Carnap’s Works

The two major collections of Carnap papers are at the Archive of Scientific Philosophy (Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh) and at the Young Research Library (University of California at Los Angeles). Both of these collections have been used extensively in many of the publications cited.

• 1918a [2019], “Völkerbund—Staatenbund”, Politische Rundbriefe, 1: 4 and 4: 15–16. Translated into English in Carnap 2019: 3–10. [Carnap 1918 available online] (Scholar)
• 1918b, “Deutschlands Niederlage: Sinnloses Schicksal oder Schuld?” (typed), 29 October 1918, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Carnap Papers [089-72-04].
• 1919, Politischer Rundbrief of 1 April 1919. Recommendation of G. Landauer’s book Revolution und Sozialismus, p.124. Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Carnap Papers [110-01-28]. (Scholar)
• 1922a [2019], Der Raum: Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre, Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte, Nr. 56, Berlin: Reuther & Reichard. Translated into English in Carnap 2019: 21–208.
• 1922b, Three positions papers on: (a) Beziehungslehre und Strukturlehre; (b) Ansätze zur Charakterisierung von Strukturen (with Bernhard Merten); (c) Aufbau der Wirklichkeit (Strukturtheorie des Erkenntnisgegenstandes) (carbons); late 1922. Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Carnap Papers [091-17-12]. (Scholar)
• 1923 [2019], “Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der Einfachstheit”, Kant-Studien, 28: 90–107. Translated into English in Carnap 2019: 209–46. (Scholar)
• 1924 [2019], “Dreidimensionalität des Raumes und Kausalität: Eine Untersuchung über den logischen Zusammenhang zweier Fiktionen”, Annalen der Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik, 4: 105–30. Translated into English in Carnap 2019: 247–298. (Scholar)
• 1925a, “Gedanken zum Kategorienproblem. Prolegomena zu einer Konstitutionstheorie (Vortrag Wien)” (shorthand), 21 January 1925. Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Carnap Papers [081-05-03]. (Scholar)
• 1925b, “Entwurf einer Konstitutionstheorie der Erkenntnisgegenstände” (typed), first sketch, 17 December 1924; this version typed, 28 January 1925. Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, Carnap Papers [081-05-02]. (Scholar)
• 1926 [2019], Physikalische Begriffsbildung, Karlsruhe: Braun. Translated into English as Physical Concept Formation in Carnap 2019: 339–440.
• 1927, “Eigentliche und uneigentliche Begriffe”, Symposion, 1: 355–374. (Scholar)
• [Aufbau] 1928a [1967], Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis. Second edition, Hamburg: Meiner, 1961. Translated into English as The Logical Structure of the World, Rolf A. George (trans.), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967. (Scholar)
• 1928b, Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie, Berlin: Weltkreis.
• 1929, Abriß der Logistik, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Relationstheorie und ihrer Anwendungen, Vienna: Springer.
• 1930a, “Die alte und die neue Logik”, Erkenntnis, 1: 12–26. doi:10.1007/bf00208606 (Scholar)
• 1930b, “[Review of] Felix Kaufmann, Das Unendliche in der Mathematik und seine Ausschaltung”, Deutsche Literaturzeitung, 51: cols. 1674–1678. (Scholar)
• 1930c, “Bericht über Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Axiomatik”, Erkenntnis, 1: 303–307. doi:10.1007/bf00208622 (Scholar)
• 1930d, “Review: Der logistische Neupositivismus: E. Kaila (1930)”, Erkenntnis, 2: 75–77. doi:10.1007/bf02028134 (Scholar)
• 1930e, “Plan für Kaila-Aufsatz: Über die Erkenntnis des sog. ‘Nicht-Gegebenen’” (shorthand), 2 November 1930; also an outline headed ‘Kaila-Aufsatz’ on a separate sheet dated 29 October 1930, Young Research Library, University of California at Los Angeles, Special Collections, Carnap Papers (Collection 1029) [UCLA Box4, CM13, item1]. (Scholar)
• 1931, “Die logizistische Grundlegung der Mathematik” (The Logicist Foundations of Mathematics), Erkenntnis, 2: 91–105. doi:10.1007/bf02028142 (Scholar)
• 1932a, “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”, Erkenntnis, 2: 219–241. doi:10.1007/bf02028153 (Scholar)
• 1932b [1934], “Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft”, Erkenntnis, 2: 432–465. Translated into English as Unity of Science, Max Black (trans.), London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1934. doi:10.1007/bf02028172 (Scholar)
• 1932c, “Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache”, Erkenntnis, 3: 107–142. doi:10.1007/bf01886414 (Scholar)
• 1932d, “Erwiderung auf die vorstehenden Aufsätze von E. Zilsel und K. Duncker”, Erkenntnis, 3: 177–188. doi:10.1007/bf01886417 (Scholar)
• 1932e [1987], “Über Protokollsätze”, Erkenntnis, 3: 215–228. Translated in 1987 as “On Protocol Sentences”, Richard Creath and Richard Nollan (trans.), Noûs, 21(4): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2215667 (en) doi:10.1007/BF01886421 (de) (Scholar)
• [LSS] 1934a [1937], Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Springer. Translated by Amethe Smeaton as The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge, 1937. (Scholar)
• 1934b, “Theoretische Fragen und praktische Entscheidungen”, Natur und Geist, 2: 257–260. (Scholar)
• 1934c [1987], Die Aufgabe der Wissenschaftslogik, Vienna: Gerold. Translated as “The Task of the Logic of Science”, Hans Kaal (trans.), in Unified Science, Rainer Hegselmann and Brian McGuinness (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987, 46–66. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3865-6_3 (Scholar)
• 1934d [2004], “On the Character of Philosophic Problems”, W. M. Malisoff (trans.), Philosophy of Science, 1(1): 5–19. German original “Über den Charakter philosophischer Probleme” published in R. Carnap Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie und andere metaphysikkritische Schriften, T. Mormann (ed.), Hamburg: Meiner, 2004, 111–127. doi:10.1086/286302 (en) (Scholar)
• 1935a, Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London: Routledge.
• 1935b, “Review: Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnistheorie der modernen Naturwissenschaft: Popper, Karl (1935)”, Erkenntnis, 5: 290–294. doi:10.1007/bf00172319 (Scholar)
• 1936 [1949], “Wahrheit und Bewährung”, in Actes du Congrès international de philosophie scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris 1935, fasc. 4. Unité de la science, Paris: Hermann, pp. 18–23. A modified version is translated as “Truth and Confirmation”, in Feigl and Sellars 1949: 119–127. (Scholar)
• [TM] 1936–37, “Testability and Meaning”, Philosophy of Science,
  • [TM1] 3(4): 419–471 (sections 1–16). doi:10.1086/286432, (Scholar)
  • [TM2] 4(1): 1–40 (sections 17–28). doi:10.1086/286443
• 1939, Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 1942, Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 1943, Formalization of Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 1945a, “The Two Concepts of Probability: The Problem of Probability”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4): 513–532. doi:10.2307/2102817 (Scholar)
• 1945b, “On Inductive Logic”, Philosophy of Science, 12(2): 72–97. doi:10.1086/286851 (Scholar)
• 1946, “Modalities and Quantification”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11(2): 33–64. doi:10.2307/2268610 (Scholar)
• 1947, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; second edition: 1956.
• 1949, “A Reply to Leonard Linsky”, Philosophy of Science, 16(4): 347–350. doi:10.1086/287056 (Scholar)
• [ESO] 1950a [1956], “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4(11): 20–40. Reprinted in Carnap 1956b: 205–221. (Scholar)
• [LFP] 1950b, Logical Foundations of Probability, first edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• 1952a [1956], “Meaning Postulates”, Philosophical Studies, 3(5): 65–73. Reprinted in Carnap 1956b: 222–229. doi:10.1007/bf02350366 (Scholar)
• 1952b, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 1954a [1968], Einführung in die symbolische Logik, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Anwendungen, first edition, Vienna: Springer; second edition, 1968.
• 1954b [1956], “On Belief Sentences: Reply to Alonzo Church”, in Philosophy and Analysis, Margaret MacDonald (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 128–131. Reprinted in Carnap 1956b: 230–232. (Scholar)
• 1955a [1956], “On Some Concepts of Pragmatics”, Philosophical Studies, 6(6): 89–91. Reprinted in Carnap 1956b: 249–251. doi:10.1007/bf02341065 (Scholar)
• 1955b [1956], “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages”, Philosophical Studies, 6(3): 33–47. Reprinted in Carnap 1956b: 222–229. doi:10.1007/bf02330951 (Scholar)
• 1956a, “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts”, in The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 38–76. [Carnap 1956a available online] (Scholar)
• 1956b [1947], Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (This is an enlarged version of 1947.)
• 1957, “How Can Induction Be Justified?” Unpublished Manuscript from the Carnap Papers at the Archives of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh, catalogue number 082-01-01. (Scholar)
• 1958 [1975], “Beobachtungssprache und Theoretische Sprache”, Dialectica, 12(3–4): 236–248. Translated as “Observational Language and Theoretical Language”, in Hintikka 1975: 75–85. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1958.tb01461.x (Scholar)
• 1959a [2000], “Theoretical Concepts in Science”, unpublished lecture. Published in Stathis Psillos, 2000, “Rudolf Carnap’s ‘Theoretical Concepts in Science’”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 31(1): 151–172. doi:10.1016/s0039-3681(99)00031-x">10.1016/s0039-3681(99)00031-x (Scholar)
• 1959b, Induktive Logik und Wahrscheinlichkeit (coauthor: Wolfgang Stegmüller), Vienna: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-3142-8
• 1961a, “Vorwort zur zweiten Auflage” (introduction to second edition), in Aufbau, second edition, Hamburg: Meiner, pp. X–XV. (Scholar)
• 1961b, “On the Use of Hilbert’s ε-Operator in Scientific Theories”, in Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics, Y. Bar-Hillel et al. (eds.), Jerusalem: Magnes Press, pp. 154–64. (Scholar)
• 1962, Logical Foundations of Probability, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 1963a, “Carnap’s Intellectual Autobiography”, in Schilpp 1963: 3–84. (Scholar)
• 1963b, “The Philosopher Replies”, in Schilpp 1963: 859–1013.
• 1964, “Interview mit Rudolf Carnap”, in Mein Weg in die Philosophie, Rudolf Carnap, interview with Willy Hochkeppel, Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 134–148. (Scholar)
• 1966, Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, New York: Basic Books.
• 1968a “Inductive Logic and Inductive Intuition”, in The Problem of Inductive Logic, Imre Lakatos (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 258–314. (Scholar)
• 1968b, “On Rules of Acceptance”, in The Problem of Inductive Logic, Imre Lakatos (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 146–50. (Scholar)
• 1971a, “A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part I”, in Carnap (and Jeffrey) 1971c: 33–165. (Scholar)
• 1971b, “Inductive Logic and Rational Decisions”, in Carnap (and Jeffrey) 1971c: 5–31. (Scholar)
• 1971c, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, volume 1, with Richard C. Jeffrey, Berkeley: University of California Press. See Jeffrey 1980 for volume 2.
• 1974, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, New York, Basic Books; second edition of Carnap 1966.
• 1980, “A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II”, in Jeffrey 1980: 7–155. (Scholar)
• 2000, Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Axiomatik, Thomas Bonk and Jesús Mosterin (eds.), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
• 2017, “Value Concepts (1958)”, Synthese, 194(1): 185–194. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0793-2 (Scholar)
• 2019, Rudolf Carnap: Early Writings, A.W. Carus, Michael Friedman, Wolfgang Kienzler, Alan Richardson, and Sven Schlotter (eds.), (The Collected Works of Rudolf Carnap, 1), New York: Oxford University Press.

Other Works

• d’Alembert, J.L., 1751, Discours Préliminaire des Éditeurs, Paris. Translated as Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, Richard N. Schwab (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. (Scholar)
• Anderson, C. Anthony, 1989, “Russellian Intensional Logic”, in Themes from Kaplan, in John Perry, Joseph Almog, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–103. (Scholar)
• Andreas, Holger, 2007, Carnaps Wissenschaftslogik: Eine Untersuchung zur Zweistufenkonzeption, Paderborn: mentis. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Deductive Reasoning in the Structuralist Approach”, Studia Logica, 101(5): 1093–1113. doi:10.1007/s11225-012-9447-2 (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “Carnapian Structuralism”, Erkenntnis, 79(S8): 1373–1391. doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9573-x (Scholar)
• Andreas, Holger and Georg Schiemer, 2016, “A Choice-Semantical Approach to Theoretical Truth”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 58: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.02.001 (Scholar)
• Appiah, Kwame Anthony, 2017, As If: Idealization and Ideals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Awodey, Steve, 1996, “Structure in Mathematics and Logic: A Categorical Perspective”, Philosophia Mathematica, 4(3): 209–237. doi:10.1093/philmat/4.3.209 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “An Answer to Hellman’s Question: ‘Does Category Theory Provide a Framework for Mathematical Structuralism?’”, Philosophia Mathematica, 12(1): 54–64. doi:10.1093/philmat/12.1.54 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Carnap’s Quest for Analyticity: The Studies in Semantics”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 226–247. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.011">10.1017/ccol9780521840156.011 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Explicating ‘Analytic’”, in Wagner 2012: 131–143. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Carnap and the Invariance of Logical Truth”, Synthese, 194(1): 67–78. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0781-6 (Scholar)
• Awodey, Steve and A. W. Carus, 2001, “Carnap, Completeness, And Categoricity: The Gabelbarkeitssatz of 1928”, Erkenntnis, 54(2): 145–172. doi:10.1023/a:1005622201768 (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Carnap versus Gödel on Syntax and Tolerance”, in Parrini, Salmon, and Salmon 2003: 57–64. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “How Carnap Could Have Replied to Gödel”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 203–223. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Carnap’s Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax”, Synthese, 159(1): 23–45. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9066-4 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “From Wittgenstein’s Prison to the Boundless Ocean: Carnap’s Dream of Logical Syntax”, in Wagner 2009: 79–108. (Scholar)
• Awodey, Steve and Carsten Klein (eds.), 2004, Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Ayer, Alfred Jules, 1936, Language, Truth and Logic, London: Gollancz. (Scholar)
• Balzer, Wolfgang, C.-Ulises Moulines, and Joseph D. Sneed, 1986, “The Structure of Empirical Science: Local and Global”, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 114: 291–306. doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(09)70697-4 (Scholar)
• Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1955, “Comments on ‘Degree of Confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6(22): 155–157. doi:10.1093/bjps/vi.22.155 (Scholar)
• –––, 1956, “Further Comments on Probability and Confirmation A Rejoinder to Professor Popper”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 7(27): 245–248. doi:10.1093/bjps/vii.27.245 (Scholar)
• Barcan, Ruth C., 1946, “A Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11(1): 1–16. doi:10.2307/2269159 (Scholar)
• Barrett, Robert and Roger Gibson (eds.), 1990, Perspectives on Quine, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Beall, J. C. and Greg Restall, 2006, Logical Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Ben-Menahem, Yemima, 2006, Conventionalism: From Poincare to Quine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584404 (Scholar)
• Benacerraf, Paul, 1965, “What Numbers Could Not Be”, The Philosophical Review, 74(1): 47–73. doi:10.2307/2183530 (Scholar)
• Berto, Francesco and Matteo Plebani, 2015, Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide, London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
• Beth, E.W., 1953, “On Padoa’s Method in the Theory of Definition”, Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), 56: 330–339. doi:10.1016/s1385-7258(53)50042-3 (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “Carnap’s Views on the Advantages of Constructed Systems over Natural Languages in the Philosophy of Science”, in Schilpp 1963: 469–502. (Scholar)
• Bird, Graham H., 1995, “Carnap and Quine: Internal and External Questions”, Erkenntnis, 42(1): 41–64. doi:10.1007/bf01666811 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the “Critique of Pure Reason”, Chicago and LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Blackburn, Simon, 1993, Essays in Quasi-Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Blatti, Stephan and Sandra Lapointe (eds.), 2016, Ontology after Carnap, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661985.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Bohnert, Herbert G., 1975, “Carnap’s Logicism”, in Hintikka 1975: 183–216. (Scholar)
• Boghossian, Paul Artin, 1996, “Analyticity Reconsidered”, Noûs, 30(3): 360–391. doi:10.2307/2216275 (Scholar)
• Bonnay, Denis, 2009, “Carnap’s Criterion of Logicality”, in Wagner 2009: 147–164. (Scholar)
• Brandom, Robert, 1984, “Reference Explained Away”, The Journal of Philosophy, 81(9): 469–492. doi:10.2307/2026268 (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “The Significance of Complex Numbers for Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 293–316. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.293 (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, Articulating Reasons; An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Bridgeman, Percy Williams, 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Brössel, Peter, 2012, Rethinking Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Steps Toward a New Theory of Confirmation, PhD Thesis in philosophy, University of Konstanz. (Scholar)
• Brun, Georg, 2016, “Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-Engineering”, Erkenntnis, 81(6): 1211–1241. doi:10.1007/s10670-015-9791-5 (Scholar)
• Burks, A.W., 1963, “On the Significance of Carnap’s System of Inductive Logic for the Philosophy of Induction”, in Schilpp 1963: 739–760. (Scholar)
• Cappelen, Herman, 2018, Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Cantini, Andrea, 2004, “On a Russellian Paradox about Propositions and Truth”, in One Hundred Years of Russell’s Paradox: Mathematics, Logic, Philosophy, Godehard Link (ed.), Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 259–284. (Scholar)
• Cartwright, Nancy, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and Thomas E. Uebel, 1996, Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598241 (Scholar)
• Carus, A.W., 1999, “Carnap, Syntax, and Truth”, in Truth and Its Nature (If Any), Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 15–35. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9233-8_2 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Sellars, Carnap, and the Logical Space of Reasons”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 317–355. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007a, Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487132 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007b, “Carnap’s Intellectual Development”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 19–42. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.002 (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Carnap and Phenomenology: What Happened in 1924?”, in Damböck 2016: 137–162. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21876-2_8">10.1007/978-3-319-21876-2_8 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Carnapian Rationality”, Synthese, 194(1): 163–184. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0574-3 (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Going Global: Carnap’s Voluntarism and Price’s Expressivism”, The Monist, 101(4): 441–467. doi:10.1093/monist/ony016 (Scholar)
• –––, 2019, “Neurath and Carnap on Semantics”, in Neurath Reconsidered: New Sources and Perspectives, Jordi Cat and Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 336), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 339–361. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02128-3_12 (Scholar)
• Chalmers, David J., 2012, Constructing the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press. See also “Nineteenth Excursus” to Constructing the World, on the subject of “Inferentialism and Analyticity”. [Chalmers 2012 available online] (Scholar)
• Chalmers, David J., David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman (eds.), 2009, Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Church, Alonzo, 1951, “A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation” in Structure, Method, and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Henry Sheffer, Paul Henle (ed.), New York: Liberal Arts Press, pp. 3–24. (Scholar)
• –––, 1954, “Intensional Isomorphism and Identity of Belief”, Philosophical Studies, 5(5): 65–73. doi:10.1007/bf02221771 (Scholar)
• –––, 1976, “Comparison of Russell’s Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with That of Tarski”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41(4): 747–760. doi:10.2307/2272393 (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, “Russell’s Theory of Identity of Propositions”, Philosophia Naturalis, 21: 513–522. (Scholar)
• Coffa, J. Alberto, 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172240 (Scholar)
• Comte, Auguste, 1822 [1914], Plan des travaux scientifiques nécessaires pour réorganiser la société. Translated and edited by Wilhelm Ostwald as Entwurf der wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten, welche für eine Reorganisation der Gesellschaft erforderlich sind, Leipzig: Unesma 1914. (Scholar)
• Creath, Richard, 1976, “On Kaplan on Carnap on Significance”, Philosophical Studies, 30(6): 393–400. doi:10.1007/bf00372539 (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, “The Initial Reception of Carnap’s Doctrine of Analyticity”, Noûs, 21(4): 477–499. doi:10.2307/2215669 (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1990, Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Every Dogma has its Day”, Erkenntnis, 35(1–3): 347–389. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Functionalist Theories of Meaning and the Defense of Analyticity”, in Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories, Wesley Salman and Gereon Wolters (eds.), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996a, “The Unity of Science: Carnap, Neurath, and Beyond”, in Galison and Stump 1996: 158–169. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996b, “Languages without Logic”, in Giere and Richardson 1996: 251–268. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “The Linguistic Doctrine and Conventionality: The Main Argument in ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’”, in Hardcastle and Richardson 2003: 234–256. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Quine’s Challenge to Carnap”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 316–335. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.015 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “The Gentle Strength of Tolerance: The Logical Syntax of Language and Carnap’s Philosophical Programme”, in Wagner 2009: 203–216. (Scholar)
• Cresswell, M. J., 1975, “Hyperintensional Logic”, Studia Logica, 34(1): 25–38. doi:10.1007/bf02314421 (Scholar)
• –––, 1985, Structured Meanings, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Dahms, Hans-Joachim, 1994, Positivismusstreit: Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Realismus, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Neue Sachlichkeit in the Architecture and Philosophy of the 1920s”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 353–372. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “Carnap’s Early Conception of a ‘System of the Sciences’: The Importance of Wilhelm Ostwald”, in Damböck 2016: 163–185. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21876-2_9 (Scholar)
• Damböck, Christian (ed.), 2016, Influences on the Aufbau, (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 18), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21876-2 (Scholar)
• Damböck, Christian, G. Sandner, and M. Werner, forthcoming, Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
• David, Marian, 1996, “Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth”, Philosophical Perspectives, 10: 281–296. (Scholar)
• Dedekind, Richard, 1888, Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?, Braunschweig: Vieweg. (Scholar)
• de Finetti, Bruno, 1931, “Funzione caratteristica di un fenomeno aleatorio”, Atti della Academia Nazionale dei Lincei, Serie 6. Memorie, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Mathematice e Naturale 4, pp. 251–299. (Scholar)
• Demopoulos, William, 2007, “Carnap on the Rational Reconstruction of Scientific Theories”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 248–272. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.012 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “On Extending ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’ to the Realism/Instrumentalism Controversy”, Journal of Philosophy, 108(12): 647–669. doi:10.5840/jphil20111081237 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Carnap’s Thesis”, in his Logicism and Its Philosophical Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–45. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342605.004 (Scholar)
• Demopoulos, William and Michael Friedman, 1985, “Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: Its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest”, Philosophy of Science, 52(4): 621–639. doi:10.1086/289281 (Scholar)
• Deutsch, Harry, 2014, “Resolution of Some Paradoxes of Propositions”, Analysis, 74(1): 26–34. doi:10.1093/analys/ant089 (Scholar)
• Dewar, Neil, 2019, “Ramsey Equivalence”, Erkenntnis, 84(1): 77–99. doi:10.1007/s10670-017-9948-5 (Scholar)
• Dingler, Hugo, 1919, Die Grundlagen der Physik: Synthetische Prinzipien der mathematischen Naturphilosophie, Berlin and Leipzig: Vereinigung wissenschaftlicher Verleger. (Scholar)
• Dörpfeld, Friedrich Wilhelm, 1963, Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften, Albert Reble (ed.), Paderborn: Schöningh. (Scholar)
• Dreben, Burton, 1990, “Quine”, in Barrett and Gibson 1990: 81–95. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “In Mediis Rebus”, Inquiry, 37(4): 441–447. doi:10.1080/00201749408602366 (Scholar)
• du Bois-Reymond, Emil, 1872, “Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens”. Reprinted in Reden von Emil du Bois-Reymond, second edition, Leipzig: Veit, 1912, vol. I, pp. 441–472. (Scholar)
• –––, 1880, “Die sieben Welträtsel”. Reprinted in Reden von Emil du Bois-Reymond, second edition, Leipzig: Veit, 1912, vol. II, pp. 65–98. (Scholar)
• Dutilh Novaes, Catarina, forthcoming, “Carnapian Explication and Ameliorative Analysis: A Systematic Comparison”, Synthese, first online: 24 February 2018. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1732-9 (Scholar)
• Dutilh Novaes, Catarina and Erich Reck, 2017, “Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization”, Synthese, 194(1): 195–215. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0816-z (Scholar)
• Earman, John, 1992, “Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology”, in World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, Paul Horwich (ed.),, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9–36. (Scholar)
• Eberle, Rolf A., 1975, “A Construction of Quality Classes Improved upon the Aufbau”, in Hintikka 1975: 55–73. (Scholar)
• Ebbs, Gary, 2017, Carnap, Quine, and Putnam on Methods of Inquiry, New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316823392 (Scholar)
• Einstein, Albert, 1921, Geometrie und Erfahrung, Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49903-6 (Scholar)
• Essler, Wilhelm K., 1975, “Die Kreativität der bilateralen Reduktionssätze”, Erkenntnis, 9(3): 383–392. doi:10.1007/bf00178007 (Scholar)
• Feigl, Herbert, 1929, Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik, Karlsruhe: Braun. (Scholar)
• –––, 1943 [1949], “Logical Empiricism”, in Twentieth Century Philosophy: Living Schools of Thought, Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), New York: Philosophical Library, pp. 371–416. Reprinted in Feigl and Sellars 1949: 3–26. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “Physicalism, Unity of Science, and the Foundations of Psychology”, in Schilpp 1963: 227–268. (Scholar)
• Feigl, Herbert and Wilfrid Sellars (eds.), 1949, Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Scholar)
• Fitelson, Branden, 1999, “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity”, Philosophy of Science, 66(September): S362–S378. doi:10.1086/392738 (Scholar)
• Flitner, Wilhelm, 1986, Erinnerungen, 1889–1945, Paderborn: Schöningh. (Scholar)
• Flocke, Vera, forthcoming-a, “Carnap’s Noncognitivism about Ontology”, Noûs, first online 30 August 2018. doi:10.1111/nous.12267 (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming-b, “How to Engineer a Concept”, Philosophical Studies.
• Føllesdal, Dagfinn, 1961, Referential Opacity and Modal Logic, Oslo: Oslo University Press. (Scholar)
• Frank, Philipp, 1949, Modern Science and Its Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Frege, Gottlob, 1879, Begriffsschrift; Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle: Nebert. Reprinted 1964, Hildesheim: Olms. (Scholar)
• –––, 1882, “Über die wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift”, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 81. Reprinted in Gottlob Frege, Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze, Hildesheim: Olms, 2007, pp. 106–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner. Reprinted 1986, Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 9–52. (Scholar)
• –––, 1918, “Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung”, Beiträge Zur Philosophie Des Deutschen Idealismus, 1: 58–77. Reprinted in Gottlob Frege, Logische Untersuchungen, G. Patzig (ed.), Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 1966, pp. 30–53. (Scholar)
• Friedman, Michael, 1987, “Carnap’s Aufbau Reconsidered”, Noûs, 21(4): 521–545. Reprinted in Friedman 1999: 89–113. doi:10.2307/2215671 (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “Epistemology in the Aufbau”, Synthese, 93(1–2): 15–57. Reprinted in Friedman 1999: 114–151. doi:10.1007/bf00869420 (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Helmholtz’s Zeichentheorie and Schlick’s Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre: Early Logical Empiricism and Its Nineteenth-Century Background”, Philosophical Topics, 25(2): 19–50. doi:10.5840/philtopics199725213 (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173193 (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, Heidegger, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Carnap and Quine: Twentieth-Century Echoes of Kant and Hume”, Philosophical Topics, 34(1–2): 35–58. doi:10.5840/philtopics2006341/23 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “The Aufbau and the Rejection of Metaphysics”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 129–152. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.007 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism without Metaphysics”, Synthese, 180(2): 249–263. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9604-y (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Rational Reconstruction, Explication, and the Rejection of Metaphysics”, in Wagner 2012: 190–204. (Scholar)
• Friedman, Michael and Richard Creath (eds.), 2007, The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL9780521840156 (Scholar)
• Gabriel, Gottfried, 2004, “Introduction: Carnap Brought Home”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 3–23. (Scholar)
• Gaifman, Haim, 1971, “Applications of De Finetti’s Theorem to Inductive Logic”, in Carnap (and Jeffrey) 1971c: 235–251. (Scholar)
• Galison, Peter and David J. Stump (eds.), 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Gallois, Andre, 1998, “Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 72: 263–283. Reply to Yablo 1998. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00045 (Scholar)
• Gentzen, Gerhard, 1934/1935, “Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen”, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39: 176–210, 405–431. doi:10.1007/bf01201353 doi:10.1007/BF01201363. (Scholar)
• George, Alexander, 2000, “On Washing the Fur without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity”, Mind, 109(433): 1–24. doi:10.1093/mind/109.433.1 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Opening the Door to Cloud-Cuckoo-Land: Hempel and Kuhn on Rationality”, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 1: article 4. doi:10.4148/jhap.v1i4.1301 (Scholar)
• Gheerbrant, Amélie and Marcin Mostowski, 2006, “Recursive Complexity of the Carnap First Order Modal Logic C”, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 52(1): 87–94. doi:10.1002/malq.200410057 (Scholar)
• Gibbard, Alan, 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Giere, Ronald N. and Alan W. Richardson (eds.), 1996, The Origins of Logical Empiricism, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Gillispie, Charles Coulston, 2004, Science and Polity in France: The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Years, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Glymour, Clark N., 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Gödel, Kurt, *1953/9 [1995], “Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?”, unpublished manuscript. Published in Kurt Gödel Collected Works, volume 3, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 334–363. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, Collected Works, volume 4: Correspondence A-G, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Goessler, Peter, 1951, Wilhelm Dörpfeld: Ein Leben im Dienst der Antike, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. (Scholar)
• Goldfarb, Warren D., 1979, “Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 44(3): 351–368. doi:10.2307/2273128 (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Introductory Note to Gödel *1953/9”, in Kurt Gödel, Collected Works, volume 3, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 324–334. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “The Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Positivism”, in Giere and Richarson 1996: 213–230. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Semantics in Carnap: A Rejoinder to Alberto Coffa”, Philosophical Topics, 25(2): 51–66. doi:10.5840/philtopics19972529 (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Introduction” to Gödel’s Correspondence with Carnap, in Gödel 2003: 335–342. (Scholar)
• Goldfarb, Warren and Thomas Ricketts, 1992, “Carnap and the Philosophy of Mathematics”, in Science and Subjectivity: The Vienna Circle and Twentieth-Century Philosophy, David Andrew Bell and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (eds.), Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, pp. 61–78. (Scholar)
• Good, Irving John, 1971, “46656 Varieties of Bayesians”, Letter in American Statistician, 25(5): 62–63. (Scholar)
• Goodman, Nelson, 1951, The Structure of Appearance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “The Significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt”, in Schilpp 1963: 545–558. (Scholar)
• Gustafsson, Martin, 2014, “Quine’s Conception of Explication—and Why It Isn’t Carnap’s”, in A Companion to W.V.O. Quine, Gilbert Harman and Ernie Lepore (eds.), Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 508–525. doi:10.1002/9781118607992.ch24 (Scholar)
• Haeckel, Ernst, 1899 [1902], Die Welträtsel, Leipzig: Kröner. Translated by Joseph McCabe as The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century, New York: Harper 1902. (Scholar)
• Hahn, Hans, 1929, “Empirismus, Mathematik, Logik”, Forschungen und Fortschritte, 5. Reprinted in Hans Hahn Empirismus, Logik, Mathematik, Frankfurt: M: Suhrkamp, 1988, pp. 55–58. Translated by Hans Kaal as “Empiricism, Mathematics, and Logic” in Empiricism, Logic, and Mathematics: Philosophical Papers, Brian McGuinness (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel 1980, pp. 39–42. (Scholar)
• Hahn, Hans, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath, 1929, Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis, Vienna. Reprinted in Otto Neurath, Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus, Rainer Hegselmann (ed.), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979, pp. 81–101. Translated by P. Foulkes and M. Neurath as “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis [The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle]”, in Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology, Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973, pp. 299–318. (Scholar)
• Hahn, Hans, Rudolf Carnap, et al., 1931, “Diskussion zur Grundlegung der Mathematik: am Sonntag, dem 7. Sept. 1930”, Erkenntnis, 2: 135–151. doi:10.1007/bf02028146 (Scholar)
• Halbach, Volker, Hannes Leitgeb, and Philip Welch, 2003, “Possible-Worlds Semantics for Modal Notions Conceived as Predicates”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32(2): 179–223. doi:10.1023/a:1023080715357 (Scholar)
• Hardcastle, Gary L. and Alan W. Richardson (eds.), 2003, Logical Empiricism in North America, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Hare, R.M., 1954, The Language of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Heijenoort, Jean van, 1967, “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language”, Synthese, 17(1): 324–330. doi:10.1007/bf00485036 (Scholar)
• Heis, Jeremy, 2011, “Ernst Cassirer’s Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(4): 759–794. doi:10.1080/09608788.2011.583421 (Scholar)
• Helman, David H. (ed.), 1988, Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0 (Scholar)
• Hellman, Geoffrey and Stewart Shapiro, 2018, Mathematical Structuralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108582933 (Scholar)
• Hempel, Carl G., 1945, “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I and II)”, Mind, 54(213): 1–26, 54(214): 97–121. doi:10.1093/mind/liv.213.1 doi:10.1093/mind/LIV.214.97 (Scholar)
• –––, 1950, “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4(11): 41–63. (Scholar)
• –––, 1958, “The Theoretician’s Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction”, in Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, and Grover Maxwell (eds.), (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 37–98. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “Implications of Carnap’s Work for the Philosophy of Science”, in Schilpp 1963: 685–710. (Scholar)
• Hieke, Alexander and Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), 2009, Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis: Proceedings of the 31th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2008, (Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, N.S., 11), Frankfurt: Ontos-Verl. (Scholar)
• Hilbert, David, 1899, Grundlagen der Geometrie, Leipzig: Teubner. (Scholar)
• Hilpinen, Risto, 1973, “Carnap’s New System of Inductive Logic”, Synthese, 25(3–4): 307–333. doi:10.1007/bf00499684 (Scholar)
• Hintikka, Jaakko, 1966, “A Two-Dimensional Continuum of Inductive Methods”, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 43: 113–132. doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71666-5 (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1975, Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1807-4 (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Quine as a Member of the Tradition of the Universality of Language”, in Barrett and Gibson 1990: 159–175. (Scholar)
• Hintikka, Jaakko and Ilkka Niiniluoto, 1980, “An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization”, in Jeffrey 1980: 157–181. (Scholar)
• Hirsch, Eli, 2011, Quantifier Variance and Realism: Essays in Metaontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199732111.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Hofweber, Thomas, 2016, “Carnap’s Big Idea”, in Blatti and Lapointe 2016: 13–30. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661985.003.0002 (Scholar)
• Horsten, Leon, 2005, “Canonical Naming Systems”, Minds and Machines, 15(2): 229–257. doi:10.1007/s11023-004-6590-1 (Scholar)
• Hosiasson-Lindenbaum, Janina, 1940, “On Confirmation”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(4): 133–148. doi:10.2307/2268173 (Scholar)
• Humburg, Jurgen, 1971, “The Principle of Instantial Relevance”, in Carnap (and Jeffrey) 1971c: 225–233. (Scholar)
• Husserl, Edmund, 1911, “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft”, Logos 1, pp. 289–341. (Scholar)
• –––, 1913, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Tübingen: Niemeyer. Reprinted The Hague: Nijhoff, 1976. (Scholar)
• Huttegger, Simon M., 2019, “Analogical Predictive Probabilities”, Mind, 128(509): 1–37. doi:10.1093/mind/fzw049 (Scholar)
• Hylton, Peter, 1998, “Analysis in Analytic Philosophy”, in The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes, Anat Biletski and Anat Matar (eds.), London: Routledge, pp. 37–55. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Quine, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Irzik, Gürol, 2003, “Changing Conceptions of Rationality: From Logical Empiricism to Postpositivism”, in Parrini, Salmon, & Salmon 2003: 325–46. (Scholar)
• Isaacson, Daniel, 1992, “Carnap, Quine, and Logical Truth”, in Science and Subjectivity: The Vienna Circle and Twentieth Century Philosophy, David Bell and Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (eds.), Berlin: Akademie, 100–130. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Quine and Logical Positivism”, in The Cambridge Companion to Quine, Roger Gibson (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 214–269. (Scholar)
• Ivanova, Milena, 2011, “Friedman’s Relativised A Priori and Structural Realism: In Search of Compatibility”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/02698595.2011.552416 (Scholar)
• Jackson, Frank, 1998, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Jaynes, Edwin T., 1968, “Prior Probabilities”, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(3): 227–241. doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300117 (Scholar)
• Jeffrey, Richard C., 1965, The Logic of Decision, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1980, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, volume 2, Berkeley: University of California Press. See Carnap (and Jeffrey) 1971c for volume 1. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Probability and the Art of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172394 (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Carnap’s Voluntarism”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, Dag Prawitz, Brian Skyrms, and Dag Westerståhl (eds.), (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 134), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 847–866. doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(06)80077-7 (Scholar)
• Joyce, James M., 1998, “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism”, Philosophy of Science, 65(4): 575–603. doi:10.1086/392661 (Scholar)
• Juhl, Cory and Eric Loomis, 2010, Analyticity, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Justus, James, 2012, “Carnap on Concept Determination: Methodology for Philosophy of Science”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(2): 161–179. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0027-5 (Scholar)
• Kaila, Eino, 1926, Die Prinzipien der Wahrscheinlichkeitslogik, Turku: Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis. (Scholar)
• –––, 1930 [1979], Der logische Neupositivismus: Eine kritische Studie, Turku: Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis. Translated as “Logistic Neopositivism. A Critical Study”, Peter and Ann Kirschenmann (trans.) in Reality and Experience: Four Philosophical Essays, Robert S. Cohen (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, pp. 1–58. (Scholar)
• Kant, Immanuel, 1783, Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, K. Vorländer (ed.), fifth edition, Hamburg: Meiner, 1913. Translated by Gary Hatfield as Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as a science, in Kant 2002: 29–170. (Scholar)
• –––, 1786, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, in his Schriften zur Natur-philosophie, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1977. Translated by Michael Friedman as Metaphyisical Foundations of Natural Science, in Kant 2002: 171–270. (Scholar)
• –––, 1787, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, J. Timmermann (ed.), Hamburg: Meiner, 1998. Page references to second (‘B’) edition according to pagination of Akademie-Ausgabe. Translated Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (eds/trans), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804649 (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Henry Allison and Peter Heath (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498015 (Scholar)
• Kaplan, David, 1975, “Significance and Analyticity: a Comment on Some Recent Proposals of Carnap”, in Hintikka 1975: 87–94. (Scholar)
• Kemeny, John G., 1955, “Fair Bets and Inductive Probabilities”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20(3): 263–273. doi:10.2307/2268222 (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “Carnap’s Theory of Probability and Induction”, in Schilpp 1963: 711–738. (Scholar)
• Ketland, Jeffrey, 2004, “Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(2): 287–300. doi:10.1093/bjps/55.2.287 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification, II”, in Hieke and Leitgeb 2009: 29–45. (Scholar)
• Keynes, John Maynard, 1921, A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Kitcher, Philip, 2008, “Carnap and the Caterpillar”, Philosophical Topics, 36(1): 111–127. doi:10.5840/philtopics20083617 (Scholar)
• Kleinknecht, Richard, 1980, “Quasianalyse und Qualitätsklassen”, Grazer Philosophical Studies, 11: 23–43. doi:10.1163/18756735-90000095 (Scholar)
• Korbmacher, Johannes and Georg Schiemer, 2018, “What Are Structural Properties?”, Philosophia Mathematica, 26(3): 295–323. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkx011 (Scholar)
• Kremer, Michael, 1997, “Marti on Descriptions in Carnap’s S2”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 26(6): 629–634. doi:10.1023/a:1017941003240 (Scholar)
• Kripke, Saul, 1980, Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Based on three lectures given in January, 1970. (Scholar)
• Kuhn, Thomas, 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Kuipers, Theo A. F., 1978, “On the Generalization of the Continuum of Inductive Methods to Universal Hypotheses”, Synthese, 37(3): 255–284. doi:10.1007/bf00873242 (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity”, Erkenntnis, 21(1). doi:10.1007/bf00176183 (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “Inductive Analogy by Similarity and Proximity”, in Helman 1988: 299–313. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0_14 (Scholar)
• Kutz, Oliver, Till Mossakowski, and Dominik Lücke, 2010, “Carnap, Goguen, and the Hyperontologies: Logical Pluralism and Heterogeneous Structuring in Ontology Design”, Logica Universalis, 4(2): 255–333. doi:10.1007/s11787-010-0020-3 (Scholar)
• Kyburg, Henry E., 1961, Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. (Scholar)
• Ladyman, James, 1998, “What Is Structural Realism?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 29(3): 409–424. doi:10.1016/s0039-3681(98)80129-5 (Scholar)
• Ladyman, James and Don Ross, 2007, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Landes, Jürgen, Jeff Paris, and Alena Vencovská, 2008, “Some Aspects of Polyadic Inductive Logic”, Studia Logica, 90(1): 3–16. doi:10.1007/s11225-008-9140-7 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “A Survey of Some Recent Results on Spectrum Exchangeability in Polyadic Inductive Logic”, Synthese, 181(S1): 19–47. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9711-9 (Scholar)
• Leblanc, Hugues, 1962, Statistical and Inductive Probabilities, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• Leisenring, A. C., 1969, Mathematical Logic and Hilbert’s ε-Symbol, London: Macdonald. (Scholar)
• Leitgeb, Hannes, 2007, “A New Analysis of Quasianalysis”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36(2): 181–226. doi:10.1007/s10992-006-9033-z (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “New Life for Carnap’s Aufbau?”, Synthese, 180(2): 265–299. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Scientific Philosophy, Mathematical Philosophy, and All That”, Metaphilosophy, 44(3): 267–275. doi:10.1111/meta.12029 (Scholar)
• Lewis, C. I., 1943, “The Modes of Meaning”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(2): 236–250. doi:10.2307/2103080 (Scholar)
• Lewis, Clarence Irving and Cooper Harold Langford, 1932, Symbolic Logic, New York: Century Company. (Scholar)
• Lewis, David K., 1969, “Policing the Aufbau”, Philosophical Studies, 20(1–2): 13–17. doi:10.1007/bf02441100 (Scholar)
• –––, 1970, “How to Define Theoretical Terms”, The Journal of Philosophy, 67(13): 427–446. doi:10.2307/2023861 (Scholar)
• –––, 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”, in Jeffrey 1980: 263–293. (Scholar)
• –––, 1983, “New Work for a Theory of Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61(4): 343–377. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131 (Scholar)
• Linsky, Leonard, 1949, “Some Notes on Carnap’s Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis”, Philosophy of Science, 16(4): 343–347. doi:10.1086/287055 (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “Terms and Propositions in Russell’s Principles of Mathematics”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26(4): 621–642. doi:10.1353/hph.1988.0082 (Scholar)
• Loomis, Eric J. and Cory F. Juhl, 2006, “Explication”, in The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Science, S. Sarkar and J. Pfeifer (eds.), London: Routledge, pp. 287–94. (Scholar)
• Lück, Uwe, 2006, “Continuous Time Goes by Russell”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 47(3): 397–434. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1163775446 (Scholar)
• Lutz, Sebastian, 2012a, “Artificial Language Philosophy of Science”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(2): 181–203. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0042-6 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012b, “On a Straw Man in the Philosophy of Science: A Defense of the Received View”, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2(1): 77–120. doi:10.1086/664460 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012c, Criteria of Empirical Significance. Foundations, Relations, Applications, Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht: Utrecht University. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, “What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?”, Erkenntnis, 79(S8): 1475–1492. doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9578-5 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “Carnap on Empirical Significance”, Synthese, 194(1): 217–252. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0561-8 (Scholar)
• Mach, Ernst, 1902, Erkenntnis und Irrtum: Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Reprinted 1991, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Scholar)
• –––, 1912, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung: Historisch-kritisch dargestellt, seventh edition. Reprinted 1988, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft). (Scholar)
• Mac Lane, Saunders, 1938, “Carnap on Logical Syntax”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 44(3): 171–176. (Scholar)
• Maddy, Penelope, 2007, Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Maher, Patrick, 2000, “Probabilities for Two Properties”, Erkenntnis, 52(1): 63–91. doi:10.1023/a:1005557828204 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Explication Defended”, Studia Logica, 86(2): 331–341. doi:10.1007/s11225-007-9063-8 (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, “Explication of Inductive Probability”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39(6): 593–616. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9144-4 (Scholar)
• Makinson, David, 1966, “How Meaningful Are Modal Operators?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 44(3): 331–337. doi:10.1080/00048406612341161 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Conditional Probability in the Light of Qualitative Belief Change”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(2): 121–153. doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9176-4 (Scholar)
• Marti, Genoveva, 1994, “Do Modal Distinctions Collapse in Carnap’s System?”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 23(6): 575–593. doi:10.1007/bf01052778 (Scholar)
• Mautner, F. I., 1946, “An Extension of Klein’s Erlanger Program: Logic as Invariant-Theory”, American Journal of Mathematics, 68(3): 345–384. doi:10.2307/2371821 (Scholar)
• Menger, Karl, 1930, “Der Intuitionismus”, Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie, 4: 311–325. (Scholar)
• Michalos, Alex C., 1971, The Popper-Carnap Controversy, The Hague: Nijhoff. (Scholar)
• Mises, Richard von, 1928, Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit, Vienna: Springer. (Scholar)
• –––, 1939, Kleines Lehrbuch des Positivismus: Einführung in die empiristische Wissenschaftsauffassung, The Hague: W. P. van Stockum. Reprinted 1990, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp. (Scholar)
• Montague, Richard, 1969, “On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities”:, The Monist, 53(2): 159–194. doi:10.5840/monist19695327 (Scholar)
• Mormann, Thomas, 1994, “A Representational Reconstruction of Carnap’s Quasianalysis”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, 1: 96–104. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.1.193015 (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Repräsentation, Struktur, Quasianalyse. Formale Aspekte einer Carnapianischen Konstitutionstheorie”, in Georg Meggle (ed.), Analyomen, 2, Berlin: de Gruyter, 431–438. (Scholar)
• –––, 1999, “Neurath’s Opposition To Tarskian Semantics”, in Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Jan Woleński and Eckehart Köhler (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 165–178. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0689-6_14 (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, Rudolf Carnap, Munich: Beck. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Carnaps Philosophie als Möglichkeitswissenschaft”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 55(1): 79–100. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Synthetic Geometry and Aufbau”, in Language, Truth and Knowledge: Contributions to the Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Thomas Bonk (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 45–64. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0151-8_3 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “A Quasi-analytical Constitution of Physical Space”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 79–100. (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, “Werte Bei Carnap”, Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung, 60(2): 169–189. doi:10.3196/004433006780282913 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Russell’s Many Points”, in Hieke and Leitgeb 2009: 239–258. (Scholar)
• Moulines, C. Ulises, 1991, “Making Sense of Carnap’s Aufbau“, in Spohn 1991: 263–286. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3490-3_14">10.1007/978-94-011-3490-3_14 (Scholar)
• Murzi, Julien and Ole Thomassen Hjortland, 2009, “Inferentialism and the Categoricity Problem: Reply to Raatikainen”, Analysis, 69(3): 480–488. doi:10.1093/analys/anp071 (Scholar)
• Myhill, John, 1958, “Problems Arising in the Formalization of Intensional Logic”, Logique et Analyse, 1(2): 74–83. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “An Alternative to the Method of Extension and Intension”, in Schilpp 1963: 299–310. (Scholar)
• Nasrin, Mehdi, 2004, “Anomalous Monism in Carnap’s Aufbau”, Erkenntnis, 60(3): 283–293. doi:10.1023/b:erke.0000023385.19894.47 (Scholar)
• Neuber, Matthias, 2018, Der Realismus Im Logischen Empirismus: Eine Studie Zur Geschichte Der Wissenschaftsphilosophie, (Veröffentlichungen Des Instituts Wiener Kreis 27), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58025-8 (Scholar)
• Neurath, Otto, 1928, “Rezension: R. Carnap, Der logische Aufbau der Welt und Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie”, Der Kampf, 21: 624–6. (Scholar)
• –––, 1932, “Protokollsätze”, Erkenntnis, 3: 204–214. doi:10.1007/bf01886420 (Scholar)
• –––, 1934, “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘Wirkliche welt’”, Erkenntnis, 4(1): 346–362. doi:10.1007/bf01793498 (Scholar)
• Niiniluoto, Ilkka, 1972, “Inductive Systematization: Definition and a Critical Survey”, Synthese, 25(1–2): 25–81. doi:10.1007/bf00484998 (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, “Analogy and Inductive Logic”, Erkenntnis, 16(1): 1–34. doi:10.1007/bf00219640 (Scholar)
• –––, 1988, “Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning”, in Helman 1988: 271–298. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0_13 (Scholar)
• Ostwald, Wilhelm, 1914a, Auguste Comte: Der Mann und sein Werk, Leipzig: Unesma. (Scholar)
• –––, 1914b, “Vorrede” to the 1914 translation of Comte 1822: VII–XI. (Scholar)
• –––, 1914c, Moderne Naturphilosophie: I. Die Ordnungswissenschaften, Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. (Scholar)
• Papineau, David, 1996, “Theory-Dependent Terms”, Philosophy of Science, 63(1): 1–20. doi:10.1086/289890 (Scholar)
• Parrini, Paolo, Wesley C. Salmon, and Merrilee H. Salmon (eds.), 2003, Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
• Parsons, Charles, 1995, “Quine and Gödel on Analyticity”, in On Quine: New Essays, Paolo Leonardi and Marco Santambrogio (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–313. (Scholar)
• Partee, Barbara H., 1975, “Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry, 6(2): 203–300. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact”, The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 6: 1–52. (Scholar)
• Peregrin, Jaroslav, 2011, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) (Scholar)
• –––, forthcoming, “Carnap’s Inferentialism”, in R. Schuster (ed.) The Vienna Circle in Czechoslovakia, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
• Pettigrew, Richard, 2007, “Platonism and Aristotelianism in Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica, 16(3): 310–332. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkm035 (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, Accuracy and the Laws of Credence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732716.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Pietroski, Paul M., 2018, Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198812722.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Pincock, Christopher, 2002, “Russell’s Influence On Carnap’s Aufbau”, Synthese, 131(1): 1–37. doi:10.1023/a:1015066427566 (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “A Reserved Reading of Carnap’s Aufbau”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 86(4): 518–543. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2005.00240.x (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Carnap, Russell, and the External World”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 106–128. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.006 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Carnap’s Logical Structure of the World”, Philosophy Compass, 4(6): 951–961. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00247.x (Scholar)
• Pinder, Mark, forthcoming, “On Strawson’s Critique of Explication as a Method in Philosophy”, Synthese, first online: 14 November 2017. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1614-6 (Scholar)
• Popper, Karl R., 1935 [1959], Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Springer. Translated as The Logic of Scientific Discovery, author translated, London: Hutchinson, 1959. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics”, in Schilpp 1963: 183–226. (Scholar)
• Potter, Michael, 2000, Reason’s Nearest Kin: Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to Carnap, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252619.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Price, Huw, 1988, Facts and the Function of Truth, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, “Naturalism and the Fate of the M-Worlds I”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 71(1): 247–267. Reprinted in Price 2011: 132–147. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00029 (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?”, in Chalmers, Manley, and Wasserman 2009: 320–46. (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, Naturalism without Mirrors, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, Expressivism, Pragmatism and Representationalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842498 (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Carnapian Voluntarism and Global Expressivism: Reply to Carus”, The Monist, 101(4): 468–474. doi:10.1093/monist/ony017 (Scholar)
• Proust, Joëlle, 1986 [1989], Questions de forme: Logique et proposition analytique de Kant à Carnap, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard. Translated as Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap, Anastasios Albert Brenner (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Psillos, Stathis, 1999, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000, “Rudolf Carnap’s `Theoretical Concepts in Science’”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 31(1): 151–172. doi:10.1016/S0039-3681(99)00031-X (Scholar)
• Putnam, Hilary, 1962, “What Theories are Not”, in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 240–251. (Scholar)
• –––, 1963, “‘Degree of Confirmation’ and Inductive Logic”, in Schilpp 1963: 761–84. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975, “The Analytic and the Synthetic”, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–69. (Scholar)
• Quine, Willard V. O., 1936, “Truth by Convention”, in Philosophical Essays for Alfred North Whitehead, New York: Longmans, Green, & Company. Reprinted in Quine 1976: 77–106. (Scholar)
• –––, 1951 [1953], “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, The Philosophical Review, 60(1): 20–43. Reprinted in Quine From a Logical Point of View, New York: Harper, 1953, pp. 20–46. doi:10.2307/2181906 (Scholar)
• –––, 1960a, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1960b, “Carnap and Logical Truth”, Synthese, 12(4): 350–374. Reprinted in Quine 1976: 107–32. doi:10.1007/bf00485423 (Scholar)
• –––, 1969, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1970a, Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
• –––, 1970b, “Natural Kinds”, in Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Nicholas Rescher et al. (eds.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 5–23. (Scholar)
• –––, 1974, The Roots of Reference, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• –––, 1976, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, revised and enlarged edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1978, “On the Nature of Moral Values”, in Values and Morals, Alvin I. Goldman and Jaegwon Kim (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 37–45. Reprinted in Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981, pp. 55–66. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7634-5_3 (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Carnap’s Positivistic Travail”, Fundamenta Scientiae, 5: 325–333. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, “Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr.”, in The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, Lewis Edwin Hahn and Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.), LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 155–157. (Scholar)
• –––, 1987, Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1990, “Comment on Hintikka”, in Barrett and Gibson 1990: 176. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, From Stimulus to Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Raatikainen, Panu, 2008, “On Rules of Inference and the Meanings of Logical Constants”, Analysis, 68(4): 282–287. doi:10.1093/analys/68.4.282 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Ramsification and Inductive Inference”, Synthese, 187(2): 569–577. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9861-9 (Scholar)
• Ramsey, Frank P., 1929, “Theories”, in Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, R.B. Braithwaite (ed.), London: Kegan Paul, 1931, 212–236. (Scholar)
• Reck, Erich H., 2007, “Carnap and Modern Logic”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 176–199. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.009 (Scholar)
• Reck, Erich H. and Steve Awodey, 2005, Frege’s Lectures on Logic: Carnap’s Jena Notes 1910–1914, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Reichenbach, Hans, 1920, Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-50774-8 (Scholar)
• –––, 1925 Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Braunschweig: Vieweg. (Scholar)
• –––, 1928, Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin: de Gruyter. (Scholar)
• –––, 1929, “Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis”, in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 4 Allgemeine Grundlagen der Physik, Berlin: Springer, Chapter 1, pp. 1–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 1930, “Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit”, Erkenntnis, 1: 158–188. doi:10.1007/bf00208615 (Scholar)
• –––, 1938, Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Reisch, George A., 1991, “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?”, Philosophy of Science, 58(2): 264–277. doi:10.1086/289615 (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610318 (Scholar)
• Restall, Greg, 2002, “Carnap’s Tolerance, Meaning, and Logical Pluralism”, The Journal of Philosophy, 99(8): 426–443. doi:10.2307/3655622 (Scholar)
• Richardson, Alan W., 1994, “The Limits of Tolerance: Carnap’s Logico-Philosophical Project in Logical Syntax of Language”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 68: 67–82. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511570810 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Carnapian Pragmatism”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: 295–315. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.014 (Scholar)
• Ricketts, Thomas, 1994, “Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism, and Conventionalism”, in Reading Putnam, Peter Clark and Bob Hale (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 176–200. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “Carnap: From Logical Syntax to Semantics”, in Giere and Richardson 1996: 231–250. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Languages and Calculi”, in Hardcastle and Richardson 2003: 257–280. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Frege, Carnap, and Quine: Continuities and Discontinuities”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 181–202. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “From Tolerance to Reciprocal Containment”, in Wagner 2009: 217–235. (Scholar)
• Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo, 2002, Resemblance Nominalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Roeper, Peter and Hugues Leblanc, 1999, Probability Theory and Probability Logic, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
• Russell, Bertrand, 1905, “On Denoting”, Mind, 14(4): 479–493. doi:10.1093/mind/xiv.4.479 (Scholar)
• –––, 1914a, Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• –––, 1914b, “The Relation of Sense-Data to Physics”, Scientia, 4. Reprinted in Mysticism and Logic, London: Longmans, 1918, pp. 145–179. (Scholar)
• –––, 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
• –––, 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, London: Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
• Russell, Gillian, 2008, Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232192.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Ryle, Gilbert, 1949, “Meaning and Necessity”, Philosophy, 24(88): 69–76. (Scholar)
• Scheffler, Israel, 1963, The Anatomy of Inquiry: Philosophical Studies in the Theory of Science, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Scholar)
• –––, 1968, “Reflections on the Ramsey Method”, Journal of Philosophy, 65(10): 269–274. doi:10.2307/2024077 (Scholar)
• Schiemer, Georg, 2012, “Carnap’s Untersuchungen: Logicism, Formal Axiomatics, and Metatheory”, in Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, Richard Creath (ed.), (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 13–36. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_2 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Carnap’s Early Semantics”, Erkenntnis, 78(3): 487–522. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9365-8 (Scholar)
• Schiemer, Georg and Norbert Gratzl, 2016, “The Epsilon-Reconstruction of Theories and Scientific Structuralism”, Erkenntnis, 81(2): 407–432. doi:10.1007/s10670-015-9747-9 (Scholar)
• Schiemer, Georg, Richard Zach, and Erich Reck, 2017, “Carnap’s Early Metatheory: Scope and Limits”, Synthese, 194(1): 33–65. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0877-z (Scholar)
• Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.), 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Schlick, Moritz, 1918, Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Berlin: Springer. (Scholar)
• Schoch, Daniel, 2001, “Dimensional Characterization in Finite Quasi-Analysis”, Erkenntnis, 54(1): 121–131. doi:10.1023/a:1005603819576 (Scholar)
• Schroeder-Heister, Peter, 2012 [2018] “Proof-Theoretic Semantics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/>. (Scholar)
• Schupbach, Jonah N., 2017, “Experimental Explication”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94(3): 672–710. doi:10.1111/phpr.12207 (Scholar)
• Schurz, Gerhard, 2001, “Rudolf Carnap’s Modal Logic”, in Zwischen traditioneller und moderner Logik: Nichtklassische Ansätze, Werner Stelzner and Manfred Stöckler (eds.), Paderborn: Mentis, pp. 365–380. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, “Semantic Holism and (Non-)Compositionality in Scientific Theories”, in The Compositionality of Meaning and Content, Vol. I, M. Werning et al. (eds.), Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, pp. 271–84. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, “When Empirical Success Implies Theoretical Reference: A Structural Correspondence Theorem”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(1): 101–133. doi:10.1093/bjps/axn049 (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Philosophy of Science. A Unified Approach, New York: Routledge. (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, “No Free Lunch Theorem, Inductive Skepticism, and the Optimality of Meta-Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 84(5): 825–839. doi:10.1086/693929 (Scholar)
• Schurz, Gerhard and Georg Dorn, 1988, “Why Popper’s Basic Statements Are Not Falsifiable Some Paradoxes in Popper’s ‘Logic of Scientific Discovery’”, Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 19(1): 124–143. doi:10.1007/bf01801380 (Scholar)
• Shapiro, Stewart, 1997, Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195139305.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Identity, Indiscernibility, and ante rem Structuralism: The Tale of i and −i”, Philosophia Mathematica, 16(3): 285–309. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkm042 (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Varieties of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696529.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Shepherd, Joshua and James Justus, 2015, “X-Phi and Carnapian Explication”, Erkenntnis, 80(2): 381–402. doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3 (Scholar)
• Sher, Gila, 1991, The Bounds of Logic, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Siegetsleitner, Anne, 2014, Ethik und Moral im Wiener Kreis: Zur Geschichte eines engagierten Humanismus, Weimar: Böhlau. (Scholar)
• Skyrms, Brian, 1991, “Carnapian Inductive Logic for Markov Chains”, in Spohn 1991: 439–460. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3490-3_21 (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, “Carnapian Inductive Logic and Bayesian Statistics”, Statistics, Probability and Game Theory, IMS Lecture Notes – Monograph Series 30: 321–336. (Scholar)
• Sneed, Joseph D., 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3066-3 (Scholar)
• Soames, Scott, 2003, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume I: The Dawn of Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Spohn, Wolfgang (ed.), 1991, Erkenntnis Orientated: A Centennial Volume for Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3490-3 (Scholar)
• Stein, Howard, 1989, “Yes, but? Some Skeptical Remarks on Realism and Anti-Realism”, Dialectica, 43(1–2): 47–65. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00930.x (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, “Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, after All?”, Synthese, 93(1–2): 275–295. doi:10.1007/bf00869429 (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, “Some Reflections on the Structure of Our Knowledge in Physics”, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, Dag Prawitz, Brian Skyrms, and Dag Westerståhl (eds.), (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 134), Elsevier, 633–655. doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(06)80067-4 (Scholar)
• –––, 1998, “How Does Physics Bear upon Metaphysics, and Why Did Plato Hold that Philosophy Cannot Be Written Down”, Colloquium Lecture at the University of Chicago. [Stein 1998 available online] (Scholar)
• Steinberger, Florian, 2016, “How Tolerant Can You Be? Carnap on Rationality”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(3): 645–668. doi:10.1111/phpr.12165 (Scholar)
• Sterkenburg, Tom F., 2018, Universal Prediction, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen. [Sterkenburg 2018 available online] (Scholar)
• Stevenson, Charles L., 1944, Ethics and Language, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P. F., 1963, “Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems versus Natural Languages in Analytical Philosophy”, in Schilpp 1963: 503–518. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198751182.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Suppes, Patrick, 1957, Introduction to Logic, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. (Scholar)
• Sznajder, Marta, 2016, “What Conceptual Spaces Can Do for Carnap’s Late Inductive Logic”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56: 62–71. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.12.001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2017, Inductive Logic on Conceptual Spaces, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen. (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Inductive Logic as Explication: The Evolution of Carnap’s Notion of Logical Probability”, The Monist, 101(4): 417–440. doi:10.1093/monist/ony015 (Scholar)
• Tarski, Alfred, 1933 [1935], Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych, Warsaw: Nakładem Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego. Translated in 1935 as “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen”, L. Blaustein (trans.), with a postscript added, Studia Philosophica, 1: 261–405. (Scholar)
• –––, 1936 [2002], “O pojęciu wynikania logicznego”, Przegląd Filozoficzny, 39: 58–68. Translated as “On the Concept of Following Logically”, Magda Stroińska and David Hitchcock (trans.), History and Philosophy of Logic, 23(3): 155–196. doi:10.1080/0144534021000036683 (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, “What Are Logical Notions?”, John Corcoran (ed.), History and Philosophy of Logic, 7(2): 143–154. doi:10.1080/01445348608837096 (Scholar)
• Tarski, Alfred and Adolf Lindenbaum, 1935, “Über die Beschränktheit der Ausdrucksmittel deduktiver Theorien”, in Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, fasc. 7, 1934–1935, pp. 15–22. (Scholar)
• Thomasson, Amie L., 2009, “Answerable and Unanswerable Questions”, in Chalmers, Manley, and Wasserman 2009: 444–471. (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Ontology Made Easy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385119.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Thomasson, Amie, 2016, “Carnap and the Prospects for Easy Ontology”, in S. Blatti and S. LaPointe (eds.), Ontology After Carnap, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 122–144. (Scholar)
• Tsou, Jonathan Y., 2003, “The Justification of Concepts in Carnap’s Aufbau”, Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 671–689. doi:10.1086/378859 (Scholar)
• Tuomela, Raimo, 1974, “Review: Herbert G. Bohnert, ‘Communication by Ramsey-Sentence Clause’ (1967); Israel Scheffler, ‘Reflections on the Ramsey Method’ (1968); Herbert G. Bohnert, ‘In Defense of Ramsey’s Elimination Method’ (1968); Ilkka Niiniluoto, ‘Empirically Trivial Theories and Inductive Systematization’ (1973)”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 39(3): 617–619. doi:10.2307/2272932 (Scholar)
• Uebel, Thomas E., 1992, “Rational Reconstruction as Elucidation? Carnap in the Early Protocol Sentence Debate”, Synthese, 93(1–2): 107–140. doi:10.1007/bf00869423 (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, “Carnap and Neurath in Exile: Can Their Disputes Be Resolved?”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15(2): 211–220. doi:10.1080/02698590120059077 (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, “Carnap, the Left Vienna Circle, and Neopositivist Antimetaphysics”, in Awodey and Klein 2004: 247–277. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate, LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “The Bipartite Conception of Metatheory and the Dialectical Conception of Explication”, in Wagner 2012: 117–130. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception”, Erkenntnis, 78(3): 523–546. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9352-5 (Scholar)
• –––, 2018, “Carnap’s Transformation of Epistemology and the Development of His Metaphilosophy”, The Monist, 101(4): 367–387. doi:10.1093/monist/ony012 (Scholar)
• Urmson, J.O., 1956, Philosophical Analysis: Its Development between the Two World Wars, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Vaihinger, Hans, 1922, Die Philosophie des Als Ob: System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus, eighth edition, Leipzig: Meiner. (Scholar)
• van Benthem, Johan F. A. K., 1978, “Ramsey Eliminability”, Studia Logica, 37(4): 321–336. doi:10.1007/bf02176165 (Scholar)
• –––, 1982, “The Logical Study of Science”, Synthese, 51(3): 431–472. doi:10.1007/bf00485263 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “The Logic of Empirical Theories Revisited”, Synthese, 186(3): 775–792. doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9916-6 (Scholar)
• van Fraassen, Bas C., 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Wagner, Pierre (ed.), 2009, Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 2012, Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
• Waismann, Friedrich, 1930, “Logische analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs”, Erkenntnis, 1: 228–248. doi:10.1007/bf00208618 (Scholar)
• ––– (ed.), 1967, Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Wajsberg, M., 1933, “Ein erweiterter Klassenkalkül”, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 40(1): 113–126. doi:10.1007/bf01708856 (Scholar)
• Werner, Meike G., 2003, Moderne in der Provinz: Kulturelle Experimente im Fin de Siècle Jena, Göttingen: Wallstein. (Scholar)
• –––, 2015, “Freideutsche Jugend und Politik; Rudolf Carnaps Politische Rundbriefe 1918”, in Geschichte intellektuell: theoriegeschichtliche Perspektiven, F.W. Graf, E. Hanke, und B. Picht (Hrsg.), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, S. 465–486. (Scholar)
• Weyl, Hermann, 1926, Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft, Munich: Oldenbourg. Translated as Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Olf Helmer (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947. (Scholar)
• Whitehead, Alfred North and Bertrand Russell, 1910–1913, Principia Mathematica, Vol. 1–3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Williamson, Jon, 2010, In Defence of Objective Bayesianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228003.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Williamson, Timothy, 1998, “Conditionalizing on Knowledge”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(1): 89–121. doi:10.1093/bjps/49.1.89 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470696675 (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, Modal Logic as Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001 (Scholar)
• Wilson, Mark, 1982, “Predicate Meets Property”, The Philosophical Review, 91(4): 549–589. doi:10.2307/2184801 (Scholar)
• –––, 2006, Wandering Significance: An Essay on Conceptual Behaviour, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269259.001.0001 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “The Perils of Polyanna”, in Wagner 2012: 205–224. (Scholar)
• Winnie, John A., 1970, “Theoretical Analyticity”, in In Memory of Rudolf Carnap: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970, Roger C. Buck and Robert S. Cohen (eds.), (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 289–305. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_20 (Scholar)
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1922, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Woleński, J., 1999, “Semantic Revolution: Rudolf Carnap, Kurt Gödel, and Alfred Tarski”, in J. Woleński and E. Köhler (eds.), Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, “Carnap’s Metaphilosophy”, in Thomas Bonk (ed.), Language, Truth and Knowledge, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 2–27. (Scholar)
• Worrall, John, 1989, “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica, 43(1–2): 99–124. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x (Scholar)
• Yablo, Stephen, 1998, “Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 72: 229–261. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00044 (Scholar)
• –––, 2014, Aboutness, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Yap, Audrey, 2010, “Feminism and Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance”, Hypatia, 24: 437–54. (Scholar)
• Zabell, S. L., 2005, Symmetry and Its Discontents: Essays on the History of Inductive Probability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614293 (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, “Carnap on Probability and Induction”, in Friedman and Creath 2007: (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 273–294. doi:10.1017/ccol9780521840156.013 (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Carnap and the Logic of Inductive Inference”, in Handbook of the History of Logic, volume 10: Inductive Logic, Dordrecht: Elsevier, 265–309. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52936-7.50008-2 (Scholar)