Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Philosophy and Christian Theology" by Michael J. Murray and Michael Rea

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.



  • Augustine, The Trinity, trans. E. Hill, New York: New City Press, 1991.
  • Ayres, Lewis, 2004. Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Barnes, Michel R., 1995. “De Regnon Reconsidered,” Augustinian Studies 26: 51–80. (Scholar)
  • Brower, Jeffrey, 2004. “Abelard on the Trinity,” in Jeffrey E. Brower and Kevom Guilfoy (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Abelard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–57. (Scholar)
  • Brower, Jeffrey and Michael Rea, 2005a. “Material Constitution and the Trinity,” Faith and Philosophy, 22: 57–76. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005b “Understanding the Trinity,” Logos 8: 145–57. (Scholar)
  • Brown, David, 1989. “Trinitarian Personhood and Individuality,” in Feenstra and Plantinga 1989, pp. 48–78. (Scholar)
  • Davis, Stephen T., Daniel Kendall, and Gerald O'Collins (eds.), 1999. The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Feenstra, R., and C. Plantinga, Jr. (eds.), 1989. Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
  • Gregory of Nyssa, “On ”not three Gods“: to Ablabius,” in P. Schaff and H. Wace (eds.), A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, 2nd series, vol. V, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1979. (Scholar)
  • Howard-Snyder, Daniel, 2003. “Trinity Monotheism,” Philosophia Christi 5: 375–403. (Scholar)
  • Leftow, Brian, 2004. “A Latin Trinity,” Faith and Philosophy, 21: 304–33. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, C.S., 1958. Mere Christianity: A Revised and Enlarged Edition, New York: MacMillan. (Scholar)
  • McCall, Thomas, 2010. Which Trinity? Whose Monotheism?: Philosophical and Systematic Theologians on the Metaphysics of Trinitarian Theology, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmanns. (Scholar)
  • McCall, Thomas and Michael Rea (eds.), 2009. These Three are One: Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Doctrine of the Trinity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Moreland, J.P. and William Lane Craig, 2003. “The Trinity,” in Moreland & Craig, Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview, InterVarsity Press. (Scholar)
  • Plantinga, Jr., Cornelius, 1989. “Social Trinty and Tritheism,” in Feenstra and Plantinga 1989, pp. 21–47. (Scholar)
  • Rea, Michael, 2006. “Polytheism and Christian Belief,” Journal of Theological Studies 57: 133–48. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2009. “The Trinity,” pp. 403–29 in Flint & Rea (eds.) 2009. (Scholar)
  • Swinburne, Richard, 1994. The Christian God, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Tuggy, Dale, 2003. “The Unfinished Business of Trinitarian Theorizing,” Religious Studies, 39: 165–83. (Scholar)
  • van Inwagen, Peter, 1988. “And Yet They Are Not Three Gods But One God,”, pp. 222–59 in Morris (ed.) 1988. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2003. “Three Persons in One Being: On Attempts to Show that the Doctrine of the Trinity is Self-Contradictory,” pp. 83 - 97 in Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), The Trinity: East/West Dialogue, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)



  • Abelard, Peter, “Exposition of the Epistle to the Romans,” Gerald E. Moffatt (trans.), in Eugene R. Fairweather (ed.), A Scholastic Miscellany: Anselm to Ockham, Philadelphia: Westminster, 1956. (Scholar)
  • Anselm of Canterbury, “Why God Became Man,” in Brian Davies and G.R. Evans (eds.), Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
  • Aulén, Gustaf. 1969. Christus Victor, trans. H.G. Herbert. New York: MacMillan. (Scholar)
  • Brown, Joanne Carlson and Rebecca Parker, 1989. Christianity, Patriarchy, and Abuse: A Feminist Critique, New York: Pilgrim. (Scholar)
  • Calvin, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Henry Beveridge (trans.), London: James Clarke and Co.(See esp. II.16), 1957.
  • Chalke, Steve, et al., 2008. The Atonement Debate: Papers from the London Symposium on the Theology of the Atonement, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. (Scholar)
  • Crisp, Oliver, 2009. “Original Sin and Atonement,” in Thomas Flint and Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cross, Richard, 2001. “Atonement without Satisfaction” reprinted in Rea (ed.) 2009a, pp. 328–47. (Scholar)
  • Davis, Stephen, Daniel Kendall, and Gerald O'Collins, 2004. The Redemption, Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. (Scholar)
  • Fiddes, Paul S., 2007. “Salvation,” pp. 176–96 in Webster et. al (eds.) 2007. (Scholar)
  • Finlan, Stephen, 2005. Problems with Atonement: The Origins of, and Controversy About, the Atonement Doctrine, Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007. Options on Atonement in Christian Thought, Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press. (Scholar)
  • Hare, John, 1996. The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits and God's Assistance. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Jensen, Paul, 1993. “Forgiveness and Atonement”, Scottish Journal of Theology, 46: 141–160. (Scholar)
  • Lewis, David, 1997. “Do We Believe in Penal Substitution?Philosophical Papers, 26: 203–209. (Scholar)
  • Murphy, Mark C., 2009. “Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.” Faith and Philosophy 26:253–273. (Scholar)
  • Origen, Commentary on Matthew, xvi, 8.
  • Porter, Stephen, 2004. “Swinburnian Atonement and the Doctrine of Penal Substitution,” Faith and Philosophy 21: 228–241 (Scholar)
  • Quinn, Philip, 1989. “Aquinas on Atonement,” in Feenstra and Plantinga 1989, pp. 153–177. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1993. “Abelard on Atonement: ‘Nothing Unintelligible, Arbitrary, Illogical, or Immoral about It’,” in Eleonore Stump (ed.), Reasoned Faith: Essays in Philosophical Theology in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 153–177. (Scholar)
  • Stump, Eleonore, 1988. “Atonement According to Aquinas” in Philosophy and the Christian Faith, T.V. Morris (ed.), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 61–91. (Scholar)
  • Swinburne, Richard, 1988. “The Christian Scheme of Salvation,” pp. 15–30 in Morris (ed.) 1988. (Scholar)
  • Swinburne, Richard, 1989. Responsibility and Atonement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Sykes, S. W. (ed.), 1991a. Sacrifice and Redemption: Durham Essays in Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • Tanner, Kathryn, 2001. Jesus, Humanity, and the Trinity, Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 05:52:43 2017