Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Causation in the Law" by Michael Moore

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

  • American Law Institute, 1934, Restatement of Torts, §§ 431–435. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1962, Model Penal Code, §2.03, Proposed Official Draft. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1965, Restatement (Second) of Torts, §§ 431–433. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, Commentaries on the Model Penal Code, § 2.03(1). (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm, secs. 26–36, (Scholar)
  • Austin, J. L., 1957, “A Plea for Excuses”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57(1): 1–30. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1 (Scholar)
  • Bacon, Sir Francis, 1630, “Maxims of the Law”, in his The Elements of the Common Law of England, London: Assigns of I. Moore. (Scholar)
  • Beale, Joseph H., 1895, “Recovery for Consequences of an Act”, Harvard Law Review, 9(1): 80–89. doi:10.2307/1322317 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1920, “The Proximate Consequences of an Act”, Harvard Law Review, 33(5): 633–658. doi:10.2307/1327211 (Scholar)
  • Berry v. Borough of Sugar Notch, 43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899).
  • Bird v. St. Paul F. and Minneapolis Ins. Co., 224 N. Y. 47, 120 N.E. 86 (1918).
  • Borgo, John, 1979, “Causal Paradigms in Tort Law”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 8(3): 419–455. doi:10.1086/467616 (Scholar)
  • Calabresi, Guido, 1961, “Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts”, Yale Law Journal, 70(4): 499–553. doi:10.1086/467495">10.1086/467495 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1975, “Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven, Jr”., University of Chicago Law Review, 43(1): 69–108. (Scholar)
  • Carpenter, Charles E., 1932, “Workable Rules for Determining Proximate Cause”, California Law Review, 20(3): 229–259; 20(4): 396–419; 20(5): 471–539. doi:10.2307/3475308 doi:10.2307/3475371 doi:10.2307/3475743 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1940–1943, “Proximate Cause”, Southern California Law Review, 14: 1–34, 115–153, 416–451; 15: 187–213, 304–321, 427–468; 16: 1–23, 61–92, 275–313. (Scholar)
  • Coase, Ronald H., 1960, “The Problem of Social Cost”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44. doi:10.1086/466560 (Scholar)
  • Cohen, Felix S., 1935, “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach”, Columbia Law Review, 35(6): 809–849. doi:10.2307/1116300 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1937, “The Problems of a Functional Jurisprudence”, The Modern Law Review, 1(1): 5–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1937.tb00004.x (Scholar)
  • Cole, Robert H., 1964a, “Windfall and Probability: A Study of ‘Cause’ in Negligence Law: Part I. Uses of Causal Language”, California Law Review, 52(3): 459–512. doi:10.2307/3479196 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1964b, “Windfall and Probability: A Study of ‘Cause’ in Negligence Law: Part II. Factual Uncertainty and Competitive Fairness”, California Law Review, 52(4): 764–821. doi:10.2307/3479050 (Scholar)
  • Dan-Cohen, Meir, 1983, “Causation”, in Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, Sanford H. Kadish (ed.), New York: Free Press, I: 165–166. (Scholar)
  • Denny v. N.Y. Central R.R., 13 Gray (Mass.) 481 (1859).
  • Dressler, Joshua, 1995, Understanding Criminal Law, second edition, New York: Matthew-Bender. (Scholar)
  • Edgerton, Henry W., 1924, “Legal Cause”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 72(3): 211–244, 72(4): 343–375. doi:10.2307/3314478 doi:10.2307/3314220 (Scholar)
  • Eldredge, Laurence H., 1937, “Culpable Intervention as Superseding Cause”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 86(2): 135. doi:10.2307/3308858 (Scholar)
  • Epstein, Richard A., 1973, “A Theory of Strict Liability”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1): 151–204. doi:10.1086/467495 (Scholar)
  • Feinberg, Joel, 1970, “Action and Responsibility”, in Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 119–151. (Scholar)
  • Fisher, David A., 1992, “Causation in Fact in Omission Cases”, Utah Law Review, [1992]: 1335–1384. (Scholar)
  • Fuller, Lon, 1958, “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart”, Harvard Law Review, 71(4): 630–672. (Scholar)
  • Green, Leon, 1929, “Are There Dependable Rules of Causation?”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 77(5): 601–628. doi:10.2307/3307290 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1967, “The Wagon Mound No. 2: Foreseeability Revised”, Utah Law Review, [1967]: 197–206. (Scholar)
  • Hart, H. L. A., 1949, “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 49(1): 171–194. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/49.1.171 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1968, Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hart, H.L.A., and Honoré, A.M., 1956, “Causation in the Law”, Law Quarterly Review, 72(1): 58–90, 72(2): 260–281, 72(3): 398–417. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1959, Causation in the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985, Causation in the Law, second edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001 (Scholar)
  • Honoré, Tony, 1997, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law”, in The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, David G. Owen (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 363–386. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265795.003.0017 (Scholar)
  • Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1961) (Stewart, J., concurring). (Scholar)
  • Johnson, Eric A., 2005, “Lost Chance in Criminal Cases”, Iowa Law Review, 91: 66–71. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016, “Cause-in-Fact After Burrage v. United States”, Florida Law Review, 68(6): 1727–1771. [Johnson 2016 available online] (Scholar)
  • Kadish, Sanford H., 1985, “Complicity, Cause and Blame: A Study in the Interpretation of Doctrine”, California Law Review, 73(2): 323–410. doi:10.2307/3480313 (Scholar)
  • Kahmen, Benedikt and Markus S. Stepanians, (eds.), 2013, Critical Essays on “Causation and Responsibility”, Berlin: De Gruyter. (Scholar)
  • Keeton, Robert, 1963, Legal Cause in the Law of Torts, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press. (Scholar)
  • Kelman, Mark, 1987, “The Necessary Myth of Objective Causation Judgments in Liberal Political Theory”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 63(3): 579–637. [Kelman 1987 available online] (Scholar)
  • Kripke, Saul, 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Landes, William M. and Richard A. Posner, 1983, “Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1): 109–134. doi:10.1086/467716 (Scholar)
  • Larremore, Wilbur, 1909, “Negligence and the Act of God”, Yale Law Journal, 18(5): 338–342. doi:10.2307/785759 (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1973a, “Causation”, The Journal of Philosophy, 70(17): 556–567. doi:10.2307/2025310 (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1973b, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwells. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1986, “Postscripts to ‘Causation’”, Philosophical Papers, II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 172–213. (Scholar)
  • Mackie, J. L., 1980, The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198246420.001.0001 (Scholar)
  • Malone, Wex S., 1956, “Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact”, Stanford Law Review, 9(1): 60–99. doi:10.2307/1226919 (Scholar)
  • Moore, Michael S., 1989, “The Interpretive Turn in Modern Theory: A Turn for the Worse?”, Stanford Law Review, 41(4): 871–957. Reprinted as chapter 10 of Moore, Educating Oneself in Public: Critical Essays in Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. doi:10.2307/1228741 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009a, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256860.001.0001 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009b, “Introduction: The Nature of Singularist Theories of Causation”, Monist, 92(1): 3–22. Reprinted in Moore 2009a: chapter 20. doi:10.5840/monist20099211 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011a, “Intention as a Marker of Moral Culpability and Legal Punishability”, in Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, R.A. Duff and Stuart Green (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 179–205. Revised and reprinted as chapter 4 of Moore, Mechanical Choices: The Responsibility of the Human Machine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559152.003.0009 (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011b, “Causation Revisited”, Rutgers Law Journal, 42: 451–509. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “Further Thoughts on Causation (and Related Topics) Prompted by Fifteen Critics”, in Kahmen and Stepanians 2013: 333–416. (Scholar)
  • New York Central R. R. v. Grimstad, 264 F. 2d 334 (2d Cir. 1920).
  • Oxendine v. State, 528 A. 2d 870, 872–873 (Del. 1987).
  • People v. Botkin, 132 Cal. 231, 64 P. 286 (1901).
  • People v. Lewis, 124 Cal. 551, 57 P. 470 (1899).
  • Pigou, Arthur Cecil, 1920, The Economics of Welfare, London: Palgrave Macmillan. (Scholar)
  • Pollack, Frederick, 1901, The Law of Torts, sixth edition, London: Stevens and Sons. [Pollack 1901 available online] (Scholar)
  • Pound, Roscoe, 1910, “Law in Books and Law in Action”, American Law Review, 44(1): 12–36. (Scholar)
  • Raz, Joseph, 2012, “The Inner Logic of the Law”, in J. Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Regina v. Blaue, [1975–3] All Eng. Rep. 446 (Ct. App.). (Scholar)
  • Ryan v. New York Center R.R., 35 N.Y. 210, 91 Am. Dec. 49 (1866).
  • Scott v. Shepard, 96 Eng. Rep. 525 (K.B. 1773).
  • Shavell, Steven, 1980, “An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 9(3): 463–516. doi:10.1086/467650 (Scholar)
  • Smith, Jeremiah, 1911, “Legal Cause in Actions of Tort”, Harvard Law Review, 25(2): 103–128. doi:10.2307/1324390 (Scholar)
  • Stapleton, Jane, 2008, “Choosing What We Mean by Causation in the Law”, Missouri Law Review, 73(2): 433–480. [Stapleton 2008 available online] (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015, “An ‘Extended But-For’ Test for the Causal Relation in the Law of Obligations”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(4): 697–726. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqv005 (Scholar)
  • Terry, Charles, 1914, “Proximate Causation in the Law of Torts”, Harvard Law Review, 28(1): 10–33. (Scholar)
  • Wright, Richard W., 1985a, “Actual Causation vs. Probabilistic Linkage: The Bane of Economic Analysis”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2): 435–456. doi:10.1086/467780 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1985b, “Causation in Tort Law”, California Law Review, 73(6): 1735–1828. doi:10.2307/3480373 (Scholar)
  • –––, 1987, “The Efficiency Theory of Causation and Responsibility: Unscientific Formalism and False Semantic”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 63(3): 553–578. [Wright 1987 available online] (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013, “The NESS Account of Natural Causation: A Response to Criticisms”, in Kahmen and Stepanians 2013: 13–66. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 22 04:06:39 2022