Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Concepts" by Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, F. & Campbell, K. (1999). Modality and Abstract Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 610. (Scholar)
- Andrews, K. & Beck, J. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Ariew, A. (1999). Innateness is Canalization: In Defense of a
Developmental Account of Innateness, in V. Hardcastle (ed.), Where
Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays, pp. 117–38.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Armstrong, D. (1968). A Materialist Theory of Mind, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Atran, S. & Medin, D. (2008). The Native Mind and the
Cultural Construction of Nature, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Ayer, A.J. (1959). Logical Positivism, New York: The Free Press. (Scholar)
- Baker, M. (2001). The Atoms of Language: The Mind’s
Hidden Rules of Grammar, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Baillargeon, R. (2008). Innate Ideas Revisited: For a Principle of
Persistence in Infants’ Physical Reasoning. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 3 (1): 2–13. (Scholar)
- Baillargeon, R., Scott, R.M., He, Z., Sloane, S., Setoh, P., Jin,
K.-S., Wu, D., & Bian, L. (2015). Psychological and Sociomoral
Reasoning in Infancy, in M.Mikulincer & P.R. Shaver (eds.),
APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Volume 1.
Attitudes and Social Cognition, Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association, pp. 79–150. (Scholar)
- Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 577–609. (Scholar)
- Barsalou, L., Simmons, W., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C. (2003).
Grounding Conceptual Knowledge in Modality-Specific Systems.
Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 (2): 84–89. (Scholar)
- Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy, in M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (eds.) Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 201–239. (Scholar)
- Bekoff, M., Allen, C., & Burghardt, G. (2002). The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Bennett, M. & Hacker, P. (2008). History of Cognitive Neuroscience, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Bermudez, J. (2003). Thinking Without Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Block, N. & Stalnaker, R. (1999). Conceptual Analysis and the
Explanatory Gap, Philosophical Review, 108 (1):
1–46. (Scholar)
- Blok, S., Newman, G. & Rips, L.J. (2005). Individuals and
Their Concepts, in W.-K. Ahn, R.L. Goldstone, B.C. Love, A.B. Markman,
& P. Wolff (eds.), Categorization Inside and Outside the
Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin, Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association, pp. 127–149. (Scholar)
- Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex,
Syntax, and Semantics, in D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.)
Language in Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.
61–79. (Scholar)
- Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (2001). Language Acquisition
and Conceptual Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Brewer, W. (1999). Perceptual Symbols: The Power and Limitations of a Theory of Dynamic Imagery and Structured Frames, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 611–12. (Scholar)
- Camp, E. (2009). A Language of Baboon Thought?, in R.W. Lurz (ed.) The Philosophy of Animal Minds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–127. (Scholar)
- Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009). The Origin of Concepts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Carruthers, P. (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996). Language, Thought, and Consciousness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002). The Cognitive Functions of Language,
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25: 657–74. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S. (2005). The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2006). The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). The Innate Mind: Foundations and
the Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a
Fundamental Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). The Character of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chalmers, D. & Jackson, F. (2001). Conceptual Analysis and
Reductive Explanation, Philosophical Review, 110:
315–61. (Scholar)
- Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean: The Influence of Language-Specific Lexicalization Patterns, Cognition, 41: 83–121. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, N. (1967). Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate
Ideas, Synthese, 17: 2–11. Reprinted in S. Stich (ed.)
Innate Ideas, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp.
121–31. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975). Reflections on Language, New York: Pantheon. (Scholar)
- ––– (1980). Rules and Representations, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1988). Language and the Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative Materialism and Propositional
Attitudes, Journal of Philosophy, 78 (2): 67–90. (Scholar)
- Clark, A. (1993). Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998). Twisted Tales: Causal Complexity and Cognitive Scientific Explanation, Minds and Machines, 8: 76–99. (Scholar)
- Clayton, N., Bussey, T., & Dickinson, A. (2003). Can Animals
Recall the Past and Plan for the Future? Nature Reviews:
Neuroscience, 4: 685–91 (Scholar)
- Cowie, F. (1999). What’s Within: Nativism
Reconsidered, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Crain, S. & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, Nurture, and Universal Grammar, Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 139–186. (Scholar)
- Crane, T. (2015). The Mechanical Mind, Third Edition,
London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Cummins, R. (1998). Reflection on Reflective Equilibrium, in M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 113–27. (Scholar)
- Davidson, D. (1975). Thought and Talk. In his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Del Pinal, G. (2016). Prototypes as Compositional Components of
Concepts, Synthese, 193 (9): 2899–2927. (Scholar)
- Dennett, D. (1977). A Cure for the Common Code. Reprinted in D. Dennett (1978) Brainstorms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1987). The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1991). Consciousness Explained, Boston: Little, Brown and Company. (Scholar)
- DePaul, M. & Ramsey, W. (1998). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Scholar)
- Devitt, M. (1981). Designation, New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996). Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Dove, G. (2009). Beyond Perceptual Symbols: A Call for Representational Pluralism, Cognition, 110: 412–431. (Scholar)
- Dummett, M. (1993). Seas of Language, Oxford: Oxford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi,
D., and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A
Connectionist Perspective on Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (Scholar)
- Emery, N., Dally, J., & Clayton, N. (2004). Western Scrub-Jays
(Aphelocoma Californica) Use Cognitive Strategies to Protect
Their Caches from Thieving Conspecifics, Animal Cognition, 7:
37–43. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J. (1968). The Appeal to Tacit Knowledge, Journal of
Philosophy, 65 (20): 627–640. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975). The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1981). The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy. In his Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1987). Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2003). Hume Variations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J. & Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper’s
Guide, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- ––– (1996). The Red Herring and the Pet Fish: Why Concepts Still Can’t Be Prototypes, Cognition, 58: 253–270. (Scholar)
- Fodor, J. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis, Cognition, 28: 3–71. (Scholar)
- Gallistel, C.R. & King, A. (2009). Memory and the
Computational Brain: Why Cognitive Science Will Transform
Neuroscience, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- ––– (1990). The Organization of Learning,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gelman, S. (2003). The Essential Child: Origins of
Essentialism in Everyday Thought, Oxford: Oxford University
Press. (Scholar)
- Genone, E. (1963). Theories of Reference and Experimental
Philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 7 (2): 152–163. (Scholar)
- Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23: 121–123. (Scholar)
- Gleitman, L. & Papafragou, A. (2012). New Perspectives on
Language and Thought, in K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (eds.),
Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 543–568. (Scholar)
- Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gonnerman, C. & Weinberg, J. (2010). Two Uneliminated Uses for
‘Concepts’: Hybrids and Guides for Inquiry, Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 33: 211–212
- Goodman, N. (1969). The Emporer’s New Ideas, in S. Hook
(ed.), Language and Philosophy, New York: NYU Press,
pp. 138–42. (Scholar)
- Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence
from Amazonia, Science, 306: 496–499. (Scholar)
- Griffiths, P. (2002). What Is Innateness? Monist, 85 (1): 70–85. (Scholar)
- Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Hampton, J. (2006). Concepts as Prototypes, in B.H. Ross (ed.),
Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Volume 46), New York:
Academic Press, pp. 79–113 (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). Concept Talk Cannot Be Avoided, Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 33: 212–213
- Hampton, J. & Jönsson, M. (2012). Typicality and
Compositionality: The Logic of Combining Vague Concepts, in M.
Werning, W. Hintzen, & E. Machery (eds.), Oxford Handbook of
Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E., & Katsnelson, A. (2001). Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language, Cognitive Psychology, 39: 3–36. (Scholar)
- Hespos, S. & Spelke, E. (2004). Conceptual Precursors to
Language, Nature, 430: 453–456. (Scholar)
- Hume, D. (1739/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1748/1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hurley, S. & Nudds, M. (2006) Rational Animals?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a Concept, that a Person May Grasp It? Mind & Language, 4: 68–102. (Scholar)
- Jackson, F. (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Johnson, S.P. (2010). Neuroconstructivism: The New Science of
Cognitive Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Kenny, A. (2010). Concepts, Brains, and Behaviour, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 81 (1): 105–113. (Scholar)
- Khalidi, M.A. (2015). Innateness as a Natural Cognitive Kind,
Philosophical Psychology, 29 (3): 319–333. (Scholar)
- Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and Its Place in Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Kripke, S. (1972/1980). Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Lalumera, E. (2010). Concepts are a Functional Kind, Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 33: 217–218
- Landau, B. (1982). Will the Real Grandmother Please Stand Up? The
Psychological Reality of Dual Meaning Representations, Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 11 (1): 47–62. (Scholar)
- Langland-Hassan, P. & Vicente, A. (2018). Inner Speech: New Voices, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (1997). Regress Arguments Against
the Language of Thought, Analysis, 57: 60–66. (Scholar)
- ––– (1999). Concepts and Cognitive Science, in E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–81. (Scholar)
- ––– (2001). The Poverty of the
Stimulus Argument, British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science, 52: 217–76. (Scholar)
- ––– (2002). Radical Concept Nativism,
Cognition, 86: 25–55. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). Linguistic Determinism and
the Innate Basis of Number, in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S.
Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Foundations and the Future,
New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–169. (Scholar)
- ––– (2012). The Scope of the
Conceptual, in E. Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. Stich (eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, New York:
Oxford University Press, pp. 291–317. (Scholar)
- Levin, B. & Pinker, S. (1991). Introduction, in B. Levin &
S. Pinker (eds.), Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, Oxford:
Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Levine, J. (2001). Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). Demonstrative Thought. Mind & Language, 25 (2): 169–195. (Scholar)
- Levinson, S. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition:
Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (Scholar)
- Levinson, S., Kita, S., Haun, D., & Rasch, B. (2002). Returning the Tables: Language Affects Spatial Reasoning, Cognition, 84: 155–188. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D. (1966). An Argument for the Identity Theory, Journal
of Philosophy, 63 (1): 17–25. (Scholar)
- Li, P. & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the Tables: Language and Spatial Reasoning, Cognition, 83: 265–294. (Scholar)
- Li, P., Abarbanell, L., Gleitman, L. & Papafragou, A. (2011).
Spatial Reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans, Cognition, 120 (1):
33–53. (Scholar)
- Locke, J. (1690/1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lupyan, G. (2012). What Do Words Do? Toward a Theory of
Language-Augmented Thought, in B.H. Ross (ed.), Psychology of
Learning and Motivation (Volume 57), New York: Academic Press, pp.
155–297 (Scholar)
- Machery, E. (2007). Concept Empiricism: A Methodological Critique, Cognition, 104: 19–46. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009). Doing Without Concepts, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). Precis of Doing Without Concepts, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 195–244. (Scholar)
- ––– (2017). Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. (2004).
Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style, Cognition, 92: B1–B12. (Scholar)
- Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N., & Hashimoto, T. (2017). Gettier Across Cultures. Noûs, 51 (3): 645–664. (Scholar)
- Mahon, B.Z. (2015). What is Embodied about Cognition?
Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30 (4):
420–429. (Scholar)
- Mallon, R. & Weinberg, J. (2006). Innateness as Closed Process
Invariance, Philosophy of Science, 73 (3):
323–344. (Scholar)
- Mameli, M. (2008). On Innateness: The Clutter Hypothesis and the Cluster Hypothesis. The Journal of Philosophy, 105 (12): 719–736. (Scholar)
- Manfredi, P. (1993). Tacit Beliefs and Other Doxastic Attitudes. Philosophia, 22 (1): 95–117. (Scholar)
- Marcus, G. (2001). The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2004). The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates the Complexities of Human Thought, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Margolis, E. (1998). How to Acquire a Concept, Mind &
Language, 13: 347–369. (Scholar)
- Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). The Ontology of Concepts — Abstract Objects or Mental Representations? Noûs, 41 (4): 561–593. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). Concepts and Theoretical
Unification, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33:
219–220. (Scholar)
- ––– (2011). Learning Matters: The Role of Learning in Concept Acquisition, Mind & Language, 26 (5): 507–539. (Scholar)
- ––– (2013). In Defense of Nativism,
Philosophical Studies, 165 (2): 693–718. (Scholar)
- ––– (2015). The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- McClelland, J., Botvinick, M., Noelle, D., Plaut, D., Rogers, T., Seidenberg, M., & Smith, L. (2010). Letting Structure Emerge: Connectionist and Dynamic Systems Approaches to Cognition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 348–56. (Scholar)
- McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Millikan, R. (2000). On Clear and Confused Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Murphy, G. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Osherson, D., & Smith, E. (1981). On the Adequacy of Prototype
Theory as a Theory of Concepts, Cognition, 9:
35–58. (Scholar)
- Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking About Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2013). The Poverty of Conceptual Analysis,
in M. Haug (ed.),The Armchair or the Laboratory?, New York:
Routledge, pp. 166–194 (Scholar)
- Peacocke, C. (1992). A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (2005). Rationale and Maxims in the Study of
Concepts, Noûs, 39 (1): 167–78. (Scholar)
- Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact
and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group,
Science, 306: 499–503. (Scholar)
- Pietroski, P. & Crain, S. (2012). The Language Faculty, in E.
Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. Stich (eds.), The Oxford Handbook
of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, New York: Oxford University
Press, pp. 361–381. (Scholar)
- Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: The New Science of
Language and Mind. London: Penguin. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Language
as a Window into Human Nature. London: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Putnam, H. (1967). The ‘Innateness Hypothesis’ and
Explanatory Models in Linguistics, Synthese, 17: 12–22;
reprinted in H. Putnam, Philosophical Papers (Volume 2: Mind,
Language and Reality), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.
107–116. (Scholar)
- ––– (1975). The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, in H.
Putnam, Philosophical Papers (Volume 2: Mind, Language and
Reality), pp. 215–271, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. (Scholar)
- Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Ramsey, W. (1998). Prototypes and Conceptual Analysis, in M.
DePaul & W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The
Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry,
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 161–77. (Scholar)
- Robbins, P. (2002). How to Blunt the Sword of Compositionality,
Noûs, 36 (2): 313–34. (Scholar)
- Roberts, I. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization, in E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27–48. (Scholar)
- Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories, Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573–605. (Scholar)
- Sampson, G. (2005). The “Language Instinct”
Debate, revised edition, London: Continuum. (Scholar)
- Samuels, R. (2002). Nativism in Cognitive Science, Mind &
Language, 17 (3): 233–65. (Scholar)
- Samuels, R. & Ferreira, M. (2010). Why Don’t
Concepts Constitute a Natural Kind, Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 33: 222–223. (Scholar)
- Shapiro, L. (2004). The Mind Incarnate, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Shettleworth, S. (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior,
2nd edition, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Shusterman, A. & Spelke, E. (2005). Language and the Development of Spatial Reasoning, in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–106. (Scholar)
- Smith, E., & Medin, D. (1981). Categories and
Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Sosa, E. (2009). A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy, in D. Murphy & M. Bishop (eds.), Stich and His Critics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E.S. (2003). What Makes Us Smart? Core Knowledge and Natural Language, in D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 277–311. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E.S. & Kinzler, K.D. (1992). Core Knowledge,
Developmental Science, 10 (1): 89–96. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E.S. & Newport, E. (1998). Nativism, Empiricism, and
the Development of Knowledge, in W. Damon (series ed.) and R.M. Lerner
(volume ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Volume 1:
Theoretical Models of Human Development), fifth edition, New
York: Wiley, pp. 275–340. (Scholar)
- Spelke, E.S. & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Initial Knowledge and
Conceptual Change: Space and Number, in M. Bowerman & S. Levinson
(eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Stich, S. (1990). The Fragmentation of Reason, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (1992). What Is a Theory of Mental Representation? Mind, 101 (402): 243–61. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009). Reply to Sosa. In D. Murphy & M. Bishop (eds.). Stich and His Critics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Scholar)
- ––– (2012). Collected Papers (Volume 2:
Knowledge, Rationality, and Morality, 1978–2010), Oxford: Oxford
University Press. (Scholar)
- Strevens, M. (2018). Thinking Off Your Feet: How Empirical
Psychology Vindicates Armchair Psychology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press. (Scholar)
- Strohminger, N. & Moore, B. (2010). Banishing the Thought,
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 225–226
- Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2016). The Theoretical Foundations
of Evolutionary Psychology. In D. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of
Evolutionary Psychology, Second Edition, Wiley, pp.
3–87. (Scholar)
- Van Gelder, T. (1995). What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91: 345–381. (Scholar)
- Vicente, A. & Manrique, F.M. (2016). The Big Concepts Paper: A
Defense of Hybridism, British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science, 67: 59–88. (Scholar)
- Weinberg, J., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23 (3): 331–355. (Scholar)
- Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and
Epistemic Intuitions, Philosophical Topics, 29 (1&2):
429–460. (Scholar)
- Weiskopf, D. (2007). Concept Empiricism and the Vehicles of
Thought, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14: pp.
156–183. (Scholar)
- ––– (2009). The Plurality of Concepts, Synthese,
169: 145–173. (Scholar)
- ––– (2010). The Theoretical Indispensability of Concepts,
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 228–229
- Whorf, B. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Williamson, T. (2005). Armchair Philosophy, Metaphysical Modality
and Counterfactual Thinking, Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society, 105: 1–23. (Scholar)
- ––– (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1958). Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edition, G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Wright, C. (1989). The Verification Principle: Another Puncture—Another Patch, Mind, 98: 611–622. (Scholar)
- Yablo, S. (2008). Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Zalta, E. (2001). Fregean Senses, Modes of Presentation, and
Concepts, Philosophical Perspectives, 15: 335–359. (Scholar)