Miller & Page 2007 and Mitchell 2009 both contain a chapter devoted to CA: they are accessible introductions written by notable scholars. Ilachinski 2001 is an excellent starting point for the exploration of the CA literature: although not up-to-date on some technical points, the volume nicely introduces the field and covers its most important applications. Wolfram 2002 took some twenty-years and 1200 pages to be finished and is a passionate journey including bold speculations on the role of CA for understanding the universe and our place in it.

• Aaronson, Scott, 2002, “On ‘A New Kind of Science’ by Stephen Wolfram ”, Quantum Information and Computation, 2(5): 410–423. [Aaronson 2002 preprint available online] (Scholar)
• –––, 2011, “Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity”, in Computability Turing, Gödel, Church, and Beyond, B. Jack Copeland, Carl J. Posy, and Oron Shagrir (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 261–328. [Aaronson 2011 preprint available online] (Scholar)
• Aburasa, Maher Milad, Yuek Ming Hoa, Mohammad Firuz Ramlia, and Zulfa Hanan Ash’aaria, 2016, “The simulation and prediction of spatio-temporal urban growth trends using cellular automata models: A review”, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 52: 380–389. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2016.07.007
• Albert, David Z., 2000, Time and Chance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Ambjorn, J., J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Lolli, 2004, “Emergence of a 4D World from Causal Quantum Gravity”, Physical Review Letters, 98(13): 131–301. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.131301 (Scholar)
• Barberousse, Anouk and Cyrille Imbert, 2013, “New Mathematics for Old Physics. The Case of Lattice Fluids”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(3): 231–241. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.03.003 (Scholar)
• Barrow, John D., Paul C.W. Davies, and Charles L. Harper, Jr (eds.), 2005, Science and Ultimate Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Batty, Michael, 2005, Cities and Complexity, Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Bedau, Mark A., 1997, “Weak Emergence”, in Philosophical Perspectives, 11: Mind, Causation, and World, J. Tomberlin (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 375–399. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.31.s11.17 (Scholar)
• Beraldo-de-Araújo, Anderson and Lorenzo Baravalle, forthcoming, “The Ontology of Digital Physics”, Erkenntnis, first published online 19 December 2016, doi:10.1007/s10670-016-9866-y (Scholar)
• Berto, Francesco, Gabriele Rossi, and Jacopo Tagliabue, 2010, The Mathematics of the Models of Reference, London: College Publications. (Scholar)
• –––, 2016, “There’s Plenty of Boole at the Bottom: A Reversible CA Against Information Entropy”, Minds and Machines, 26(4): 341–367. doi:10.1007/s11023-016-9401-6 (Scholar)
• Berto, Francesco and Jacopo Tagliabue, 2014, “The World is Either Digital or Analogue”, Synthese, 191(3): 481–497. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0285-1 (Scholar)
• Berlekamp, Elwyn R., John H. Conway, and Richard K. Guy, 1982, Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays, Vol. 2, London: Academic Press. (Scholar)
• Casati, Roberto and Achille C. Varzi, 1999, Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Chalmers, David John, 1996, The Conscious Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, “Strong and Weak Emergence”, in The Re-Emergence of Emergence, Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 244–255. (Scholar)
• Chen, Hudong, Shiyi Chen, Gary Doolen, and Y.C. Lee, 1983, “Simple Lattice Gas Models for Waves”, Complex Systems, 2(3): 259–267. (Scholar)
• Clark, Andy, 1996, Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science, second edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Cook, Matthew, 2004, “Universality in Elementary Cellular Automata”, Complex Systems, 15(1): 1–40. (Scholar)
• Creutz, Michael, 1986, “Deterministic Ising Dynamics”, Annals of Physics, 167(1): 62–76. doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(86)80006-9 (Scholar)
• Crutchfield, James .P., 1994a, “The Calculi of Emergence: Computation, Dynamics, and Induction”, Physica D, 75(1–3): 11–54. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90273-9 (Scholar)
• –––, 1994b, “Is Anything Ever New? Considering Emergence”, in Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality, G. Cowan, D. Pines, D. Melzner (eds.), (SFI Series in the Sciences of Complexity XIX), Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 479–497. (Scholar)
• Crutchfield, James P. and James E. Hanson, 1993, “Turbulent Pattern Bases for Cellular Automata”, Physica D, 69(3–4): 279–301. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(93)90092-f (Scholar)
• Crutchfield, James P. and M. Mitchell, 1995, “The Evolution of Emergent Computation”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(23): 10742–10746. (Scholar)
• Dennett, Daniel C., 1987, The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, “Real Patterns”, Journal of Philosophy, 88(1): 27–51. doi:10.2307/2027085 (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, Freedom Evolves, New York: Viking Penguin. (Scholar)
• Deutsch, David, 2005, “It from Qubit”. in Barrow, Davies, & Harper 2005: 90–102. (Scholar)
• Dowker, Fay, 2003, “Real Time”, New Scientist, 180(2415): 36–39. (Scholar)
• Epstein, Joshua M., 1999, “Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Science”, Complexity, 4(5): 41–60. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F (Scholar)
• Feynman, Richard P., 1965, The Character of Physical Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Floridi, Luciano, 2009, “Against Digital Ontology”, Synthese, 168(1): 151–178. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9334-6 (Scholar)
• Franceschetti, Donald R., D. Wayne Jones, Bruce W. Campbell and John W. Hamneken, 1992, “Hamming Nets, Ising Sets, Cellular Automata, Neural Nets and Random Walks”, American Journal of Physics, 61: 50–53. doi:10.1119/1.17409 (Scholar)
• Fredkin, Edward, 1990, “Digital Mechanics: An Information Process Based on Reversible Universal Cellular Automata”, Physica D, 45(1–3): 254–270. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90186-s (Scholar)
• –––, 1993, “A New Cosmogony”, in PhysComp ’92: Proceedings of the Workshop on Physics and Computation, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 116–121. doi:10.1109/phycmp.1992.615507 (Scholar)
• Fredkin, Edward and Tommaso Toffoli, 1982, “Conservative Logic”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(3–4): 219–253. doi:10.1007/bf01857727 (Scholar)
• Gell-Mann, Murray, 1994, The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. (Scholar)
• Grattarola, Daniele, Lorenzo Livi and Cesare Alippi, 2021, “Learning Graph Cellular Automata”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34: 20983–20994. (Scholar)
• Grim, Patrick, 1997, “The Undecidability of the Spatialized Prisoner’s Dilemma”, Theory and Decision, 42: 53–80. (Scholar)
• Grim, Patrick, Evan Selinger, William Braynen, Robert Rosenberger, Randy Au, Nancy Louie and John Connolly, 2005, “Modeling Prejudice Reduction: Spatialized Game Theory and the Contact Hypothesis”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 19(2): 95–125. (Scholar)
• Ha, David and Yujin Tang, 2022, “Collective Intelligence for Deep Learning: A Survey of Recent Developments”, Collective Intelligence, 1(1). doi:10.1177/26339137221114874 (Scholar)
• Hanson, James E. and James P. Crutchfield, 1992, “The Attractor-Basin Portrait of a Cellular Automaton”, Journal of Statistical Physics, 66(5–6): 1415–1462. doi:10.1007/bf01054429 (Scholar)
• Hardy, Lucien, 2005, “Why is Nature Described by Quantum Physics”, in Barrow, Davies, & Harper 2005: 45–71. (Scholar)
• Hedlund, G.A., 1969, “Endomorphisms and Automorphisms of the Shift Dynamical System”, Mathematical Systems Theory, 3(4): 51–59. doi:10.1007/bf01691062 (Scholar)
• ’t Hooft, Gerard, 1997, In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Hordijk, Wim, James P. Crutchfield, and Melanie Mitchell, 1996, “Embedded Particle Computation in Evolved Cellular Automata”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Physics and Computation, T. Toffoli, M. Biafore and J. Leao (eds.), Boston: New England Complex Systems Institute, pp. 153–158. (Scholar)
• Ilachinski, Andrew, 2001, Cellular Automata, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, Artificial War. Multiagent-Based Simulation of Combat, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. (Scholar)
• Ingerson, T.E. and R.L. Buvel, 1984, “Structure in Asynchronous Cellular Automata”, Physica D, 10(1–2): 59–68. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(84)90249-5 (Scholar)
• Kauffman, Stuart A., 1984, “Emergent Properties in Random Complex Automata”, Physica D, 10(1–2): 145–156. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(84)90257-4 (Scholar)
• Kelso, J.A. Scott, 1995, Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Kier, Lemont B., Paul G. Seybold, and Chao-Kun Cheng, 2005, Modeling Chemical Systems using Cellular Automata, Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
• Kim, Jaegwon, 1999, “Making Sense of Emergence”, Philosophical Studies, 95(1/2): 3–36. doi:10.1023/a:1004563122154 (Scholar)
• Land, Mark and Richard K. Belew, 1995, “No Perfect Two-State Cellular Automata for Density Classification Exist”, Physical Review Letters, 74(25): 1548–1550. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.5148 (Scholar)
• Landauer, R., 1961, “Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process”, IBM Journal of Research and Develop men, 5(3): 183–191. (Scholar)
• Langton, Chris G., 1990, “Computation at the Edge of Chaos: Phase Transitions and Emergent Computation”, Physica D, 42(1–3): 12–37. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90064-v (Scholar)
• Lárragaa, M.E., J.A. del Ríob, and L. Alvarez-lcaza, 2005, “Cellular Automata for One-Lane Traffic Flow Modeling”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13(1): 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2004.12.001 (Scholar)
• Lee, T.D., 1986, “Solutions of Discrete Mechanics Near the Continuum Limit”, in Rationale of Being: Recent Developments in Particle, Nuclear, and General Physics, Festschrift in honor of Gyō Takeda, Kenzo Ishikawa et al. (eds.), Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. (Scholar)
• Lewis, David, 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. (Scholar)
• –––, 1994, “Humean Supervenience Debugged”, Mind, 103(412): 473–490. doi:10.1093/mind/103.412.473 (Scholar)
• Malament, David B., 2006, “Classical General Relativity”, In Jeremy Butterfield & John Earman (eds.), Philosophy of Physics, (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science), Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50006-3 (Scholar)
• Miller, John H. and Scott E. Page, 2007, Complex Adaptive System, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Mitchell, Melanie, 1998, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 2009, Complexity: A Guided Tour, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Mitchell, Melanie, James P. Crutchfield, and Rajarshi Das, 1996, “Evolving Cellular Automata with Genetic Algorithm: A Review of Recent Works”, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Computation and Its Applications, Russian Academy of Science. [Mitchell, Crutchfield, & Das 1996 preprint available online] (Scholar)
• Mitchell, Melanie, Peter T. Hraber, and James P. Crutchfield, 1994, “Revisiting the Edge of Chaos: Evolving Cellular Automata to Perform Computations”, Complex Systems, 7(2): 89–130. (Scholar)
• Moore, Christopher, 1996, “Recursion Theory on the Reals and Continuous-Time Computation”, Theoretical Computer Science, 162(1): 23–44. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(95)00248-0 (Scholar)
• Moore, E.F., 1962, “Machine Models of Self-Reproduction”, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 14: 17–33. (Scholar)
• Mordvintsev, Alexander, Ettore Randazzo, Eyvind Niklasson and Michael Levin, 2020, “Growing Neural Cellular Automata”, Distill. doi:10.23915/distill.00023. (Scholar)
• Myhill, John, 1963, “The Converse of Moore’s Garden-of-Eden Theorem”, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 14(4): 685–686. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1963-0155764-9 (Scholar)
• O’Connor, Timothy and Wong, Hong Yu, 2015, “Emergent Properties”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Summer 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/> (Scholar)
• Packard, Norman H., 1988, “Adaptation toward the Edge of Chaos”, in Dynamic Patterns in Complex Systems, J.A. Scott Kelso, Arnold J. Mandell and Michael F. Schlesinger (eds.), Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 293–301. (Scholar)
• Piccinini, Gualtiero, 2010, “Computation in Physical Systems”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/computation-physicalsystems/> (Scholar)
• Poincaré, Henri, 1914, Science and Method, New York: Nelsons and Sons. (Scholar)
• Putnam, Hilary, 1988, Representation and Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Richards, Fred C., Thomas P. Meyer, and Norman H. Packard, 1990, “Extracting Cellular Automaton Rules Directly from Experimental Data”, Physica D, 45(1–3): 189–202. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90182-o (Scholar)
• Schelling, Thomas C., 1978, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: Norton. (Scholar)
• Searle, John R., 1992, The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Svozil, Karl, 1987, “Are Quantum Fields Cellular Automata?”, Physics Letters, 119(4): 153–6. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(86)90436-6 (Scholar)
• Teller, Paul, 1992, “A Contemporary Look at Emergence”, in Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, Ansgar Beckermann, Hans Flohr and Jaegwon Kim (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110870084.139 (Scholar)
• Thompson, Evan, 2007, Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Toffoli, Tommaso, 1977, “Computation and Construction Universality of Reversible Cellular Automata”, Journal of Computer and System Science, 15(2): 213–231. doi:10.1016/s0022-0000(77)80007-x (Scholar)
• –––, 1984, “Cellular Automata as an Alternative to (Rather Than an Approximation of) Differential Equations in Modeling Physics”, Physica D, 10(1–2): 117–127. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(84)90254-9 (Scholar)
• Toffoli, Tommaso and Norman H. Margolus, 1990, “Invertible Cellular Automata: A review”, Physica D, 45(1–3): 229–253. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90185-r (Scholar)
• Turing, Alan M., 1936, “On Computable Numbers with an Application to the Entscheideungproblem”, Proceeding of the London Mathematical Society, 42: 230–265. doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230 (Scholar)
• Vichniac, Gérard Y., 1984, “Simulating Physics With Cellular Automata”, Physica D, 10(1–2): 96–110. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(84)90253-7 (Scholar)
• Von Neumann, John, 1951, “The General and Logical Theory of Automata”, in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium, New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Scholar)
• Wheeler, John Archibald, 1990, “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links”, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, Wojciech H. Zurek (ed.), Boston: Addison-Wesley. (Scholar)
• Wolfram, S., 1983, “Statistical Mechanics of Cellular Automata”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 55(3): 601–644. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.55.601 (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, A New Kind of Science, Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media. (Scholar)
• Xiao, Xuan, Pu Wang, and Kuo-Chen Chou, 2011, “Cellular Automata and Its Applications in Protein Bioinformatics”, Current Protein & Peptide Science, 12(6): 508–19. doi:10.2174/138920311796957720 (Scholar)
• Zaheer, Manzil, Michael Wick, Jean-Baptiste Tristan, Alex Smola, and Guy L. Steele, 2016, “Exponential Stochastic Cellular Automata for Massively Parallel Inference”, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR 51: 966–975. [Zaheer et al. 2016 available online] (Scholar)
• Zuse, Konrad, 1982, “The Computing Universe”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6–7): 589–600. doi:10.1007/bf02650187 (Scholar)