Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Anaphora" by Jeffrey C. King and Karen S. Lewis

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Asher, Nicholas, 1987, “A Typology for Attitude Verbs and their Anaphoric Properties”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 10: 125–197. (Scholar)
Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides, 2003, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee, 1980, “Anaphora and semantic structure”, in Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, J. Kreiman and A. Ojeda (eds.), pp. 1–28, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago. (Scholar)
Barker, Chris and Shan, Chun-chieh, 2008, “Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 1(1): 1–46. (Scholar)
Barker, Chris and Shan, Chun-chieh, 2014, Continuations and Natural Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Beaver, David, 2001, Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics, CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
Brasoveanu, Adrian, 2006, Structured Nominal and Modal Reference, Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Structured Discourse Reference to Individuals”, Proceedings of the 6^th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, Lagos (Algarve), Portugal. [Brasoveanu 2006 available online] (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Donkey Pluralities: plural information states versus non-atomic individuals”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 31: 129–209. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Structured anaphora to quantifier domains”, Information and Computation, 208: 405–473. (Scholar)
Braun, David, 2012, “Hob, Nob, and Mythical Witches”, in Reference and Referring, Campbell, O”Rourke, and Silverstein (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 148–188. (Scholar)
Breheny, Richard, 2004, “Indefinites and Anaphoric Dependence: A Case for Dynamic Semantics or Pragmatics?”, in Descriptions and Beyond, Reimer and Bezuidenhout (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 455–483. (Scholar)
Büring, Daniel, 2005, Binding Theory, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Champollion, Lucas, Dylan Bumford, and Robert Henderson, 2019, “Donkeys under discussion”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 12(1): 1–50. (Scholar)
Charlow, Simon, 2014, On the semantics of exceptional scope, Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, New York. (Scholar)
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1995, Dynamics of Meaning, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Chomsky, Noam, 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris. (Scholar)
Cresswell, M.J., 2002, “Static Semantics for Dynamic Discourse”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 545–571. (Scholar)
Davies, Martin, 1981, Meaning, Quantification and Necessity, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
Dekker, Paul, 2004, “Grounding Dynamic Semantics”, in Descriptions and Beyond, Reimer and Bezuidenhout (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 484–502. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, Dynamic Semantics, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 91, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
Edelberg, Walter, 1986, “A New Puzzle About Intentional Identity”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15: 1–25. (Scholar)
van Eijck, Jan and Hans Kamp, 1997, “Representing Discourse in Context”, in Handbook of Logic and Language, van Benthem, ter Meulen (eds.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
Elbourne, Paul, 2005, Situations and Individuals, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants”, Natural Language Semantics, 24: 1–43. (Scholar)
Evans, Gareth, 1977, “Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I)”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, VIII(3): 467–536. (Scholar)
Gawron, Jean Mark, John Nerboone and Stanley Peters, 1991, “The absorption principle and E-type anaphora”, in Situation Theory and its Applications, Jon Barwise, Jean Mark Gawron, Plotkin & Syun Tutiya (eds.), Vol.2, 355–362. (Scholar)
Geach, Peter T., 1962, Reference and Generality, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1967, “Intentional Identity”, Journal of Philosophy, 64(20): 627–632, reprinted in Geach 1972. (Scholar)
–––, 1972, Logic Matters, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Scholar)
Geurts, Bart, 2002, “Donkey Business”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25: 129–156. (Scholar)
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof, 1990, “Dynamic Montague Grammar”, Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, 3–48, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Dynamic Predicate Logic”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39–100. (Scholar)
Heim, Irene, 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Doctoral Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 13: 137–177. (Scholar)
Higginbotham, James and Robert May 1981, “Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing”, The Linguistic Review, 1: 41–80. Reprinted in J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Semantics: Critical Concepts. Volume 5: Operators and Sentence Types., London: Routledge, 2003. (Scholar)
Jacobson, Pauline, 2000, “Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics”, Natural Language Semantics, 8: 77–155. (Scholar)
Kamp, Hans, 1981, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, Formal Methods in the Study of Language, A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen, and M.B.J. Stokhof (eds.), Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, “Prolegomena to a Structural Theory of Belief and Other Attitudes”, in Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language and Mind, CSLI Lecture Notes Number 20, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Kanazawa, Makoto, 1994a, “Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Monotonicity”, in Dynamics, Polarity and Quantification, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 48, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
–––, 1994b, “Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences in a Dynamic Setting”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 17(2): 109–158. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Singular donkey pronouns are semantically singular”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(3): 383–403. (Scholar)
Karttunen, Lauri, 1976, “Discourse Referents”, in Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground, J. McCawley (ed.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 363–385. (Scholar)
Keshet, Ezra, 2018, “Dynamic Update Anaphora Logic: A Simple Analysis of Complex Anaphora”, Journal of Semantics, 35: 263–303. (Scholar)
King, Jeffrey C., 1987, “Pronouns, Descriptions and the Semantics of Discourse”, Philosophical Studies, 51: 341–363. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Instantial Terms, Anaphora and Arbitrary Objects”, Philosophical Studies, 61: 239–265. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “Anaphora and Operators”, Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 221–250 (Logic and Language). (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Context Dependent Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora”, in New Essays in the Philosophy of Language, Supplement to Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 30, M. Ezcurdia, R. Stainton and C. Viger (eds.), Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press, pp. 97–127. (Scholar)
Krifka, Manfred, 1996a, “Parametrized sum individuals for plural anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 555–598. (Scholar)
–––, 1996b, “Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences”, 6th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 6), 136–153. (Scholar)
Križ, Manuel, 2016, “Homogeneity, non-maximality, and all ”, Journal of Semantics, 33(3): 493–539. (Scholar)
Kuhn, Jeremy, 2016, “ASL Loci: Variables or Features?”, Journal of Semantics. (Scholar)
Kurafuji, Takeo, 1998, “Dynamic binding and the E-type strategy: evidence from Japanese”, in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson (eds.), pp. 129–144, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. doi:10.3765/salt.v8i0.2802 (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Japanese Pronouns in Dynamic Semantics: the null/overt contrast. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 1975, “Adverbs of Quantification”, in Formal Semantics, E. Keenan (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Lewis, Karen, 2012, “Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites”, Philosophical Studies, 158: 313–342. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Speaker’s reference and anaphoric pronouns”, Philosophical Perspectives, 27: 404–437. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “Anaphora and Negation”, Philosophical Studies, 178: 1403–1440. (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, “Descriptions, Pronouns, and Uniqueness”, Linguistics and Philosophy. (Scholar)
Ludlow, Peter, 1994, “Conditionals, events, and unbound pronouns”, Lingua e Stile, 29: 165–183. (Scholar)
Mandelkern, Matthew and Rothschild, Daniel, 2020, “Definiteness projection”, Natural Language Semantics, 28: 77–109. (Scholar)
May, Robert, 1980, “Movement and Binding”, Linguistic Inquiry, 12: 215–243. (Scholar)
Muskens, Reinhard, 1991, “Anaphora and the Logic of Change”, in Logics in AI: Proceedings of JELIA ”90, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 478: 412–427, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [Muskens 1991 available online] (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation” Linguistics and Philosophy, 19: 143–186. (Scholar)
Neale, Stephen, 1990, Descriptions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Nouwen, Rick, 2003a, “Complement Anaphora and Interpretation”, Journal of Semantics, 20: 73–113. (Scholar)
–––, 2003b, Plural Pronominal Anaphora in Context, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht. (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara, 1973, “Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English”, The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18): 601–609. doi:10.2307/2025024 (Scholar)
–––, 1978, “Bound variables and other anaphors”, in Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, 2, David Waltz (ed.), pp. 79–85, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. [Partee 1978 available online] (Scholar)
–––, 1984, “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 7: 243–286. (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara and Emmon Bach, 1984, “Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora”, in Truth, Interpretation and Information, J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (eds.), selected papers from the 3^rd Amsterdam Colloquium, Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics, Foris Publications. (Scholar)
Postal, Paul, 1966, “On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English”, Report on the seventeenth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies: 177–206, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (Scholar)
Prüst, Hub, Remko Scha, and Martin van den Berg, 1994, “Discourse grammar and verb phrase anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 17(3): 261–327. (Scholar)
Quine, Willard v.O., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
Reinhart, Tanya, 1983a, “Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora question”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 6: 47–88. (Scholar)
–––, 1983b, Anaphora and semantic interpretation, London: Croom Helm. (Scholar)
Roberts, Craige, 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity., Phd dissertation. UMass. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “Modal Subordination and Pornominal Anaphora in Discourse”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(6): 683–721. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Anaphora in Intensional Contexts”, in The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin (ed.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Uniqueness in definite noun phrases”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 26: 287–350. (Scholar)
–––,2004 “Pronouns as definites”, in Descriptions and Beyond, Reimer and Bezuidenhout (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 503–543. (Scholar)
Sanford, Anthony and Linda Moxey, 1993, Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Scholar)
Schlenker, Philippe, 2009, “Donkey Anaphora in Sign Language II: The Presuppositions of Pronouns”, Proceedings of the NELS 2009, Special Session on Pronouns. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Donkey Anaphora and Sign Language I: E-type vs. Dynamic Accounts”, in Logic, Language and Meaning: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, Aloni and Schulz (eds.), 405–415. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Donkey Anaphora: the View from Sign Language (ASL and LSF)”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(4): 341–395. (Scholar)
–––, 2012a, “Formal Indices and Iconicity in ASL”, in Logic, Language and Meaning: Proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Springer 7218: 1–11. (Scholar)
–––, 2012b, “Complement Set Anaphora and Structural Iconicity in ASL”, Snippets, 25. (Scholar)
–––, 2013a, “Temporal and Modal Anaphora in Sign Language (ASL)”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(1): 207–234. (Scholar)
–––, 2013b, “Anaphora: Insight from Sign Language”, Proceedings of the International Congres of Linguists, Geneva. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Iconic Features”, Natural Language Semantics, 22(4): 299–356. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Sign Language and the Foundations of Anaphora”, unpublished manuscript, Institut Jean-Nicod and New York University. [Schlenker 2015 available online] (Scholar)
Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton, and Mirko Santoro, 2013, “Iconic Variables”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 36(2): 91–149. doi:10.1007/s10988-013-9129-1 (Scholar)
Schwarz, Florian, 2009, Two Types of Definites in Natural Language, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “"Different Types of Definites Crosslinguistically"”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(10): 534–559. (Scholar)
Soames, Scott, 1989, “Review of Gareth Evans’ Collected Papers”, The Journal of Philosophy, 86: 141–156. (Scholar)
Stone, Matthew D., 1992, “Or, and anaphora”, in SALT II: Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Chris Barker and David Dowty (eds.), pp. 367–385, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus. doi:10.3765/salt.v2i0.3037 (Scholar)
Stone, Matthew and Daniel Hardt, 1999, “Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals”, in Computing Meaning, Bunt and Muskens (eds.), Kluwer, pp. 302–321. (Scholar)
Wilson, George, 1984, “Pronouns and Pronominal Descriptions: A New Semantical ‘Category’”, Philosophical Studies, 45: 1–30. (Scholar)
Yoon, Youngeun, 1994, Weak and strong interpretttions of quantifiers and definite NPs in English and Korean, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. (Scholar)
Yoon, Youngeun, 1996, “Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations’, Natural Language Semantics, 4(3): 217–236. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Sep 15 03:16:12 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...