Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Bolzano’s Logic" by Jan Šebestik

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Primary Literature

  • 1810, Beyträge zu einer begründeteren Darstellung der Mathematik (Contributions to a better grounded presentation of mathematics), Prague (English transl. Bolzano 2004b; French transl. Bolzano 2010). (Scholar)
  • 1817, Rein analytischer Beweiss des Lehrsatzes, dass zwischen je zwey Werthen, die ein engegengesetztes Resultat gewähren, wenigstens eine reelle Wurzel der Gleichung liege (Purely analytic proof of the theorem that between any two values which give results of opposite sign, there lies at least one real root of the equation), Prague (English transl. Bolzano 2004b; French transl. Bolzano 2010). (Scholar)
  • 1834, Lehrbuch der Religionswissenschaft (Treatise of the science of religion), Sulzbach: Seidel; Gesamtausgabe I 6–8.
  • 1837 [TS], Wissenschaftslehre, Versuch einer ausführlichen und grössentheils neuen Darstellung der Logik mit steter Rücksicht auf deren bisherige Bearbeiter, 4 vol., Sulzbach: Seidel; reprint of the 2nd edition 1929–1931, Aalen: Scientia Verlag 1970; Gesamtausgabe I 11–14, with introductions by J. Berg; English translation 2014, Theory of science, 4 vol., translated by Paul Rusnock and Rolf George, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (This translation is indicated as TS. The page numbers are those of the original German edition which are on the margins of the other editions, so that the reference is the same for the German original, for the Gesamtausgabe and for the English translation).
    • vol. I: §§1–120 (Scholar)
    • vol. II: §§121–268
    • vol. III: §§269–391
    • vol. IV: §§391–718.
  • 1842, Über die Zusammensetzung der Kräfte, Prag; Gesamtausgabe I 18, 9–60.
  • 1851, Paradoxien des Unendlichen (Paradoxes of the Infinite), Leipzig; new edition 1920 with notes by H. Hahn; the latest edition 1975, Hamburg: F. Meiner, with notes by B. van Rootselaar (English transl. D.A. Steele, 1950, London: Routledge; new transl. S. Russ, Bolzano 2004b; French transl. Paris: Seuil 1993).
  • 1932, Von dem besten Staate (On the Best State), edited with an introduction by A. Kowalewski, Prag: Königliche böhmische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften; Gesamtausgabe II A 14; Engl. transl. by P. Rusnock and R. George, in Selected Writings on Ethics and Politics, 2007, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 231–359. (Scholar)
  • 1969–present, Bernard-Bolzano Gesamtausgabe (complete works), Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, editors E. Winter, J. Berg., et al., altogether 130 volumes of which 94 have appeared.
  • 1972, Theory of science, attempt at a detailed and in the main novel exposition of logic with constant attention to earlier authors, edited and translated by Rolf George, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press (a selection).
  • 1973, Theory of science, edited, with an introduction, by Jan Berg, translated from the German by Burnham Terrell, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel (a selection).
  • 1976, Einleitung in die Grössenlehre und Erste Begriffe der allgemeinen Grössenlehre (Introduction to the Theory of Magnitudes and First concepts of the general Theory of Magnitudes, Gesamtausgabe), II A 7, (Engl. transl. of the chapter. On the mathematical method, 2004, Paul Rusnock and Rolf George, Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi; French transl. Paris: Vrin, 2008; see 2004a). (Scholar)
  • 1978, Grundlegung der Logik. Wissenschaftslehre I/II, edited, with an introduction by Friedrich Kambartel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner (a selection; French transl. 2011, Paris: Gallimard). (Scholar)
  • 2004a, On the mathematical method and Correspondence with Exner, Paul Rusnock and Rolf George (transl.), Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi; French transl. De la méthode mathématique et correspondance avec Exner, 2008, introd. par C. Maigné et J. Šebestik, Paris: Vrin.
  • 2004b, The mathematical works of Bernard Bolzano, S. Russ (transl.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2010, Premiers écrits, Philosophie, logique, mathématique, trad. fr. par M. Bartzel et al., introd. par C. Maigné et J. Šebestik, Paris: Vrin.

Secondary Literature

Works Cited

  • Anderson, A.R. and N.D. Belnap, 1975, Entailment: the logic of relevance, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Arnauld, A. and P. Nicole, 1662, Logique ou l’Art de Penser (also called Logique de Port-Royal and Port-Royal Logic); reprinted Paris: Vrin, 1993. (Scholar)
  • Berg, J., 1962, Bolzano’s Logic, Stockholm: Almquist Wiksell. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1973, “Editor’s introduction”, in Bolzano 1973: 1–30. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1988, “Einleitung des Herausgebers”, Wissenschaftslehre II, Part IV, (Gesamtausgabe, I, 12/3, 7–44). (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, Ontology without ultrafilters and possible worlds: An examination of Bolzano’s ontology, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Bergmann, H., 1970, Das philosophische Werk Bernard Bolzanos, reprint Hildesheim: Olms. (Scholar)
  • Berka, K., 1992, “Bolzanos Lehre vom natürlichen Schliessen”, in BW-1987: 141–161. (Scholar)
  • Cavaillès, J., 2008, Sur la logique et la théorie de la science, second edition, preface by G. Canguilhem and G. Bachelard, postface by J. Šebestik, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Coffa, A., 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Fedorov, B.I., 1980, Bernard Bolzano’s Logic (in Russian), Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo Universiteta. (Scholar)
  • Frege, G., unpublished, “Logic in Mathematics,” translation by P. Long and R. White, in H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds.), 1979, Posthumous Writings, Chicago: U. of Chicago Press, pp. 203–250)
  • George, R., 1983, “Bolzano’s consequence, relevance, and enthymemes”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 12(3): 299–318. (Scholar)
  • Hafner, J., 1999, “Bolzano’s criticism of indirect proofs”, in Sinaceur 1999: 385–398. (Scholar)
  • Husserl, E., 1900, Logische Untersuchungen, I, Prolegomena zu reiner Logik (Logical Investigations, I, Prolegomena to pure logic; Engl. transl. J.N. Findlay, 1970, London: Routledge). (Scholar)
  • –––, 1939, “Entwurf einer ‘Vorrede’ zu den ‘Logischen Untersuchungen’ 1913”, Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 1(1): 106–133. (Scholar)
  • Katz, J., 1990, Metaphysics of Meaning, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • Kreiser, L., 1981, “Logical semantics in Bolzano and the reproach of Platonism”, (Czech), Filozofický časopis, 29: 94–103. (Scholar)
  • Maass, J.G.E., 1793, Grundriss der Logik, 4th edition, Leipzig, 1823. (Scholar)
  • Mancosu, P., 1999, “Bolzano and Cournot on mathematical explanation”, in Sinaceur 1999: 429–455. (Scholar)
  • Mancosu, P., 1996, Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Morscher, E., 1973, Das logische An-Sich bei Bernard Bolzano, Salzburg-München: Anton Pustat. (Scholar)
  • Patočka, J., 1958, “Bolzanovo místo v dějinách filosofie” (Bolzano’s place in the history of philosophy), Filosofie v dějinách českého národa, Praha: Nakl. Československé Akademie Věd, 111–123. (Scholar)
  • Proust, J., 1999, “Bolzano’s theory of representation”, in Sinaceur 1999: 363–383. (Scholar)
  • Roski, S., 2014, Bolzano’s Notion of Grounding and the Classical Model of Science, Amsterdam: CPI Wöhrmann Print Service BV. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, P., 2000, Bolzano’s philosophy and the emergence of modern mathematics, Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi. (Scholar)
  • Šebestik, J., 1992, Logique et mathématique chez Bernard Bolzano, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Siebel, M., 1996, Der Begriff der Ableitbarkeit bei Bolzano, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Simons, P., 1987, “Bolzano, Tarski, and the limits of logic”, in Morscher 1987: 378–405. (Scholar)
  • Sundholm, G., 2000, “When and why, did Frege read Bolzano?”, LOGICA Yearbook 1999, Prague: Filosofia, pp. 164–174. (Scholar)
  • Twardowski, K., 1894, Zur Lehre von Inhalt und Gegenstand von Vorstellungen, Wien; Engl. transl. and introd. by R. Grossmann, 1997, On the content and object of presentations, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (Scholar)
  • Zimmermann, R., 1853, Philosophische Propädeutik für Obergymnasien, 1st ed., Wien. (Scholar)

Collections

  • Benoist, J. (ed.), 2000, Bolzano, Les Études philosophiques (special issue), n° 4 (Octobre-Décembre), 433–534. (Scholar)
  • Besoli, S., L. Guidetti, and V. Raspa (eds.), 2011, Bernard Bolzano e la tradizione filosofica, special issue of Discipline Filosofiche, 21(2). (Scholar)
  • Centro Fiorentino di Storia e Filosofia della Scienza (ed.), 1992 [BW-1987], Bolzano’s Wissenschaftslehre 1837–1987: International Workshop (Firenze, 16–19 settembre 1987), Firenze: Leo S. Olschki. (Scholar)
  • Künne, W., M. Siebel, and M. Textor (eds.), 1997, Bolzano and Analytic Philosophy, special issue of Grazer philosophische Studien, 53. (Scholar)
  • Lapointe, S. (ed.), 2003, Bernard Bolzano. Philosophie de la logique et théorie de la connaissance, special issue of Philosophiques, 30(1). (Scholar)
  • Morscher, E. (ed.), 1987, Bolzano-Studien, special issue of Philosophia Naturalis, 24(4). (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 2000, Bolzanos geistiges Erbe für das 21. Jahrhundert, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 2003b, Bernard Bolzanos Leistungen in Logik, Mathematik und Physik, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Novy, M. (ed.), 1982, Impact of Bolzano’s epoch on the development of science (Volume 13 of Acta Historiae Rerum Naturalium Necnon Technicarum), Prague: Ústav Československých a Světových Dějin ČSAV. (Scholar)
  • Sinaceur, H. (ed.), 1999, Mathématique et logique chez Bolzano, special issue of Revue d’Histoire des Science, 52(3–4). (Scholar)
  • Trlifajová, K. (ed.), 2006, The solitary thinker Bernard Bolzano, in Czech, Prague: Filosofia. (Scholar)

Other Works on Bolzano

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., 1952, “Bolzano’s propositional logic”, Archiv für Mathematik, Logik und Grundlagenforschung, 1: 65–98. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1950, “Bolzano’s definition of analytic proposition”, Theoria: 91–117. (Scholar)
  • Bayerová, M., 1994, Bernard Bolzano, the European dimension of his thought, (Czech), Prague: Filosofia. (Scholar)
  • Behboud, A., 2000, Bolzanos Beiträge zur Mathematik und ihrer Philosophie (Bolzano’s Contributions to Mathematics and its Philosophy), Bern: Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. (Scholar)
  • Benoist, J., 1999, L’a priori conceptuel. Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick, Paris: Vrin.
  • Benthem, J. van, 1984, Lessons from Bolzano, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University (13 p.). (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, “The variety of consequence, according to Bolzano”, Studia Logica, 44(4): 389–403. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Is there still logic in Bolzano’s key?”, in Morscher 2003b: 11–34. (Scholar)
  • Berg, J., 1977, “Bolzano’s contribution to logic and philosophy of mathematics”, in Logic Colloquium 76, R.O. Gandy and J.M. Hyland (eds), Amsterdam: North Holland, 141–171. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987a, “Bolzano and situation semantics: variations on a theme of variation”, in Morscher 1987: 373–377. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987b, “Bolzano on induction”, in Morscher 1987: 442–446. (Scholar)
  • Berg, J., H. Ganthaler, and E. Morscher, 1987, “Bolzanos Biographie in tabellarischer Übersicht”, in Morscher 1987: 353–372. (Scholar)
  • Betti, A., 1998, “De Veritate: another chapter. The Bolzano-Lesniewski connection”, in The Lvov-Warsaw School and contemporary philosophy, K. Kijania-Placek and J. Wolenski (eds), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 115–137. (Scholar)
  • Bouveresse, J., 2000, “Sur les représentations sans objet”, J. Benoist (ed.), Les Études Philosophiques, n° 4: 519–534. (Scholar)
  • Buhl, G., 1961, Ableitbarkeit und Abfolge in der Wissenschaftslehre Bolzanos, Kantstudien, Ergänzungshefte n° 83. (Scholar)
  • Bussotti, P., 2000, “The problem of the foundations of mathematics at the beginning of the nineteenth century: Two lines of thought: Bolzano and Gauss” (Italian), Teoria (New Series), 20(1): 83–95. (Scholar)
  • Cantù, P., 1992, “Bolzano versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis”, in Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan, Volume 1, A. Reboul (ed.), Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 295–316. (Scholar)
  • Casari, E., 1992, “An interpretation of some ontological and semantical notions in Bolzano’s logic”, in BW-1987: 55–105. (Scholar)
  • Casari, E., 2016, Bolzano’s Logical System, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cellucci, C., 1992, “Bolzano and multiple-conclusion logic”, in BW-1987: 179–189. (Scholar)
  • Centrone S., 2015, Studien zu Bernard Bolzanos, Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Chihara, Ch., 1999, “Frege’s and Bolzano’s rationalist conceptions of arithmetic”, in Sinaceur 1999: 343–361. (Scholar)
  • Coffa, A., 1982, “Kant, Bolzano and the emergence of logicism”, Journal of Philosophy, 74: 679–689. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, J.L., 1982, “Bolzano’s theory of induction”, in L. Nový (ed.) Impact of Bolzano’s epoch on the development of science, Prague: Institute of Czechoslovak and General History, 443–457. (Scholar)
  • Daněk, J., 1975, Les projets de Leibniz et de Bolzano: deux sources de logique contemporaine, Quebec: Presses de l’Université de Laval. (Scholar)
  • Detlefsen, M., 1988, “Fregean hierarchies and mathematical explanation”, International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 3: 97–116. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Rigor, Re-proof and Bolzano’s critical program”, in Constructions, P. Bour et al. (eds.), Festschrift for Gerhard Heinzmann, pp. 171–184, King’s College Publications. (Scholar)
  • Dorn, G.J.W., 1987, “Zu Bolzanos Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre”, in Morscher 1987: 452–468. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Intuitions”, in French, in S. Lapointe (ed.) 2003, Philosophiques, 30(1): 19–46. (Scholar)
  • Haller, R., 1992, “Bolzano and Austrian Philosophy”, in BW-1987: 191–206. (Scholar)
  • Husserl, E., 1969, Formal and Transcendental logic, transl. D. Cairns, The Hague: Nijhoff. (Scholar)
  • Kerry, B., 1885–1891, “Über Anschauung und ihre psychische Verarbeitung”, Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 1885, 9: 432–493; 1886, 10: 419–467; 1887, 11: 53–116 and 249–307; 1891, 15: 127–167. (Scholar)
  • Kitcher, K., 1975, “Bolzano’s ideal of algebraic analysis”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 6(3): 229–269. (Scholar)
  • Kolman, A., 1961, Bernard Bolzano, Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Kozelmann Ziv, A., 2010, Kräfte, Wahrscheinlichkeit und “Zuversicht”, Bernard Bolzanos Erkenntnislehre, Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag. (Scholar)
  • Koreň, L., 2014, “Quantificational account of logical consequence”, II: In the Footsteps of Bolzano, Organon, Bratislava, 3(21), 303–326. (Scholar)
  • Krause, A., 2004, Bolzanos Metaphysik, Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber. (Scholar)
  • Krickel, F., 1995, Teil und Inbegriff. Bernard Bolzanos Mereologie, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Künne, W., 1998, “Bernard Bolzano”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 824–828. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, Versuche Über Bolzano. Essays on Bolzano, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Lapointe, S., 2000, “Analyticité, universalité et quantification chez Bolzano”, in Les Études Philosophiques, 4: 455–470. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, Qu’est-ce que l’analyse?, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Laz, J., 1993, Bolzano critique de Kant, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
  • Lukasiewicz, J., 1970, The logical foundations of probability calculus, in Selected Works, Amsterdam: North Holland. (Scholar)
  • Mačák, K., 1996, “Bernard Bolzano and the calculus of probabilities”, (Czech), in Mathematics in the 19th century, (Czech), Prague: Prometheus, pp. 39–55. (Scholar)
  • Materna, P., 1995, The World of Concepts and Logic, (Czech), Prague: Filosofia. (Scholar)
  • Morscher, E., 1997, “Bolzano’s Method of Variation: Three Puzzles”, W. Künne, et al. (eds.), Grazer philosophische Studien, 53: 151–159. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003a “La définition bolzanienne de l’analyticité logique, ”Philosophiques, 30: 149–169. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, Studien zur Logik Bernard Bolzanos, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Mugnai, M., 1992, “Leibniz and Bolzano on the ‘Realm of truths’”, in BW-1987: 207–220. (Scholar)
  • Niiniuloto I., 1977, “Bolzano and Bayes’ tests”, Studia Excellentia, Essays in Honour of Oliva Ketonen, 30–36, Helsinki. (Scholar)
  • Nový, L, 1982, “Bolzano’s contribution to science and society”, in Impact of Bolzano’s epoch on the development of science, Prague: Institute of Czechoslovak and General History, 9–23. (Scholar)
  • Preti, G., 1976, “I fondamenti della logica formale pura nella ‘Wissenschaftslehre’ di B. Bolzano e nelle ‘Logische Unturschungen’ di E. Husserl”, Saggi filosofici (vol. I, pp. 11–31), Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  • Prihonsky, 1850, Neuer Anti-Kant oder Prüfung der Kritik der reinen Vernunft nach den in Bolzano‘s Wissenschaftslehre niedergelegten Begriffen, Bautzen; English transl. by S. Lapointe and C. Tolley, 2014, Houndmills: Palgrave and MacMillan. (Scholar)
  • Proust, J., 1986, Questions de forme, Logique et proposition analytique de Kant à Carnap, Paris: Fayard; Engl. transl. Questions of form, Logic and analytic proposition from Kant to Carnap, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
  • Rootselaar, B. van, 1970–1990, “Bernard Bolzano”, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, New York, II, 273–279. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, “Axiomatics in Bolzanos logico-mathematical research”, in BW-1987: 221–230. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “A Priori Knowledge in Bolzano, Conceptual Truths, and Judgments”, in M. van der Schaar (ed.), Judgment and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic, Dordrecht: Springer, 101–130. (Scholar)
  • Roski, S. and P. Rusnock, 2014, “Bolzano on necessary existence”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(3): 320–359. doi:10.1515/agph-2014-0015 (Scholar)
  • Roski, S. and B. Schnieder (eds.), 2021, Bolzano’s Philosophy of Grounding, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Rumberg, A., 2009, Ableitbarkeit und Abfolge bei Bernard Bolzano vor dem Hintergrund des modelltheoretischen und beweistheoretischen Folgerungsbegriff, Magisterarbeit Universität Tübingen. (Scholar)
  • –––, “Bolzano’s concept of grounding (Abfolge) against the background of normal proofs”, Review of Symbolic Logic, 6(3): 424–459. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, P., 1997, “Bolzano and the traditions of analysis ”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 53: 61–85. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Philosophy of mathematics: Bolzano’s responses to Kant and Lagrange”, in Sinaceur 1999: 99–427. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012, “Remarks on Bolzano’s conception of necessary truth”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20(4): 817–837. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013a, “Kant and Bolzano on analyticity”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 95(3): 298–335. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013b, “On Bolzano’s concept of a Sum”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 34(2): 155–169. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, P. and Burke, M., 2010, “Etchemendy and Bolzano on logical consequence”, in History and Philosophy of Logic, 31(3): 3–29. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, P. and R. George, 2004, “Bolzano as logician”, in Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 3: The Rise of modern logic: from Leibniz to Frege, D. Gabbay and J. Woods (eds), Amsterdam: Nort Holland, 177–205. (Scholar)
  • Rusnock, P. and J. Šebestik, 2019, Bernard Bolzano: His Life and Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Russ, S., 1992, “Bolzano’s analytic program”, The Mathematical Intelligencer, 14(3): 45–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1982, “Influence of Bolzano’s methodology on the development of his mathematics”, in Impact of Bolzano’s epoch on the development of science, Prague, 335–337. (Scholar)
  • Schmutz, J., 2009, “Quand le langage a-t-il cessé d’être mental? Remarques sur les sources scolastiques de Bolzano”, in Le langage mental du Moyen-Âge à l’Âge classique, J. Biard (dir.), Louvain: Ed. Peeters, pp. 307–337. (Scholar)
  • Schnieder, B., 2002, Substanz und Adhärenz. Bolzanos Ontologie des Wirklichen, Sankt Augustin: Akademia. (Scholar)
  • Scholz, H., 1961, “Die Wissenschaftslehre Bolzanos: Eine Jahrhundert-Betrachtung (1937)”, in Mathesis Universalis, Basel-Stuttgart: Benno Schwabe. (Scholar)
  • Šebestik, J., 2013, “Review of S. Lapointe, Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy, An Introduction”, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 2(2): 5. doi:10.4148/jhap.v2i2.1947 (Scholar)
  • Segura, L.F., 2001, La prehistoria del logicismo, Mexico: Plaza y Valdes. (Scholar)
  • Simons, P., 1997, “Bolzano on collections”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 53: 87–108. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “Bolzano e la logica”, S. Besoli et al. (eds.) 2011: 321–342. (Scholar)
  • Sinaceur, H., 1996, “Bolzano et les mathématiques”, in Les philosophes et les mathématiques, Paris: Ellipses, pp. 150–173. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, “Réalisme mathématique, réalisme logique chez Bolzano”, in Sinaceur 1999: 457–477. (Scholar)
  • Stelzner, W., 2002, “Compatibility and relevance: Bolzano and Orlov”, in The Third German-Polish Workshop on Logic & Logical Philosophy, Dresden, 2001, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 10: 137–171. (Scholar)
  • Sundholm, B.G, 2002, “A Century of Inference: 1837–1936”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (11, Cracow 1999), J. Wolenski and K. Placek (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011, “A Garden of Grounding Trees ”, in Logic and Knowledge, C. Cellucci, E. Grosholz, and E. Ippoliti, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 57–74. (Scholar)
  • Tarski, A., 1936 [1983], “Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung”, in Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, fasc. 7 (Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, vol. 394), Paris: Hermann et Cie, pp. 1–11; English translation by J.H. Woodger in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, second edition, J. Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983, pp. 409–420. (Scholar)
  • Tatzel, A., 2002, “Bolzano’s theory of ground and consequence, ” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 43: 1–25. (Scholar)
  • Textor, M., 1996, Bolzanos Propositionalismus, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Thompson, P., 1981, “Bolzano’s deducibility and Tarski’s logical consequence”, History and. Philosophy of Logic, 2: 11–20. (Scholar)
  • Vlasáková, M., 2005, Bernard Bolzano: the road towards logical semantic (Czech), Prague: Filosofia. (Scholar)
  • Voltaggio, F., 1974, Bernard Bolzano e la dottrina della scienza, Milano: Edizioni di Comunità. (Scholar)
  • Wussing, W., 1981, “Bernard Bolzano und die Grundlegung der Analysis”, Mitteilungen der Matematischen Gesellschaft der DDR, 2–4: 128–152. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Nov 28 03:15:33 2021