Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Coercion" by Scott Anderson
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Abizadeh, Arash (2008). “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders,” Political Theory, 36: 37–65. (Scholar)
- Abizadeh, Arash (2010). “Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller,” Political Theory, 38: 121–130. (Scholar)
- Alexander, Lawrence A. (1983). “Zimmerman on Coercive Wage Offers,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12: 160–164. (Scholar)
- Anderson, Scott (2008a). “Of Theories of Coercion, Two Axes, and the Importance of the Coercer,” The Journal of Moral Philosophy, 5: 394–422. (Scholar)
- Anderson, Scott (2008b). “How Did There Come to be Two Kinds of Coercion?” Chapter 1 in Coercion and the State, David Reidy and Walter Riker (eds.), New York: Kluwer/Springer, 17–30. (Scholar)
- Anderson, Scott (2010). “The Enforcement Approach to Coercion,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 5: 1–31. (Scholar)
- Anderson, Scott (2011). “On the Immorality of Threatening,” Ratio, 24: 229–242. (Scholar)
- Aquinas, Thomas (1920 [1273]). The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Second and Revised Edition. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. [Available online].
- Bayles, Michael D. (1972). “A Concept of Coercion,” In Pennock and Chapman (1972), 16–29. (Scholar)
- Bayles, Michael D. (1974). “Coercive Offers and Public Benefits,” The Personalist, 55: 139–144. (Scholar)
- Benditt, Theodore (1979). “Threats and Offers,” The Personalist, 58: 382–384. (Scholar)
- Blake, Michael (2001). “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30: 257–296. (Scholar)
- Berman, Mitchell (2001). “Coercion without Baselines: Unconstitutional Conditions in Three Dimensions,” Georgetown Law Journal, 90: 1–112. (Scholar)
- Berman, Mitchell (2002). “The Normative Functions of Coercion Claims,” Legal Theory, 8: 45–89. (Scholar)
- Carr, Craig L. (1988). “Coercion and Freedom,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 25: 59–67. (Scholar)
- Christie, George (1999). “The Defense of Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View,” Duke Law Journal, 48: 975–1042. (Scholar)
- DeRose, Keith (1992). “Deterrent Threats: What Can Matter,” Philosophical Studies, 67: 241–260. (Scholar)
- Dworkin, Gerald (1985). “Nuclear Intentions,” Ethics, 95: 445–460. (Scholar)
- Eberle, Christopher J. (2002). Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Edmundson, William (1995). “Is Law Coercive?” Legal Theory, 1: 81–111. (Scholar)
- Edmundson, William (1998). Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Feinberg, Joel (1986). Harm to Self, New York: Oxford University Press, especially chs. 23–24. (Scholar)
- Fowler, Mark (1982). “Coercion and Practical Reason,” Social Theory and Practice, 8: 329–355. (Scholar)
- Frankfurt, Harry (1988 [1973]). “Coercion and Moral Responsibility,” in The Importance of What We Care About, New York: Cambridge University Press. First published in Essays on Freedom of Action, Ted Honderich (ed.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 65–86.
- Gaus, Gerald (2010). “Coercion, Ownership, and the Redistributive State: Justificatory Liberalism's Classical Tilt,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 27: 233–275. (Scholar)
- Gorr, Michael (1986). “Toward a Theory of Coercion,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16: 383–406. (Scholar)
- Gunderson, Martin (1979). “Threats and Coercion,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9: 247–259. (Scholar)
- Hardin, Russell (1986). "Deterrence and Moral Theory." Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 12: 161–193. (Scholar)
- Haksar, Vinit (1976). “Coercive Proposals,” Political Theory, 4: 65–79. (Scholar)
- Held, Virginia (1972). “Coercion and Coercive Offers,” In Pennock and Chapman (1972). (Scholar)
- Hetherington, Andrew (1999). “The Real Distinction Between Threats and Offers,” Social Theory and Practice, 25: 211–242. (Scholar)
- Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan. [Available online]. (Scholar)
- Huemer, Michael (2010). “Is There a Right To Immigrate?” Social Theory and Practice, 36: 429–461. (Scholar)
- Kant, Immanuel (1996 [1797]). The Metaphysics of Morals, Mary Gregor (trans.), New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kavka, Gregory (1978). “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence,” The Journal of Philosophy, 75: 285–302. (Scholar)
- Kelsen, Hans (1967 [1934]). The Pure Theory of Law, Max Knight (trans.), Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Kroon, Frederick (1996). “Deterrence and the Fragility of Rationality,” Ethics, 106: 350–377. (Scholar)
- Lamond, Grant (1996). “Coercion, Threats, and the Puzzle of Blackmail,” Chapter 10 in Harm and Culpability, A. P. Simester and A. T. H. Smith (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 215–238. (Scholar)
- Lamond, Grant (2000). “The Coerciveness of Law,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20: 39–62. (Scholar)
- Lamond, Grant (2001). “Coercion and the Nature of Law,” Legal Theory, 7: 35–57. (Scholar)
- Locke, John (1823 [1689]). Two Treatises of Government, in The Works of John Locke, A New Edition, Corrected, Vol. V, London: Printed for Thomas Tegg; W. Sharpe and Son; G. Offor; G. and J. Robinson; J. Evans and Co.: Also R. Griffin and Co. Glasgow; and J. Gumming, Dublin. [Available online].
- Lucas, J. R. (1966). The Principles of Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Lyons, Daniel (1975). “Welcome Threats and Coercive Offers,” Philosophy, 50: 425–436. (Scholar)
- McCloskey, H. J. (1980). “Coercion: Its Nature and Significance,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 18: 335–352. (Scholar)
- McGregor, Joan (1988–89). “Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market,” Philosophy Research Archives, 14: 23–50. (Scholar)
- Mill, John Stuart (1909 [1848]). Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, seventh edition, William J. Ashley (ed.), London: Longmans, Green and Co. [Available online].
- Mill, John Stuart (1909–14 [1859]). On Liberty, Vol. XXV, Part 2 (The Harvard Classics), Charles W. Eliot (ed.), New York: P.F. Collier & Son. [Available online].
- Miller, David (2009). “Democracy's Domain,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37: 201–228. (Scholar)
- Miller, David (2010). “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh,” Political Theory, 38: 111–120. (Scholar)
- Murray, Michael J. and David F. Dudrick (1995). “Are Coerced Acts Free?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 32: 118–123. (Scholar)
- Nozick, Robert (1969). “Coercion,” in Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton White (eds.), New York: St. Martin's Press, 440–472. (Scholar)
- Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Oberdiek, Hans (1976). “The Role of Sanctions and Coercion in Understanding Law and Legal Systems,” American Journal of Jurisprudence, 21: 71–94. (Scholar)
- O'Neill, Onora (1991). “Which are the Offers You, Can't Refuse?” Chapter 7 in Violence, Terrorism, and Justice, R. G. Frey and Christopher Morris (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170–195. (Scholar)
- Pennock, J. Roland and John W. Chapman (eds.) (1972). Nomos XIV: Coercion, Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, Inc. (Scholar)
- Pettit, Philip (1996). “Freedom as Antipower,” Ethics, 106: 576–604. (Scholar)
- Pogge, Thomas (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Scholar)
- Raz, Joseph (1975). Practical Reason and Norms, London: Hutchinson. (Scholar)
- Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Rhodes, Michael (2002). Coercion: A Nonevaluative Approach, Amsterdam: Rodopi. (Scholar)
- Ripstein, Arthur (2004). “Authority and Coercion,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32: 2–35. (Scholar)
- Ryan, Cheyney C. (1980). “The Normative Concept of Coercion,” Mind, 89: 481–498. (Scholar)
- Schelling, Thomas (1956). “An Essay on Bargaining,” American Economic Review, 46: 281–306. (Scholar)
- Stevens, Robert (1988). “Coercive Offers,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 66: 83–95. (Scholar)
- Swanton, Christine (1989). “Robert Stevens on Offers,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67: 472–475. (Scholar)
- Van De Veer, Don (1979). “Coercion, Seduction, and Rights,” The Personalist, 58: 374–381. (Scholar)
- Waldron, Jeremy (2004). “Terrorism and the Uses of Terror,” Journal of Ethics, 5: 5–35. (Scholar)
- Wasserstrom, Richard (1985). “War, Nuclear War, and Nuclear Deterrence: Some Conceptual and Moral Issues,” Ethics, 95: 424–444. (Scholar)
- Wertheimer, Alan (1987). Coercion, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Wertheimer, Alan (2004). Consent to Sexual Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Williams, Bernard (1973). “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Yaffe, Gideon (2003). “Indoctrination, Coercion and Freedom of Will,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67: 335–356. (Scholar)
- Yankah, Ekow (2008). “The Force of Law: The Role of Coercion in Legal Norms,” University of Richmond Law Review, 42: 1195–1256. (Scholar)
- Zimmerman, David (1981). “Coercive Wage Offers,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10: 121–145. (Scholar)
- Zimmerman, David (2002). “Taking Liberties: The Perils of ‘Moralizing’ Freedom and Coercion in Social Theory and Practice,” Social Theory and Practice, 28: 577–609. (Scholar)
