Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation" by Gabriella Pigozzi
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alchourrón, C.E., P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson,
1985, “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for
Contraction and Revision”, Journal of Symbolic Logic,
50: 510–530. (Scholar)
- Arrow, K., 1951/1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley. (Scholar)
- Baral, C., S. Kraus, and J. Minker, 1991, “Combining
Multiple Knowledge Bases”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge
and Data Engineering, 3(2): 208–220. (Scholar)
- Baral, C., S. Kraus, J. Minker, and V. Subrahmanian, 1992,
“Combining Multiple Knowledge Bases Consisting of First Order
Theories”, Computational Intelligence, 8(1):
45–71. (Scholar)
- Bartholdi, J., C. Tovey, and M. Trick, 1989, “The
Computational Difficulty of Manipulating an Election”,
Social Choice and Welfare, 6: 227–241. (Scholar)
- Baumeister, D., J. Rothe, and A.K. Selker, 2017, “Strategic
Behavior in Judgment Aggregation”, in U. Endriss (ed.),
Trends in Computational Social Choice, AI Access, pp.
145–168. (Scholar)
- Benferhat, S., D. Dubois, J. Lang, H. Prade, A. Saffiotti, and P.
Smets, 1998, “A General Approach for Inconsistency Handling and
Merging Information in Prioritized Knowledge Bases”, in
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pp.
466–477. (Scholar)
- Black, D., 1948, “On the Rationale of Group Decision
Making”, The Journal of Political Economy, 56:
23–34. (Scholar)
- Bloch, I., A. Hunter, A. Ayoun, S. Benferhat, P. Besnard, L.
Cholvy, R. Cooke, D. Dubois and H. Fargier, 2001, “Fusion:
general concepts and characteristics”, International Journal
of Intelligent Systems, 16: 1107–1134. (Scholar)
- Borgida, A. and T. Imielinski, 1984, “Decision Making in
Committees: A Framework for Dealing with Inconsistency and
Non-Monotonicity”, in Proceedings Workshop on Nonmonotonic
Reasoning, pp. 21–32. (Scholar)
- Brams, S.J., D.M. Kilgour, and M.R. Sanver, 2007a, “A
Minimax Procedure for Negotiating Multilateral Treaties”, in R.
Avenhaus and I. W. Zartman (eds.), Diplomacy Games: Formal Models
and International Negotiations, Berlin: Springer, pp
265–282. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, “A Minimax Procedure for
Electing Committees”, Public Choice, 132:
401–420. (Scholar)
- Cariani, F., M. Pauly, and J. Snyder, 2008, “Decision Framing in Judgment Aggregation”, Synthese, 163(1): 1–24. (Scholar)
- Cevolani, G., 2014, “Truth Approximation, Belief Merging and Peer Disagreement”, Synthese, 191(11): 2383–2401. (Scholar)
- Chapman, B., 2002, “Rational Aggregation”, Politics, Philosophy, Economics, 1(3): 337–354. (Scholar)
- Chawathe, S., H. Garcia Molina, J. Hammer, K. Ireland, Y.
Papakonstantinou, J. Ullman, and J. Widom, 1994, “The TSIMMIS
Project: Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources”, in
Proceedings of IPSJ Conference, pp. 7–18. (Scholar)
- Cholvy, L., 1998, “Reasoning about Merged
Information”, in D.M. Gabbay, and Ph. Smets (eds.), Handbook
of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol.
3, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 233–263. (Scholar)
- Condorcet, N. de, 1785, Essai sur l’Application de
l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions
Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix, Paris. (Scholar)
- Delgrande, J.P., D. Dubois, and J. Lang, 2006, “Iterated
Revision as Prioritized Merging”, in Proceedings of the
10th International Conference on Knowledge Representation
and Reasoning (KR’06), pp. 210–220. (Scholar)
- Dietrich, F., 2006, “Judgment Aggregation: (Im)Possibility Theorems”, Journal of Economic Theory, 126: 286–298. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007, “A Generalised Model of Judgment Aggregation”, Social Choice and Welfare, 28(4): 529–565. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016, “Judgment Aggregation and
Agenda Manipulation”, Games and Economic Behavior, 95:
113–136. (Scholar)
- Dietrich, F. and C. List, 2007a, “Arrow’s Theorem in
Judgment Aggregation”, Social Choice and Welfare, 29:
19–33. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, “Strategy-proof Judgment Aggregation”, Economics and Philosophy, 23: 269–300. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008a, “Judgment Aggregation Without Full Rationality”, Social Choice and Welfare, 31: 15–39. (Scholar)
- –––, 2008b, “Judgment Aggregation Under Constraints”, in T. Boylan and R. Gekker, eds., Economics, Rational Choice and Normative Philosophy, Routledge, pp. 111–123. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “The Aggregation of Propositional Attitudes: Towards a General Theory”, in Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 3, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–234. (Scholar)
- Dokow, E. and R. Holzman, 2010, “Aggregation of Binary
Evaluations with Abstentions”, Journal of Economic
Theory, 145(2): 544–561. (Scholar)
- Duddy, C. and A. Piggins, 2012, “A Measure of Distance
Between Judgment Sets”, Social Choice and Welfare, 39:
855–867. (Scholar)
- Eckert, D. and C. Klamler, 2007, “How puzzling is judgment
aggregation? Antipodality in distance-based aggregation rules”,
Working paper, University of Graz. (Scholar)
- Elmagarmid, A., M. Rusinliewicz, and A. Sheth (eds.), 1999,
Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems,
San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann. (Scholar)
- Elster, J., 2013, “Excessive Ambitions (II)”,
Capitalism and Society, 8(1): Article 1
[Elster 2013 available online] (Scholar)
- Endriss, U., 2016, “Judgment Aggregation”, in F.
Brandt, V. Conitzer, U. Endriss, J. Lang, A. Procaccia (eds.),
Handbook of Computational Social Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 399–426. (Scholar)
- Endriss, U. and R. de Haan, 2015, “Complexity of the Winner
Determination Problem in Judgment Aggregation: Kemeny, Slater,
Tideman, Young”, in Proceedings of the 14th International
Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, IFAMAS,
pp. 117–125. (Scholar)
- Endriss, U., U. Grandi, and D. Porello, 2012, “Complexity of Judgment Aggregation”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 45: 481–514. (Scholar)
- Everaere, P., S. Konieczny, and P. Marquis, 2007, “The
Strategy-Proofness Landscape of Merging”, Journal of
Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 28: 49–105. (Scholar)
- –––, 2015, “Belief Merging versus Judgment
Aggregation”, in Proceedings of the 2015 International
Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS
15), pp. 999–1007. (Scholar)
- –––, 2017, “An Introduction to Belief
Merging and its Links to Judgment Aggregation”, in U. Endriss
(ed.), Trends in Computational Social Choice, AI Access Books, pp.
123–143. (Scholar)
- Fermé, E. and S.O. Hansson, 2018, Belief Change. Introduction and Overview, Springer. (Scholar)
- Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006, “A Representation Theorem for Voting with Logical Consequences”, Economics and Philosophy, 22: 18–190. (Scholar)
- Gauwin, O., S. Konieczny, and P. Marquis, 2005,
“Conciliation and Consensus in Iterated Belief Merging”,
in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and
Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Berlin:
Springer, pp. 514–526. (Scholar)
- Ginsberg, M., 1986, “Counterfactuals”, Artificial Intelligence, 30(1): 35–79. (Scholar)
- Goldman, A., 1999, Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford:
Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology”, Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology, 1(1): 11–22. (Scholar)
- –––, 2010, “Social Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/epistemology-social/>. (Scholar)
- Grégoire, E., 2004, “Extension of a Distance-based
Fusion Framework”, in Proceedings of the 8th International
Conference on Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms and
Applications, pp. 282–286. (Scholar)
- Grégoire, E. and S. Konieczny, 2006, “Logic-based
Approaches to Information Fusion”, Information Fusion,
7: 4–18. (Scholar)
- Grandi, U., 2012, Binary Aggregation with Integrity
Constraints, Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam
[Grandi 2012 available online]. (Scholar)
- Grossi, D., 2009, “Unifying Preference and Judgment
Aggregation”, in Proceedings of the 8th International
Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp.
217–224. (Scholar)
- Grossi, D. and G. Pigozzi, 2014, Judgment Aggregation: A
Primer, San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. (Scholar)
- Hansson, S.O., 2011, “Logic of Belief Revision”,
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition),
Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/logic-belief-revision/>. (Scholar)
- Hartmann, S., G. Pigozzi, and J. Sprenger, 2010, “Reliable
Methods of Judgment Aggregation”, Journal of Logic and
Computation, 20(2): 603–617. (Scholar)
- Hartmann, S. and J. Sprenger, 2012, “Judgment Aggregation and the Problem of Tracking the Truth”, Synthese, 187(1): 209–221. (Scholar)
- Hudry, O., 1989, Recherches d’Ordres Médians:
Complexité, Algorithmique et Problèmes
Combinatoires, Ph.D. thesis, Telecom Paris Tech. (Scholar)
- Katsuno, H. and A.O. Mendelzon, 1991, “Propositional Knowledge Base Revision and Minimal Change”, Artificial Intelligence, 52: 263–294. (Scholar)
- Kemeny, J., 1959, “Mathematics without numbers”,
Daedalus, 88: 577–591. (Scholar)
- Kim, W. (ed.), 1995, Modern Database Systems: The Object
Model, Interoperability and Beyond, New York: Addison
Wesley. (Scholar)
- Konieczny, S., 2000, “On the Difference between Merging
Knowledge Bases and Combining them”, in A.G. Cohn, F.
Giunchiglia, and B. Selman, (eds.), KR2000: Principles of
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Francisco: Morgan
Kaufmann, pp. 135–144. (Scholar)
- Konieczny, S. and R. Pino Pérez, 1998, “On the Logic
of Merging”, in Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and
Reasoning, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pp.
488–498. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Merging with Integrity
Constraints”, in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference
on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with
Uncertainty (ECSQARU ’99), LNAI 1638, pp.
233–244. (Scholar)
- –––, 2002, “Merging Information under
Constraints: A Logical Framework”, Journal of Logic and
Computation, 12: 773–808. (Scholar)
- Kornhauser, L.A., 1992, “Modeling Collegial Courts. II.
Legal Doctrine”, Journal of Law, Economics, and
Organization, 8: 441–470. (Scholar)
- Kornhauser, L.A. and L.G. Sager, 1986, “Unpacking the
Court”, Yale Law Journal, 96: 82–117. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993, “The One and the Many:
Adjudication in Collegial Courts”, California Law
Review, 81: 1–51. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “The Many as One: Integrity and Group Choice in Paradoxical Cases”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(3): 249–276. (Scholar)
- Kowalski, R., 1978, “Logic for data description”, in
H.G.J. Minker (ed.), Logic and data bases, New York: Plenum,
pp. 77–102. (Scholar)
- Lang, J., M. Slavkovik, and S. Vesic, 2016, “Agenda
Separability in Judgment Aggregation”, in Proceedings of the
Thirtieth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto:
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp.
1016–1022. (Scholar)
- Lang, J., G. Pigozzi, M. Slavkovik, L. van der Torre, and S.
Vesic, 2017, “A Partial Taxonomy of Judgment Aggregation Rules
and their Properties”, Social Choice and Welfare,
48(2): 327–356. (Scholar)
- Liberatore, P. and M. Schaerf, 1995, “Arbitration: a
Commutative Operator for Belief Revision”, in Proceedings of
the Second World Conference on the Fundamentals of Artificial
Intelligence, pp. 217–228. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998, “Arbitration (or How to Merge
Knowledge Bases)”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
Engineering, 10(1): 76–90. (Scholar)
- Lin, J., 1995, Frameworks for Dealing with Conflicting
Information and Applications, Ph.D. thesis, University of
Toronto. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996, “Integration of Weighted Knowledge Bases”, Artificial Intelligence, 83: 363–378. (Scholar)
- Lin, J. and A. Mendelzon, 1996, “Merging databases under
constraints”, International Journal of Cooperative
Information Systems, 7: 55–76. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999, “Knowledge Base Merging by
Majority”, in Dynamic Worlds: From the Frame Problem to
Knowledge Management, R. Pareschi and B. Fronhöfer (eds),
Norwell, MA: Kluwer, pp. 195–218. (Scholar)
- List, C., 2002, “A Possibility Theorem on Aggregation over
Multiple Interconnected Propositions”, Mathematical Social
Sciences, 45(1): 1–13. (Scholar)
- –––, 2013, “Social Choice Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/social-choice/>. (Scholar)
- List, C. and P. Pettit, 2002, “Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result”, Economics and Philosophy, 18: 89–110. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared”, Synthese, 140: 207–235. (Scholar)
- List, C. and C. Puppe, 2009, “Judgment Aggregation: A Survey”, in P. Anand, C. Puppe, and P. Pattanaik (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 457–482. (Scholar)
- Meyer, T., A. Ghose, and S. Chopra, 2001, “Social Choice,
Merging and Elections”, in Proceedings of the 6th European
Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with
Uncertainty, Benferhat and Besnard (eds.), Vol. 2143 of
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer,
pp. 466–477. (Scholar)
- Miller, M.K. and D. Osherson, 2009, “Methods for Distance-based Judgment Aggregation”, Social Choice and Welfare, 32(4): 575–601. (Scholar)
- Mongin, P., 2008, “Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation”, Journal of Economic Theory, 141: 100–113. (Scholar)
- Morreau, M., 2014, “Arrow’s Theorem”, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward
N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/arrows-theorem/>. (Scholar)
- Pauly, M. and M. van Hees, 2006, “Logical Constraints on Judgment Aggregation”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 35: 569–585. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 2001, “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma”, Philosophical Issues, 11: 268–299. (Scholar)
- Pigozzi, G., 2006, “Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation”, Synthese, 152: 285–298. (Scholar)
- Poisson, S.D., 1837, Recherches sur la probabilité des
jugements en matière criminelle et en matière civile:
précédées des règles
générales du calcul des probabilités,
Paris. (Scholar)
- Porello, D., 2017, “Judgment Aggregation in Non-Classical Logics”, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 27(1–2): 106–139. (Scholar)
- Reiter, R., 1988, “On Integrity Constraints”, in M.Y.
Vardi (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on the
Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, San Francisco:
Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 97–111. (Scholar)
- Revesz, P., 1993, “On the Semantics of Theory Change:
Arbitration between Old and New Information”, in C. Beeri (ed.),
Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Symposium on Principles of Database
Systems, Washington D.C., pp. 71–82. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997, “On the Semantics of
Arbitration”, International Journal of Algebra and
Computation, 7(2): 133–160. (Scholar)
- Roth, A.S., 2011, “Shared Agency”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/shared-agency>. (Scholar)
- Sen, A.K., 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare,
San Francisco: Holden-Day. (Scholar)
- Spector, H., 2009, “The Right to a Constitutional
Jury”, Legisprudence, 3(1): 111–123. (Scholar)
- Subrahmanian, V.S., 1994, “Amalgamating Knowledge
Bases”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19(2):
291–331. (Scholar)
- Vacca, R., 1921, “Opinioni Individuali e Deliberazioni
Collettive”, Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del
Diritto, 52: 52–59. (Scholar)
- Willamson, J., 2009, “Aggregating Judgments by Merging Evidence”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 19(3): 461–473. (Scholar)
- Xuefeng, W., 2018, “Judgment Aggregation in Nonmonotonic
Logic”, Synthese, 195(8): 3651–3683. (Scholar)