Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Capability Approach" by Ingrid Robeyns and Morten Fibieger Byskov

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • Alexander, John M., 2010, “Ending the Liberal Hegemony: Republican Freedom and Amartya Sen’s Theory of Capabilities”, Contemporary Political Theory, 9(1): 5–24. (Scholar)
  • Alkire, Sabina, 2002, Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty,” in N. Kakwani and J. Silber (eds.), The Many Dimensions of Poverty, London: Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 89–119. (Scholar)
  • Alkire, S. and Deneulin, S., 2009, “The Human Development and Capability Approach”, in Shahani and Deneulin (eds.), An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency, London: Earthscan, pp. 22–48. (Scholar)
  • Anderson, E., 1999, “What is the Point of Equality?Ethics, 109(2): 287–337. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Justifying the capabilities approach to justice”, in Brighouse and Robeyns (eds.), pp. 81–100. (Scholar)
  • Argenton, C. and Rossi, E., 2013, “Pluralism, Preferences, and Deliberation: A Critique of Sen’s Constructive Argument for Democracy”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 44(2): 129–145. (Scholar)
  • Arneson, R., 2010, “Two cheers for capabilities”, in Brighouse and Robeyns (eds.), pp. 101–127. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “The Capabilities Approach and Political Liberalism”, in Chiappero-Martinetti, Osmani, and Qizilbash (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.165-187. (Scholar)
  • Barclay, L., 2003, “What kind of liberal is Martha Nussbaum?”, SATS: Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 4(3): 5–24. (Scholar)
  • Basu, K., 1987, “Achievements, Capabilities, and the Concept of Well-being”,, Social Choice and Welfare, 4: 69–76. (Scholar)
  • Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J., 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Bendik-Keymer, J., 2014, “From Humans to all of Life: Nussbaum’s transformation of human dignity” in Comim and Nussbaum (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–187. (Scholar)
  • Bertland, A., 2009, “Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capability Approach”, Journal of Business Ethics, 84: 25–32. (Scholar)
  • Bhargava, R., 1992, Individualism in Social Science. Forms and Limits of a Methodology, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Binder, C. and Binder, C., 2016, “A Capability Perspective on Indigenous Autonomy”, Oxford Development Studies, 44(3): 297–314. (Scholar)
  • Binder, C., 2009, “Context-Dependency of Valuable Functionings: How Culture Affects the Capability Framework”, in Chiappero-Martinetti (ed.), Debating Global Society: Reach and Limit of the Capability Approach, Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, pp. 205–232. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, Agency, Freedom, and Choice, Dordrecht: Spinger. (Scholar)
  • Bockstael, E. and Watene, K., 2016, “Indigenous Peoples and the Capability Approach: Taking Stock”, Oxford Development Studies, 44(3): 265–270. (Scholar)
  • Bonvin, J.-M. and Farvaque, N., 2005, “What Informational Bases for Assessing Job-Seekers? Capabilities vs. Preferences”, Review of Social Economy, 63(2): 269-289. (Scholar)
  • Brando, N. and Schweiger, G. (eds.), 2019, Philosophy and Child Poverty: Reflections on the Ethics and Politics of Poor Children and their Families, Cham: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Brighouse, H. and I. Robeyns (eds.), 2010, Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Byskov, M.F., 2017, “Democracy, Philosophy, and the Selection of Capabilities”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, online first September 28, 2015. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2015.1091809 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2018a, “Selecting Capabilities for Development”, in Comim, Fennell, and Anand (eds.), New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–231.. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2018b, The Capability Approach in Practice: A New Ethics for Setting Development Agendas, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2019, “Qualitative and Quantitative Interpretations of the Least Restrictive Means”, Bioethics, 33(4): 511–521. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “Beyond ‘Having Reason to Value’: Why We Should Adopt a Procedure-Independent and Value-Neutral Definition of Capabilities”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 27(1): 18–35. (Scholar)
  • Carter, I., 2014, “Is the Capability Approach Paternalist?”, Economics & Philosophy, 30(1): 75–98. (Scholar)
  • Chakraborty, A., 1996, “On the Possibility of a Weighting System for Functionings”, Indian Economic Review, 31: 241–50. (Scholar)
  • Claassen R., 2011, “Making Capability Lists: Philosophy versus Democracy”, Political Studies, 59: 491–508. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, “Capability Paternalism”, Economics & Philosophy, 30: 57–73. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, “An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice”, European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4): 1279–1304. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2018, Capabilities in a Just Society: A Theory of Navigational Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “Selecting a List: The Capability Approach’s Achilles’ Heel”, in Chiappero-Martinetti, Osmani, and Qizilbash (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 188–205. (Scholar)
  • Crocker, D. A., 2008, Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability and Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Crocker, D. A. and I. Robeyns, 2009, “Capability and agency” in: Christopher Morris (ed.), The Philosophy of Amartya Sen, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 60–90. (Scholar)
  • Deneulin, S. (ed.), 2009, The Human Development and Capabilities Approach, London: Earthscan. (Scholar)
  • Dowding, K. and Van Hees, M., 2009, “Freedom of Choice”, in Anand, Pattanaik, and Puppe (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 374–392. (Scholar)
  • Drèze, J. and A. Sen, 2002, India: Development and Participation, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Drydyk, J., 2012, “A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue”,, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15: 23–38. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Empowerment, Agency, and Power”, Journal of Global Ethics, 9(3): 249–262. (Scholar)
  • Drydyk, J. and Keleher, L., 2018, Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics, Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Dworkin, R., 2000, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Entwistle, V. and Watt, I., 2013a, “A Capabilities Approach to Person-Centered Care: Response to Open-Peer Commentaries on ‘Treating Patients as Persons: A Capability Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care’ ”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8): 29–39. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013b, “Treating Patients as Persons: A Capability Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8): 29–39. (Scholar)
  • Evans, P., 2002, “Collective Capabilities, Culture, and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2): 54–60. (Scholar)
  • Ferracioli, L. and Terlazzo, R., 2014, “Educating for Autonomy: Liberalism and Autonomy in the Capabilities Approach”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(3): 443–455. (Scholar)
  • Fleurbaey, M., 2002, “Development, Capabilities and Freedom”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37: 71–7. (Scholar)
  • Freeman, S., 2006, “Book Review — Frontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach versus Contractualism”, Texas Law Review, 85(2): 385–430. (Scholar)
  • Fukuda-Parr, S., 2002, “Operationalising Amartya Sen’s Ideas on Capabilities, Development, Freedom and Human Rights – the Shifting Policy Focus of the Human Development Approach”, Publicaciones PNUD, PNUD-Costa Rica. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on development”, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 301–317. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011a, “The Metrics of Human Rights: Complementarities of the Human Development and Capabilities Approach”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1): 73–89. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011b, “Theory and Policy in International Development: Human Development and Capability Approach and the Millennium Development Goals”, International Studies Review, 13(1): 122–132. (Scholar)
  • Fukuda-Parr, S. and S. Kumar (eds.,), 2009, Handbook of Human Development: Concepts, Measures and Policies, Delhi: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Giovanola, B., 2009, “Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capability Enhancement”, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3): 431–444. (Scholar)
  • Gore, C., 1997, “Irreducibly Social Goods and the Informational Basis of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach”, Journal of International Development, 9(2): 235–250– (Scholar)
  • Gutwald, R., Lessmann, O., Masson, T., and Rauschmayer, F., 2014, “A Capability Approach to Intergenerational Justice? Examining the Potential of Amartya Sen’s Ethics with Regard to Intergenerational Issues”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(4): 355–368. (Scholar)
  • ul Haq, M., 2003, “The Birth of the Human Development Index”, in Fukuda-Parr and Kumar (eds.), Readings in Human Development, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–113. (Scholar)
  • Harnacke, C., 2013, “Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention”, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(4): 768–780. (Scholar)
  • Hart, C. and Brando, N., 2018, “A Capability Approach to Childrens’ Well-Being, Agency and Participatory Rights in Education”, European Journal of Education, 53(3): 293-309. (Scholar)
  • Hoffmann, N. and Metz, T., 2017, “What can the Capabilities Approach Learn from an Ubuntu Ethics? A Relational Approach to Development Theory”, World Development, 97: 153–164. (Scholar)
  • Holland, B., 2008a, “Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach: Why Sustainable Ecological Capacity Is a Meta-Capability”, Political Research Quarterly, 61: 319–32. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008b, “Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing Capability Ceilings in Nussbaum’s Capability Approach”, Journal of Human Development, 9(3): 401–425. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014a, Allocating the Earth: A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014b, “Nussbaum, Rawls, and the Ecological Limits of Justice: Using Capability Ceilings to Resolve Capability Conflicts”, in Comim and Nussbaum (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality: Towards Fundamental Entitlements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 382–413. (Scholar)
  • Ibrahim, S., 2006, “From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-Help”, Journal of Human Development, 7(3): 397–416. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “Individualism and the Capability Approach: The Role of Collectivities in Expanding Human Capabilities”, in Chiappero-Martinetti, Osmani, and Qizilbash, The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–226. (Scholar)
  • Ibrahim, S. and Alkire, S., 2007, “Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators”, Oxford Development Studies, 35(4): 379–403. (Scholar)
  • Kaufman, A., 2006a, “Capabilities and Freedom”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3): 289–300. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006b, “What Goods Do to (and for) People: Duality and Ambiguity in Sen’s Capabilities Approach?” in A. Kaufman (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems, New York: Routledge, pp. 117–129. (Scholar)
  • Keleher, L. and Kosko, S.J. (eds.), 2019, Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kelly, E., 2010, “Equal Opportunity, Unequal Capability”, in Brighouse and Robeyns (ed.): 61–80. (Scholar)
  • Khader, S., 2008, “Cognitive Disability, Capabilities, and Justice”,, Essays in Philosophy, 9(1): 93–112; available online. (Scholar)
  • Khader, S. and Kosko, S.J., 2019, “‘Reason to Value’: Process, Opportunity, and Perfectionism in the Capability Approach”in Keleher and Kosko (eds.), Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–204. (Scholar)
  • Kramm, M., 2020, “When a River Becomes a Person”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21(4): 307–319. (Scholar)
  • Kronlid, D., 2014, Climate Change Adaptation and Human Capabilities: Justice and Ethics in Research and Policy, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
  • Kynch, J. and Sen, A., 1983, “Indian Women: Well-Being and Survival”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7(3/4): 363–380. (Scholar)
  • Lessmann, O. and Rauschmayer, F. (eds.), 2014, The Capability Approach and Sustainability, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • List, C., 2004, “The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen”, Economics & Philosophy, 20(1): 65–87. (Scholar)
  • Metz, T., 2016, “Recent Philosophical Approaches to Social Protection: From Capability to Ubuntu”, Global Social Policy, 16(2): 132–150. (Scholar)
  • Millar, M., 2013, “A Capabilities Perspective on Healthcare Associated Infection”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8): 53–54. (Scholar)
  • Murphy, M., 2014, “Self-Determination as a Collective Capability: The Case of Indigenous Peoples”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(4): 320–334. (Scholar)
  • Nielsen, L., 2015, “Why Health Matters to Justice: A Capability Theory Perspective”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18: 403–415. (Scholar)
  • Nielsen, L. and D. Axelsen, 2017, “Capabilitarian Sufficiency: Capabilities and Social Justice”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(1): 46–59. (Scholar)
  • Nussbaum, M., 1988, “Nature, Functioning and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Supplementary Volume), 6: 145–84. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, Human functioning and social justice. In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2): 202–246. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003, “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice”, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 33–59. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011a, Creating Capabilities, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011b, “The Capabilities Approach and Animal Entitlements”, in Beauchamp and Frey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, Oxford University Press, pp. 228–53. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2020, “The Capabilities Approach and the History of Philosophy”, in Chiappero-Martinetti, Osmani, and Qizilbash (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–39. (Scholar)
  • O’Neill, O., 1996, Towards Justice and Virtue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Oosterlaken, I., 2011, “Inserting Technologies in the Relational Ontology of Sen’s Capability Approach”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3): 425–432. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, Technology and Human Development, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Palmer, C., 2010, Animal Ethics in Context, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
  • Panzironi, F., 2012, “The ‘Indigenous Capability-Right to Health’ and Australia’s ‘Close the Gap’ Indigenous Health Policy”, in Panzironi and Gelber (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge, pp. 68–83. (Scholar)
  • Pettit, P., 2001, “Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen”, Economics & Philosophy, 17(1): 1–20. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, “Freedom in the Spirit of Sen”, in Morris (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91 –114. (Scholar)
  • Phillips, A. 2004, “Defending Equality of Outcome”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1): 1–19. (Scholar)
  • Pierik, R. and I. Robeyns, 2007, “Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory”, Political Studies, 55(1): 133–52. (Scholar)
  • Pogge, T., 2002, “Can the Capability Approach be Justified?Philosophical Topics, 30(2): 167–228. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
  • Prah Ruger, J., 2009, Health and Social Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Health Capability: Conceptualization and Operationalization”, American Journal of Public Health, 100(1): 41–49. (Scholar)
  • Qizilbash, M., 2008, “Amartya Sen’s capability view: insightful sketch or distorted picture?”, in: Comim, Qizilbash and Alkire (eds.), pp. 53–81. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2012, “The Capability Approach: Its Interpretation and ‘Limitations’”, in Panzironi and Gelber (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge, pp. 9–22. (Scholar)
  • Rawls, J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Richardson, H.S., 2006, “Rawlsian Social Contract and the Severely Disabled”, Journal of Ethics, 10: 419–62. (Scholar)
  • Riddle, C.A., 2013, “Well-Being and the Capability of Health”, Topoi, 32(2): 153–160. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2014, Disability and Justice: The Capabilies Approach in Practice, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. (Scholar)
  • Robeyns, I., 2003, “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities”, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 61–92. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “The Capability Approach: A theoretical survey”, Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 93–117. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “The Capability Approach in Practice”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3): 351–76. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, “Justice as fairness and the capability approach”, in: Kaushik Basu and Ravi Kanbur (eds.), Arguments for a Better World. Essays for Amartya Sen’s 75th Birthday, Oxford University Press, pp. 397–413. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, “Capabilitarianism”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3): 397–414. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017, Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Schlosberg, D., 2012, “Climate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy”, Ethics & International Affairs, 26(4): 445–461. (Scholar)
  • Schlosberg, D. and Carruthers, D., 2010, “Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities”, Global Environmental Politics, 10(4): 12–35. (Scholar)
  • Schokkaert, E., 2007, “Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life”, Journal of Human Development, 8(3): 415–30. (Scholar)
  • Sen, A., 1974, “Informational Bases of Alternative Welfare Approaches: Aggregation and Income Distribution”, Journal of Public Economics, 3(4): 387–403. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1979a, “Equality of What?” in McMurrin (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–220. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1979b, “Issues in the Measurement of Poverty”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81(2): 285–307. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1983, “Poor, Relatively Speaking”, Oxford Economic Papers, 35: 153–169. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985a, Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985b, “Rights and Capabilities”, in Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J.L. Mackie, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 130–48. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985c, “Women, Technology and Sexual Divisions”, in Trade and Development, New York: United Nations, pp. 218–223. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985d, “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984”, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169–221. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987a, “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts”, WIDER Working Papers, 18. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987b, “The Standard of Living”, in Sen, Muellbauer, Kanbur, Hart, and Williams, The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992, Inequality Re-examined, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993a, “Capability and Well-being”, in Nussbaum and Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993b, “Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms”, Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4): 519–541. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability”, World Development, 25(12): 1959–1961. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1999, Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, “Reply”, Economics & Philosophy, 17: 51–66. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2002, Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004a, “Capabilities, Lists and Public Reasons: Continuing the Conversation”, Feminist Economics, 10(3): 77–80. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2004b, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4): 315–56. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Human Rights and Capabilities”, Journal of Human Development, 6(2): 151–66. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?”, Journal Philosophy, 103(5): 215–238. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2008, “The Idea of Justice”, Journal of Human Development, 9(3): 331–342. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009, The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane. (Scholar)
  • Sferrazzo, R. and Ruffini, R., forthcoming, “Are Liberated Companies a Concrete Application of Sen’s Capability Approach?”, Journal of Business Ethics, first online 31 October 2019. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04324-3 (Scholar)
  • Singer, P., 2009. The Life You Can Safe, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
  • Stewart, F., 1995, “Basic Needs, Capabilities and Human Development”, Greek Economic Review, 17(2): 83–96. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Groups and Capabilities”, Journal of Human Development, 6(2): 185–204. (Scholar)
  • Stewart, F. and Deneulin, S., 2002, “Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Thinking”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2): 61–70. (Scholar)
  • Terzi, L., 2008, Justice and Equality in Education: A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Education Needs, London: Bloomsbury Publishing. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “What metric of justice for disabled people?”, in Brighouse and Robeyns (eds.), pp. 150–173. (Scholar)
  • Unterhalter, E., 2005, “Global Inequality, Capabilities, Social Justice: The Millennium Development Goals for Gender Equality in Education”, International Journal of Educational Development, 25(2): 111–22. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, Gender, Schooling, and Global Social Justice, Abington: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “What is Wrong with Global Inequality in Education?”, in Boni and Walker (eds.), Human Development and Capabilities: Re-Imagining the University of the Twenty-First Century, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
  • Vallentyne, P., 2005, “Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Wellbeing”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 13: 359–71. (Scholar)
  • Venkatapuram, S., 2011, Health Justice: An Argument from the Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
  • Voget-Kleschin, L., 2013, “Employing the Capability Approach in Conceptualizing Sustainable Development”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(4): 483–502. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, “Reasoning Claims for More Sustainable Food Consumption: A Capabilities Perspective”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(3): 455–477. (Scholar)
  • Walker, M., 2003, “Framing Social Justice in Education: What Does the ‘Capabilities’ Approach Offer?”, British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2): 168–187. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2006, “Towards a Capability-Based Theory of Social Justice for Education Policy-Making”, Journal of Education Policy, 21(2): 163–185. (Scholar)
  • Walker, M. and Unterhalter, E., 2007, Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Walsh, V., 2000, “Smith after Sen”, Review of Political Economy, 12(1): 5–25. (Scholar)
  • Watene, K., 2016, “Valuing Nature: Maori Philosophy and the Capability Approach”, Oxford Development Studies, 44(3): 287–296. (Scholar)
  • Watene, K. and J. Drydyk (eds.), 2016, Theorizing Justice, London: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
  • Watene, K. and Yap, M., 2015, “Culture and Sustainable Development: Indigenous Contributions”, Journal of Global Ethics, 11(1): 51–55. (Scholar)
  • Williams, A., 2002, “Dworkin on Capability”, Ethics, 113: 23–39. (Scholar)
  • Williams, B., 1987, “The Standard of Living: Interests and Capabilities”, Sen, Muellbauer, Kanbur, Hart, and Williams, The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–102. (Scholar)
  • Wolff, J. and A. de-Shalit, 2007, Disadvantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Wynne Bannister, E. and Venkatapuram, S., 2020, “Grounding the Right to Live in the Community (CRPF Article 19) in the Capabilities Approach to Social Justice”, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 69: 101551. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Jan 23 05:37:38 2022