Primary Literature

• Expositio vetus super librum Porphyrii, in M. von Perger, “Walter Burley’s Expositio vetus super librum Porphyrii. An edition”, Franciscan Studies 59 (2001): 237–269. (Scholar)
• Expositio vetus super librum Praedicamentorum, in M. von Perger, “Walter Burley’s Expositio vetus super librum Praedicamentorum. An Edition”, Franciscan Studies 61 (2003): 55–95. (Scholar)
• Quaestiones circa tertium De anima, in Questions on the De anima by Magister Adam Burley and Dominus Walter Burley, ed. by E.A. Synan, Leiden: Brill, 1997.
• Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias, in S.F. Brown, “Walter Burley’s Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias”, Franciscan Studies, 34 (1974): 200–295. (Scholar)
• Tractatus de suppositionibus, in S.F. Brown, “Walter Burleigh’s Treatise De suppositionibus and its Influence on William of Ockham”, Franciscan Studies, 32 (1972): 15–64. (Scholar)
• Tractatus super Praedicamenta Aristotelis, Cambridge, Peterhouse, ms. 184, fols. 171ra–189vb—provisional edition on the basis of all the four mss. by Alessandro D. Conti (see below: Other Internet Resources).
• Commentarius in librum Perihermeneias, in S.F. Brown, “Walter Burley’s Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Perihermeneias”, Franciscan Studies, 33 (1973): 45–134. (Scholar)
• Quaestiones super librum Posteriorum, ed. by M.C. Sommers, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2000.
• Expositio libri De anima, Bibl. Apost. Vat., ms. Vat. Lat. 2151, fols. 1ra–88rb.
• Expositio librorum Physicorum, Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, ms. 448, pp. 172–543.
• De potentiis animae, in M.J. Kitchel, “The De potentiis animae of Walter Burley”, Mediaeval Studies, 33 (1971): 85–113. (Scholar)
• De relativis, in H. Shapiro – M.J. Kiteley, “Walter Burleigh’s De relativis”, Franciscan Studies, 22 (1962): 155–171. (Scholar)
• Expositio in libros octo Physicorum Aristotelis, ed. Venetiis 1501.
• Tractatus de formis, ed. by J.D. Scott, München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1970.
• De puritate artis logicae. Tractus longior, with a Revised Edition of the Tractatus brevior, ed. by Ph. Boehner, St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 1955.
• Expositio super Artem Veterem Porphyrii et Aristotelis, ed. Venetiis 1509.
• Expositio super Universalia Porphyrii, (1337), provisional edition in M. Vittorini, Predicabili e categorie nell’ultimo commento di Walter Burley all’Isagoge di Porfirio, Ph.D. diss., University of Salerno, Academic Year 2004–05, Appendice, pp. 429–495.
• Tractatus de universalibus, ed. by H.-U. Wöhler, Leipzig: Verlag der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999.

Secondary Literature

• Ashworth, E.J., (1991),“Equivocation and Analogy in Fourteenth Century Logic: Ockham, Burley and Buridan,” in Historia Philosophiae Medii Aevi, Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, B. Mojsisch and O. Pluta eds., 2 vols, Amsterdam, vol. 1, pp. 23–43. (Scholar)
• –––, (1992),“Analogical Concepts: The Fourteenth-Century Background to Cajetan,” Dialogue, 31, pp. 399–413. (Scholar)
• –––, (2008) Les theories de l’analogie du XIIe au XVIe siecle, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• Berger, H. “Extensionale versus Intensionale Semantik am Beispiel der Sprachphilosophie Ockhams und Burleighs.” Acta Analytica 4 (1989), 171–86. (Scholar)
• Biard, J., (1989), Logique et théorie du signe au 14e siècle, Paris: Vrin, pp. 136–161. (Scholar)
• –––, (2004), “Le statut des énoncés dans les commentaires du Peri Hermeneias de Gauthier Burley”, in The Commentaries on Peri Hermeneias in the Middle Ages, eds. H.A.G. Braakhuis and C.H. Kneepkens, Haaren, pp. 103–118. (Scholar)
• Boh, I., (1994), “Walter Burley”, in J.E. Garcia Jorge ed., Individuation in Sholasticism. The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150–1650, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 347–372. (Scholar)
• Bulthuis, N.E., (2016), “Properties in Walter Burley’s Later Metaphysics,” in A Companion to Responses to Ockham, C. Rode ed., Leiden: Brill, pp. 140–72. (Scholar)
• Cesalli, L., (2001), “Le réalisme propositionnel de Walter Burley”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 68: 155–221. (Scholar)
• –––, (2007), Le réalisme propositionnel: sémantique et ontologie des propositions chez Jeans Duns Scot, Gauthier Burley, Richard Brinkley et Jean Wyclif, Paris: Vrin. (Scholar)
• –––, (2007), “Intentionality and Truth-Making: Augustine’s Influence on Burley’s and Wyclif’s Propositional Semantics”, Vivarium, 45.2: 283–297. (Scholar)
• Conti, A.D., (1989), “Essenza ed essere nel pensiero della tarda scolastica (Burley, Wyclif, Paolo Veneto)”, Medioevo, 15: 235–267. (Scholar)
• –––, (1990), “Ontology in Walter Burley’s Last Commentary on the Ars Vetus”, Franciscan Studies, 50: 121–176. (Scholar)
• –––, (1999), “Second Intentions in the Late Middle Ages”, in S. Ebbesen – R. Friedmann eds., Medieval Analysis in Language and Cognition, Copenhagen: The Royal Academy of Sciences and Letters, pp. 453–470 (Scholar)
• –––, (2000), “Significato e verità in Walter Burley”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 11: 317–350 (Scholar)
• –––, (2004), “La conoscenza del singolare in Walter Burley”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 15: 517–540 (Scholar)
• –––, (2008–09), “Ockham and Burley on Categories and Universals: a Comparison”, The Modern Schoolman, 86.1–2: 181–210 (Scholar)
• Conti, A.D. ed., (2013), A Companion to Walter Burley, Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, Leiden: Brill. (Scholar)
• Daly, L.J., (1968) “The Conclusions of Walter Burley’s Commentary on the Politics: Books I to IV,” Manuscripta 12, 79–92. (Scholar)
• –––, (1969), “The Conclusions of Walter Burley’s Commentary on the Politics: Books V and VI,” Manuscripta 13, 142–49. (Scholar)
• –––, (1971), “The Conclusions of Walter Burley’s Commentary on the Politics: Books VII and VIII,” Manuscripta 15, 13–22. (Scholar)
• –––, (1969), “Some Notes on Walter Burley’s Commentary on the Politics,” in Essays in Medieval History Presented to Bertie Wilkinson, T.A. Sandquist and M.R. Powicke, eds., 270–81. (Scholar)
• Dekker, D.-J., (2001), “Time and Motion in Walter Burley’s Late Expositio on Aristotle’s Physics,” Early Science and Medicine 6.3: 185–203. (Scholar)
• Dewender, Th., (2011.), “William of Ockham and Walter Burley on Signification and Imaginary Objects,” in Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages. A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, K. Emery, R.L. Friedman, and A. Speer eds., Leiden: Brill, pp. 437–50. (Scholar)
• Donati, S., (2004), “Il dibattito sulle dimensioni indeterminate tra XIII e XIV secolo: Thomas Wylton and Walter Burley,” Medioevo, 29: 177–231. (Scholar)
• D’Ors, A., (1990), “Ex impossibili quodlibet sequitur (Walter Burley),” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age, 57: 121–54 (Scholar)
• –––, (1990) “On Stump’s Interpretation of Burley’s De obligationibus,” in Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Simo Knuuttila, Sten Ebbesen, and Reijo Tyorinoja, Helsinki, pp. 468–78. (Scholar)
• Ebbesen, S. (1985), “OXYNAT: A Theory about the Origins of British Logic,” in The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, P.O. Lewry ed., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, pp. 1–17. (Scholar)
• Feltrin, P., Parodi, M., (1983), “Il problema del primo e ultimo istante in Walter Burley”, Medioevo, 9: 137–178. (Scholar)
• Gambra, J.M., (1996), “El compromiso de existencia y la teoría de la predicación en la obra de Gualterio Burley”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 63: 139–170. (Scholar)
• Green-Pedersen, N.J., (1981), “Walter Burley, De consequentiis and the Origin of the Theory of Consequence,” in English Logic and Semantics. Acts of the 4th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, H.A.G. Braakhuis, C.H. Kneepkens, and L.M. de Rijk eds., Nijmegen, pp. 279–304. (Scholar)
• Karger, E., (1996), “Mental Sentences according to Burley and the Early Ockham”, Vivarium, 34: 192–230. (Scholar)
• –––, (1999), “Walter Burley’s Realism”, Vivarium, 37: 24–40. (Scholar)
• Krieger, G., (1999), “Studies on Walter Burley, 1989–1997”, Vivarium, 37: 94–100. (Scholar)
• de Libera, A., (1996), La querelle des universaux. De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age, Paris: Seuil, passim. (Scholar)
• Maier, A.L., (1947), “Zu Walter Burley’s Politik-Kommentar”, Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 14: 322–336. (Scholar)
• –––, (1964), “Ein unbeacheter ‘Averroist’ des 14ten Jahrhunderts: Walter Burley”, in Ausgehendes Mittelalter, Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, pp. 101–122 (Scholar)
• Markowski, M., (1982), “Die Anschauunngen des Walter Burleigh über die Universalien”, in A. Maierù ed., English Logic in Italy in the 14^th and 15^th Centuries, Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 219–229. (Scholar)
• –––, (1982), “Johannes Buridans Polemik gegen die Universalienlehre des Walter Burleigh”, Medievalia Philosophica Polonorum, 26: 7–17. (Scholar)
• Martin, C., (1964), “Walter Burleigh”, in W.H. Hinnebush ed., Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 194–230. (Scholar)
• McCord Adams, M., (1982), “Universals in the Early 14^th Century”, in N. Kretzmann – A. Kenny – J. Pinborg eds., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press, pp. 413–439. (Scholar)
• Mugnai, M., (1982), “La Expositio reduplicativarum che Walter Burleigh et Paulus Venetus”, in A. Maierù ed., English Logic in Italy in the 14^th and 15^th Centuries, Napoli: Bibliopolis, pp. 305–320. (Scholar)
• Normore, C., (1982), “Walter Burley on Continuity”, in N. Kretzmann ed., Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 258–269. (Scholar)
• Nuchelmans, G., (1973), Theories of the Proposition, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 219–225. (Scholar)
• Ottman, J., Wood, R., (1999), “Walter Burley: His Life and Works”, Vivarium, 37: 1–24. (Scholar)
• Perini-Santos, E., (2010), “Por que construir uma proposicao com coisas? As razoes de Gualter Burleigh em 1301,” Discurso 40: 123–44. (Scholar)
• Perler, D., (1992), Der propositionale Wahrheitsbegriff in 14. Jahrhundert, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
• Pinborg, J., (1969), “Walter Burleigh on the Meaning of Proposition”, Classica et Medieaevalia, 28: 394–404. (Scholar)
• Rode, C., (2005), “Sätze und Dinge. Die propositio in re bei Walter Burley und anderen”, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter, 10: 67–90. (Scholar)
• Spade, P.V., (1975), “Some Epistemological Implications of the Burley-Ockham Dispute”, Franciscan Studies, 35: 212–222. (Scholar)
• –––, (1994), “How to Start and Stop: Walter Burley on the Instant of Transition”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 19: 193–221. (Scholar)
• –––, (1999), “Walter Burley on the Kinds of Simple Supposition”, Vivarium, 37: 41–59. (Scholar)
• Uña Juarez, A., (1978), La filosoifa del siglo XIV. Contexto cultural de Walter Burley, Madrid: La Ciudad de Dios. (Scholar)
• Weisheipl, J.A., (1968), “Ockham and Some Mertonians”, Medieval Studies, 30: 163–213. (Scholar)
• –––, (1969), “Repertorium Mertonense”, Medieval Studies, 31: 174–228. (Scholar)
• Wagner, M.F., (1981), “Supposition-Theory and the Problem of Universals”, Franciscan Studies, 41: 385–414. (Scholar)
• Wöhler, H.U., (1996), “Das ‘realistische’ Individualitätskonzept Walter Burleys im geschichtlichen Kontext”, in J.A. Aertsen, A. Speer eds., Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, pp. 312–326. (Scholar)
• Wood, R., (1984), “Walter Burley’s Physics Commentaries”, Franciscan Studies, 44: 275–327. (Scholar)
• –––, (1989/90), “Walter Burley on Motion in a Vacuum”, Traditio, 45: 191–217. (Scholar)
• –––, (1999), “Willing Wickedly: Ockham and Burley Compared”, Vivarium, 37: 72–93. (Scholar)