Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Computing and Moral Responsibility" by Merel Noorman
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Allen, C. & W. Wallach, 2012. “Moral Machines. Contradiction in Terms or Abdication of Human Responsibility?” in P. Lin, K. Abney, and G. Bekey (eds.), Robot ethics. The ethics and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Allen, C., G. Varner & J. Zinser, 2000. “Prolegomena to any Future Artificial Moral Agent,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12: 251–261. (Scholar)
- Allen, C. W. Wallach & I. Smit, 2006. “Why Machine Ethics?” Intelligent Systems, IEEE , 21(4): 12–17. (Scholar)
- Angwin, J., J. Larson, S. Mattu & L. Kirchner, 2016. “Machine Bias. There is software that is used across the county to predict future criminals. And it is biased against blacks”, ProPublica, May 23, 2016, available online. (Scholar)
- Asaro, P., 2011. “A Body to Kick, But Still No Soul to Damn: Legal Perspectives on Robotics,” in P. Lin, K. Abney, and G. Bekey (eds.) Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bechtel, W., 1985. “Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems,” Metaphilosophy, 16(4): 296–306. (Scholar)
- Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch, 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, London, UK: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bovens, M. & S. Zouridis, 2002. “From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: how information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control,” Public Administration Review, 62(2):174–184. (Scholar)
- Boyd, D. & K. Crawford, 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon,” Information, Communication, & Society 15(5): 662–679. (Scholar)
- Coeckelbergh, M. & R. Wackers, 2007. “Imagination, Distributed Responsibility and Vulnerable Technological Systems: the Case of Snorre A,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(2): 235–248. (Scholar)
- Cummings, M. L., 2004. “Automation Bias in Intelligent Time Critical Decision Support Systems,” Paper presented at the AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago. (Scholar)
- Dennett, D. C., 1997. “When HAL Kills, Who’s to Blame? Computer Ethics,” in HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, D. G. Stork (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Denning, P. J., 1989. “The Science of Computing: The Internet Worm,” American Scientist, 77(2): 126–128. (Scholar)
- Doorn, N. & van de Poel, I., 2012. “Editors Overview: Moral Responsibility in Technology and Engineering,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 18: 1–11. (Scholar)
- Eshleman, A., 2016. “Moral Responsibility,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-responsibility/>. (Scholar)
- Fisher, J. M., 1999. “Recent work on moral responsibility,” Ethics, 110(1): 93–139. (Scholar)
- Floridi, L., & J. Sanders, 2004. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents,” Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349–379. (Scholar)
- Floridi, L., 2013. “Distributed morality in an information society,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3): 727–743. (Scholar)
- –––, 2016. “Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A (Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences), 374(2083); doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0112 (Scholar)
- Friedman, B., 1990. “Moral Responsibility and Computer Technology,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1997. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, Stanford: CSLI Publications; New York: Cambridge University Press (Scholar)
- Gotterbarn D., 2001. “Informatics and professional responsibility,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(2): 221–230. (Scholar)
- Graubard, S. R., 1988. The Artificial Intelligence Debate: False Starts, Real Foundations, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gray, C. H., 1997. “AI at War: The Aegis System in Combat,” Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing, D. Schuler, (ed.), New York: Ablex, pp. 62–79. (Scholar)
- Hart, H. L. A., 1968. Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hughes, T.P., 1987. “The evolution of Large Technological System,” in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 51–82. (Scholar)
- IJsselsteijn, W., Y. de Korte, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. Hoven (eds.), 2006. Persuasive Technology, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
- Johnson, D. G., 2001. Computer Ethics, 3rd edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006. “Computer Systems: Moral Entities but not Moral Agents,” Ethics and Information Technology, 8: 195–204. (Scholar)
- Johnson, D. G. & T. M. Power, 2005. “Computer systems and responsibility: A normative look at technological complexity,” Ethics and Information Technology, 7: 99–107. (Scholar)
- Jonas, H., 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility. In search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, Chicago: The Chicago University Press. (Scholar)
- Kroes, P.& P.P. Verbeek (eds.), 2014. The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts, Dordrecht: Springer (Scholar)
- Kuflik, A., 1999. “Computers in Control: Rational Transfer of Authority or Irresponsible Abdication of Authority?” Ethics and Information Technology, 1: 173–184. (Scholar)
- Ladd. J., 1989. “Computers and Moral Responsibility. A Framework for an Ethical Analysis,” in C.C. Gould (ed.), The Information Web. Ethical and Social Implications of Computer Networking, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 207–228. (Scholar)
- Latour, B., 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts,” in W. Bijker & J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-Technical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT press, pp. 225–258. (Scholar)
- Leveson, N. G. & C. S. Turner, 1993. “An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents,” Computer, 26(7): 18–41. (Scholar)
- Leveson, N., 1995. “Medical Devices: The Therac-25,” in N. Leveson, Safeware. System, Safety and Computers, Boston: Addison-Wesley. (Scholar)
- Matthias, A., 2004. “The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata,” Ethics and Information Technology, 6: 175–183. (Scholar)
- McCorduck, P., 1979. Machines Who Think, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. (Scholar)
- Miller, K. W., 2008. “Critiquing a critique,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2): 245–249. (Scholar)
- Moor, J.H., 2006. “The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics,” Intelligent Systems (IEEE), 21(4): 18–21. (Scholar)
- Nissenbaum, H., 1994. “Computing and Accountability,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 37(1): 72–80. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997. “Accountability in a Computerized Society,” in B. Friedman (ed.), Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–64. (Scholar)
- Nass, C. & Y. Moon, 2000. “Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers,” Journal of Social Issues, 56(1): 81–103. (Scholar)
- Noorman, M., 2009. Mind the Gap: A Critique of Human/Technology Analogies in Artificial Agents Discourse, Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht. (Scholar)
- –––, 2012. “Responsibility Practices and Unmanned Military Technologies,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3): 809–826. (Scholar)
- Parasuraman, R. & V. Riley, 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse,” Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors Society, 39(2): 230–253. (Scholar)
- Reeves, B. & C. Nass, 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C., 2013. “An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 5 (1): 17–34. (Scholar)
- Sack, W., 1997. “Artificial Human Nature,” Design Issues, 13: 55–64. (Scholar)
- Sartor, G. and M. Viola de Azevedo Cunha, 2010. “The Italian Google-Case: Privacy, Freedom of Speech and Responsibility of Providers for User-Generated Contents,” International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 18(4): 356–378. (Scholar)
- Searle, J. R., 1980. “Minds, brains, and programs” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3): 417–457. (Scholar)
- Singel, R., 2010. “Does Italy’s Google Conviction Portend More Censorship?” Wired (February 24th, 2010), available online. (Scholar)
- Sparrow, R., 2007. “Killer Robots,” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1): 62–77. (Scholar)
- Stahl, B. C., 2004. “Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents,” Minds and Machines, 14: 67–83. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006. “Responsible Computers? A Case for Ascribing Quasi-Responsibility to Computers Independent of Personhood or Agency,” Ethics and Information Technology, 8: 205–213. (Scholar)
- Stieb, J. A., 2008. “A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2): 219–233. (Scholar)
- Suchman, L., 1998. “Human/machine reconsidered,” Cognitive Studies, 5(1): 5–13. (Scholar)
- Sullins, J. P., 2006. “When is a Robot a Moral Agent?” International Review of Information Ethics, 6(12): 23–29. (Scholar)
- Taddeo, M. and L. Floridi, 2015. “The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6): 1575–1603. (Scholar)
- U.S. Department of Defense, 2009. “FY2009–2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap,” available online. (Scholar)
- Van den Hoven, J., 2002. “Wadlopen bij Opkomend Tij: Denken over Ethiek en Informatiemaatschappij,” in J. de Mul (ed.), Filosofie in Cyberspace, Kampen, the Netherlands: Uitgeverij Klement, pp. 47–65 (Scholar)
- Verbeek, P. P., 2006. “Materializing Morality,” Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(3): 361–380. (Scholar)
- Vidal, J., 2004. “The alco-lock is claimed to foil drink-drivers. Then the man from the Guardian had a go …,” The Guardian, August 5th, 2004. (Scholar)
- Waelbers, K., 2009. “Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended,” Science & Engineering Ethics, 15(1): 51–68. (Scholar)
- Wallach, W. and C. Allen, 2009. Moral Machines. Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Whitby, B., 2008. “Sometimes it’s hard to be a robot. A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents,” Interacting with Computers, 20(3): 326–333. (Scholar)
- Zuboff, S., 1982. “Automate/Informate: The Two Faces of Intelligent Technology,” Organizational Dynamics, 14(2): 5–18 (Scholar)
