A. Primary Sources

• Addison, J., and Steele, R., 1879, The Spectator, A. Chalmers (ed.), New York: D. Appleton. (Scholar)
• Alison, A., 1811, Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste, Edinburgh: Bell and Bradfute. (Scholar)
• Augustine, 389–390 [2005], De vera religione in Works of Saint Augustine. A Translation for the 21st Century, Book 1, Volume 8, John E. Rotelle et al. (eds.), New York: New City Press. (Scholar)
• Burke, E., 1757 [1990], A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful, A. Phillips (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cooper, A. (Third Earl of Shaftesbury), 1711 [2001], Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Scholar)
• Gerard, A., 1759, An Essay on Taste, London. (Scholar)
• Gilpin, W., 1794, Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; on Picturesque Travel; and on Sketching Landscape, London. (Scholar)
• Home, H. (Lord Kames), 1762 [2005], The Elements of Criticism, 2 vols, P. Jones (ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Scholar)
• Hume, D., 1739–40 [1987], A Treatise of Human Nature, 2^nd ed., L. A. Shelby-Bigge (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1751 [1986], An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, 3^rd ed., L. A. Shelby-Bigge (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1757 [1987], “Of the Standard of Taste,” in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. E. Miller, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Scholar)
• Hutcheson, F., 1726 [2004], An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, W. Leidhold (ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Scholar)
• –––, 1742 [2002], An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, A. Garrett (ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Scholar)
• –––, 1747, A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, 1^st ed., Glasgow. (Scholar)
• –––, 1755, A System of Moral Philosophy, 2 vols, London. (Scholar)
• Plato, [1989], Symposium, Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
• Plotinus, 250 [1991], The Enneads, Stephen McKenna (trans.), London: Penguin. (Scholar)
• Price, U., 1796, An Essay on the Picturesque, as Compared with the Sublime and Beautiful, London. (Scholar)
• Reid, T., 1785 [1969], Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press. (Scholar)
• Sibley, F., 2001, Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics, J. Benson, B. Redfern, and J. Cox (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Townsend, D. (ed.), 1999, Eighteenth Century British Aesthetics, Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing. (Scholar)

B. Secondary Sources

• Axelsson, K., 2019, Political Aesthetics: Addison and Shaftesbury on Taste, Morals and Society, London: Bloomsbury Academic. (Scholar)
• Bate, W., 1961, From Classic to Romantic: Premises of Taste in Eighteenth-Century England, New York: Harper Torchbooks. (Scholar)
• Brady, E., 2013, The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Cassirer, E., 1955, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, Boston: Beacon Press. (Scholar)
• Copenhaver, R., 2015, “Thomas Reid on Aesthetic Perception,” in Mind, Knowledge and Action: Essays in Honor of Reid’s Tercentenary, ed. T. Buras and R. Copenhaver, Mind Occasional Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Costelloe, T., 2013, The British Aesthetic Tradition From Shaftesbury to Wittgenstein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2012, The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume, London: Routledge Press. (Scholar)
• Deepwell, K., 2022, “Beauty and Its Shadow: A Feminist Critique of Disinterestedness,” in Feminist Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art: The Power of Critical Visions and Creative Engagement, ed. L. R. Musgrave, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
• Dickie, G., 1996, The Century of Taste, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Eaton, A., 2022, “Why Feminists Shouldn’t Deny Disinterestedness,” in Feminist Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art: The Power of Critical Visions and Creative Engagement, ed. L. R. Musgrave, New York: Springer. (Scholar)
• Gill, M., 2021a. “Shaftesbury on the Beauty of Nature,” Journal of Modern Philosophy, 3: 1–18. (Scholar)
• –––, 2021b. “Shaftesbury’s Claim That Beauty and Good Are One and the Same,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 59: 69–92. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018. “Shaftesbury on Life as a Work of Art.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26: 1110–1131. (Scholar)
• Gracyk, T., 1987, “The Failure of Thomas Reid’s Aesthetic Theory,” The Monist, 70: 465–482. (Scholar)
• Guyer, P., 2014, A History of Modern Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “The Origins of Modern Aesthetics: 1711–1735,” in The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, P. Kivy (ed.), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “The dialectic of disinterestedness: I. Eighteenth-century aesthetics,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hipple, W., 1967, The Beautiful, the Sublime, and the Picturesque in Eighteenth Century Aesthetic Theory, Carbondale, Ill.: The Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
• Kail, P., 2000, “Normativity and Function in Hutcheson’s Aesthetic Epistemology,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 40: 441–451. (Scholar)
• Kivy, P., 2007, “The Perception of Beauty in Hutcheson’s First Inquiry: A Reply to James Shelley,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 47: 416–431. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson & Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics, 2^nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Korsmeyer, C., 1995, “Gendered Concepts and Hume’s Standard of Taste,” in Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, eds. P. Brand and C. Korsmeyer, University Park, PA: Penn State Press. (Scholar)
• Michael, E., 1984, “Francis Hutcheson on Aesthetic Perception and Aesthetic Pleasure,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 24: 241–255. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Hutcheson’s Account of Beauty as a Response to Mandeville,” History of European Ideas, 12: 655–668. (Scholar)
• Monk, S., 1960, The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)
• Rind, M., 2002, “The Concept of Disinterestedness in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40: 67–87. (Scholar)
• Shelley, J., 2022, “Intelligible Beauty,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplemental Volume), 96: 147–164. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume,” in The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 3^rd ed., B. Gaut and D. Lopes (eds.), New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Aesthetics and the World at Large,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 47: 169–183. (Scholar)
• Stolnitz, J., 1961a, “On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory,” Philosophical Quarterly, 11: 97–113. (Scholar)
• –––, 1961b, “‘Beauty’: Some Stages in the History of an Idea,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 22: 185–204. (Scholar)
• –––, 1961c, “On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness,’” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20: 131–144. (Scholar)
• Szécsényi, E., 2022, “The aesthetics of the invisible: George Berkeley and the modern aesthetics,” History of European Ideas, 48: 731–743. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017a, “The regard of the first man: on Joseph Addison’s aesthetic categories, ” History of European Ideas, 43: 582–597. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017b, “Landscape and Walking: On Early Aesthetic Experience,” Journal of Scottish Thought, 9: 39–74. (Scholar)
• Townsend, D., 2003, “Thomas Reid and the Theory of Taste,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 341–351. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Sentiment and Taste, London: Routledge Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Lockean Aesthetics,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49: 349–361. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “From Shaftesbury to Kant: The Development of the Concept of Aesthetic Experience,” The Journal of the History of Ideas, 48: 287–305. (Scholar)
• –––, 1982, “Shaftesbury’s Aesthetic Theory,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 41: 205–213. (Scholar)
• Zuckert, R., 2015, “Reid’s Expressivist Aesthetics,” in Mind, Knowledge and Action: Essays in Honor of Reid’s Tercentenary, ed. T. Buras and R. Copenhaver, Mind Occasional Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Kames’s Naturalist Aesthetics and the Case of Tragedy,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 7: 147–162. (Scholar)