Works by Brentano

• Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, 2 books, 1874. In 1911 an edition of part of the second book with new appendices was published as Von der Klassifikation der psychischen Phänomene. A revised edition of the whole including the 1911 appendices, edited by Oskar Kraus, was published in 1924. An English translation, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, based on the 1924 edition was published in 1973.
  • [PES] Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Linda L. McAlister (ed.). Antos C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister (trans.), London: Routledge, 1973, page numbers from the 1995 edition edited by Tim Crane and Jonathan Wolff. (Scholar)
  Page references in brackets refer to the 1973 German edition, Volume I and II, Hamburg: Meiner and to SVS volume 1
• [EL80] Logik. Manuscript, Houghton Library: Harvard. available online.
• [LRU] Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil, Franziska Mayer-Hillebrand (ed.), Bern: Francke Verlag, 1956.
• Wahrheit und Evidenz, Oskar Kraus (ed.), 1930.
  • [TE] The True and the Evident, Roderick M. Chisholm (ed.), Roderick M. Chisholm, Ilse Politzer, and Kurt R. Fischer (trans.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966. Page numbers from the 2010 edition. (Scholar)
  • Page reference are to the 1974 German edition, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. (Scholar)
• Grundlegung und Aufbau der Ethik, Bern: Francke Verlag, 1952.
  • [FCE] Foundation and Construction of Ethics, Elizabeth Hughes Schneewind (trans.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973. Page numbers from the 2009 edition. (Scholar)
  Page references in brackets refer to the 1978 German edition, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag and to SVS volume 3.
• Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis, Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot, 1889. Second edition with Oskar Kraus as editor, 1921, Leipzig: Felix Meiner. Third revised edition also edited by Kraus in 1934.
  • [OKRW] The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, Roderick M. Chisholm (ed.), Roderick M. Chisholm and Elizabeth H. Schneewind (trans.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969. Based on the third edition. Page numbers from the 2009 reprint. (Scholar)
  Page references in brackets to the 1969 German reprint, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
• [VNV] “Von der Natur der Vorstellung” (Diktat 1903). Printed 1987, Johannes Brandl (ed.), in Conceptus: Zeitschrift für Philosophie 21(53/54): 25–31, 1987. (Scholar)
• [DP] Deskriptive Psychologie, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1982, based on a series of lectures given in 1887. Translated as Descriptive Psychology by Benito Müller, London: Routledge, 1995.
• [SVS] Sämtliche veröffentlichte Schriften (Complete Published Works), Thomas Binder and Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (eds), Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.

Further Historical Texts

• Aquinas, Thomas, 1265ff, Summa Theologica. English translation, 1947, by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros. Summa Theologica available online (Scholar)
• Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, (Revised Oxford Translation), J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press 1984.
• Bain, Alexander, 1872, Mental and Moral Science. London: Longman, Greens and Co. [Bain 1872 available online] (Scholar)
• Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm, 1863, Neue Darstellung der Logik nach Ihren einfachsten Verhältnissen. Mit Rücksicht auf Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, third edition, Leipzig: Voss. (Scholar)
• Frege, Gottlob, 1918, “Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung”. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I, pp. 143–157. Translated as “Negation” in his Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy, Brian McGuinness (ed.), Oxford: Blackwells, 1984, 373–389. (Scholar)
• Jerusalem, Wilhelm, 1895, Die Urteilsfunktion. Eine Pyschologische und Erkenntniskritische Untersuchung, Wien: Braunmüller. (Scholar)
• Herbart, Johann Friedrich, 1813, Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie, Königsberg: Unzer. (Scholar)
• Hillebrand, Franz, 1891, Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse, Wien: Hölder. Reprinted by VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken 2007. (Scholar)
• Husserl, Edmund, 1896 [2001], Logik Vorlesung 1896, Elisabeth Schuhmann (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0779-5 (Scholar)
• –––, 1900–1901, Logische Untersuchungen, Niemeyer: Halle a. d. Saale; second edition, 1913–1922. English translation of the second edition, Logical Investigations, J.N. Findlay (trans.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970. (Scholar)
• Karelitzki, Arnold, 1914, Urteil und Anerkennung, Parchim: Hermann Freise. (Scholar)
• Land, J. P. N., 1876, “Brentano’s Logical Innovations”, Mind, old series, 1(2): 289–292. doi:10.1093/mind/os-1.2.289 (Scholar)
• Marty, Anton [d. 1914], 2011, Deskriptive Psychologie, Mauro Antonelli and Johann Marek, Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann. (Scholar)
• Meinong, Alexius, 1892, “Rezension von: Franz Hillebrand, Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse”, in his Gesamtausgabe, Bd 7, Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, pp. 197–222. (Scholar)
• Mill, John Stuart, 1872 [1972], Letter to Brentano (18.12.1872), in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVII—The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849–1873, Part IV, Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley (eds). University of Toronto Press/Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972. (Scholar)
• –––, 1878, Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind, second edition. Edited with additional notes by J. St. Mill. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer. (Scholar)
• Reinach, Adolf, 1911, “Zur Theorie des negativen Urteils”, Münchener Philosophische Abhandlungen, Festschrift for T. Lipps, A. Pfänder (ed.), Leipzig: Barth; English translation as “On the Theory of the Negative Judgment”, in Barry Smith (ed.), 1982, Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Philosophia Verlag, München: 315–377. (Scholar)
• Schlick, Moritz, 1925, Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Frankfurt. (Eng. trans. General Theory of Knowledge, New York 1974). (Scholar)
• Twardowski, Kazimierz, 2016, Logik: Wiener Logikkolleg 1894/95, Berlin. Walter de Gruyter. (Scholar)

Secondary Literature

• Bacigalupo, Giuliano, 2018, “Towards a New Brentanian Theory of Judgment”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 95(2): 245–264. doi:10.1163/18756735-000039 (Scholar)
• Betti, Arianna, 2013, “We Owe It To Sigwart! A New Look at the Content/Object Distinction in Early Phenomenological Theories of Judgment from Brentano to Twardowski”, in Textor 2013b: 74–96. doi:10.1057/9781137286338_5">10.1057/9781137286338_5 (Scholar)
• Betti, Arianna and Maria van der Schaar, 2004, “The Road from Vienna to Lvov Twardowski’s Theory of Judgement between 1894 and 1897”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 67(1): 1–20. doi:10.1163/18756735-90000821 (Scholar)
• Brandl, Johannes L., 2017, “Was Brentano an Early Deflationist About Truth?”, The Monist, 100(1): 1–14. (Scholar)
• Brandl, Johannes L., and Mark Textor, 2021, “‘Disentangling Judgement from its Linguistic Clothing’: Brentano’s View of Judgement and its Linguistic Guises”, in M. Antonelli & T. Binder (eds.), The Philosophy of Brentano, Leiden/Boston: Brill/Rodopi, 156–79. (Scholar)
• Chisholm, Roderick M., 1982, “Brentano’s Theory of Judgement” in Brentano and Meinong Studies, Roderick M. Chisholm (ed.), Amsterdam: Rodopi: 17–36. (Scholar)
• Cobb-Stevens, Richard, 1998, “Two Stages in Husserl’s Critique of Brentano’s Theory of Judgment:”, Études Phénoménologiques, 14(27): 193–212. doi:10.5840/etudphen19981427/287 (Scholar)
• Church, Alonzo, 1947, “Review of Psychologie Du Point de Vue Empirique, by Franz Brentano”, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(2): 56–57. (Scholar)
• Crivelli, Paolo, 2004, Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511482496 (Scholar)
• Fréchette, Guillaume, 2014, “Austrian Logical Realism? Brentano on States of Affairs”, in Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations, Guido Bonino, Greg Jesson, and Javier Cumpa (eds.), Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9781614516651.379 (Scholar)
• Geach, P. T., 1965, “Assertion”, The Philosophical Review, 74(4): 449–465. Reprinted in his Logic Matters, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1972: 254–269. doi:10.2307/2183123 (Scholar)
• Ierna, Carlo, 2008, “Husserl’s Critique of Double Judgments”, in Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives, Filip Mattens (ed.), (Phaenomenologica 187), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 49–73. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8331-0_3 (Scholar)
• Janoušek, Hynek, 2015, “Judgmental Force and Assertion in Brentano and Early Husserl”:, Studia Phaenomenologica, 15: 105–128. doi:10.5840/studphaen2015157 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Consciousness of Judging: Katkov’s Critique of Marty’s State of Affairs and Brentano’s Description of Judgement”, in Mind and Language—On the Philosophy of Anton Marty, Guillaume Fréchette and Hamid Taieb (eds.), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 241–260. doi:10.1515/9783110531480-011 (Scholar)
• Kriegel, Uriah, 2015, “How to Speak of Existence: A Brentanian Approach to (Linguistic and Mental) Ontological Commitment”, in Themes from Ontology, Mind, and Logic: Essays in Honor of Peter Simons, Sandra Lapointe (ed.) (Grazer Philosophische Studien, 91), Brill, 81–106. doi:10.1163/9789004302273_005 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Brentano’s Classification of Mental Phenomena”, in Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School, Uriah Kriegel (ed.), London: Routledge, 97–102. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Belief-That and Belief-In: Which Reductive Analysis?”, in Non-Propositional Intentionality, Alex Grzankowski and Michelle Montague (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 192–214. (Scholar)
• Łukasiewicz, Dariusz, 2007, “Brentano’s Theory of Judgment and the Lvov-Warsaw School”, Ruch Filozoficzny 64(1), 33–47. (Scholar)
• Martin, Wayne M., 2010, “Fichte’s Logical Legacy: Thetic Judgment from the Wissenschaftslehre to Brentano”, in Fichte and the Phenomenological Tradition, Violetta L. Waibel, Daniel Breazeale, and Tom Rockmore (eds.), Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 379–407. doi:10.1515/9783110245288.4.379 (Scholar)
• Mulligan Kevin, 2013, “Acceptance, Acknowledgment, Affirmation, Agreement, Assertion, Belief, Certainty, Conviction, Denial, Judgment, Refusal & Rejection”, in Textor 2013b: 97–137. doi:10.1057/9781137286338_6 (Scholar)
• Parsons, Charles, 2004, “Brentano on Judgment and Truth”, in The Cambridge Companion to Brentano, Dale Jacquette (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–196. doi:10.1017/ccol0521809800.008 (Scholar)
• Parsons, Terence, 2017, “The Traditional Square of Opposition”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/square/>. (Scholar)
• Pietroski, Paul M., 2005, Events and Semantic Architecture, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244300.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Prior, Arthur N., 1962, Formal Logic, Oxford: The Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1976, The Doctrine of Propositions and Terms, Duckworth, London. (Scholar)
• Rojszczak, Artur and Barry Smith, 2003, “Theories of Judgement”, in The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945, Thomas Baldwin (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 157–173. doi:10.1017/chol9780521591041.013 (Scholar)
• Rollinger, Robin, 2020, Concept and Judgement in Brentano’s Logic Lectures, Leiden/Boston: Brill/Rodopi. (Scholar)
• Rosenkoetter, Timothy, 2010, “Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant’s Definitions of Judgment”, European Journal of Philosophy, 18(4): 539–566. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00362.x (Scholar)
• Simons, Peter M., 1987, “Brentano’s Reform of Logic”, Topoi, 6(1): 25–38. doi:10.1007/bf00141816 (Scholar)
• Staiti, Andrea, 2015, “Husserl and Rickert on the Nature of Judgment”, Philosophy Compass, 10(12): 815–827. doi:10.1111/phc3.12270 (Scholar)
• Sundholm, Göran, 2009, “A Century of Judgment and Inference, 1837–1936: Some Strands in the Development of Logic”, in The Development of Modern Logic, Leila Haaparanta (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, 263–317. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137316.003.0028 (Scholar)
• Stumpf, Carl, 1919, “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano”, in Oskar Kraus, 1919, Franz Brentano, München: Beck, 87–147. (Scholar)
• Terrell, Burnham, 1976, “Franz Brentano’s Logical Innovations”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 1: 81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1976.tb00015.x (Scholar)
• –––, 1978, “Quantification and Brentano’s Logic:”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 5: 45–65. doi:10.5840/gps1978520 (Scholar)
• Tassone, Biagio G., 2011, “Franz Brentano’s Phenomenological Transformation of Aristotle’s Theory of Judgment”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(3): 305–328. doi:10.1080/00071773.2011.11006749 (Scholar)
• Textor, Mark, 2007, “Seeing Something and Believing IN It”, in Perspectives on Perception, Mary Margaret McCabe and Mark Textor (eds.), Berlin, Boston: Ontos, 65–87. doi:10.1515/9783110327557.65 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013a, “‘Thereby we have broken with the old logical dualism’—Reinach on negative judgement and negation”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21 (3): 570–590. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2013b, Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137286338 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Towards a Neo-Brentanian Theory of Existence”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 17(6): 20 pages. [Textor 2017 available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2020, “How many terms does a judgement have? Jerusalem versus Brentano”, in Franz Brentano and Austrian Philosophy, Denis Fisette and Guillaume Fréchette (eds.), Cham: Springer, 235–51. (Scholar)
• Vallicella, William F., 2001, “Brentano on Existence”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18(3): 311–327. (Scholar)