Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Compositionality" by Zoltán Gendler Szabó

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Bach, Kent, 1994, “Semantic Slack: What is Said and More”, in Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech-Act Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 267–291. (Scholar)
Barker, Stephen, 1997, “Material Implication and General Indicative Conditionals”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(187): 195–211. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00055 (Scholar)
Berg, Jonathan, 2002, “Is Semantics Still Possible?” Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4): 349–359. (Scholar)
Båve, Arvid, 2005, Insensitive Semantics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230334.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “A Pragmatic Defense of Millianism”Philosophical Studies, 138(2): 271–289. doi:10.1007/s11098-006-9037-0 (Scholar)
Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore, 2005, Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Carnap, Rudolf, 1947, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Cohen, L. Jonathan, 1986, “How is Conceptual Innovation Possible?”Erkenntnis, 25(2): 221–238. doi:10.1007/bf00167173 (Scholar)
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1995, The Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Cresswell, M.J., 1986, Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Crimmins, Mark, 1992, Talk about Beliefs, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Crimmins, Mark and John Perry, 1989, “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs”, The Journal of Philosophy, 86(12): 685–711. (Scholar)
Davidson, Donald, 1965, “Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages”, in the Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 3–17. Reprinted in Davidson 2001: 3–16. doi:10.1093/0199246297.003.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 1970, “Semantics for Natural Languages”, in Bruno Visentini, et al. (eds.), 1970, Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica: convegno promosso dalla C. Olivetti, per il centenario della nascita di Camillo Olivetti, Museo Nazionale della Scienza e della Tecnica Milano, 14–17 ottobre 1968 (Volume 87 of Saggi di cultura contemporanea), Milan: Edizioni di Communita, pp. 177–188. Reprinted in Davidson 2001: 55–64. doi:10.1093/0199246297.003.0004 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0199246297.001.0001 (Scholar)
Davies, Martin, 1981, Meaning, Quantification, Necessity: Themes in Philosophical Logic, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Davis, Wayne A., 2003, Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Dever, Josh, 1999, “Compositionality as Methodology”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(3): 311–326. doi:10.1023/a:1005410301126 (Scholar)
Dummett, Michael, 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Evans, Gareth, 1982, The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Fine, Kit, 2007, Semantic Relationism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
von Fintel, Kai, 1998, “Quantifiers and ‘if’-Clauses”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 48(191): 209–214. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00095 (Scholar)
Fischer, Eugen, 2000, Linguistic Creativity: Exercises in “Philosophical Therapy”, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
Fodor, Jerry A., 1998a, “There Are No Recognitional Concepts—Not Even RED”, in Fodor 1998c: 35–47. (Scholar)
–––, 1998b, “There Are No Recognitional Concepts—Not Even RED, Part 2: the Plot Thickens”, in Fodor 1998c: 49–62. (Scholar)
–––, 1998c, In Critical Condition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Language, Thought and Compositionality”, Mind and Language, 16(1): 1–15. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00153 (Scholar)
Fodor, Jerry and Ernest Lepore, 1991, “Why Meaning (Probably) Isn’t Conceptual Role”, Mind and Language, 6(4): 329–343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1991.tb00260.x (Scholar)
–––, 1992, Holism: A Shopper’s Guide, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “The Pet Fish and the Red Herring: Why Concepts Aren’t Prototypes”, Cognition, 58(2): 243–276. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Why Compositionality Won’t Go Away: Reflections on Horwich’s ‘Deflationary’ Theory”, Ratio, 14(4): 350–368. doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00169 (Scholar)
–––, 2002, The Compositionality Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Fodor, Jerry A. and Zenon W. Pylyshyn, 1988, “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critique”, Cognition, 28: 3–71. (Scholar)
Frege, Gottlob, [1884] 1950, The Foundations of Arithmetic (Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik), J.L. Austin (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1980. (Scholar)
–––, 1891, “On the Law of Inertia” (Über das Tragheitsgesetz), Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 98: 145–161. Reprinted in Frege 1984: 123–138. (Scholar)
–––, 1892, “On Concept and Object”, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16: 192–205, Peter Geach (trans.), 1952, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 42–55. Reprinted in Frege 1984: 182–194. (Scholar)
–––, 1906a, “Foundations of Geometry (second series)” (Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie), reprinted in Frege 1984: 293–340. (Scholar)
–––, 1906b, “Introduction to Logic” (Einleitung in die Logik), in Frege 1979: 185–196. (Scholar)
–––, 1914, “Logic in Mathematics” (Logik in der Mathematik), in Frege 1979: 201–250. (Scholar)
–––, [c. 1914] 1980, “Letter to Jourdain”, translated in Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Hans Kaal (trans.), Gottfried Gabriel et al. (eds.), Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 78–80. (Scholar)
–––, 1919, “Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter” (Logik in der Mathematik), in Frege 1979: 253–257. (Scholar)
–––, 1923, “Compound Thoughts” (Gedankengefüge), reprinted in Frege 1984: 390–406. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, Posthumous Writings, Hermes et al. (eds.), Chicago: Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1984, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Brian McGuiness (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag, 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Geach, Peter, 1965, “Logical Procedures and the Identity of Expressions”, Ratio, old series 7(2): 199–205. Reprinted in Logic Matters, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980: 108–115. (Scholar)
Grandy, Richard E., 1990, “Understanding and Compositionality”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co., pp. 557–572. (Scholar)
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof, 1990, “Dynamic Montague Grammar”, in L. Kálmán et al. Proceedings of the 2^nd Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 3–48. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Dynamic Predicate Logic”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(1): 39–100. doi:10.1007/bf00628304 (Scholar)
Heim, Irene, 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Garland Publishing Inc., 1988. (Scholar)
Hendrix, Herman, 2001, “Compositionality and Model-Theoretic Interpretation”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10(1): 29–48. doi:10.1023/a:1026592526654 (Scholar)
Higginbotham, James, 1985, “On Semantics”, Linguistic Inquiry, 16(4): 547–593. (Scholar)
–––, 1986, “Linguistic Theory and Davidson’s Program in Semantics”, in Ernest Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 29–48. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Conditionals and Compositionality”, in John Hawthorne (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 17: 181–194. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Remarks on Compositionality”, in Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 425–444. (Scholar)
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1981, “Theories of Truth and Learnable Languages”, in Kanger & Öhman 1981: 37–58. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9012-8_4 (Scholar)
Hintikka, Jaakko and G. Sandu, 1997, “Game-Theoretical Semantics”, in van Benthem and ter Meulen 1997: 361–410. (Scholar)
Hodges, Wilfrid, 1998, “Compositionality is Not the Problem”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 6: 7–33. doi:10.12775/llp.1998.001 (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Formal Features of Compositionality”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10(1): 7–28. doi:10.1023/a:1026502210492 (Scholar)
–––, 2012,“Formalizing Between Meaning and Syntax”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 245–261. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0011 (Scholar)
Horwich, Paul, 1997, “The Composition of Meanings”, Philosophical Review, 106(4): 503–533. doi:10.2307/2998510 (Scholar)
Husserl, Edmund, 1913, Logische Untersuchungen II/1, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. English translation: 2001, Logical Investigations Volume 2. Routledge. (Scholar)
Jackendoff, Ray, 1997, The Architecture of the Language Faculty, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
Janssen, Theo M.V., 1983, Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Compositionality”, in van Benthem & ter Meulen 1997: 417–473. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Frege, Contextuality and Compositionality”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10(1): 115–136. doi:10.1023/a:1026542332224 (Scholar)
Jacobson, Pauline, 2002, “The (Dis)Organization of Grammar: 25 Years”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5): 601–626. doi:10.1023/a:1020851413268 (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Direct Compositionality”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 109–128. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0005 (Scholar)
Johnson, Kent, 2004, “On the Systematicity of Language and Thought”, Journal of Philosophy, 101(3): 111–139. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “On the Nature of Reverse Compositionality”, Erkenntnis, 64(1): 37–60. doi:10.1007/s10670-005-0362-z (Scholar)
Kamp, Hans, 1981, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, in Jeroen A.G. Groenendijk and Theo M.V. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Natural Language, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Centre, pp. 277–322. (Scholar)
Kamp, Hans and Barbara Partee, 1995, “Prototype Theory and Compositionality”, Cognition, 57: 129–191. (Scholar)
Kanger, Stig and Sven Öhman (eds.), 1980, Philosophy and Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
Kaplan, David, 1977, “Demonstratives. An Essay on the Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”, conference presentation. Finally printed in Joseph Almog, John Perry and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 481–565. (Scholar)
Kazmi, Ali and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 1998, “Is Compositionality Formally Vacuous?” Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(6): 629–633. doi:10.1023/a:1005388721969 (Scholar)
Kratzer, Angelica, 1986, “Conditionals”, Chicago Linguistic Society, 22(2): 1–15. (Scholar)
Lahav, Ran, 1989, “Against Compositionality: the Case of Adjectives”, Philosophical Studies, 57(3): 261–279. doi:10.1007/bf00372697 (Scholar)
Larson, Richard L. and Peter Ludlow, 1993, “Interpreted Logical Forms”, Synthese, 95(3): 305–355. (Scholar)
Larson, Richard L. and Gabriel M.A. Segal, 1995, Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Lasersohn, Peter, 2012, “Contextualism and Compositionality”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 35: 171–189. doi: 10.1007/s10988-012-9115-z (Scholar)
Leitgeb, Hannes, 2005, “Hodges’ Theorem Does Not Account for Determinacy of Translation: A Reply to Werning”, Erkenntnis, 62(3): 411–425. doi:10.1007/s10670-004-1992-2 (Scholar)
Lewis, David, 1970, “General Semantics”, Synthese, 22(12): 18–67. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983: 189–229. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, “Adverbs of Quantification”, in Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Lewis 1998: 5–20. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625237.003 (Scholar)
–––, 1980, “Index, Context, and Content”, in Kanger and Öhman 1980: 79–100; reprinted in Lewis 1998: 21–44. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9012-8_6 and doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625237.004 (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Papers in Philosophical Logic, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Martin Robert M., 1994, The Meaning of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Montague, Richard, 1970, “Universal Grammar”, Theoria, 36(3): 373–398. Reprinted in Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974: 222–246. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x (Scholar)
Nunberg Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag, and Thomas Wasow, 1994, “Idioms”, Language, 70(3): 491–538. doi:10.1353/lan.1994.0007 (Scholar)
Pagin, Peter, 2003, “Communication and Strong Compositionality”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32: 287–322. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Compositionality and Context”, in Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 303–348. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Communication and the Complexity of Semantics”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 510–529. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.002 (Scholar)
Pagin, Peter and Francis Jeffrey Pelletier., 2007, “Context, Content, and Composition”, in Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 25–62. (Scholar)
Pagin, Peter and Dag Westerståhl, 2010a, “Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants”, Philosophy Compass, 5(3): 250–264. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00228.x (Scholar)
–––, 2010b, “Compositionality II: Arguments and Problems”, Philosophy Compass, 5(3): 265–282. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00229.x (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara H., 1984, “Compositionality”, in Fred Landman and Frank Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 281–312. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, “Lexical Semantics and Compositionality”, Daniel N. Osherson (gen. ed.), Lila R. Gleitman and Mark Liberman (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language, vol. 1, second edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 311–360. (Scholar)
Patterson, Douglas, 2005, “Learnability and Compositionality”, Mind and Language, 20(3): 326–352. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00288.x (Scholar)
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 1994, “The Principle of Semantic Compositionality”, Topoi, 13: 11–24. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “Did Frege Believe in Frege’s Principle?” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10(1): 87–114. doi:10.1023/a:1026594023292 (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Context Dependence and Compositionality”, Mind and Language, 18(2): 148–161. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00218 (Scholar)
Pietroski, Paul M., 2005, Events and Semantic Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244300.001.0001 (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Semantic Monadicity and Conceptual Polyadicity”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 129–148. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0006 (Scholar)
Platts, Mark de Bretton, 1979, Ways of Meaning: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Language, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Barbara C. Scholz, 2010, “Recursion and the Infinitude Claim”, in Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion in Human Language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 113–137. (Scholar)
Quine, Willard Van Orman, 1953, “Reference and Modality”, in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 139–159. (Scholar)
–––, 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Recanati, François, 2004, Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Flexibility and Context-Dependence”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 175–191. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0008 (Scholar)
Richard, Mark, 1990, Propositional Attitudes: An Essay of Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Robbins, Philip, 2001, “What Compositionality Still Can Do”, Philosophical Quarterly, 51(204): 328–336. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00232 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “The Myth of Reverse Compositionality”, Philosophical Studies, 125(2): 251–275. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-7785-x (Scholar)
Sainsbury, R.M., 2001, “Two Ways to Smoke a Cigarette”, Ratio, 14(4): 386–406. doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00171 (Scholar)
Salmon, Nathan U., 1986, Frege’s Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Schiffer, Stephen R., 1987, The Remnants of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1991, “Does Mentalese Have a Compositional Semantics?” in Barry M. Loewer and Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 181–199. (Scholar)
Searle, John R., 1980, “The Background of Meaning”, in John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), Speech-Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 221–232. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_10 (Scholar)
Segal, Gabriel, 1989, “A Preference for Sense and Reference”, The Journal of Philosophy, 86: 73–89. (Scholar)
Soames, Scott, 2005, “Naming and Asserting”, in Zoltán Gendler Szabó (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 356–382. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0010 (Scholar)
Stainton, Robert, 2003, Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001 (Scholar)
Stalnaker, Robert, 1975, “Indicative Conditionals”, Philososphia, 5: 269–286. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645169.001.0001 (Scholar)
Stanley, Jason and Zoltán Gendler Szabó, 2000, “On Quantifier Domain Restriction”, Mind and Language, 15(2–3): 219–261. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00130 (Scholar)
Szabó, Zoltán Gendler, 2000a, Problems of Compositionality, New York: Garland. (Scholar)
–––, 2000b, “Compositionality as Supervenience”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(5): 475–505. doi:10.1023/a:1005657817893 (Scholar)
–––, 2000c, “Adjectives in Context”, in István Kenesei and Robert M. Harnish (eds.), Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 119–146. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “Review of J. Fodor and E. Lepore The Compositionality Papers”, Mind, 113(450): 340–344. doi:10.1093/mind/113.450.340 (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Structure and Conventions”, Philosophical Studies, 137(3): 399–408. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9125-9 (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “The Determination of Content”, Philosophical Studies, 148(2): 253–272. doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9296-z (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Semantic Explanations”, in Ernest Lepore and David Sosa (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–275. (Scholar)
Travis, Charles, 1994, “On Constraints of Generality”, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 44. London: Aristotelian Society Publications, pp. 165–188. (Scholar)
Travis, Charles, 1996, “Meaning’s Role in Truth”, Mind, 105(419): 451–466. doi:10.1093/mind/105.419.451 (Scholar)
van Benthem, Johan and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier. (Scholar)
Werning, Markus, 2004, “Compositionality, Context, Categories and the Indeterminacy of Translation”, Erkenntnis, 60(2): 145–178. doi:10.1023/b:erke.0000012876.85940.b3 (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Right and Wrong Reasons for Compositionality”, Markus Werning (ed.), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. Volume 1: Foundational Issues, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, pp. 285–309. (Scholar)
Werning, Markus, Wolfram Hinzen, and Edouard Machery (eds.), 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.001.0001 (Scholar)
Westerståhl, Dag, 1998, “On Mathematical Proofs of the Vacuity of Compositionality”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(6): 635–643. doi:10.1023/a:1005401829598 (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Compositionality in Kaplan Style Semantics”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 192–219. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0009 (Scholar)
Zadrozny, Wlodek, 1994, “From Compositional to Systematic Semantics”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 17(4): 329–342. doi:10.1007/bf00985572 (Scholar)
Zeevat, Henk, 1989, “A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(1): 95–131. doi:10.1007/bf00627399 (Scholar)
Ziff, Paul, 1974, “The Number of English Sentences”, Foundations of Language, 11: 519–532. (Scholar)
Zimmermann, Thomas Ede, 2012, “Compositionality Problems and How to Solve Them”, in Werning, Hinzen, & Machery 2012: 81–106. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0004 (Scholar)

Generated Sun Dec 8 09:18:14 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...