- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Conceptual Art" by Elisabeth Schellekens
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Alberro, Alexander & Blake, Stimson (eds.), 1999. Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Alberro, Alexander& Buchmann, Sabeth (eds.), 2006. Art after Conceptual Art, Cambridge, MA & Vienna: MIT Press/General Foundation. (Scholar)
- Beardsley, Monroe, 1970. The Possibility of Criticism, Detroit: Wayne State University Press. (Scholar)
- Bell, Clive, 1914. Art, London. (Scholar)
- Binkley, Timothy, 1977. ‘Piece: Contra Aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35: 265–277. (Scholar)
- Budd, Malcolm, 1995. Values of Art: Painting, Poetry, and Music, London: Penguin. (Scholar)
- Caldarola, Elisa, 2021. ‘On Tags and Conceptual Street Art’, Philosophical Inquiries, IX(2): 93–114. (Scholar)
- –––, 2021. ‘Exemplification, Knowledge, and Education of the Emotions through Conceptual Art’, Discipline Filosofiche, XXXI(1): 179–195. (Scholar)
- Carroll, Noel, 1992. ‘Art, Intention, and Conversation’, Intention and Interpretation, G. Iseminger (ed.), Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 97–131. (Scholar)
- Corris, Michael (ed.), 2004. Conceptual Art: Theory, Myth, and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cray, Wesley, 2014. ‘Conceptual Art, Ideas and Ontology’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72: 265–277. (Scholar)
- Currie, Gregory, 1988. An Ontology of Art, New York: St Martin’s Press. (Scholar)
- Dal Sasso, David & Schellekens, Elisabeth, 2022. Aesthetics, Philosophy and Conceptual Art. London: Bloomsbury. (Scholar)
- Danto, Arthur C., 1964. ‘The Artworld’, Journal of Philosophy, 61: 571–584. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Davies, David, 2004. Art as Performance, Oxford: Blackwells. (Scholar)
- Davies, Stephen, 2001. Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Dickie, George, 1973. ‘The Institutional Conception of Art’, in Tilghman, Benjamin (ed.). Language and Aesthetics, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, pp. 21–30. (Scholar)
- –––, 1974, Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Fry, R., 1920. Vision and Design, London: Chatto & Windus. (Scholar)
- Godfrey, Tony, 1998. Conceptual Art, London: Phaidon Press. (Scholar)
- Goldie, Peter & Schellekens, Elisabeth (eds.), 2007. Philosophy and Conceptual Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009. Who’s Afraid of Conceptual Art?, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Goldman, Alan, 1990. ‘Interpreting Art and Literature’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48: 205–14. (Scholar)
- Gover, Karen, 2012. ‘What is Humpty Dumptyism in Contemporary Art? A Reply to Maes’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 52: 169–181. (Scholar)
- Hanson, Louise. 2015. “Conceptual Art and the Acquaintance Principle.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(3): 247–258. (Scholar)
- Harrison, Charles, 1991. Essays on Art and Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Ingarden, Roman, 1973. The Literary Work of Art, G.G. Grabowicz (trans.), Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. (Scholar)
- Irvin, Sherri & Dodd, Julian, 2017. ‘In Advance of the Broken Theory: Philosophy and Contemporary Art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(4): 375–386. (Scholar)
- Kieran, Matthew, 1996. ‘In Defence of Critical Pluralism’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 36: 239–251. (Scholar)
- Kosuth, Joseph, 1969. Art After Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966–1990, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Lewitt, Sol, 1967. ‘Paragraphs on Conceptual Art’, Artforum, 5(10): 79–83. (Scholar)
- –––, 1969. ‘Sentences on Conceptual Art’, Art-Language: The Journal of Conceptual Art, 1 (May): 11–13. Reprinted in Osborne, 2002. (Scholar)
- Levinson, Jerrold, 1979. ‘Defining Art Historically’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 19: 232–250. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. ‘Intention and Interpretation: A Last Look’, Intention and Interpretation, G. Iseminger (ed.), Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 221–256. (Scholar)
- Lippard, Lucy, 1973. Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object 1966–1972, New York: Praeger. (Scholar)
- Maes, Hans, 2010. ‘Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 50: 121–138. (Scholar)
- Margolis, Joseph, 1991. The Truth About Relativism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Meyer, Ursula, 1972. Conceptual Art, New York: Dutton Press. (Scholar)
- Morgan, Robert C., 1996. Art into Ideas: Essays on Conceptual Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Newman, M. & Bird, J. (eds.), 1999. Rewriting Conceptual Art, London: Reaktion Books. (Scholar)
- Osborne, Peter (ed.), 2002. Conceptual Art: Themes and Movements, London & New York: Phaidon Press. (Scholar)
- Pakes, Anna, 2019. ‘Can There Be Conceptual Dance?’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 44: 195–212. (Scholar)
- Piper, Adrian, 1993. ‘The Logic of Modernism’, Flash Art, 26: 56–58. (Scholar)
- Sauchelli, Andrea, 2016. ‘The Acquaintance Principle, Aesthetic Judgments and Conceptual Art’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 50: 1–15. (Scholar)
- Schellekens, Elisabeth, 2005. ‘“Seeing is Believing” and “Believing is Seeing”‘, Acta Analytica, 20: 10–23. (Scholar)
- –––, 2007. ‘The Aesthetic Value of Ideas’, Philosophy and Conceptual Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–91. (Scholar)
- Shelley, James, 2003. ‘The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 43: 363–78. (Scholar)
- Sibley, Frank, 1965. ‘Aesthetic and Nonaesthetic’, Philosophical Review, 74: 135–59 (Scholar)
- Young, James, 2001. Art and Knowledge, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Walton, Kendall, 1970. ‘Categories of Art’, Philosophical Review, 79: 334–67. (Scholar)
- Weitz, Morris, 1956. ‘The Role of Theory in Aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15: 27–35. (Scholar)
- Wimsatt, W. K. & Beardsley M. C., 1946. ‘The Intentional Fallacy’, Sewanee Review, LIV: 468–488. (Scholar)
- Wollheim, Richard, 1980. Art and Its Objects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Wood, Paul, 2002. Conceptual Art, London: Tate Publishing. Series: Movements in Modern Art. (Scholar)
Generated Sun Mar 19 02:38:34 2023
