Primary Sources

• Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont Jr. (trans), 1998, The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation (complete translation), New York: Ballantine Books. (Scholar)
• Graham, A.C., 2003 [1978], Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, reprint edition, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press; original edition, 1978. (Scholar)
• Johnston, Ian (trans.), 2010, The Mozi: A Complete Translation, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• Mei, Yi-pao (trans.), 1929, The Ethical and Political Works of Motse (partial translation), London: Probsthain. (Scholar)
• Watson, Burton (trans.), 1963, Mo Tzu: Basic Writings (partial translation), New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• Hutton, E.L. (trans.), 2014, Xunzi: The Complete Text, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Knoblock, John (trans.), 1988–1994, Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, 3 volumes, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Graham, Angus C. (trans.), 1981, “Chuang-tzu”: The Seven Inner Chapters and Other Writings from the Book “Chuang-tzu”, Boston: Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
• –––, 1981, Chuang Tzu: The Inner Chapters, London: Hackett Publishing Co. Inc. (Scholar)
• Watson, Burton (trans.), 1968, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)

Additional Sources

• Alt, Wayne E., 1991, “Logic and Language in the Chuang Tzu”, Asian Philosophy, 1(1): 61–76. doi:10.1080/09552369108575336 (Scholar)
• Aristotle, Metaphysics, in Christopher Kirwan, 1993, Translation with Notes, Aristotle’s Metaphysics Books Gamma, Delta and Epsilon, 2^nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Chan, Wing-Tsit, 1963, A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Chen Meng-lin, 1983, Mo-Bian-Luo-Ji-Xui [Studies in the Logic of Mohist Disputation], Ji Nan: Qi-Lu Publishing House, 21–22. (Scholar)
• Cua, Antonio, 1985, Ethical Argumentation: A Study In Hsün Tzu’s Moral Epistemology, Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. (Scholar)
• Fraser, Chris, 2007, “Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought”, Philosophy East and West, 57(4): 420–56. (Scholar)
• –––, 2013, “Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 34(1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/01445340.2012.724927 (Scholar)
• Fung, Yiu-ming, 2020a, “Introduction: Chinese Philosophy of Logic”, in Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Volume 12: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic), Yiu-ming Fung (ed.), Cham: Springer Nature. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_15 (Scholar)
• Fung, Yiu-ming, 2020b, “Sameness (Tong) and Difference (Yi)”, in Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Volume 12: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic), Yiu-ming Fung (ed.), Cham: Springer Nature. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_15 (Scholar)
• Garrett, Mary M., 1993, “Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion”, Argumentation and Advocacy, 29(3): 105–15. (Scholar)
• Graham, A.C., 1989, Disputers of the Tao, LaSalle: Open Court. (Scholar)
• Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames, 1987, Thinking Through Confucius, Albany: State University of New York Press. (Scholar)
• Han, Xiaoqiang, 2009, “Maybe There Are No Subject-Predicate Sentences in Chinese”, Dao: a Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 8(3): 277–287. doi:10.1007/s11712-009-9126-9 (Scholar)
• Hansen, Chad, 1983, Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Harbsmeier, Christoph, 1998, Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7, Part 1: Language and Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• He Jing-lun, 1971, Mo-Tzu-Jiao-Gu [An Emended Compilation of Mohist Writings], Taipei: Hua Lian Publishing House, 151, 179. (Scholar)
• Lin, Chung-I, 2011, “Xunzi as a Semantic Inferentialist: Zhengmin, Bian-Shuo and Dao-Li”, Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 10(3): 311–340. doi:10.1007/s11712-011-9228-z (Scholar)
• Liu, Fenrong, Jeremy Seligman, and Johan van Benthem, 2011, “Models of Reasoning in Ancient China”, Studies in Logic, 4(3): 57–81. (Scholar)
• Liu, Fenrong & Jialong Zhang, 2010, “New Perspectives on Moist Logic”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(4): 605–621. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2010.01607.x (Scholar)
• Lucas, Thierry, 2020, “Logical Thought in Mohism and Later Mohism”, in Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Volume 12: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic), Yiu-ming Fung (ed.), Cham: Springer Nature. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_15 (Scholar)
• Mou, Bo, 2016, “How the Validity of the Parallel Inference is Possible: From the Ancient Mohist Diagnosis to a Modern Logical Treatment of Its Semantic-Syntactic Structure”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 37: 301–324. (Scholar)
• Robins, Dan, 2010, “The Later Mohists and Logic”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 31(3): 247–285. doi:10.1080/01445340.2010.500920 (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, “Names, Cranes, and the Later Mohists and Logic”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 369–385. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01728.x (Scholar)
• Shun, Kwong-Loi, 1997, Mencius and Early Chinese Thought, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
• Tiles, Mary and Jinmei Yuan, 2004, “Could the Aristotelian Square of Opposition Be Translated into Chinese?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 4(1): 137–149. doi:10.1007/bf02871087 (Scholar)
• Willman, Marshall D., 2010, “Logical Analysis and Later Mohist Logic: Some Comparative Reflections”, Comparative Philosophy, 1(1): 53–77. Reprinted in Mou, Bo (ed.), 2018, Chinese Philosophy: Critical Concepts in Philosophy, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Yang, Wujin, 2020, “Reasoning: Pi, Mou, Yuan, Tui”, in Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Volume 12: Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic), Yiu-ming Fung (ed.), Cham: Springer Nature. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_15 (Scholar)
• Yuan, Jinmei, 2012, “Analogical Propositions in Moist Texts”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39(3): 404–423. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01730.x (Scholar)
• Zhang, Chunpo and Jialong Zhang, 1997, “Logic and Language in Chinese Philosophy”, in Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, Brian Carr (ed.), London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Zhang, Jialong and Fenrong Liu, 2007, “Some Thoughts on Mohist Logic”, in A Meeting of the Minds: Proceedings of the Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction, Johan van Benthem, Shier Ju, and Frank Veltman (eds.), London: College Publications, 85–102. (Scholar)
• Zong, Desheng, 2000, “Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings”, Philosophy East and West, 50(2): 208–229. (Scholar)

General Surveys of Classical Chinese Thought

• Feng, Yu-lan, 1952, A History of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 1, Derk Bodde (trans.), Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
• Hansen, Chad, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Nivison, David Shepherd, 1999, “The Classical Philosophical Writings”, in The Cambridge History of Ancient China, Michael Loewe and Edward L. Shaughnessy (eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Schwartz, Benjamin, 1985, The World of Thought in Ancient China, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. (Scholar)