Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Alexander of Aphrodisias" by Dorothea Frede

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

A. Primary Sources

1. Commentaries

  • Diels, H. (ed.), 1882–1909, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Berlin: Reimer.
    • Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1891, Vol. 1 On the Metaphysics. (Scholar)
    • Wallies, M. (ed.), 1883, Vol. 2.1 On Prior Analytics 1. (Scholar)
    • Wallies, M. (ed.), 1891, Vol. 2.2. On the Topics. (Scholar)
    • Wallies, M. (ed.), 1898, Vol. 2.3. On Sophistical Refutations. (Scholar)
    • Wendland, P. (ed.), 1901, Vol. 3.1. On De sensu. (Scholar)
    • Hayduck, M. (ed.), 1899, Vol. 3.2. On Meteorology. (Scholar)

2. Treatises considered genuine and fragments

  • Bruns, Ivo (ed.), 1887, 1892, Scripta Minora, vols. 1 and 2, Berlin: Reimer (Scholar)
  • Rescigno, A. (ed), 2004, Alessandro di Afrodisia: Commentario al (De caelo di Aristotele, Frammenti del primo libro), Amsterdam: Hakkert (Scholar)
  • Rashed, M. (ed.), 2011, Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Commentaire perdue à la Physique d’Aristote (livres IV-VIII). Les scholies byzantines, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Groisard, J. (ed.), 2013, Sur la mixtion et la croissance d’ Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Texte établi, trad. et commenté, Paris: Belles Lettres (Scholar)

3. Spuria

  • Kapetanaki, S. & R. W.Sharples, 2006, Pseudo Aristoteles (Pseudo Alexander), Supplementa Problematorum (edited with introduction and annotated translation), Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)

B. Translations

1. Latin translations

  • Alexandre d’Aphrodiasias. Commentaire sur les météores d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, A.J. Smet (ed.), Paris: Nauwelaerts, 1968. (Scholar)
  • Alexandre d’Aphrodisias. De fato ad imperatores: Version latine de Guillaume de Moerbeke, P. Thillet (ed.), Paris: Vrin, 1963. (Scholar)
  • Alexander Aphrodisias: Enarratio de anima ex Aristotelis institutione, Hieronymus Donatus (trans.), reprint of first edition Brescia 1495 (with intr. by Eckard Kessler). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca: Versiones latinae temporis resuctitatarum litterarum, (CAGL.) 13, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2008.
  • Alexander von Aphrodisias: In libros meteorologicorum, Alexander Piccolomineus (trans.), reprint of first edition Venice 1561, with introduction by Cristina Viano, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2010. (Scholar)

2. English translations of the commentaries (with notes):

Richard Sorabji (gen. ed.), London: Duckworth, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Later: London: Bristol Classical Press. Presently: London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 1, W.E. Dooley, 1989. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 2 & 3, W.E. Dooley & A. Madigan, 1992. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 4, A. Madigan, 1993. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 5, W. E. Dooley, 1993. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Meteorology 4, E. Lewis, 1996. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.1–7, J. Barnes et al., 1991. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics I.8–13, I. Mueller with J. Gould, 1999. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics I,14–22. I. Mueller with J. Gould, 1999 (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s On Sense Perception, A. Towey, 2000. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Topics 1, J. M. van Ophuisen, 2001. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Coming-to-Be and Perishing 2.2–5, E. Gannagé, 2005. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.23–31, I. Mueller, 2006. (Scholar)
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics 1.32–46, I. Mueller, 2006. (Scholar)

3. Major Treatises

  • Todd, R. B., 1976, Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics: a study of the De mixtione with preliminary essay (text, translation and commentary), Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Fotinis, A. P., 1980, The De anima of Alexander of Aphrodisias (translation and commentary), Washington, D.C.: University Press of America. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W., 1983, Alexander of Aphrodisias On Fate (text, translation and commentary), London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W, 2004, Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement to On the Soul, London: Duckworth (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W., 2008, Alexander Aphrodisiensis De anima libri mantissa (a new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary), Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Caston, V., 2012, Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Soul: Part I (translation with introduction and commentary), London: Bristol Classical Press. (Scholar)

4. Minor works

  • Sharples, R.W., 1990, Ethical Problems (translation with notes), London: Duckworth and Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W., 1992, Quaestiones 1.2–2.15 (translation with notes), London: Duckworth and Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R.W., 1994, Quaestiones 2.16–3.15 (translation with notes), London: Duckworth and Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)

5. Works extant in Arabic

  • D’Ancona C. & G. Serra, 2002 (eds.), ‘ Alexander On the Principles of the Universe, On Providence, Against Galen on Motion, and On Specific Differences’, in Aristotele et Alessandro di Afrodisia nella tradizione araba, Padova: Il Poligrafo.
  • Genequand, C., 2001, Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Cosmos, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Rescher, N. & M. Marmura, 1969, The Refutation by Alexander of Aphrodisias of Galen’s Treatise on the Theory of Motion (translation with introduction and notes), Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute. (Scholar)
  • Thillet, P., 2003, Alexandre d’Aphrodise: Traité de la providence (Peri pronoias, version Arabe de Abu Bissar Matthae ibn Yunus. Intr. ed. et trad.), Lagrasse: Verdier. (Scholar)

C. Secondary Literature: Overviews

D. Secondary Literature: Studies on Particular Topics

  • Accattino, P., 2005, Alessandro di Afrodisia: De anima II (Mantissa), Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso. (Scholar)
  • Adler, J., 2014, ‘Mortality of the soul from Alexander of Aphrodisias to Spinoza,’ Spinoza and medieval Jewish philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–35. (Scholar)
  • Angelelli, I. & Cerezo, M. (eds.), 1996, Studies on the History of Logic, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 107–127. (Scholar)
  • Bobzien, S., 1998, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Theory of the Stoic Indemonstrables’, in M. Lee (ed.), Strategies of Argument. Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 199–227. (Scholar)
  • Bodnar, I., 1997, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Celestial Motions,’ Phronesis, 42: 190–205. (Scholar)
  • Bonelli, M., 2001, Alessandro di Afrodisia e la metafisica come scienza dimostrativa, Naples: Bibliopolis. (Scholar)
  • Chaniotis, A., 2004, ‘Epigraphic evidence for the philosopher Alexander of Aphrodisias,’ Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 47: 79–81. (Scholar)
  • Coroleu, A., 1996, ‘The Fortuna of Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda’s Translations of Aristotle and of Alexander of Aphrodisias,’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 59: 325–332. (Scholar)
  • Ellis, J., 1994, ‘Alexander’s Defense of Aristotle’s Categories,’ Phronesis, 39: 69–89. (Scholar)
  • Ebbesen, S., 1981, Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Fine, G., 1993, On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Flannery, K., 1995, Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Gaskin, R., 1993, ‘Alexander’s Sea Battle: a discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias De fato 10,’ Phronesis, 38: 75–94. (Scholar)
  • Gili, L., 2011, La sillogistica di Alessandro di Afrodisia (with preface by Paul Thom), Hildesheim: Olms. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, ‘Boeto di Sidone e Alessandro di Afrodisia intorno alla sillogistica,’ Rheinisches Museum, 154: 375–397. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Heterodox dictum de omni et nullo,’ History and Philosophy of Logic, 36: 114–128 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, ‘Categorical me kata chronon-propositions in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Modal Syllogistic,’ Apeiron, 48: 466–482. (Scholar)
  • Gutas, D., 1988, Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Hahmann, A., 2005, Was ist Willensfreiheit?: Alexander von Aphrodisias Über das Schicksal, Marburg: Tectum. (Scholar)
  • Harlfinger, D. & W. Leszl (eds.), 1975, Il “De ideis”di Aristotele e la teoria Platonica delle idee, Florence: Olschki. (Scholar)
  • Kessler, E., 2011, Alexander of Aphrodisias and his doctrine of the soul: 1400 years of lasting significance, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
  • Kotwick, M., 2016, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • Kupreeva, I., 2004, ‘Qualities and Bodies: Alexander against the Stoics.’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 25: 297–334. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Mixture and Growth,’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 27: 297–334. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Form. A discussion of Marwan Rashed, Essentialisme,’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 38: 211–249. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias and Aristotle’s De anima: What is in a commentary?’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 55: 109–129. (Scholar)
  • Lee, T. S., 1984, Die griechische Tradition der aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike, Hypomnemata 79, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (Scholar)
  • Madigan, A., 1987, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: The Book of Ethical Problems,’ in W. Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1987, pp. 1260–1279. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, ‘Alexander on Species and Genera,’ in L. Schrenk (ed.), Aristotle in Late Antiquity. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 74–91. (Scholar)
  • Mansfeld, J., 1988, ‘Diaphonia: the argument of Alexander, de fato chs. 1–2,‘ Phronesis, 33: 181–207. (Scholar)
  • Mignucci, M., 1985,‘Logic and omniscience: Alexander of Aphrodisias and Proclus,’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3: 219–246. (Scholar)
  • Mittelmann, J., 2013, ‘Neoplatonic sailors and Peripatetic Ships: Aristotle, Alexander, and Philoponus‘, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51: 545–566. (Scholar)
  • Movia, G. (ed.), 2003, Alessandro di Afrodisia et la Metafisica di Aristotele, Milan: Vita e pensiero universita. (Scholar)
  • Opsomer, J. & R. W. Sharples, 2000, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias, De intellectu 110.4: “I heard this from Aristotle”. A modest proposal,’ Classical Quarterly, 50: 252–256. (Scholar)
  • Rashed, M., 2010, ‘Alexander of Aphrosisias on Particulars and the Stoic Criterion of Identity,’ in R. Sharples (ed.), Particulars in Greek Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 157–179. (Scholar)
  • Rashed, M., 2011, ‘Un corpus de logique anti-platonicienne d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise,’ in T. Benatouil et al. (eds.), Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity, Hildesheim: Olms. (Scholar)
  • Rist, J. M., 1966, ‘On tracking Alexander of Aphrodisias,’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 48: 82–90. (Scholar)
  • Salis, R., 2005, Il commento di pseudo-Alessandro al libro Λ della Metafisica di Aristotele, Padua: Rubbettino. (Scholar)
  • Salles, R., 1998, ‘Categorical Possiblity and Incompatibilism in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Theory of Responsibility,’ Methexis, 11: 65–83. (Scholar)
  • Schroeder, F. M. & R. B. Todd, 1990, Two Aristotelian Commentators on the Intellect: The De intellectu attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius’ Paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima 3.4–8, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. (Scholar)
  • Sharples, R. W., 1990, ‘The School of Alexander?’ in Sorabji (ed.) 1990, 83–111. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994, ‘On Body, Soul and Generation in Alexander of Aphrodisias,’ Apeiron, 27: 163–170. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, ‘On being a tode ti in Aristotle and Alexander,’ Methexis, 12: 77–87. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001a, ‘Determinism, Responsibility and Chance,’ in Moraux 2001, 513–592. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001b, ‘Other Ethical Problems,’ in Moraux 2001, 593–616. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: what is a mantissa?’ in P. Adamson et al. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Latin and Arabic Commentaries, London: Institute of Classical Studies Bulletin, Suppl. 83.1, pp. 51–69. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004,‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on the nature and location of vision,’ in R. Salles (ed.) Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes frorm the Work of Richard Sorabji, Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 345–362. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005,‘ Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts,’ Phronesis, 50: 43–55. (Scholar)
  • Sirkel, R., 2011, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Account of Universals and its Problems,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49: 297–314. (Scholar)
  • Smith, Robin, 1998, ‘Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias,’ Ancient Philosophy, 18: 206–210. (Scholar)
  • Tweedale, M.M., 1984, ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias’ views on universals,’ Phronesis, 29: 279–303. (Scholar)
  • Weidemann, H., 1996 ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias, Cicero, and Aristotle’s Definition of Possibility,’ in I. Angelelli & M. Cerezo (eds.), Studies in the History of Logic, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 33–41. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Nov 27 01:16:23 2022