Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Actualism and Possibilism in Ethics" by Travis Timmerman and Yishai Cohen

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Almeida, Michael J., 1992, “The Paradoxes of Feldman’s Neo-Utilitarianism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70(4): 455–468. doi:10.1080/00048409212345331 (Scholar)
Åqvist, Lennart, 1969, “Improved Formulations of Act-Utilitarianism”, Noûs, 3(3): 299. doi:10.2307/2214553 (Scholar)
Baker, Derek, 2012, “Knowing Yourself–And Giving Up On Your Own Agency In The Process”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90(4): 641–656. doi:10.1080/00048402.2011.617761 (Scholar)
Bales, Eugene, 1972, “Utilitarianism, Overall Obligatoriness and Deontic Logic”, Analysis, 32(6): 203–205. doi:10.1093/analys/32.6.203 (Scholar)
Bergström, Lars, 1966, The Alternatives and Consequences of Actions: An Essay on Certain Fundamental Notions in Teleological Ethics, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. (Scholar)
–––, 1968a, “Discussion: Alternatives and Utilitarianism”, Theoria, 34(2): 163–170. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1968.tb00348.x (Scholar)
–––, 1968b, “Utilitarianism and Deontic Logic”, Analysis, 29(2): 43–44. doi:10.1093/analys/29.2.43 (Scholar)
–––, 1971, “Utilitarianism and Alternative Actions”, Noûs, 5(3): 237. doi:10.2307/2214666 (Scholar)
–––, 1973, “On the Coherence of Act-Utilitarianism”, Analysis, 33(3): 98–102. doi:10.1093/analys/33.3.98 (Scholar)
–––, 1976, “On the Formulation and Application of Utilitarianism”, Noûs, 10(2): 121–144. doi:10.2307/2214572 (Scholar)
Brown, Campbell, 2018, “Maximalism and the Structure of Acts”, Noûs, 52(4): 752–771. doi:10.1111/nous.12181 (Scholar)
Bykvist, Krister, 2002, “Alternative Actions and the Spirit of Consequentialism”, Philosophical Studies, 107(1): 45–68. doi:10.1023/a:1013191909430 (Scholar)
Cariani, Fabrizio, 2016, “Consequence and Contrast in Deontic Semantics”, Journal of Philosophy, 113(8): 396–416. doi:10.5840/jphil2016113826 (Scholar)
Carlson, Erik, 1995, Consequentialism Reconsidered, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism”, Philosophical Studies, 96(3): 253–268. doi:10.1023/a:1004239306956 (Scholar)
Castañeda, Hector-Neri, 1968, “A Problem for Utilitarianism”, Analysis, 28(4): 141–142. doi:10.1093/analys/28.4.141 (Scholar)
–––, 1969, “Ought, Value, and Utilitarianism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 6(4): 257–275. (Scholar)
–––, 1972, “On the Problem of Formulating a Coherent Act-Utilitarianism”, Analysis, 32(4): 118–124. doi:10.1093/analys/32.4.118 (Scholar)
Cohen, Yishai and Travis Timmerman, 2016, “Actualism Has Control Issues”, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 10(3): 1–19. doi:10.26556/jesp.v10i3.104 (Scholar)
Curran, Angela, 1995, “Utilitarianism and Future Mistakes: Another Look”, Philosophical Studies, 78(1): 71–85. doi:10.1007/bf00989819 (Scholar)
Feldman, Fred, 1986, Doing the Best We Can, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company. (Scholar)
Gauthier, David, 1994, “Assure and Threaten”, Ethics, 104(4): 690–721. doi:10.1086/293651 (Scholar)
Goldman, Holly S. [Holly M. Smith], 1976, “Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection”, The Philosophical Review, 85(4): 449. doi:10.2307/2184275 (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “Doing the Best One Can”, in Values and Morals: Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt, Alvin I. Goldman and Jaegwon Kim (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 185–214. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7634-5_11 (Scholar)
Greenspan, P. S., 1975, “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives”, Journal of Philosophy, 72(10): 259–276. doi:10.2307/2024734 (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “Oughts and Determinism: A Response to Goldman”, The Philosophical Review, 87(1): 77–83. doi:10.2307/2184348 (Scholar)
Gustafsson, Johan E., 2014, “Combinative Consequentialism and the Problem of Act Versions”, Philosophical Studies, 167(3): 585–596. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0114-x (Scholar)
Jackson, Frank, 1985, “On the Semantics and Logic of Obligation”, Mind, 94(374): 177–195. doi:10.1093/mind/xciv.374.177 (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Procrastinate Revisited”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(4): 634–647. doi:10.1111/papq.12051 (Scholar)
Jackson, Frank and Robert Pargetter, 1986, “Oughts, Options, and Actualism”, The Philosophical Review, 95(2): 233–255. doi:10.2307/2185591 (Scholar)
Humberstone, I. L., 1983, “The Background of Circumstances”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64(1): 19–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00181.x (Scholar)
Kiesewetter, Benjamin, 2018, “Contrary-to-Duty Scenarios, Deontic Dilemmas, and Transmission Principles”, Ethics, 129(1): 98–115. doi:10.1086/698734 (Scholar)
Lehrer, Keith, 1968, “Cans without Ifs”, Analysis, 29(1): 29–32. doi:10.1093/analys/29.1.29 (Scholar)
Lewis, David K., 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973. Reprinted with revisions, 1986. (Scholar)
Louise, Jennie, 2009, “I Won’t Do It! Self-Prediction, Moral Obligation and Moral Deliberation”, Philosophical Studies, 146(3): 327–348. doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9258-5 (Scholar)
McClennen, Edward F., 1990, Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
McKinsey, Michael, 1979, “Levels of Obligation”, Philosophical Studies, 35(4): 385–395. doi:10.1007/bf00368053 (Scholar)
Portmore, Douglas W., 2011, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794539.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2017a, “Maximalism versus Omnism about Permissibility”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(S1): 427–452. doi:10.1111/papq.12186 (Scholar)
–––, 2017b, “Maximalism versus Omnism about Reasons”, Philosophical Studies, 174(12): 2953–2972. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0819-8 (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Maximalism and Moral Harmony”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(2): 318–341. doi:10.1111/phpr.12304 (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Prawitz, Dag, 1968, “A Discussion Note on Utilitarianism1”, Theoria, 34(1): 76–84. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1968.tb00340.x (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “The Alternatives to an Action”, Theoria, 36(2): 116–126. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00414.x (Scholar)
Ross, Jacob, 2012, “Actualism, Possibilism, and Beyond”, in Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2:74–96. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662951.003.0004 (Scholar)
Scanlon, T. M., 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press. (Scholar)
Sobel, Jordan Howard, 1976, “Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes”, Noûs, 10(2): 195. doi:10.2307/2214575 (Scholar)
Stalnaker, Robert C., 1968, “A Theory of Conditionals”, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, 2), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–112. (Scholar)
Thomason, Richmond H., 1981, “Deontic Logic and the Role of Freedom in Moral Deliberation”, in New Studies in Deontic Logic, Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 177–186. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8484-4_8 (Scholar)
Timmerman, Travis, 2015, “Does Scrupulous Securitism Stand-up to Scrutiny? Two Problems for Moral Securitism and How We Might Fix Them”, Philosophical Studies, 172(6): 1509–1528. doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0362-4 (Scholar)
Timmerman, Travis and Yishai Cohen, 2016, “Moral Obligations: Actualist, Possibilist, or Hybridist?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94(4): 672–686. doi:10.1080/00048402.2016.1140789 (Scholar)
Timmerman, Travis and Philip Swenson, 2019, “How to be an Actualist and Blame People”, in David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility (Volume 6), New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Vessel, Jean-Paul, 2009, “Defending a Possibilist Insight in Consequentialist Thought”, Philosophical Studies, 142(2): 183–195. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9182-0 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Against Securitism, the New Breed of Actualism in Consequentialist Thought”, Utilitas, 28(2): 164–178. doi:10.1017/s095382081500028x (Scholar)
Vorobej, M., 2000, “Prosaic Possibilism”, Philosophical Studies, 97(2): 131–136. doi:10.1023/a:1008349904432 (Scholar)
Westphal, Fred, 1972, “Utilitarianism and ‘Conjunctive Acts’: A Reply to Professor Castaneda”, Analysis, 32(3): 82–85. doi:10.1093/analys/32.3.82 (Scholar)
Woodard, Christopher, 2009, “What’s Wrong with Possibilism”, Analysis, 69(2): 219–226. doi:10.1093/analys/anp005 (Scholar)
Zellner, Harold M., 1972, “Utilitarianism and Derived Obligation”, Analysis, 32(4): 124–125. doi:10.1093/analys/32.4.124 (Scholar)
Zimmerman, Michael J., 1986, “Subsidiary Obligation”, Philosophical Studies, 50(1): 65–75. doi:10.1007/bf00355161 (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Where Did I Go Wrong?”, Philosophical Studies, 59(1): 55–77. doi:10.1007/bf00368391 (Scholar)
–––, 1996, The Concept of Moral Obligation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624681 (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “The Relevant Risks to Wrongdoing”, in The Good, The Right, Life And Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman, Kris McDaniel, Jason R. Raibley, Richard Feldman, and Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), New York: Ashgate, 151–172. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511481505 (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Prospective Possibilism”, The Journal of Ethics, 21(2): 117–150. doi:10.1007/s10892-017-9245-1 (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 11:56:08 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...