Translations, Editions and Commentaries

• Bartlett, Robert C., 2019. Aristotle’ Art of Rhetoric, translation with an Interpretive Essay, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Castaldi, Silvia, 2014. Aristotele, Retorica, Introduzione, Traduzione e Commento. Rome: Carocci. (Scholar)
• Chiron Pierre, 2007. Aristotle, Rhétorique, Paris: Flammarion. (Scholar)
• Cope, Edward Meredith, 1877 [1970]. The Rhetoric of Aristotle, with a Commentary, revised and edited by John Edwin Sandys, 3 volumes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; repr. Hildesheim: Olms.
• Dufour, Médéric and Wartelle, André, 1960–73. Aristote, Rhétorique, Texte établi et traduit, 3 volumes, Paris: Les Belles Lettres. (Scholar)
• Freese, John Henry, 1926. Aristotle, The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric, London and Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Grimaldi, William M. A., 1980/1988. Aristotle, Rhetoric I-II. A Commentary, New York: Fordham University Press. (Scholar)
• Kassel, Rudolf, 1976. Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• Kennedy, George A., 2007. Aristotle, On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse, translated, with introduction, notes and appendices, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Rapp, Christof, 2002. Aristoteles, Rhetorik, translation, introduction, and commentary, 2 volumes, Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (Scholar)
• Reeve, C.D.C., 2018. Aristotle, Rhetoric, translation with introduction and notes, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing. (Scholar)
• Roberts, W. Rhys, 1924 [1984]. Rhetorica, in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Oxford: Clarendon Press; reprinted in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Works of Aristotle, Princeton: Princeton University Press, II 2152–2269.
• Roemer Adolf (ed.), 1885. Aristotelis ars rhetorica, Leipzig: Teubner; second edition, 1898. (Scholar)
• Rose, Valentin (ed.), 1886. Aristoteles qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta, Leipzig: Teubner. (Scholar)
• Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1959. Aristotelis ars rhetorica, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Spengel, Leonhard (ed.), 1867. Aristotelis ars rhetorica cum adnotatione, 2 volumes, Leipzig: Teubner. (Scholar)
• Viano, Cristina, 2021. Aristotele, Retorica, Introduzione, Traduzione e Note, Bari: Laterza. (Scholar)
• Waterfield, Robin, 2018. Aristotle, The Art of Rhetoric, with an introduction and notes by Harvey Yunis, Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press. (Scholar)

Collections

• Erickson, Keith V. (ed.), 1974. Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. (Scholar)
• Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander (eds.), 1994. Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Fortenbaugh, William W. and Mirhady, David C. (eds.), 1994. Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities: Volume 6), New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers. (Scholar)
• Gross, Alan G. and Walzer Arthur E. (eds.), 2000. Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
• Meyer, Michel (ed.), 2018. Style, Persuasion and Virtue in Aristotle’s Rhetoric (= Revue Internationale de Philosophie, Volume 72), Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Mirhady, David C. (ed.), 2007. Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric, Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Scholar)
• Rorty, Amelie O. (ed.), 1996. Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• Woerther, Frédérique (ed.), 2018. Commenting on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, from Antiquity to the Present, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Worthington, I. (ed.), 2008. A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (Scholar)

Monographs and Articles

• Allen, James, 2001. Inference from Signs. Ancient Debates About the Nature of Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007. “Aristotle on the Disciplines of Argument: Rhetoric, Dialectic, Analytic,” in Rhetorica, 25: 87–108. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008. “Rhetoric and Logic,” in I. Worthington (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Malden: Blackwell, 350–364. (Scholar)
• Barnes, Jonathan, 1981. “Proof and the Syllogism,” in E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics, Padua: Antenore, 17–59. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Bitzer, L. F., 1959. “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited,” in Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45: 399–408. (Scholar)
• Burnyeat, Myles, 1994. “Enthymeme: The Logic of Persuasion,” in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–55. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996. “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric,” in A.O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 88–115. (Scholar)
• Cooper, John M., 1993. “Rhetoric, Dialectic, and the Passions,” in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 11: 175–198. (Scholar)
• Cope, Edward Meredith, 1867 [1970]. An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric, London, Cambridge: Macmillan and Co.; reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1970.
• Cronkhite, Garry L., 1966. “The Enthymeme as Deductive Rhetorical Argument,” Western Speech Journal, 30: 129–134. (Scholar)
• de Brauw, Michael, 2008. “The Parts of the Speech,” in I. Worthington (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Malden: Blackwell, 187–202. (Scholar)
• de Jonge, Casper C., 2014. “Ancient Theories of Style (lexis),” in Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics (Volume 3), Leiden: Brill, 326–331. (Scholar)
• Dow, Jamie, 2007. “A Supposed Contradiction about Emotion-Arousal in Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Phronesis, 52: 382–402. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Feeling Fantastic? Emotions and Appearances in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 37: 143–175. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Aristotle’s Theory of the Emotions—Emotions as Pleasure and Pain,” in M. Pakaluk and G. Pearson (eds.), Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 47–74. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014a. “Proof-Reading Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” in Archiv fuer Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(1): 1–37. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014b. “Feeling Fantastic Again: Passions, Appearances and Beliefs in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 46: 213–251. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015. Passions and Persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Duering, Ingmar, 1966. Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Heidelberg: Universitaetsverlag Winter. (Scholar)
• Fortenbaugh, William W., 1970. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric on Emotions,” Archiv fuer Geschichte der Philosophie, 52: 40–70. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986. “Aristotle’s Platonic Attitude Toward Delivery,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19: 242–254. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992. “Aristotle on Persuasion through Character,” Rhetorica, 10: 207–244. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002. Aristotle on Emotion, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
• Garver, Eugene, 1994. Aristotle’s Rhetoric. An Art of Character, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Grimaldi, William M. A., 1957. “A Note on the PISTEIS in Aristotle’s Rhetoric 1354–1356,” American Journal of Philology, 78: 188–192. (Scholar)
• Halliwell, Stephen, 1993. “Style and Sense in Aristotle’s Rhetoric Book 3,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 47: 50–69. (Scholar)
• Havrda, Matyas, 2019. “Does Aristotle Distinguish Between Common and Specific Topoi in the Rhetoric?” Eirene, 55: 179–197. (Scholar)
• Kantelhardt, Adolf, 1911. “De Aristotelis Rhetoricis,” Dissertation Goettingen, reprinted in Rudolf Stark (ed.), Rhetorika. Schriften zur aristotelischen und hellenistischen Rhetorik, Hildesheim: Olms, 1968, 124–181. (Scholar)
• Kassel, Rudolf, 1971. Der Text der Aristotelischen Rhetorik. Prolegomena zu einer kritischen Ausgabe, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• Konstan, David, 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks. Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, Toronto and Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• Kontos, Pavlos, 2021. Aristotle on the Scope of Practical Reason. Spectators, Legislators, Hopes, and Evils, Abingdon and New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Leff, Michael C., 1993. “The Uses of Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Argumentation, 7: 313–327. (Scholar)
• Lossau, Manfred J., 1974. “Der Aristotelische Gryllos antilogisch,” Philologus, 118: 12–21. (Scholar)
• Leighton, Stephen, 1982. “Aristotle and the Emotions,” Phronesis, 27: 144–174. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009. “Passions and Persuasion,” in G. Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, Oxford: Blackwell, 597–611. (Scholar)
• Madden, Edward H., 1952. “The Enthymeme. Crossroads of Logic, Rhetoric and Metaphysics,” Philosophical Review, 61: 368–376. (Scholar)
• Marx, Friedrich, 1900. Aristoteles Rhetorik (= Berichte der koeniglich saechsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Volume 52), Leipzig. (Scholar)
• McBurney, James H., 1936. “The Place of the Enthymeme in Rhetorical Theory,” Speech Monographs, 3: 49–74. (Scholar)
• Miller, Arthur B., and Bee, John D., 1972. “Enthymemes: Body and Soul,” in Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5: 201–214. (Scholar)
• Moss, Jessica, 2012. Aristotle on the Apparent Good. Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Natali, Carlo, 1990. “Due modi di trattare le opinioni notevole. La nozione di felicità in Aristotele, Retorica I 5,” Methexis, 3: 51–63. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994. “La ‘Retorica’ di Aristotele negli studi europei più recenti,” in W.W. Fortenbaugh and D.C. Mirhady (eds.), Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, New Brunswick: Transaction, 365–382. (Scholar)
• Nussbaum, Martha C., 1996. “Aristotle on Emotions and Rational Persuasion,” in Amelie O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 303–323. (Scholar)
• Pearson, Giles, 2014. “Aristotle and the Cognitive Component of Emotions,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 46: 165–211. (Scholar)
• Pepe, Cristina, 2013. The Genres of Rhetorical Speeches in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Primavesi, Oliver, 1996. Die aristotelische Topik, Munich: C. H. Beck. (Scholar)
• Rambourg. Camille, 2014. Topos. Les Premières Méthodes D’Argumentation Dans La Rhètorique Grecque des Ve–IVe Siècles, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Raphael, Sally, 1974. “Rhetoric, Dialectic and Syllogistic Argument: Aristotle’s Position in Rhetoric I-II,” Phronesis, 19: 153–167. (Scholar)
• Rapp, Christof, 2009. “The Nature and Goals of Rhetoric,” in G. Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, Oxford: Blackwell, 579–596. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011. “Aristotelische Grundbegriffe in der Theorie der juridischen Argumentation,” Rechtstheorie, 42: 383–415. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012. “Aristotle on the Moral Psychology of Persuasion,” in Ch. Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 589–611. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013. “Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy,” in Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 15: 122–158. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016. “Dialectic and Logic from a Rhetorical Point of View,” in J.B. Gourinat and J. Lemaire (eds.), Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité, Paris: Vrin, 161–192. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018. “Aristotle and the Dialectical Turn of Rhetoric,” in Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou (ed.), Aristotle — Contemporary Perspectives on his Thought. On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter 223–236. (Scholar)
• Ricoeur, Paul, 1996. “Between Rhetoric and Poetics,” in Amelie O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 324–384. (Scholar)
• Rist, John M., 1989. The Mind of Aristotle: A Study in Philosophical Growth, Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• Rubinelli, Sara R., 2003. “Topoi e idia nella Retorica di Aristotele,” Phronesis, 48: 238–247. (Scholar)
• Ryan, Eugene E., 1984. Aristotle’s Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation, Montreal: Les Éditions Bellarmin. (Scholar)
• Seaton, R. C., 1914. “The Aristotelian Enthymeme,” Apeiron, 29: 105–144. (Scholar)
• Schuetrumpf, Eckhart, 1994. “Emotional Animals: Doe Aristotelian Emotions Requre Beliefs?” in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 99–116. (Scholar)
• Sihvola, Juha, 1996. “The Aristotelian Enthymeme,” Classical Review, 28: 113–119. (Scholar)
• Solmsen, Friedrich, 1929. Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik, Berlin: Weidmann. (Scholar)
• –––, 1938. “Aristotle and Cicero on the Orator’s Playing upon the Feelings,” Classical Philology, 33: 390–404. (Scholar)
• Sorabji, Richard, 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004. Aristotle on Memory, 2nd edition, London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
• Sprute, Juergen, 1982. Die Enthymemtheorie der aristotelischen Rhetorik, Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht . (Scholar)
• –––, 1994.“Aristotle and the Legitimacy of Rhetoric,” in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 117–128. (Scholar)
• Stocks, J. L., 1933. “The Composition of Aristotle’s Logical Works,” Classical Quarterly, 27: 115–124. (Scholar)
• Thompson, W. H., 1972. “Stasis in Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58: 134–141 . (Scholar)
• van Eemeren, Frans, 2013. “In What Sense do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics,” Argumentation, 27: 49–70. (Scholar)
• Weidemann, Hermann, 1989. “Aristotle on Inferences from Signs (Rhetoric I 2, 1357b1–25),” Phronesis, 34: 343–351. (Scholar)
• Woerner, Markus, 1990. Das Ethische in der Rhetorik des Aristoteles, Freiburg/Munich: Alber. (Scholar)