Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Bohr’s Correspondence Principle" by Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Works by Bohr

  • 1913, “On the constitution of atoms and molecules,” Philosophical Magazine, 26: 1–25, 476–502, 857–75. (Scholar)
  • 1918, “The quantum theory of line-spectra,” Det kongelige Danske videnskabernes Selskab, Matematiske-fysike Meddelser, 4(1): 1–36; reprinted in Bohr (1976), pp. 67–102. (Scholar)
  • 1920, “On the series spectra of the elements,” Lecture before the German Physical Society in Berlin (27 April 1920), translated by A. D. Udden, in Bohr (1976), 241–282. (Scholar)
  • 1921a, “Application of the quantum theory to atomic problems in general,” unpublished manuscript in Bohr (1976), pp. 397–414. (Scholar)
  • 1921b, “Constitution of atoms,” unpublished manuscript in Bohr (1977), pp. 99–174. (Scholar)
  • 1922, “Seven lectures on the theory of atomic structure,” unpublished, in Bohr (1977), pp. 341–419. (Scholar)
  • [1923] 1924, “On the application of the quantum theory to atomic structure,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (supplement), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–42. First published in Zeitschrift für Physik, 13 (1923): 117. Reprinted in Bohr (1976), pp. 457–499. (Scholar)
  • 1925, “Atomic theory and mechanics,” Nature (Supplement), 116: 845–852. Reprinted in Bohr (1984), pp. 273–280. (Scholar)
  • 1928, “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory,” Nature (Supplement), 121: 580–590. Reprinted Bohr (1985), pp. 148–158. (Scholar)
  • 1976, Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 3: The Correspondence Principle (1918–1923), J. R. Nielsen (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
  • 1977, Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 4: The Periodic System (1920–1923), J. R. Nielsen (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
  • 1984, Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 5: The Emergence of Quantum Mechanics (Mainly 1924–1926), K. Stolzenburg (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
  • 1985, Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 6: Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926–1932), J. Kalckar (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

Other Primary Literature

  • Born, M., 1924, “Über Quantenmechanik,” Zeitschrift für Physik, 26: 379–395. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1927 [1925], The Mechanics of the Atom, London: Bell; translation of Vorlesungen Über Atommechanik, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1957 [1933], Atomic Physics, 6th edition, J. Dougall and R. Blin-Stoyle (trans.), New York: Hafner Publishing Co. (Scholar)
  • Heisenberg, W., 1968 [1925], “Quantum-theoretical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations,” in B. van der Waerden (ed.), Sources of Quantum Mechanics, New York: Dover Publications, 261–276; translation of “Über quantentheorische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für Physik, 33: 879–893. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1930, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, translated by C. Eckart and F. C. Hoyt, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Pauli, W., 1946, “Exclusion Principle and Quantum Mechanics,” in Nobel Lectures, Physics 1942–1962, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co., 1964. (Scholar)
  • Sommerfeld, A., 1923 [1919], Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines, translated by H. Brose, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1924, “Grundlagen der Quantentheorie und des Bohrschen Atommodelles,” Die Naturwissenschaften, 12(47): 1047–1049. (Scholar)
  • Van Vleck, J. H., 1924a, “The Absorption of Radiation by Multiply Periodic Orbits, and Its Relation to the Correspondence Principle and the Rayleigh-Jeans law. Part I: Some Extensions of the Correspondence Principle,” Physical Review, 24: 330–346. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1924b, “The Absorption of Radiation by Multiply Periodic Orbits, and Its Relation to the Correspondence Principle and the Rayleigh-Jeans law. Part II. Calculation of Absorption by Multiply Periodic Orbits,” Physical Review, 24: 347–365. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

  • Batterman, R., 1991, “Chaos, quantization, and the correspondence principle,” Synthese, 89: 189–227. (Scholar)
  • Beller, M., 1999, Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
  • Bohm, D., 1951, Quantum Theory, New York: Prentice Hall. Reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc. (Scholar)
  • Bokulich, A., 2004, “Open or closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the relation between classical and quantum mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 377–396. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Heisenberg meets Kuhn: Closed theories and paradigms,” Philosophy of Science, 73: 90–107. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bokulich, P. and A. Bokulich, 2005, “Niels Bohr’s generalization of classical mechanics,” Foundations of Physics, 35: 347–371. (Scholar)
  • Darrigol, O., 1992, From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “Classical concepts in Bohr’s atomic theory (1913–1925),” Physis: Riv. Internaz. di Storia della Scienza, 34: 545–567. (Scholar)
  • Duncan, A. and M. Janssen, 2007, “On the verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the Correspondence Principle, Part One,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 61(6): 553–624. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, Constructing Quantum Mechanics (Volume 1: The Scaffold 1900–1923), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Fedak, W. A. and J. J. Prentis, 2002, “Quantum jumps and classical harmonics,” American Journal of Physics, 70: 332–344. (Scholar)
  • Ford, J. and G. Mantica, 1992, “Does quantum mechanics obey the correspondence principle? Is it complete?” American Journal of Physics, 60: 1086–1098. (Scholar)
  • Habib, S., K. Shizume, and W. Zurek, 1998, “Decoherence, Chaos and the Correspondence Principle,” Physical Review Letters, 80: 4361–4365. (Scholar)
  • Hassoun, G. and D. Kobe, 1989, “Synthesis of the Planck and Bohr formulations of the correspondence principle,”, American Journal of Physics, 57(7): 658–662. (Scholar)
  • Heilbron, J., 1983, “The Origins of the Exclusion Principle,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 13(2): 261–310. (Scholar)
  • Jähnert, M., 2019, Practicing the Correspondence Principle in the Old Quantum Theory: A Transformation through Implementation, Archimedes 56, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Jammer, M., 1966, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. (Scholar)
  • Liboff, R., 1984, “The correspondence principle revisited,” Physics Today, 37: 50–55. (Scholar)
  • Mehra, J. and Rechenberg, H., 1982, The Historical Development of Quantum Theory (Volume I: The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900–1925; Volume II: The Discovery of Quantum Mechanics 1925), New York: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Nielsen, J. R., 1976, “Introduction to Niels Bohr Collected Works (Volume 3),” in Bohr (1976), pp. 3–46. (Scholar)
  • Post, H., 1971, “Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2: 213–255; reprinted in Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 148), S. French and H. Kamminga (eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993, pp. 1–43. (Scholar)
  • Radder, H., 1991, “Heuristics and The Generalized Correspondence Principle,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 195–226. (Scholar)
  • Rynasiewicz, R., 2015, “The (?) Correspondence Principle,” in F. Aaserud and H. Kragh (eds.), One Hundred Years of the Bohr Atom. Proceedings from a Conference, Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 175–199. (Scholar)
  • Rosenfeld, L., 1979 [1973], “The Wave-Particle Dilemma,” in R. Cohen and J. Stachel (eds.), Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 21), Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 688–703; originally published in J. Mehra (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 251–263. (Scholar)
  • Serwer, D., 1977, “Unmechanischer Zwang: Pauli, Heisenberg, and the Rejection of the Mechanical Atom, 1923–1925,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 8: 189–256. (Scholar)
  • Seth, S., 2008, “Mystik and Technik: Arnold Sommerfeld and Early-Weimar Quantum Theory,” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 31(4): 331–352. (Scholar)
  • Stachel, J., 2009, “Bohr and the Photon,” in W. Myrvold and J. Christian (eds.), Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle (Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 73), Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–83. (Scholar)
  • Tanona, S., 2004, “Idealization and Formalism in Bohr’s Approach to Quantum Theory,” Philosophy of Science, 71: 683–695. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Jan 17 20:59:21 2021