Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Aesthetic Judgment" by Nick Zangwill
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Barker, John, 2009, “Mathematical Beauty”,
Sztuka i Filozofia, 35: 65–74.
A powerful defence of the claim that mathematical
and logical proofs have aesthetic properties. (Scholar)
- Beardsley, Monroe C., 1958, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
An extraordinary work, impressive in scope, deploying the notion of the aesthetic. The target of Dickie’s critique. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982, The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected Essays, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
A selection of Beardsley’s essays. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, Simon, 1998, Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A defense of expressivism, a modern version of Hume’s sentimentalism. (Scholar)
- Budd, Malcolm, 2001, “The Pure Judgement of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgement”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 41(3): 247–260. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.3.247
Refreshingly less deferential than many writings on Kant. (Scholar)
- Burke, Edmund, 1757 , A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, London: R. and J. Dodsley. Reprinted Harmonsworth: Penguin, 1998.
A classic, although it is sometimes eccentric. (Scholar)
- Burton, Stephan L., 1992, “‘Thick’ Concepts
Revised”, Analysis, 52(1): 28–32.
An insightful account of substantive aesthetic
descriptions, and also of so-called “thick moral
- Cohen, Ted, 1973, “ Aesthetic/Non-Aesthetic and the Concept
of Taste: A Critique of Sibley’s Position”,
Theoria, 39(1–3): 113–152.
Argues that Sibley’s account of what makes
concepts aesthetic will not do. (Scholar)
- Cova, Florian and Nicholas Pain, 2012, “Can Folk Aesthetics Ground Aesthetic Realism?”, Monist, 95(2): 241–263. doi:10.5840/monist201295214
Argues that folk aesthetic is not normativist. (Scholar)
- Dickie, George, 1965, “Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic
Experience”, Journal of Philosophy, 62(5):
Argues that Beardsley’s account of aesthetic
experience will not do. (Scholar)
- Davidson, Donald, 1970 , “Mental Events”, in
Experience and Theory, Lawrence Foster and J. W. Swanson
(eds), Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press and Duckworth.
Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1980, ch. 11. doi:10.1093/0199246270.003.0011
A classic paper in the philosophy of mind arguing
for a version of materialism without strict laws relating the mental
and the physical. (Scholar)
- Fine, Kit, 1994, “Essence and Modality: The Second
Philosophical Perspectives Lecture”, Philosophical
Perspectives, 8: 1–16. doi:10.2307/2214160
Distinguishes essence from modality; of general
philosophical importance. (Scholar)
- Gombrich, Ernst H., 1959, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, London: Phaiden.
Argues for anti-formalism by appeal to indiscernibles. (Scholar)
- Hanslick, Eduard, 1986, On the Musically Beautiful, transl. Geoffrey Payzant, Indianapolis: Hacket.
Classic work of musical aesthetics, first published in 1854. Written with panache and wit. (Scholar)
- Hanslick, Eduard, 1950, Hanslick's Music Criticism, translated and edited by Henry Pleasants, London: Dover.
Critical reviews of Bach and Wagner and others. You almost feel sorry for Wagner reading some of these. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1757 , “Of the Standard of Taste”, page reference is to reprint in Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, Eugene Miller (ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Liberty, 1985.
Hume’s classic attempt to reconcile sentimentalism with normativity. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel, 1790 , Critique of the Power of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft), page reference to the 2000 translation by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Includes the idea that judgments of beauty and ugliness are subjectively universal, and much else. (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter, 1975, “What Makes ‘Aesthetic’ Terms
Aesthetic?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research, 36(2): 197–211.
Argues that Sibley’s unitary notion of the
aesthetic has no basis. Kivy also makes a positive
- –––, 1991, “Science and Aesthetic Appreciation”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 16(1): 180–195. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1991.tb00238.x
Sympathetic to mathematical beauty. (Scholar)
- Korsgaard, Christine M., 1996, The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511554476
Defends a Kantian view of agency and includes a powerful critique of sentimentalist accounts. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001
Deploys the idea that we aim at a kind of unity in our actions. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold, 2001, “Aesthetic Properties, Evaluative Force, and Differences of Sensibility”, in Aesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley, Emily Brady and Jerrold Levinson (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–80. Reprinted in Jerrold Levinson, Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015: 315–335. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206179.003.0020
Argues for some neutral substantive aesthetic properties. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012, “Musical Beauty”, Teorema, 31(3): 127–135. Reprinted in Jerrold Levinson, Musical Concerns: Essays in Philosophy of Music, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015: 58–66. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669660.003.0006
A nuanced examination of one notion of beauty. (Scholar)
- Mitrović, Branko, 2013, Visuality for Architects:
Architectural Creativity and Modern Theories of Perception and
Imagination, Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
Puts the visual dimension back into
- –––, 2018, “Visuality and Aesthetic Formalism”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 58(2): 147–163. doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayy001
Explores and defends the psychological basis of visual formalism. (Scholar)
- Mothersill, Mary, 1984, Beauty Restored, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
An exploration of the notion of beauty, with some historical coverage. (Scholar)
- Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1887 , On the Genealogy of Morals (Zur Genealogie der Moral: Eine Streitschrift), Maudemarie Clarke and Alan J. Swensen (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1998.
Book 3, sections 1–6. An interesting, and not at all uncareful, critique of Kant’s aesthetics. In this passage he is not concerned with Schopenhauer. (Scholar)
- Scruton, Roger, 1974, Art and Imagination: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind, London: Methuen.
A wide-ranging book, in which the role of imagination is highlighted. (Scholar)
- –––, 1979, The Aesthetics of Architecture, London: Methuen.
A superb discussion of architecture, but also contains much material relevant to more central topics in aesthetics. (Scholar)
- Schellekens, Elisabeth 2007 , “Conceptual Art”,
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 edition),
Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL =
A sympathetic interpretation of some of the claims
of conceptual artists about their work. (Scholar)
- Sibley, Frank, 1959, “Aesthetic Concepts”,
Philosophical Review, 68(4): 421–450; reprinted in
Sibley 2001: 1–23. 10.2307/2182490 &
Sibley’s classic paper, which makes the
notion of the aesthetic central. The target of Cohen and Kivy’s
- –––, 1965, “Aesthetic and Nonaesthetic”, Philosophical Review, 74(2): 135–159; reprinted in Sibley 2001: 33–51. doi:10.2307/2183262 & doi:10.1093/0198238991.003.0003
Explores the dependence of aesthetic features on nonaesthetic features. This paper was originally the second part of Sibley’s paper “Aesthetic Concepts”. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, Approach to Aesthetics, John Benson, Betty Redfern, and Jeremy Roxbee Cox (eds.), Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198238991.001.0001 (Scholar)
- Taruskin, Richard, 1989 , “Resisting the Ninth”,
Nineteenth-Century Music, 12(3): 241–256; reprinted in
his Text and Act: Essays on Music and Performance, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1995: 235–261. doi:10.2307/746505
Agrees with Wagner about the sublime and the
beautiful in Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Essence or
Context”, in Essence and Context, Rima Povilioniene,
Rūta Stanevičiūtė, and Nick Zangwill (eds.), New York:
Argues against a Hanslickean view and argues for a
Wagnerian conception of the sublime in Beethoven. (Scholar)
- Wagner, Richard 1870 , Beethoven, translated by Roger Allen, Boydell Press. Originally published Leipzig: Verlag von E. W. Fritzsche.
Makes claims about the sublime in Beethoven. (Scholar)
- Walton, Kendall 1970, “Categories of Art”, Philosophical Review, 79: 334–367.
Influential series of anti-formalist arguments. (Scholar)
- Zangwill, Nick, 1995 , “The Beautiful, the Dainty and
the Dumpy”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 35(4):
317–329; reprinted slightly modified in Zangwill 2001:
Includes a statement and defense of the centrality
of beauty and ugliness among other aesthetic concepts. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999 , “Feasible Aesthetic
Formalism”, Noûs, 33(4): 610–629; reprinted
in Zangwill 2001: 55–81. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00196
Argues for a “moderate” formalist view
that allows that things can be “dependently beautiful”, in
Kant’s sense. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001, The Metaphysics of Beauty, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Nietzsche on Kant on Beauty and Disinterest”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(1): 75–91. [Zangwill 2013 available online]
Sympathetically interprets and defends Nietzsche’s criticism of Kant on disinterest. (Scholar)
- –––, forthcoming, “Folk Aesthetics and
Normativity: A Critique of Experimental Aesthetics”, in
Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics, Florian
Cova and Sébastien Réhault (eds), London: Bloomsbury.
Criticizes ‘experimental philosophy’,
in general, and in particular the experimental denial that ordinary
aesthetic judgments claim correctness. (Scholar)
- Zemach, Eddy, 1995, Real Beauty, University Park: Penn State Press.
Argues for an extreme realist view. (Scholar)
- Bender, John W., 1995, “General but Defeasible Reasons in Aesthetic Evaluation: The Particularist/Generalist Dispute”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53(4): 379–392. doi:10.2307/430973 (Scholar)
- Dickie, George, 1988, Evaluating Art, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alan, 1995, Aesthetic Value, Boulder, CO: Westview. (Scholar)
- Greenberg, Clement, 1999, Homemade Esthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hopkins, Robert, 2011, “How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony”,, Journal of Philosophy, 108(3): 138–157. doi:10.5840/jphil201110838 (Scholar)
- Kivy, Peter, 1968, “Aesthetic Aspects and Aesthetic Qualities”, Journal of Philosophy, 65(4): 85–93. doi:10.2307/2024481 (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold, 1992 , “Pleasure and the Value of
Works of Art”, The British Journal of Aesthetics,
32(4): 295–306. Reprinted in his The Pleasures of
Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 11–24. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/32.4.295 (Scholar)
- McCloskey, Mary, 1987, Kant’s Aesthetic, New York:
SUNY Press. (Scholar)
- Plato, Hippias Major. In Plato's Complete Works,
edited by John Cooper, Indiapolis: Hackett, 1997.
- Saito, Yuriko, 2001, “Everyday Aesthetics”, Philosophy and Literature, 25)1): 87–95. doi:10.1353/phl.2001.0018 (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, Everyday Aesthetics, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
- Scruton, Roger, 1983, “Understanding Music”, in his The Aesthetic Understanding: Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture, London: Carcanet. (Scholar)
- Zuckert, Rachel, 2007, Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487323 (Scholar)