Laws, Ecological Virtual Processes, Symmetries and Frozen Diversity. Acta Biotheoretica 64 (1):85-98.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    E. K. Waters (2016). Erratum To: Aggregation and Competitive Exclusion: Explaining the Coexistence of Human Papillomavirus Types and the Effectiveness of Limited Vaccine Conferred Cross-Immunity. Acta Biotheoretica 64 (2):219-219.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  7
    Kevin Morris (2014). The Exclusion Problem, Without the Exclusion Principle. Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (1):259-270.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  17
    Gordon N. Fleming (2007). The Evolution of Pauli's Exclusion Principle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (1):202-208.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  4
    Wolfgang Pauli (1947). Exclusion Principle and Quantum Mechanics Discours Prononcéà la Réception du Prix Nobel de Physique 1945. Dialectica 1 (2):204-204.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  22
    Helge Kragh (2009). Michela Massimi Pauli's Exclusion Principle: The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):235-238.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Gordon N. Fleming (2007). The Evolution of Pauli's Exclusion Principle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):202-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Kevin W. Sharpe (2014). Comments on Kevin Morris’ “The Exclusion Problem, Without the Exclusion Principle”. Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (2):79-83.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Edward Mackinnon (2006). Pauli’s Exclusion Principle: The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 97:773-774.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  4
    Thomas Ryckman (2007). Pauli's Exclusion Principle: The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle, by Michela Massimi. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):187-189.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Edward MacKinnon (2006). Michela Massimi.Pauli’s Exclusion Principle: The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle. Xiv + 211 Pp., Figs., Tables, Bibl., Index. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. $75. [REVIEW] Isis 97 (4):773-774.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. G. J. Whitrow (1948). PAULI, W. -Exclusion Principle and Quantum Mechanics. [REVIEW] Mind 57:539.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  67
    Ausonio Marras (1998). Kim's Principle of Explanatory Exclusion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):439-451.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  33. Fernando Broncano (2009). The Principle Exclusion and the Problem of Cognitive Integration in the Epistemological Virtues of Ernesto Sosa. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):82-90.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Vyacheslav Kalmykov & Lev Kalmykov (2015). A Solution to the Biodiversity Paradox by Logical Deterministic Cellular Automata. Acta Biotheoretica 63 (2):203-221.
    The paradox of biological diversity is the key problem of theoretical ecology. The paradox consists in the contradiction between the competitive exclusion principle and the observed biodiversity. The principle is important as the basis for ecological theory. On a relatively simple model we show a mechanism of indefinite coexistence of complete competitors which violates the known formulations of the competitive exclusion principle. This mechanism is based on timely recovery of limiting resources and their (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  51
    Thomas R. Alley (1982). Competition Theory, Evolution, and the Concept of an Ecological Niche. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (3):165-179.
    This article examines some of the main tenets of competition theory in light of the theory of evolution and the concept of an ecological niche. The principle of competitive exclusion and the related assumption that communities exist at competitive equilibrium - fundamental parts of many competition theories and models - may be violated if non-equilibrium conditions exist in natural communities or are incorporated into competition models. Furthermore, these two basic tenets of competition theory are not compatible (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  36.  29
    Marcel Weber (1999). The Aim and Structure of Ecological Theory. Philosophy of Science 66 (1):71-93.
    I present an attempt at an explication of the ecological theory of interspecific competition, including its explanatory role in community ecology and evolutionary biology. The account given is based on the idea that law-like statements play an important role in scientific theories of this kind. I suggest that the principle of competitive exclusion is such a law, and that it is evolutionarily invariant. The principle's empirical status is defended and implications for the ongoing debates on the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  5
    I. Walker (1983). The Physical Dimensions and Biological Meaning of the Coefficients in the Volterra Competition Equations and Their Consequences for the Possibility of Coexistence. Acta Biotheoretica 32 (2):93-122.
    Exact definitions in physical and biological terms of the coefficients in Volterra's (1926, 1931) original competition equations are indispensable for the understanding of the system. In agreement with Volterra's own, but not quite sufficient specifications, it is tried in this paper to give more precise definitions of the parameters used by Volterra. This leads to some consequences; i.a. that there does not exist a principle of competitive exclusion. In order to allow for competitive exclusion (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  16
    Julio A. Camargo (1998). A Thermodynamic Perspective on Natural Selection. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (1):65-75.
    A novel thermodynamic perspective on natural selection is presented. In the case that life continuity is optimized in an ideal system, where relatively constant and homogeneous selective pressures favour a given competing species, natural selection leads that system to a stationary state of maximum genotypic uniformity of life and maximum sustainable consumption of available energy by life (competitive equilibrium). Structurally and functionally, this optimizing tendency towards competitive equilibrium looks similar to the optimizing tendency towards thermodynamic equilibrium of classical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  3
    Ronald Tinnevelt & Helder de Schutter (2009). Introduction: Global Democracy and Exclusion. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):1-7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Jesper Kallestrup (2006). The Causal Exclusion Argument. Philosophical Studies 131 (2):459-85.
    Jaegwon Kim’s causal exclusion argument says that if all physical effects have sufficient physical causes, and no physical effects are caused twice over by distinct physical and mental causes, there cannot be any irreducible mental causes. In addition, Kim has argued that the nonreductive physicalist must give up completeness, and embrace the possibility of downward causation. This paper argues first that this extra argument relies on a principle of property individuation, which the nonreductive physicalist need not accept, and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  41. Matthew C. Haug (2010). The Exclusion Problem Meets the Problem of Many Causes. Erkenntnis 73 (1):55-65.
    In this paper I develop a novel response to the exclusion problem. I argue that the nature of the events in the causally complete physical domain raises the “problem of many causes”: there will typically be countless simultaneous low-level physical events in that domain that are causally sufficient for any given high-level physical event. This shows that even reductive physicalists must admit that the version of the exclusion principle used to pose the exclusion problem against non-reductive (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  44
    Douglas Keaton & Thomas W. Polger (2014). Exclusion, Still Not Tracted. Philosophical Studies 171 (1):135-148.
    Karen Bennett has recently articulated and defended a “compatibilist” solution to the causal exclusion problem. Bennett’s solution works by rejecting the exclusion principle on the grounds that even though physical realizers are distinct from the mental states or properties that they realize, they necessarily co-occur such that they fail to satisfy standard accounts of causal over-determination. This is the case, Bennett argues, because the causal background conditions for core realizers being sufficient causes of their effects are identical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Christian List & Peter Menzies (2014). My Brain Made Me Do It: The Exclusion Argument Against Free Will, and What’s Wrong with It. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock & H. Price (eds.), Making a Difference, Oxford (Oxford University) (forthcoming). Oxford University Press
    We offer a critical assessment of the “exclusion argument” against free will, which may be summarized by the slogan: “My brain made me do it, therefore I couldn't have been free”. While the exclusion argument has received much attention in debates about mental causation (“could my mental states ever cause my actions?”), it is seldom discussed in relation to free will. However, the argument informally underlies many neuroscientific discussions of free will, especially the claim that advances in neuroscience (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Daniel Stoljar & Christian List (2016). Does the Exclusion Argument Put Any Pressure on Dualism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-13.
    The exclusion argument is widely thought to put considerable pressure on dualism if not to refute it outright. We argue to the contrary that, whether or not their position is ultimately true, dualists have a plausible response. The response focuses on the notion of ‘distinctness’ as it occurs in the argument: if 'distinctness' is understood one way, the exclusion principle on which the argument is founded can be denied by the dualist; if it is understood another way, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  62
    Neil Campbell (2010). Explanatory Exclusion and the Intensionality of Explanation. Theoria 76 (3):207-220.
    Ausonio Marras has argued that Jaegwon Kim's principle of explanatory exclusion depends on an implausibly strong interpretation of explanatory realism that should be rejected because it leads to an extensional criterion of individuation for explanations. I examine the role explanatory realism plays in Kim's justification for the exclusion principle and explore two ways in which Kim can respond to Marras's criticism. The first involves separating criteria for explanatory truth from questions of explanatory adequacy, while the second (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  11
    S. Tarzi (2003). Exclusion Principles as Restricted Permutation Symmetries. Foundations of Physics 33 (6):955-979.
    We give a derivation of exclusion principles for the elementary particles of the standard model, using simple mathematical principles arising from a set theory of identical particles. We apply the theory of permutation group actions, stating some theorems which are proven elsewhere, and interpreting the results as a heuristic derivation of Pauli's Exclusion Principle (PEP) which dictates the formation of elements in the periodic table and the stability of matter, and also a derivation of quark confinement. We (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  22
    Anders Strand (2010). Causal Exclusion and the Preservation of Causal Sufficiency. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):117-135.
    Causal overdetermination, the existence of more than one sufficient cause for an effect, is standardly regarded as unacceptable among philosophers of mental causation. Philosophers of mind, both proponents of causal exclusion arguments and defenders of non-reductive physicalism, seem generally displeased with the idea of mental causes merely overdetermining their already physically determined effects. However, as I point out below, overdetermination is widespread in the broadly physical domain. Many of these cases are due to what I call the preservation of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  44
    Giovanni Maio (2003). Research Ethics and the Principle of Justice as Fairness – a Restatement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):395-406.
    In my recent article, I addressed the question of whether a potential categorical exclusion of decisionally impaired patients from non-therapeutic medical research would be inaccordance with the Principle of Justice as Fairness. I came to the conclusion that a categorical exclusion of decisionally impaired persons from relevant research projects may collide with Rawls’s understanding of Justice as Fairness. Derek Bell has criticized my paper by denying that it is legitimate to apply Rawls to this bioethical problem. In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  37
    Dwayne Moore (2009). Explanatory Exclusion and Extensional Individuation. Acta Analytica 24 (3):211-222.
    Jaegwon Kim’s principle of Explanatory Exclusion says there can be no more than a single complete and independent explanation of any one event. Accordingly, if we have a complete neurological explanation for some piece of human behavior, the mental explanation must either be excluded, or it must not be distinct from the neurological explanation. Jaegwon Kim argues that mental explanations are not distinct from neurological explanations on account of the fact that they refer to the same objective causal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  69
    Brad Weslake (forthcoming). Difference-Making, Closure and Exclusion. In Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Huw Price (eds.), Making a Difference. Oxford University Press
    Consider the following causal exclusion principle: For all distinct properties F and F* such that F* supervenes on F, F and F* do not both cause a property G. Peter Menzies and Christian List have proven that it follows from a natural conception of causation as difference-making that this exclusion principle is not generally true. Rather, it turns out that whether the principle is true is a contingent matter. In addition, they have shown that in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000