Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Bradley’s Regress" by Katarina Perovic

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Alexander, Samuel, 1920 [1966], Space, Time, and Deity: the Gifford lectures at Glasgow, 1916–1918, 2 volumes, London: MacMillan. (Scholar)
Armstrong, David M., 1978, Nominalism & Realism: Universals & Scientific Realism (Volume I), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Universals: An Opinionated Introduction, Boulder: Westview Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Four Disputes About Properties”, Synthese, 144(3): 309–320. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-5852-7 (Scholar)
Baxter, Donald L.M., 1996, “Bradley on Substantive and Adjective: The Complex-Unity Problem”, in W.J. Mander (ed.), Perspectives on the Logic and Metaphysics of F.H. Bradley, Bristol: Thoemmes. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Instantiation as Partial Identity”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79(4): 449–464. (Scholar)
Bennett, Karen, 2011, “By Our Bootstraps”, Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1): 27–41. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00207.x (Scholar)
Bergmann, Gustav, 1967, Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. (Scholar)
Blanshard, Brand, 1986, “Bradley on Relations”, in Anthony Manser and Guy Stock (eds.), Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Bonino, Guido, 2012, “Bradley’s Regress: Relations, Exemplification, Unity”, Axiomathes, 23(2): 189–200. doi:10.1007/s10516-012-9190-3 (Scholar)
Bradley, F.H., 1893, Appearance and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1910, “On Appearance, Error and Contradiction”, Mind, 19(74): 153–185. doi:10.1093/mind/xix.1.153 (Scholar)
–––, 1911, “Reply to Mr. Russell’s Explanations”, Mind, 20(77): 74–76. doi:10.1093/mind/xx.77.74 (Scholar)
–––, 1926, “Relations”, in Collected Essays (Volume II), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Broad, C.D., 1933, Examination of McTaggart’s Philosophy (Volume I), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Brzozowski, Jacek, 2008, “On Locating Composite Objects”, in Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics (Volume 4), 193–222. (Scholar)
Cameron, Ross P., 2008, “Turtles All The Way Down”, Philosophical Quarterly, 58(230): 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.509.x (Scholar)
Candlish, Stewart and Pierfrancesco Basile, 2017, “Francis Herbert Bradley,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition),, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/bradley/> (Scholar)
Collins, J. 2011, The Unity of Linguistic Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Daly, C., 1997, “Tropes”, in D. H. Mellor and A. Oliver (eds.), Properties, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997: 140–159. (Scholar)
Davidson, D. 2005, Truth and Predication, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Eklund, Matti, 2019, “Regress, Unity, Facts, and Propositions,” Synthese, 19(4): 1225–1247. (Scholar)
Frege, G., 1891, “Function and Concept”, in The Frege Reader, M. Beaney (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. (Scholar)
Gaskin, R., 1995, “Bradley’s Regress, The Copula and the Unity of the Proposition”, Philosophical Quarterly, 45(179): 161–180. doi:10.2307/2220413 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, The Unity of The Proposition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Grossmann, R., 1992, The Existence of The World, London and New York: Routledge (Scholar)
Hakkarainen, Jani and Markku Keinänen, 2023, “Bradley’s Relation Regress and the Inadequacy of the Relata-Specific Answer”, Acta Analytica, 38(2): 229–243. (Scholar)
Hanks, Peter W., 2007, “How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment”, Synthese, 154(1): 121–146. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-0195-y (Scholar)
Henninger, M. G., 1989, Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Hochberg, H., 1978, Thought, Fact, and Reference: The Origins and Ontology of Logical Atomism, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 2002, “Tensing the Copula”, Mind, 111(441): 1–13. doi:10.1093/mind/111.441.1 (Scholar)
MacBride, Fraser, 2016, “Relations”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <Relations" target="other">https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/Relations> (Scholar)
Mugnai, M., 2010, “Leibniz and Bradley’s Regress”, The Leibniz Review, 20: 1–12. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, Leibniz’ Theory of Relations, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. (Scholar)
Martin, C.B., 1980, “Substance Substantiated”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58(1): 3–10. doi:10.1080/00048408012341001 (Scholar)
Meinertsen, B., 2008, “A Relation as the Unifier of States of Affairs”, Dialectica, 62(1): 1–19. (Scholar)
Maurin, Anna-Sofia, 2010, “Trope theory and the Bradley regress”, Synthese, 175(3): 311–326. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9511-2 (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “States of Affairs and the Relation Regress”, in G. Galluzzo, M. J. Loux, and J. Lowe eds. The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–214. (Scholar)
Morris, Kevin, 2023, “Della Rocca’s Relations Regress and Bradley’s Relations Regresses”, Acta Analytica, first online 14 December 2023. doi:10.1007/s12136-023-00578-9 (Scholar)
Olson, K. R., 1987, An Essay on Facts, Stanford: CSLI. (Scholar)
Orilia, F., 2006, “States of Affairs. Bradley vs. Meinong”, in V. Raspa (ed.), Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy, Meinong Studies, 2: 213–238, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Bradley’s Regress: Meinong vs. Bergmann”, in L. Addis, G. Jesson, E. Tegtmeier, eds. Ontology and Analysis: Essays and Recollections about Gustav Bergmann, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 133–163. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Bradley’s Regress and Ungrounded Dependence Chains: A Reply to Cameron”, Dialectica, 63(3): 333–341. (Scholar)
Perovic, Katarina, 2014, “The Import of The Original Bradley’s Regress(es)”, Axiomathes, 24(3): 375–394. doi:10.1007/s10516-014-9229-8 (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “A Neo-Armstrongian Defense of States of Affairs: A Reply to Vallicella”, Metaphysica, 17(2): 143–161. (Scholar)
Phemister, P., 2016, “Leibnizian Pluralism and Bradleian Monism: a Question of Relations”, Studia Leibnitiana, 45: 61–79. (Scholar)
Plato, Parmenides, in The Collected Dialogues, (1963), E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russell, Bertrand, 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1910, “Some Explanations in Reply to Mr. Bradley”, Mind, 19(75): 373–378. doi:10.1093/mind/xix.1.373 (Scholar)
–––, 1911, “On the Relations of Universals and Particulars”, page references to reprint in Russell 1956: 105–124. (Scholar)
Schaffer, Jonathan, 2016, “Monism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/monism/> (Scholar)
Simons, P., 1994, “Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(3): 553–575. (Scholar)
Skrzypulec, Błażej, 2019, “Bradley’s Regress and Visual Content”, Axiomathes, 29: 155–172. (Scholar)
Spade, P.V. (trans.), 1994, Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Scholar)
Strawson, P.F., 1959, Individuals, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Vallicella, W. F., 2000, “Three Conceptions of States of Affairs”, Noûs, 34(2): 237–259. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Relations, Monism, and the Vindication of Bradley’s Regress”, Dialectica, 56(1): 3–35. (Scholar)
Vlastos, G., 1954, “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides”, The Philosophical Review, 63(3): 319–349. (Scholar)
Wieland, J. W., Betti, A., 2008, “Relata-Specific Relations: A Response to Vallicella”, Dialectica, 62(4): 509–524. (Scholar)
Wiese, Wanja, 2017, “How to Solve the Problem of Phenomenal Unity: Finding Alternatives to the Single State Conception”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(5): 811–836. (Scholar)
Wollheim, R., 1959, F. H. Bradley, London: Penguin Books. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 11 04:57:33 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...