Search results for 'knowledge of action' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
  1. Thor Grünbaum (2011). Perception and Non-Inferential Knowledge of Action. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):153 - 167.
    I present an account of how agents can know what they are doing when they intentionally execute object-oriented actions. When an agent executes an object-oriented intentional action, she uses perception in such a way that it can fulfil a justificatory role for her knowledge of her own action and it can fulfil this justificatory role without being inferentially linked to the cognitive states that it justifies. I argue for this proposal by meeting two challenges: in an agent's (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. John Schwenkler (2012). Non-Observational Knowledge of Action. Philosophy Compass 7 (10):731-740.
    Intuitively, the knowledge of one’s own intentional actions is different from the knowledge of actions of other sorts, including those of other people and unintentional actions of one's own. But how are we to understand this phenomenon? Does it pertain to all actions, under every description under which they are known? If so, then how is this possible? If not, then how should we think about cases that are exceptions to this principle? This paper is a critical survey (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. James R. Beebe & Mark Jensen (2012). Surprising Connections Between Knowledge and Action: The Robustness of the Epistemic Side-Effect Effect. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):689 - 715.
    A number of researchers have begun to demonstrate that the widely discussed ?Knobe effect? (wherein participants are more likely to think that actions with bad side-effects are brought about intentionally than actions with good or neutral side-effects) can be found in theory of mind judgments that do not involve the concept of intentional action. In this article we report experimental results that show that attributions of knowledge can be influenced by the kinds of (non-epistemic) concerns that drive the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  4.  16
    Warren G. Frisina (2002). The Unity of Knowledge and Action: Toward a Nonrepresentational Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press.
    Uses the thought of Wang Yang-ming, John Dewey, and Alfred North Whitehead to explain a more coherent theory of knowledge.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  50
    Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.) (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
    CHAPTER Simulation theory and mental concepts Alvin I. Goldman Rutgers University. Folk psychology and the TT-ST debate The study of folk psychology, ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  6.  53
    Xiaomei Yang (2009). How to Make Sense of the Claim “True Knowledge is What Constitutes Action”: A New Interpretation of Wang Yangming's Doctrine of Unity of Knowledge and Action. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):173-188.
    No one denies the importance of applying knowledge to actions. But claiming identity (unity) of knowledge and action is quite another thing. There seem to be two problems with the claim: (1) the identity claim implies that the sole cause for one to fail to act on what one judges to be right is ignorance, but it is obviously false that the sole cause of failure in moral actions is ignorance. (2) The identity statement implies non-separation of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  34
    John Dewey (1929). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York, Putnam.
    John Dewey's Gifford Lectures, given at Edinburgh in 1929.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   53 citations  
  8.  30
    Nicolas Georgieff & Yves Rossetti (1999). How Does Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Fit in the Consciousness of Action? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):765-766.
    Dienes & Perner's (D&P's) target articles proposes an analysis of explicit knowledge based on a progressive transformation of implicit into explicit products, applying this gradient to different aspects of knowledge that can be represented. The goal is to integrate a philosophical concept of knowledge with relevant psychophysical and neuropsychological data. D&P seem to fill an impressive portion of the gap between these two areas. We focus on two examples where a full synthesis of theoretical and empirical data (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Dr Eugenie Georgaca (2000). Participation, Knowledge and Power in 'New' Forms of Action Research. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 2 (1):43-59.
    The paper uses the Offenders' Social Reintegration Project, run between 1988 and 1998 by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, to discuss the characteristics of new forms of action research and to reflect on the main debates within action research literature. Firstly, new forms of action research dealing with community issues tend to take place within complex systems, aiming to bring potential partners together and to facilitate the development of networks of organisations. Networking presupposes a more open-ended (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. R. I. Ingalalli (1992). Knowledge of Action: Logico-Epistemological Analysis. Sri Satguru Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  81
    Hanna Pickard (2004). Knowledge of Action Without Observation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):203–228.
    This paper argues that perception of one's body ‘from the inside’ provides one with an awareness of acting, and that this awareness explains a previously overlooked feature of one's knowledge of one's own actions. Actions are events: they occur during periods of time. Knowledge of such events must be sensitive to their course through time. Perception of one's body ‘from the inside’ allows one to monitor one's actions as they unfold, thereby sustaining one's knowledge of what one (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  21
    Biswatosh Saha & Ram Kumar Kakani (2007). Knowledge, Power and Action: Towards an Understanding of Implementation Failures in a Government Scheme. [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (1-2):72-92.
    Conceptual knowledge inspires imagination. On the other hand, it is a claim to power as well. Multiple knowledge claims often, therefore, are engaged in a contest. This contest can take the form of several discourses. Extant power structures play a significant role in lending (or not lending) a voice to one or several such discourses. To one with the power to govern, knowledge claims flowing from abstract concepts generated in an elite discourse not only inspires imagination but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  78
    Cheng-Hung Tsai (2015). Knowledge of Language in Action. Philosophical Explorations 18 (1):68-89.
    Knowledge of a language is a kind of knowledge, the possession of which enables a speaker to understand and perform a variety of linguistic actions in that language. In this paper, I pursue an agency-oriented approach to knowledge of language. I begin by examining two major agency-oriented models of knowledge of language: Michael Dummett's Implicit Knowledge Model and Jennifer Hornsby's Practical Knowledge Model. I argue that each of these models is inadequate for different reasons. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. John Law (ed.) (1986). Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  15. Thor Grunbaum (2009). Anscombe and Practical Knowledge of What Is Happening. Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):41-67.
    On the face of it, conflicting constraints are placed on agents' knowledge of their own action: it is demanded that that which is known is an event happening in the “outside world”, but that the way in which it is known is “from the inside”. I propose to look at the way in which Anscombe sets up this epistemological puzzle and attempts to solve it. I discuss two ways in which Anscombe proposes to dissolve the paradox of agents' (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  36
    Charity Anderson (2015). On the Intimate Relationship of Knowledge and Action. Episteme 12 (3):343-353.
    Pragmatic encroachment offers a picture of knowledge whereby knowledge is unstable. This paper argues that pragmatic encroachment is committed to more instability than has been hitherto noted. One surprising result of the arguments in this paper is that pragmatic encroachment is not merely about changes in stakes. All sorts of practical factors can make for the presence or absence of knowledge on this picture stakes-sensitivity’ is misleading. Furthermore, insufficient attention has been paid to the variety of ways (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. John Hawthorne & Jason Stanley (2008). Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):571-590.
    Judging by our folk appraisals, then, knowledge and action are intimately related. The theories of rational action with which we are familiar leave this unexplained. Moreover, discussions of knowledge are frequently silent about this connection. This is a shame, since if there is such a connection it would seem to constitute one of the most fundamental roles for knowledge. Our purpose in this paper is to rectify this lacuna, by exploring ways in which knowing something (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   116 citations  
  18.  93
    Duncan Pritchard (2010). The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations. Oxford University Press.
    The value problem -- Unpacking the value problem -- The swamping problem -- fundamental and non-fundamental epistemic goods -- The relevance of epistemic value monism -- Responding to the swamping problem I : the practical response -- Responding to the swamping problem II : the monistic response -- Responding to the swamping problem III : the pluralist response -- Robust virtue epistemology -- Knowledge and achievement -- Interlude : is robust virtue epistemology a reductive theory of knowledge? -- (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   68 citations  
  19. Junjun Liu (2005). Zhi Shi Yu She Hui Xing Dong de Jie Gou: Zhi Shi She Hui de Li Lun Yu Shi Jian Yan Jiu = Knowledge and the Structure of Social Action: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Knowledge Society. Tianjin Ren Min Chu Ban She.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jonathan Weisberg (2013). Knowledge in Action. Philosophers' Imprint 13 (22).
    Recent proposals that frame norms of action in terms of knowledge have been challenged by Bayesian decision theorists. Bayesians object that knowledge-based norms conflict with the highly successful and established view that rational action is rooted in degrees of belief. I argue that the knowledge-based and Bayesian pictures are not as incompatible as these objectors have made out. Attending to the mechanisms of practical reasoning exposes space for both knowledge and degrees of belief to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  10
    Vinayak Chaturvedi (2010). Rethinking Knowledge with Action: V. D. Savarkar, the Bhagavad Gita, and Histories of Warfare. Modern Intellectual History 7 (2):417-435.
    This essay examines the significance of the Bhagavad Gita for V. D. Savarkar's interpretations of religion, nationalism, and the idea of Hindu India. As one of the intellectual founders of Hindu nationalism, Savarkar has emerged as the most controversial Indian political thinker of the last century, gaining notoriety for his program to , for his anti-Muslim and anti-Christian politics, and for his advocacy of violence in everyday life. By bringing together key selections from Savarkar's seminal historical writings, the essay also (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Hanna Pickard (2004). X-Knowledge of Action Without Observation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):205-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  3
    Hanna Pickard (2004). X-Knowledge of Action Without Observation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):203-228.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  11
    Samira Guennif (2002). From Knowledge to Individual Action. Confidence, the Hidden Face of Uncertainty. A Rereading of the Works of Knight and Keynes. Mind and Society 3 (2):13-28.
    The works of Knight (1921) and Keynes (1921, 1936) seek to clarify confusion about uncertainty. According to these authors, a precise analysis of uncertainty is required, in order to obtain a clear significance of the concept and understand the consequences for the decision process. Consequently, Knight and Keynes study the content of the decision process in uncertainty and converge towards similar views on the mobilization of confidence. Their works thus go beyond a simple examination of uncertainty, by also throwing light (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  2
    Ricarda I. Schubotz, Moritz F. Wurm, Marco K. Wittmann & D. Yves von Cramon (2014). Objects Tell Us What Action We Can Expect: Dissociating Brain Areas for Retrieval and Exploitation of Action Knowledge During Action Observation in fMRI. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett (2011). Two Conceptions of Mind and Action: Knowledge How and the Philosophical Theory of Intelligence. In John Bengson & Marc Moffett (eds.), Philosophical Inquiry. Oxford University Press 3-55.
    Perhaps it is a pity that the Theory of Knowledge and the Theory of Conduct have fallen into separate compartments. (It certainly was not so in Socrates’ time, as his interest in the relation between eidos and technê bears witness.) If we studied them together, perhaps we might have a better understanding of both. H.H. Price, Thinking and Representation..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Matthew Chrisman (2012). The Normative Evaluation of Belief and the Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions'. Journal of Philosophy 109 (10):588–612.
    It is a piece of philosophical commonsense that belief and knowledge are states. Some epistemologists reject this claim in hope of answering certain difficult questions about the normative evaluation of belief. I shall argue, however, that this move offends not only against philosophical commonsense but also against ordinary common sense, at least as far as this is manifested in the semantic content of the words we use to talk about belief and knowledge. I think it is relatively easily (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  28. William Child (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Donald M. Peterson (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. William R. Stoeger (2009). Describing God's Action in the World in Light of Scientific Knowledge of Reality. In F. LeRon Shults, Nancey C. Murphy & Robert J. Russell (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Divine Action. Brill
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  7
    Hans Aebli (1984). What Is Intentionality and Who Has Intentions in a Structuralist Model of Knowledge, Action and Thought. Dialectica 38 (2‐3):231-242.
    The philosophical core of a psychological theory of cognitive processes is developped and commented, focussing on the problem of intentionality, this term being taken in the normal and in the phenomenological sense. Actions, perceived processes, their states and results, operations and concepts are seen as related insofar as they all establish relations between elements, are generated by construction and can be objectivated. These acts and/or the objectives that control them, are intentional insofar as their structure is activated. Such activation is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  1
    Christine E. Watson, Eileen R. Cardillo, Bianca Bromberger & Anjan Chatterjee (2014). The Specificity of Action Knowledge in Sensory and Motor Systems. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  29
    Brian Ball (2014). The Knowledge Rule and the Action Rule. Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):552-574.
    In this paper I compare Timothy Williamson's knowledge rule of assertion with Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson's action rule. The paper is in two parts. In the first part I present and respond to Maitra and Weatherson's master argument against the knowledge rule. I argue that while its second premise, to the effect that an action X can be the thing to do though one is in no position to know that it is, is true, its (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    Inderjeet Parmar (2002). `To Relate Knowledge and Action': The Impact of the Rockefeller Foundation on Foreign Policy Thinking During America's Rise to Globalism 1939–1945. [REVIEW] Minerva 40 (3):235-263.
    The Rockefeller Foundation played a key role inthe shift from `isolationism' to globalism inUS foreign policy between 1939 and 1945. TheFoundation utilised its considerable financialresources in a conscious and systematic attemptto assist official policymakers and academicsto build a new globalist consensus within thestate and public opinion. The article testsfour theoretical models that have been used todescribe Rockefeller initiatives. It concludesthat a Gramscian analysis provides the mosthelpful way of understanding the Foundation'srole in American foreign affairs.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Neil Mehta (2015). Knowledge and Other Norms for Assertion, Action, and Belief: A Teleological Account. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):681-705.
    Here I advance a unified account of the structure of the epistemic normativity of assertion, action, and belief. According to my Teleological Account, all of these are epistemically successful just in case they fulfill the primary aim of knowledgeability, an aim which in turn generates a host of secondary epistemic norms. The central features of the Teleological Account are these: it is compact in its reliance on a single central explanatory posit, knowledge-centered in its insistence that knowledge (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  17
    Robert C. Neville (1983). The Unity of Knowledge and Action. Review of Metaphysics 36 (3):703-706.
  37.  1
    Julia Ching, Roger T. Ames, Anthony S. Cua, David L. Hall, Robert C. Neville & Kuang-Ming Wu (1984). Adventures in Cross-Cultural Sensibilities: Some Recent Studies of Chinese and Comparative PhilosophyThe Art of RulershipThe Unity of Knowledge and Action: A Study in Wang Yang-Ming's Moral Psychology .The Uncertain Phoenix: Adventures in Post-Cultural SensibilityThe Tao and the Daimon: Segments of a Religious InquiryChuang Tzu: World Philosopher at Play. Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (3):476.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  23
    John Allen Tucker (1985). A.S. Cua, The Unity of Knowledge and Action: A Study of Wang Yang-Ming's Moral Psychology, University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1982 (12.95, 133pp.). [REVIEW] Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12 (1):97-100.
  39.  1
    Young-Seok Jin (2007). The Unity of Knowledge and Action : Chu Hsi and Wang Yang-Ming. Journal of Moral Education 18 (2):101.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    C. I. Lewis & John Dewey (1930). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):14.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    Chul-Hong Park (2006). The Meaning of Knowledge-Action Unity with Reference to Innate Knowledge of the Good and Whole Knowledge: An Interchange Between Yang-Ming Wang and John Dewey. Journal of Moral Education 18 (1):205.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    William J. Rapaport (1988). Morgenstern Leora. A First Order Theory of Planning, Knowledge, and Action. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Proceedings of the 1986 Conference, Edited by Halpern Joseph Y., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos 1986, Pp. 99–114. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):664-665.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    Burkart Holzner (1991). Knowledge and Action in the Emerging World: Social Science, the Shocks of Global Structural Change, and Policy. Knowledge and Policy 4 (1-2):18-36.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  7
    Mark Johnson (2007). Review of "Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science". By John Mingers. New York: Springer, 2006. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2):312-315.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    William J. Rapaport (1988). Review: Leora Morgenstern, A First Order Theory of Planning, Knowledge, and Action. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):664-665.
  46. Mi-Ran Cha (2004). The Unity of Knowledge and Action as an Aim of Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 15 (2):97.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Sung-Mo Chang (2013). The Unity of Knowledge and Action’ and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 25 (1):1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Peter Janich (1988). Truth as Success of Action. The Constructive Approach in the Philosophy of Science in Scientific Knowledge Socialized. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:313-326.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Young-Sil Noh (2015). The Discrepancy Between Knowledge and Action From the Perspective of Chu Hsi’s Concept of Spirit. Journal of Moral Education 27 (2):109.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Jong-Duk Park (2012). The Naturalness and Self-Integration : The Doctrine of the Unity of Knowledge and Action. Journal of Moral Education 24 (1):1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000