Search results for 'judgments' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  54
    Tim Barnett & Cheryl Vaicys (2000). The Moderating Effect of Individuals' Perceptions of Ethical Work Climate on Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):351 - 362.
    Dimensions of the ethical work climate, as conceptualized by Victor and Cullen (1988), are potentially important influences on individual ethical decision-making in the organizational context. The present study examined the direct and indirect effects of individuals' perceptions of work climate on their ethical judgments and behavioral intentions regarding an ethical dilemma. A national sample of marketers was surveyed in a scenario-based research study. The results indicated that, although perceived climate dimensions did not have a direct effect on behavioral intentions, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   49 citations  
  2.  11
    Peter E. Mudrack & E. Sharon Mason (2013). Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):575-597.
    Investigations into ethical judgments generally seem fuzzy as to the relevant research domain. We first attempted to clarify the construct and determine domain parameters. This attempt required addressing difficulties associated with pinpointing relevant literature, most notably the varied nomenclature used to refer to ethical judgments (individual evaluations of actions’ ethicality). Given this variation in construct nomenclature and the difficulties it presented in identifying pertinent focal studies, we elected to focus on research that cited papers featuring prominent and often-used (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3.  6
    Peter E. Mudrack & E. Sharon Mason (2013). Dilemmas, Conspiracies, and Sophie's Choice: Vignette Themes and Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):639-653.
    Knowledge about ethical judgments has not advanced appreciably after decades of research. Such research, however, has rarely addressed the possible importance of the content of such judgments; that is, the material appearing in the brief vignettes or scenarios on which survey respondents base their evaluations. Indeed, this content has seemed an afterthought in most investigations. This paper closely examined the vast array of vignettes that have appeared in relevant research in an effort to reduce this proliferation to a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Bronwyn Finnigan (2015). Madhyamaka Buddhist Meta-Ethics: Investigating the Justificatory Grounds of Moral Judgments. Philosophy East and West 65 (3):765-785.
    This paper investigates whether the metaphysical commitments of Madhyamaka Buddhism afford a satisfactory justificatory ground for moral judgments. Finnigan and Tanaka (2011a) argue that they do not. Their argument has since been challenged by Tillemans (2010-11), who alleges that both Svātantrika and Prāsaṅgika Mādhyamikas can readily justify moral judgments by respective appeal to the doctrine of the two truths. This paper shall contest this claim with respect to Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka. It shall provide several arguments to show that Prāsaṅgika (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  41
    John R. Sparks & Yue Pan (2010). Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):405-418.
    Decades of empirical and theoretical research has produced an extensive literature on the ethical judgments construct. Given its importance to understanding people’s ethical choices, future research should explore the psychological processes that produce ethical judgments. In this paper, the authors discuss two steps needed to advance this effort. First, they note that the business ethics literature lacks a single, generally accepted definition of ethical judgments. After reviewing several extant definitions, the authors offer a definition of the construct (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Carolyn Parkinson, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Philipp E. Koralus, Angela Mendelovici, Victoria McGeer & Thalia Wheatley (2011). Is Morality Unified? Evidence That Distinct Neural Systems Underlie Moral Judgments of Harm, Dishonesty, and Disgust. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (10):3162-3180.
    Much recent research has sought to uncover the neural basis of moral judgment. However, it has remained unclear whether "moral judgments" are sufficiently homogenous to be studied scientifically as a unified category. We tested this assumption by using fMRI to examine the neural correlates of moral judgments within three moral areas: (physical) harm, dishonesty, and (sexual) disgust. We found that the judgment ofmoral wrongness was subserved by distinct neural systems for each of the different moral areas and that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  46
    Steven Sverdlik (2004). Intentionality and Moral Judgments in Commonsense Thought About Action. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):224-236.
    The concept of intentional action occupies a central place in commonsense or folk psychological thought. Philosophers of action, psychologists and moral philosophers all have taken an interest in understanding this important concept. One issue that has been discussed by philosophers is whether the concept of intentional action is purely ‘naturalistic’, that is, whether it is entirely a descriptive concept that can be used to explain and predict behavior. (Of course, judgments using such a concept could be used to support (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  8.  13
    Rosemary Hunter (2012). The Power of Feminist Judgments? Feminist Legal Studies 20 (2):135-148.
    Recent years have seen the advent of two feminist judgment-writing projects, the Women’s Court of Canada, and the Feminist Judgments Project in England. This article analyses these projects in light of Carol Smart’s feminist critique of law and legal reform and her proposed feminist strategies in Feminism and the Power of Law (1989). At the same time, it reflects on Smart’s arguments 20 years after their first publication and considers the extent to which feminist judgment-writing projects may reinforce or (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9. Gunnar Björnsson & Karl Persson (2009). Judgments of Moral Responsibility – a Unified Account. In [2009] Society for Philosophy and Psychology, 35th Annual Meeting (Bloomington, IN; June 12-14). 326-354.
    Recent work in experimental philosophy shows that folk intuitions about moral responsibility are sensitive to a surprising variety of factors. Whether people take agents to be responsible for their actions in deterministic scenarios depends on whether the deterministic laws are couched in neurological or psychological terms (Nahmias et. al. 2007), on whether actions are described abstractly or concretely, and on how serious moral transgression they seem to represent (Nichols & Knobe 2007). Finally, people are more inclined to hold an agent (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Richard Bradley, Franz Dietrich & Christian List (2014). Aggregating Causal Judgments. Philosophy of Science 81 (4):491-515.
    Decision-making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effects of our actions and the causal relevance of various environmental factors. We investigate how several individuals' causal judgments can be aggregated into collective causal judgments. First, we consider the aggregation of causal judgments via the aggregation of probabilistic judgments, and identify the limitations of this approach. We then explore the possibility of aggregating causal judgments independently of probabilistic ones. Formally, we (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  90
    Jan Almäng (2014). Perception, Non-Propositional Content and the Justification of Perceptual Judgments. Metaphysica 15 (1):1-23.
    It is often argued that for a perceptual experience to be able to justify perceptual judgments, the perceptual experience must have a propositional content. For, it is claimed, only propositions can bear logical relations such as implication to each other. In this paper, this claim is challenged. It is argued that whereas perceptions and judgments both have intentional content, their contents have different structures. Perceptual content does not have a propositional structure. Perceptions and judgments can nevertheless have (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  29
    John Cherry (2006). The Impact of Normative Influence and Locus of Control on Ethical Judgments and Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):113-132.
    The study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) in a cross-cultural setting, incorporating ethical judgments and locus of control in a comparison of Taiwanese and US businesspersons. A self-administered survey of 698 businesspersons from the US and Taiwan examined several hypothesized differences. Results indicate that while Taiwanese respondents have a more favorable attitude toward a requested bribe than US counterparts, and are less likely to view it as an ethical issue, their higher locus externality causes ethical judgments (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  6
    Sanjay Putrevu & Krist Swimberghek (2013). The Influence of Religiosity on Consumer Ethical Judgments and Responses Toward Sexual Appeals. Journal of Business Ethics 115 (2):351-365.
    This research explores the influence of religiosity on consumer perception of, and response toward, sexual appeals. The first study (survey, national sample; n = 423) examines the relationship between religiosity and consumer response toward sexual appeals using causal modeling. Study 1 finds that high intrinsic religiosity consumers exhibit more adverse ethical judgments toward the company’s use of sexual appeals and these judgments, in turn, result in inferior attitudes and purchase intent toward the advertised brand. To confirm and expand (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  24
    Jos V. M. Welie (2001). Living Wills and Substituted Judgments: A Critical Analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.
    In the literature three mechanisms are commonly distinguished to make decisions about the care of incompetent patients: A living will, a substituted judgment by a surrogate (who may or may not hold the power of attorney ), and a best interest judgment. Almost universally, the third mechanism is deemed the worst possible of the three, to be invoked only when the former two are unavailable. In this article, I argue in favor of best interest judgments. The evermore common aversion (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  10
    Davide Mazzi (2010). “This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):373-385.
    The centrality of argumentation in the judicial process is an age-old acquisition of research on legal discourse. Notwithstanding the deep insights provided by legal theoretical and philosophical works, only recently has judicial argumentation been tackled in its linguistic dimension. This paper aims to contribute to the development of linguistic studies of judicial argumentation, by shedding light on evaluation as a prominent aspect in the construction of the judge’s argumentative position. Evaluation as a deep structure of judicial argumentation is studied from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  24
    V. Villa (1997). Legal Theory and Value Judgments. Law and Philosophy 16 (4):447-477.
    The aim of the paper is that of putting into question the dichotomy between fact-judgments and value judgments in the legal domain, with its epistemological presuppositions (descriptivist image of knowledge) and its methodological implications for legal knowledge (value freedom principle and neutrality thesis). The basic question that I will try to answer is whether and on what conditions strong ethical value-judgments belong within legal knowledge. I criticize the traditional positivist positions that have fully accepted the value-freedom principle (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  51
    Daniele Porello (2010). Ranking Judgments in Arrow's Setting. Synthese 173 (2):199 - 210.
    In this paper, I investigate the relationship between preference and judgment aggregation, using the notion of ranking judgment introduced in List and Pettit (Synthese 140(1–2):207–235, 2004). Ranking judgments were introduced in order to state the logical connections between the impossibility theorem of aggregating sets of judgments proved in List and Pettit (Economics and Philosophy 18:89–110, 2002) and Arrow’s theorem (Arrow, Social choice and individual values, 1963). I present a proof of the theorem concerning ranking judgments as a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  5
    Tracy A. Suter, Steven W. Kopp & David M. Hardesty (2004). The Relationship Between General Ethical Judgments and Copying Behavior at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (1):61-70.
    Electronic technologies, in general, and computer-oriented technologies specifically have had a tremendous impact on all aspects of business. One area of increased concern is the protection of intellectual properties -- notably copyrights -- within the boundaries of the broadly defined technology industry. While the ability to share copyrighted information has always existed at the most basic levels, the advent of the information age has allowed the sharing of this information to take place in potentially greater quantities and without a loss (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  4
    Aaron Strickland (2016). Poetic Justice: An Interpretation of Lawyers’ Reactions to Verse Judgments. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (3):643-666.
    This article offers an interpretation of lawyers’ reactions to verse judgments, being judicial decisions rendered in rhymed poetry form. While, in recent history, there has been an unexplained break in the close historical connection between poetry and law, some judges nevertheless continue to render their judicial decisions in verse. This has met strong criticism from fellow judges, inevitably, but also from lawyers. However, there is no evidence in academic writing of anyone attempting to explain why lawyers are having these (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  26
    Wolfgang Bender, Katrin Platzer & Kristina Sinemus (1995). On the Assessment of Genetic Technology: Reaching Ethical Judgments in the Light of Modern Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):21-32.
    The “Model for Reaching Ethical Judgments in the context of Modern Technologies — the Case of Genetic Technology”, which is presented here, has arisen from the project “Ethical Criteria bearing upon Decisions taken in the field of Biotechnology”. This project has been pursued since 1991 in the Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung (ZIT) of the Technical University of Darmstadt, with the purpose of examining decision-making in selected activities involving the production of transgenic plants that have a useful application. The model (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    Lyra Jakulevičienė (2012). Lessons of the First EU Court of Justice Judgments in Asylum Cases. Jurisprudence 19 (2):477-505.
    Starting from 2009, national courts of the EU Member States for the first time gained a “real” right to request the EU Court of Justice for preliminary rulings in asylum matters. First judgments of this Court demonstrate equivocal tendencies: some are blaming the Court for incompetence in asylum matters, others believe that the adoption of authoritative decisions at the European level will assist in developing consistent practice of applying asylum law in the European Union, something that failed at international (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Christopher Michael Cloos (2009). The Evidential Weight of Considered Moral Judgments. Dissertation, San Jose State University
    The input objection to reflective equilibrium (RE) claims that the method fails as a method of moral justification. According to the objection considered moral judgments(CMJs) are not truth‐conducive. Because the method uses inputs that are not credible the method does not generate justified moral beliefs. I solve the input objection by reinterpreting RE using contemporary developments in ethical intuitionism. In the first half of the thesis I setup the input objection, explore potential responses to the objection and uncover the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  2
    Stanley J. Rule, Ronald C. Laye & Dwight W. Curtis (1974). Magnitude Judgments and Difference Judgments of Lightness and Darkness: A Two-Stage Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1108.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   62 citations  
  24. Lawrence M. Ward (1972). Category Judgments of Loudness in the Absence of an Experimenter-Induced Identification Function: Sequential Effects and Power-Function Fit. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (2):179.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   62 citations  
  25.  1
    Katherine E. Baker & Frank J. Dudek (1955). Weight Scales From Ratio Judgments and Comparisons of Existent Weight Scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (5):293.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   59 citations  
  26.  2
    Manuel Leon & Norman H. Anderson (1974). A Ratio Rule From Integration Theory Applied to Inference Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):27.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  27.  3
    Norman H. Anderson (1974). Cross-Task Validation of Functional Measurement Using Judgments of Total Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):226.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  28.  2
    Dwight W. Curtis (1970). Magnitude Estimations and Category Judgments of Brightness and Brightness Intervals: A Two-Stage Interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):201.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  29.  1
    Lawrence M. Ward & G. R. Lockhead (1970). Sequential Effects and Memory in Category Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  30.  5
    David L. Krantz & Donald T. Campbell (1961). Separating Perceptual and Linguistic Effects of Context Shifts Upon Absolute Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (1):35.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  31.  6
    O. J. Harvey & Donald T. Campbell (1963). Judgments of Weight as Affected by Adaptation Range, Adaptation Duration, Magnitude of Unlabeled Anchor, and Judgmental Language. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  32.  3
    W. R. Garner (1952). An Equal Discriminability Scale for Loudness Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (3):232.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  33.  3
    Trygg Engen & Ülker Tulunay (1957). Some Sources of Error in Half-Heaviness Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (3):208.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  34.  89
    Andrea Sauchelli (2016). The Acquaintance Principle, Aesthetic Judgments, and Conceptual Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 50 (1):1-15.
    The Acquaintance Principle is the principle according to which judgements concerning the aesthetic value of a work of art proffered by a critic must be based on the critic’s experience(s) or acquaintance with the work itself. The possible exception to this principle would be experiences obtained through other means of transmissibility, related in a particular way to the work in question, that can eventually provide the critic with an adequate basis for judging the artwork. However, recent philosophers claimed that some (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    John M. Parkman (1971). Temporal Aspects of Digit and Letter Inequality Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):191.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  36.  5
    Ellen Kimmel (1967). Judgments of Ucs Intensity and Diminution of the Ucr in Classical Gsr Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):532.
  37.  7
    Michael H. Birnbaum (1972). Morality Judgments: Tests of an Averaging Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):35.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  38.  5
    W. R. Garner (1953). An Informational Analysis of Absolute Judgments of Loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (5):373.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39.  3
    Arthur J. Flexser & Gordon H. Bower (1974). How Frequency Affects Recency Judgments: A Model for Recency Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):706.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  10
    Muzafer Sherif, Daniel Taub & Carl I. Hovland (1958). Assimilation and Contrast Effects of Anchoring Stimuli on Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (2):150.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  3
    Sanford Goldstone, William K. Boardman & William T. Lhamon (1959). Intersensory Comparisons of Temporal Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):243.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  42.  7
    H. Moran & C. C. Pratt (1926). Variability of Judgments on Musical Intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology 9 (6):492.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  6
    Robert J. Gatchel & Peter J. Lang (1973). Accuracy of Psychophysical Judgments and Physiological Response Amplitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):175.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  11
    Katherine E. Baker & Irene Mackintosh (1955). The Influence of Past Associations Upon Attributive Color Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (4):281.
  45.  3
    William J. McGill (1957). Serial Effects in Auditory Threshold Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (5):297.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46.  6
    Robert G. Pachella & Dennis F. Fisher (1969). Effect of Stimulus Degradation and Similarity on the Trade-Off Between Speed and Accuracy in Absolute Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  9
    L. Arons & F. W. Irwin (1932). Equal Weights and Psychophysical Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (6):733.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    Stephen H. Ellis (1972). Interaction of Encoding and Retrieval in Relative Age Judgments: An Extension of the "Crossover" Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (3):291-294.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  6
    H. Jasper & C. Shagass (1941). Conscious Time Judgments Related to Conditioned Time Intervals and Voluntary Control of the Alpha Rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):503-508.
  50.  3
    Thomas R. Corwin & Robert M. Boynton (1968). Transitivity of Visual Judgments of Simultaneity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):560.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000