Results for 'exclusivity'

140 found
Order:
  1.  13
    Aims and Exclusivity.Ema Sullivan-Bissett - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):721-731.
    If belief has an aim by being a intentional activity, then it ought to be the case that the aim of belief can be weighed against other aims one might have. However, this is not so with the putative truth aim of belief: from the first-person perspective, one can only be motivated by truth considerations in deliberation over what to believe. From this perspective then, the aim cannot be weighed. This problem is captured by David Owens's Exclusivity Objection to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  26
    Raising the Barriers to Access to Medicines in the Developing World – The Relentless Push for Data Exclusivity.Diependaele Lisa, Cockbain Julian & Sterckx Sigrid - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics 17 (1):11-21.
    Since the adoption of the WTO-TRIPS Agreement in 1994, there has been significant controversy over the impact of pharmaceutical patent protection on the access to medicines in the developing world. In addition to the market exclusivity provided by patents, the pharmaceutical industry has also sought to further extend their monopolies by advocating the need for additional ‘regulatory’ protection for new medicines, known as data exclusivity. Data exclusivity limits the use of clinical trial data that need to be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  22
    The Psychology of Exclusivity.Troy Jollimore - 2008 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 3 (1).
    Friendship and romantic love are, by their very nature, exclusive relationships. This paper sug- gests that we can better understand the nature of the exclusivity in question by understanding what is wrong with the view of practical reasoning I call the Comprehensive Surveyor View. The CSV claims that practical reasoning, in order to be rational, must be a process of choosing the best available alternative from a perspective that is as detached and objective as possible. But this view, while (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  66
    The Illusion of Exclusivity.Conor McHugh - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1117-1136.
    It is widely held that when you are deliberating about whether to believe some proposition p, only considerations relevant to the truth of p can be taken into account as reasons bearing on whether to believe p and motivate you accordingly. This thesis of exclusivity has significance for debates about the nature of belief, about control of belief, and about certain forms of evidentialism. In this paper I distinguish a strong and a weak version of exclusivity. I provide (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  5.  69
    A Defence of Owens' Exclusivity Objection to Beliefs Having Aims.Ema Sullivan-Bissett & Paul Noordhof - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):453-457.
    In this paper we argue that Steglich-Petersen’s response to Owens’ Exclusivity Objection does not work. Our first point is that the examples Steglich-Petersen uses to demonstrate his argument do not work because they employ an undefended conception of the truth aim not shared by his target (and officially eschewed by Steglich-Petersen himself). Secondly we will make the point that deliberating over whether to form a belief about p is not part of the belief forming process. When an agent enters (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  6.  40
    Defending Exclusivity.Sophie Archer - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):326-341.
    Exclusivity’ is the claim that when deliberating about whether to believe that p one can only be consciously motivated to reach one's conclusion by considerations one takes to pertain to the truth of p. The pragmatist tradition has long offered inspiration to those who doubt this claim. Recently, a neo-pragmatist movement, Keith Frankish (), and Conor McHugh ()) has given rise to a serious challenge to exclusivity. In this article, I defend exclusivity in the face of this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7. When Monophyly is Not Enough: Exclusivity as the Key to Defining a Phylogenetic Species Concept.Joel Velasco - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):473-486.
    A natural starting place for developing a phylogenetic species concept is to examine monophyletic groups of organisms. Proponents of “the” Phylogenetic Species Concept fall into one of two camps. The first camp denies that species even could be monophyletic and groups organisms using character traits. The second groups organisms using common ancestry and requires that species must be monophyletic. I argue that neither view is entirely correct. While monophyletic groups of organisms exist, they should not be equated with species. Instead, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8. Aims and Exclusivity.Ema Sullivan‐Bissett - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):721-731.
    If belief has an aim by being a intentional activity, then it ought to be the case that the aim of belief can be weighed against other aims one might have. However, this is not so with the putative truth aim of belief: from the first-person perspective, one can only be motivated by truth considerations in deliberation over what to believe. From this perspective then, the aim cannot be weighed. This problem is captured by David Owens's Exclusivity Objection to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  44
    Is the Requirement of Sexual Exclusivity Consistent with Romantic Love?Natasha McKeever - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (3):353-369.
    In some cultures, people tend to believe that it is very important to be sexually exclusive in romantic relationships and idealise monogamous romantic relationships; but there is a tension in this ideal. Sex is generally considered to have value, and usually when we love someone we want to increase the amount of value in their lives, not restrict it without good reason. There is thus a call, not yet adequately responded to by philosophers, for greater clarity in the reasons §why (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  12
    Hypothesis Competition Beyond Mutual Exclusivity.Jonah N. Schupbach & David H. Glass - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):810-824.
    Competition between scientific hypotheses is not always a matter of mutual exclusivity. Consistent hypotheses can compete to varying degrees either directly or indirectly via a body of evidence. We motivate and defend a particular account of hypothesis competition by showing how it captures these features. Computer simulations of Bayesian inference are used to highlight the limitations of adopting mutual exclusivity as a simplifying assumption to model scientific reasoning, particularly due to the exclusion of hypotheses that may be true. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  42
    On the Exclusivity Implicature of ‘Or’ or on the Meaning of Eating Strawberries.Liza Verhoeven & Leon Horsten - 2005 - Studia Logica 81 (1):19-24.
    This paper is a contribution to the program of constructing formal representations of pragmatic aspects of human reasoning. We propose a formalization within the framework of Adaptive Logics of the exclusivity implicature governing the connective 'or'.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  5
    Is It a Name or a Fact? Disambiguation of Reference Via Exclusivity and Pragmatic Reasoning.Stephanie A. Malone, Marina Kalashnikova & Erin M. Davis - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (8):2095-2107.
    Adults reason by exclusivity to identify the meanings of novel words. However, it is debated whether, like children, they extend this strategy to disambiguate other referential expressions. To further inform this debate, this study tested 41 adults on four conditions of a disambiguation task: label/label, fact/fact, label/fact, and fact/label. Participants also provided a verbal explanation for their referent selections to tease apart the underlying processes. Results indicated that adults successfully discerned the target object in the label/label and label/fact condition, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. The Psychology of Exclusivity.Troy Jollimore - 2008 - Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 3 (1):52-60.
    Friendship and romantic love are, by their very nature, exclusive relationships. This paper suggests that we can better understand the nature of the exclusivity in question by understanding what is wrong with the view of practical reasoning I call the Comprehensive Surveyor View. The CSV claims that practical reasoning, in order to be rational, must be a process of choosing the best available alternative from a perspective that is as detached and objective as possible. But this view, while it (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Another Defence of Owen’s Exclusivity Objection to Beliefs Having Aims.Ema Sullivan-Bissett & Paul Noordhof - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):147-153.
    David Owens objected to the truth-aim account of belief on the grounds that the putative aim of belief does not meet a necessary condition on aims, namely, that aims can be weighed against other aims. If the putative aim of belief cannot be weighed, then belief does not have an aim after all. Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen responded to this objection by appeal to other deliberative contexts in which the aim could be weighed, and we argued that this response to Owens failed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  15. ‘No Other Name’: A Middle Knowledge Perspective on the Exclusivity of Salvation Through Christ.William Lane Craig - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):172-188.
    The conviction ofthe New Testament writers was that there is no salvation apart from Jesus. This orthodox doctrine is widely rejected today because God’s condemnation of persons in other world religions seems incompatible with various attributes of God.Analysis reveals the real problem to involve certain counterfactuals of freedom, e.g., why did not God create a world in which all people would freely believe in Christ and be saved? Such questions presuppose that God possesses middle knowledge. But it can be shown (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  16.  10
    Mutual Exclusivity in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Testing the Pragmatic Hypothesis.Ashley de Marchena, Inge-Marie Eigsti, Amanda Worek, Kim Emiko Ono & Jesse Snedeker - 2011 - Cognition 119 (1):96-113.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  18
    Proximal Foundations of Jealousy: Expectations of Exclusivity in the Infant’s First Year of Life.Sybil L. Hart - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (4):358-366.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  1
    Independence and Exclusivity Among Psychological Processes: Implications for the Structure of Recall.Gregory V. Jones - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (2):229-235.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  19.  10
    Mutual Exclusivity in Crosssituational Statistical Learning.Daniel Yurovsky & Chen Yu - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 715--720.
  20.  5
    Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach.Ernest J. Weinrib - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (2):123-138.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  26
    Synergy of Complements and the Exclusivity of Opposites.Gyorgy Jaros - 2000 - World Futures 56 (1):1-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  5
    Interaction Context Theory: The Interdependence and Mutual Exclusivity of Observation and Action.W. F. Lawless - 1996 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):141-161.
    Argues that social science has not achieved the pre-eminence of physical science because it lacks a theory of social dynamics. To overcome this problem and prepare for a future of interacting agents, a theory is sketched of the social statics and dynamics in interaction contexts. The boundary limits of cognitive science are established and a theory that maps between objective and subjective reality is provided. By determining the relationships between perceived and actual situations and behaviors, interaction context theory has the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  36
    The Problem of Divine Exclusivity.Jeff Jordan - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 33 (2):89 - 101.
  24.  32
    Consciousness and the Exclusivity of Function.Eric Russert Kraemer - 1984 - Mind 93 (April):271-5.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    From Paradox to Exclusivity: Dante and Petrarch’s Lyrical Eschatologies.Francesca Southerden & Manuele Gragnolati - 2018 - In Igor Candido (ed.), Petrarch and Boccaccio: The Unity of Knowledge in the Pre-Modern World. De Gruyter. pp. 129-152.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    “No Other Name”: A Middle Knowledge Perspective on the Exclusivity of Salvation Through Christ.William Lane Craig - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):172-188.
    The conviction ofthe New Testament writers was that there is no salvation apart from Jesus. This orthodox doctrine is widely rejected today because God’s condemnation of persons in other world religions seems incompatible with various attributes of God.Analysis reveals the real problem to involve certain counterfactuals of freedom, e.g., why did not God create a world in which all people would freely believe in Christ and be saved? Such questions presuppose that God possesses middle knowledge. But it can be shown (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Neuroethology: A Call for Less Exclusivity and More Theory.Michael A. Arbib - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):381.
  28.  2
    Can the Aims of Neuroethology Be Selective, While Avoiding Exclusivity?D. M. Guthrie - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):390.
  29.  1
    The Confession of God's Exclusivity by All Mankind.W. A. M. Beuken - 1974 - Bijdragen 35 (3-4):335-356.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    The Doctrine of Exclusivity and the Position of Mixed Agreements in the External Relations of the European Community.Marise Cremona - 1982 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2 (3):393-428.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Exclusivity and African Science.D. J. Louw - 2005 - Filozofski Vestnik 26 (3):201 - +.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Christian and Buddhist Approach to Religious Exclusivity. Do Interfaith Scholars Have It Right?Daniel J. McCoy, Winfried Corduan & Henk Stoker - 2016 - Hts Theological Studies 72 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Fashioning Flesh : Inclusion, Exclusivity, and the Potential of Genomics.Fiona O'Neill - 2006 - In Paul Atkinson (ed.), New Genetics, New Indentities. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Exclusivity and Variety: Pespectives on Multidimensional Exegesis.P. M. Venter - 1997 - Hts Theological Studies 53 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  19
    The Role of Novelty in Early Word Learning.Emily Mather & Kim Plunkett - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (7):1157-1177.
    What mechanism implements the mutual exclusivity bias to map novel labels to objects without names? Prominent theoretical accounts of mutual exclusivity (e.g., Markman, 1989, 1990) propose that infants are guided by their knowledge of object names. However, the mutual exclusivity constraint could be implemented via monitoring of object novelty (see Merriman, Marazita, & Jarvis, 1995). We sought to discriminate between these contrasting explanations across two preferential looking experiments with 22-month-olds. In Experiment 1, infants viewed three objects: one (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  36. The Coherence of Love.Alan Soble - 2000 - Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):293-315.
    I examine three common beliefs about love: constancy, exclusivity, and the claim that love is a response to the properties of the beloved. Following a discussion of their relative consistency, I argue that neither the constancy nor the exclusivity of love are saved by the contrary belief, that love is not (entirely) a response to the properties of the beloved.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37. Rationalization as Performative Pretense.Jason D'Cruz - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (7):980-1000.
    Rationalization in the sense of biased self-justification is very familiar. It's not cheating because everyone else is doing it too. I didn't report the abuse because it wasn't my place. I understated my income this year because I paid too much in tax last year. I'm only a social smoker, so I won't get cancer. The mental mechanisms subserving rationalization have been studied closely by psychologists. However, when viewed against the backdrop of philosophical accounts of the regulative role of truth (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  10
    Feature Biases in Early Word Learning: Network Distinctiveness Predicts Age of Acquisition.Tomas Engelthaler & Thomas T. Hills - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):n/a-n/a.
    Do properties of a word's features influence the order of its acquisition in early word learning? Combining the principles of mutual exclusivity and shape bias, the present work takes a network analysis approach to understanding how feature distinctiveness predicts the order of early word learning. Distance networks were built from nouns with edge lengths computed using various distance measures. Feature distinctiveness was computed as a distance measure, showing how far an object in a network is from other objects based (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    Species Monophyly.Olivier Rieppel - 2009 - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48 (1):1-8.
    In biological systematics, as well as in the philosophy of biology, species and higher taxa are individuated through their unique evolutionary origin. This is taken by some authors to mean that monophyly is a (relational) property not only of higher taxa, but also of species. A species is said to originate through speciation, and to go extinct when it splits into two daughter species (or through terminal extinction). Its unique evolutionary origin is said to bestow identity on a species through (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    The Emergence of Words: Attentional Learning in Form and Meaning.Terry Regier - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):819-865.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  41.  89
    Nothing but the Evidential Considerations?Nathaniel P. Sharadin - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):1-19.
    A number of philosophers have claimed that non-evidential considerations cannot play a role in doxastic deliberation as motivating reasons to believe a proposition. This claim, interesting in its own right, naturally lends itself to use in a range of arguments for a wide array of substantive philosophical theses. I argue, by way of a counterexample, that the claim to which all these arguments appeal is false. I then consider, and reply to, seven objections to my counterexample. Finally, as a way (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  18
    A One-to-One Bias and Fast Mapping Support Preschoolers' Learning About Faces and Voices.Mariko Moher, Lisa Feigenson & Justin Halberda - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (5):719-751.
    A multimodal person representation contains information about what a person looks like and what a person sounds like. However, little is known about how children form these face-voice mappings. Here, we explored the possibility that two cognitive tools that guide word learning, a one-to-one mapping bias and fast mapping, also guide children’s learning about faces and voices. We taught 4- and 5-year-olds mappings between three individual faces and voices, then presented them with new faces and voices. In Experiment 1, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  48
    Exclusion Constraints Facilitate Statistical Word Learning.Katherine Yoshida, Mijke Rhemtulla & Athena Vouloumanos - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):933-947.
    The roles of linguistic, cognitive, and social-pragmatic processes in word learning are well established. If statistical mechanisms also contribute to word learning, they must interact with these processes; however, there exists little evidence for such mechanistic synergy. Adults use co-occurrence statistics to encode speech–object pairings with detailed sensitivity in stochastic learning environments (Vouloumanos, 2008). Here, we replicate this statistical work with nonspeech sounds and compare the results with the previous speech studies to examine whether exclusion constraints contribute equally to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  16
    Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes.Cristian Timmermann & Zoë Robaey - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):285-303.
    Having an adequate and extensively recognized resource governance system is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources in a highly populated planet. Despite the widely accepted importance of agrobiodiversity for future plant breeding and thus food security, there is still pervasive disagreement at the individual level on who should own genetic resources. The aim of the article is to provide conceptual clarification on the following concepts and their relation to agrobiodiversity stewardship: open access, commons, private property, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Doxastic Correctness.Pascal Engel - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):199-216.
    Normative accounts of the correctness of belief have often been misconstrued. The norm of truth for belief is a constitutive norm which regulates our beliefs through ideals of reason. I try to show that this kind of account can meet some of the main objections which have been raised against normativism about belief: that epistemic reasons enjoy no exclusivity, that the norm of truth does not guide, and that normativism cannot account for suspension of judgement.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  46.  20
    Quantity Implicatures.Bart Geurts - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
    Gricean pragmatics. Saying vs. implicating ; Discourse and cooperation ; Conversational implicatures ; Generalised vs. particularised ; Cancellability ; Gricean reasoning and the pragmatics of what is said -- The standard recipe for Q-implicatures. The standard recipe ; Inference to the best explanation ; Weak implicatures and competence ; Relevance ; Conclusion -- Scalar implicatures. Horn scales and the generative view ; Implicatures and downward entailing environments ; Disjunction : exclusivity and ignorance ; Conclusion -- Psychological plausibility. Charges of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  47. Belief and Aims.Conor McHugh - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):425-439.
    Does belief have an aim? According to the claim of exclusivity, non-truth-directed considerations cannot motivate belief within doxastic deliberation. This claim has been used to argue that, far from aiming at truth, belief is not aim-directed at all, because the regulation of belief fails to exhibit a kind of interaction among aims that is characteristic of ordinary aim-directed behaviour. The most prominent reply to this objection has been offered by Steglich-Petersen (Philos Stud 145:395–405, 2009), who claims that exclusivity (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  48.  1
    A Nonprofit Perspective on Business–Nonprofit Partnerships: Extending the Symbiotic Sustainability Model.Amy O’Connor, Yuli Patrick Hsieh & Michelle Shumate - 2018 - Business and Society 57 (7):1337-1373.
    Using the symbiotic sustainability model as a framework, this research investigates how many and with which businesses top nonprofit organizations report partnerships. We examined the websites of the 122 largest, most recognizable U.S. nonprofits. These websites included information about 2,418 business–nonprofit partnerships with 1,707 unique businesses. The results suggest key differences with previous research on how U.S. Fortune 500 companies report B2N partnerships. Leading nonprofits report more B2N partnerships than U.S. Fortune 500 companies do. Furthermore, nonprofits do not maintain industry (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. Socially Extended Intentions-in-Action.Olle Blomberg - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):335-353.
    According to a widely accepted constraint on the content of intentions, here called the exclusivity constraint, one cannot intend to perform another agent’s action, even if one might be able to intend that she performs it. For example, while one can intend that one’s guest leaves before midnight, one cannot intend to perform her act of leaving. However, Deborah Tollefsen’s (2005) account of joint activity requires participants to have intentions-in-action (in John Searle’s (1983) sense) that violate this constraint. I (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  50.  8
    Reformulating the Buddhist Free Will Problem: Why There Can Be No Definitive Solution.Katie Javanaud - 2018 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 46 (4):773-803.
    In recent years, scholars have become increasingly interested in reconstructing a Buddhist stance on the free will problem. Since then, Buddhism has been variously described as implicitly hard determinist, paleo-compatibilist, neo-compatibilist and libertarian. Some scholars, however, question the legitimacy of Buddhist free will theorizing, arguing that Buddhism does not share sufficiently many presuppositions required to articulate the problem. This paper argues that, though Buddhist and Western versions of the free will problem are not perfectly isomorphic, a problem analogous to that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 140