Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Rule Consequentialism" by Brad Hooker

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Adams, R. M, 1976, “Motive Utilitarianism”, Journal of Philosophy, 73: 467–81. (Scholar)
Arneson, R., 1999a, “Human Flourishing versus Desire Satisfaction”, Social Philosophy & Policy, 16: 113–42. (Scholar)
–––, 1999b, “Egalitarianism and Responsibility”, Journal of Ethics, 3: 225–47. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Sophisticated Rule Consequentialism: Some Simple Objections”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 235–251. (Scholar)
Attfield, R., 1987, A Theory of Value and Obligation, London: Croom Helm. (Scholar)
Attfield, R., 1995, Value, Obligation and Meta-ethics, Amsterdam: Rodopi BV Editions. (Scholar)
Austin, J., 1832, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. ed. H. L. A. Hart, London: Weidenfeld, 1954. (Scholar)
Audi, R., 1996, “Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics”, W. Sinnott-Armstrong and M. Timmons (eds), Moral Knowledge?, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–36. (Scholar)
–––, 2001, “A Kantian Intuitionism”, Mind, 110: 601–35. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Baier, Kurt, 1958, The Moral Point of View. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
Bales, R. E., 1971, “Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-making Characteristics or Decision-making Procedure?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 8: 257–65. (Scholar)
Barrow, R., 1991, Utilitarianism: A Contemporary Statement, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. (Scholar)
Berkeley, G., 1712, Passive Obedience, or the Christian Doctrine of Not Resisting the Supreme Power, Proved and Vindicated upon the Principles of the Law of Nature, London: H. Clements; reprinted in D.H. Monro (ed.), A Guide to the British Moralists, London: Fontana, 1972, pp. 217–27. (Scholar)
Brand-Ballard, J., 2007, “Why One Principle?” Utilitas, 19: 220–42. (Scholar)
Brandt, R.B., 1959, Ethical Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Scholar)
–––, 1963, “Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism”, in H.-N. Castañeda and G. Nakhnikian (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 107–43. (Scholar)
–––, 1967, “Some Merits of One Form of Rule-Utilitarianism”, University of Colorado Studies in Philosophy, pp. 39–65; reprinted in Brandt 1992: 111–36. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1983, “Problems of Contemporary Utilitarianism: Real and Alleged”, in N. Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century, Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 81–105. (Scholar)
–––, 1988, “Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics”, Ethics, 98: 341–60; reprinted in Brandt 1992: 137–57. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “Morality and its Critics”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 26: 89–100; reprinted in Brandt 1992: 73–92. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, Facts, Values, and Morality, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Brink, D., 1989, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Burch-Brown, J., 2014, “Clues for Consequentialists”, Utilitas, 26: 105–19. (Scholar)
Card, R., 2007, “Inconsistency and the Theoretical Commitments of Hooker’s Rule-consequentialism”, Utilitas, 19: 243–58. (Scholar)
Carson, T., 1991, “A Note on Hooker’s Rule Consequentialism”, Mind, 100: 117–21. (Scholar)
Copp, D., 2020, “The Rule Worship and Idealization Objections Revisited and Resisted”, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 10: 131–155. (Scholar)
Cowen, T., 2011, “Rule Consequentialism Makes Sense After All”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 28: 212–231. (Scholar)
Crisp, R., 1992, “Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue”, Philosophical Quarterly, 42: 139–60. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, Mill on Utilitarianism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Griffin’s Pessimism”, in R. Crisp and B. Hooker (eds.), Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 115–28. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “Hedonism Reconsidered”, Philosophy and Phenomenlogical Research, 73: 619–645. (Scholar)
Cureton, A., 2015, “Making Room for Rules”, Philosophical Studies, 172: 737–59. (Scholar)
Driver, J., 2014, “Global Utilitarianism”, in B. Eggleston and D. Miller (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–76. (Scholar)
Ebertz, R., 1993, “Is Reflective Equilibrium a Coherentist Model?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23: 193–214. (Scholar)
Eggleston, B., 2007, “Conflicts of Rules in Hooker’s Rule-consequentialism”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37: 329–49. (Scholar)
Ezorsky, G., 1968 “A Defense of Rule Utilitarianism Against David Lyons Who Insists on Tieing It to Act Utilitarianism, Plus a Brand New Way of Checking Out General Utilitarian Properties”, Journal of Philosophy, 65: 533–44. (Scholar)
Foot, P., 2000, Natural Goodness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Gaut, B., 1993, “Moral Pluralism”, Philosophical Papers, 22: 17–40. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Ragbags, Hard Cases, and Moral Pluralism”, Utilitas, 11: 37–48. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Justifying Moral Pluralism”, in P. Stratton-Lake (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–60. (Scholar)
Gert, B., 1998, Morality, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Greaves, H., 2020, “Global Consequentialism”, in Douglas Portmore (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 423–440. (Scholar)
Griffin, J., 1986, Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, Value Judgement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hare, R.M., 1981, Moral Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Harrison, J, 1953, “Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty To Be Just”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 53: 105–34. (Scholar)
Harrod, R., 1936, “Utilitarianism Revised”, Mind, 45: 137–56. (Scholar)
Harsanyi, J., 1953, “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking”, Journal of Political Economy, 61: 434–5. (Scholar)
–––, 1955, “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309–21. (Scholar)
–––, 1977, “Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory”, Erkenntnis, 11: 25–53. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour”, in Sen and Williams 1982: 39–62. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, “Expectation Effects, Individual Utilities, and Rational Desires”, in B. Hooker (ed.), Rationality, Rules, and Utility: New Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Richard Brandt, Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 115–26. (Scholar)
Haslett, D.W., 1987, Equal Consideration: A Theory of Moral Justification, Newark, Del.: University of Delaware Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, Capitalism With Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Values, Obligations, and Saving Lives”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 71–104. (Scholar)
Hill, T.E., Jr., 2005, “Assessing Moral Rules: Utilitarian and Kantian Perspectives”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 158–178. (Scholar)
Hills, A., 2010, “Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness”, Philosophical Quarterly, 60: 225–42. (Scholar)
Hodgson, D.H., 1967, Consequences of Utilitarianism, London: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hooker, B., 2000, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Review of Mulgan’s Demands of Consequentialism”, Philosophy, 78: 289–96. (Scholar)
–––, 2005, “Reply to Arneson and McIntyre”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 264–81. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “Rule-consequentialism and Internal Consistency: A Reply to Card”, Utilitas, 19: 514–19. (Scholar)
–––, 2008, “Rule-consequentialism versus Act-consequentialism”, Politea, 24: 75–85. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Publicity in Morality: A Reply to Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer”, Ratio, 23: 111–117. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Must Kantian Contractualism and Rule-consequentialism Converge?’”, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 4: 34–52. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Wrongness, Evolutionary Debunking, Public Rules”, Etica & Politica, 18: 133–149. (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, “Rule-consequentialism’s Essence and Rationale”, in David Copp, Connie Rosati, and Tina Rulli (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Normative Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hooker, B. and G. Fletcher, 2008, “Variable versus Fixed-rate Rule-utilitarianism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 58: 344–352. (Scholar)
Hooker, B., E. Mason, and D. Miller (eds.), 2000, Morality, Rules, and Consequences, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
Hospers, J., 1972, Human Conduct, Problems of Ethics, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. (Scholar)
Hursthouse, R., 1999, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2002, “Virtue Ethics vs Rule-Consequentialism”, Utilitas, 14: 41–53. (Scholar)
Ihara, C., 1981, “Toward a Rule-Utilitarian Theory of Supererogation”, Philosophy Research Archives, 7: 582–98 (Scholar)
Johnson, C., 1991, Moral Legislation, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Kagan, S., 1989, The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, Normative Ethics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, “Equality and Desert”, in Pojman and McLeod (eds.) What Do We Deserve?, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 298–314. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Evaluative Focal Points”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 134–55. (Scholar)
Kahn, L., 2012, “Rule Consequentialism and Scope”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15: 631–46. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Rule Consequentialism and Disasters”, Philosophical Studies, 162: 219–36. (Scholar)
Kamm, F., 2002, “Owing, Justifying, Rejecting: Thomas Scanlon’s What We Owe to Each Other”, Mind, 111: 323–54. (Scholar)
Lang, G., 2004, “A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 3(2): 131–262. (Scholar)
Law, I., 1999, “Rule-consequentialism’s Dilemma”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2: 263–76. (Scholar)
Lawlor, R., 2004, “Hooker’s Ideal Code and the Sacrifice Problem”, Social Theory and Practice, 30(4): 583–587. (Scholar)
Lazari-Radek, K. de and P. Singer, 2014, The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Lenman, J., 2000, “Consequentialism and Cluelessness”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29: 342–70. (Scholar)
Levy, S., 2000, “The Educational Equivalence of Act and Rule Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000: 27–39. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “A Contractualist Defense of Rule Consequentialism”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 38: 189–201. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “The Failure of Hooker’s Argument for Rule Consequentialism”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11: 598–614. (Scholar)
Lewis, D., 1972, “Utilitarianism and Truthfulness”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50: 17–19. (Scholar)
Lyons, D., 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “The Moral Opacity of Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 105–120. (Scholar)
Mabbott, J. D., 1953, “Moral Rules”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 37: 97–117, esp. 107–117. (Scholar)
Martin, R., 2010, “Mill’s Rule Utilitarianism in Context”, in B. Eggleston, D. Miller, & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
McIntyre, A., 2005, “The Perils of Holism: Brad Hooker’s Ideal Code, Real World”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 252–263. (Scholar)
McNaughton, P. and P. Rawling, 1998, “On Defending Deontology”, Ratio, 11: 37–54. (Scholar)
Mill, J. S., 1861, Utilitarianism, numerous editions. (Scholar)
Miller, D., 2000, “Hooker’s Use and Abuse of Reflective Equilibrium”, in Hooker, Mason and Miller 2000, pp. 156–78. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, John Stuart Mill, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Rule Consequentialism”, in B. Eggleston and D. Miller (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “Moral Education and Rule Consequentialism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 71: 120–140. (Scholar)
Miller, T., 2016, “Solving Rule Consequentialism’s Acceptance Rate Problem”, Utilitas, 28: 41–53. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “From Compliance, to Acceptance, to Teaching: On Relocating Rule Consequentialism’s Stipulations”, Utilitas, 33: 204–220. (Scholar)
Miller, R. B., 2009, “Actual Rule Utilitarianism”, Journal of Philosophy, 106: 5–28. (Scholar)
Montague, P., 2000, “Why Rule Consequentialism Is Not Superior to Ross-Style Pluralism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 203–11. (Scholar)
Moore, A., 2007, “Ethical Theory, Completeness & Consistency”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10: 297–308. (Scholar)
Moore, G. E., 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1912, Ethics, London: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Mulgan, T., 2001, The Demands of Consequentialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, Future People, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chs. 2, 6. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, “Rule Consequentialism and Non-Identity”, in D. Wasserman & M. Roberts (eds.), Harming Future Persons, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115–34. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “Utilitarianism for a Broken World”, Utilitas, 27: 92–114. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “How Should Utilitarians Think About the Future?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47: 290–312. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, Utilitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Nebel, J., 2012, “A Counterexample to Parfit’s Rule Consequentialism” (Discussion Note), Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, July, <available online>. (Scholar)
Norcross, A., 2002, “Contractualism and Aggregation”, Social Theory and Practice, 28: 303–14. (Scholar)
Overvold, M., 1980, “Self-interest and the Concept of Self-sacrifice”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10: 105–18. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “Self-interest and Getting What You Want”, The Limits of Utilitarianism, H.B. Miller and W.H. Williams (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 186–94. (Scholar)
Parfit, D., 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “Equality and Priority”, Ratio, 10: 202–21. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Justifiablity to Each Person”, Ratio, 16: 368–90. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, On What Matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2017a, On What Matters (Volume 3), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2017b, “Responses”, in S. Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 189–236. (Scholar)
Perl, C., 2021, “Solving the Ideal Worlds Problem”, Ethics, 132: 89–126. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule consequentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, first online 29 August 2022. doi:10.1080/00048402.2022.2056213 (Scholar)
Pettit, P., 1991, “Consequentialism”, in Companion to Ethics, edited by Peter Singer, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers pp. 230–40. (Scholar)
–––, 1994, “Consequentialism and Moral Psychology”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2: 1–17. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “The Consequentialist Perspective”, in M. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote, Three Methods of Ethics, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 92–174. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, The Robust Demands of the Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Pettit, P. and G. Brennan, 1986, “Restrictive Consequentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64: 438–55. (Scholar)
Pettit, P. and M. Smith, 2000, “Global Consequentialism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 221–33. (Scholar)
Plato, c 380BC, The Republic.
Podgorski, A., 2018, “Wouldn’t It Be Nice? Moral Rules and Distant Worlds”, Noûs, 52: 279–294. (Scholar)
Portmore, D., 2009, “Rule-Consequentialism and Irrelevant Others”, Utilitas 21: 368–76. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Parfit on Reasons and Rule Consequentialism”, in S. Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit: On On What Matters, Abingdon: Routledge. (Scholar)
Rajczi, A., 2016, “On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19: 857–876. (Scholar)
Railton, P., 1984, “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13: 174–31. (Scholar)
Raz, J., 2003, “Numbers, With and Without Contractualism”, Ratio, 16: 346–367. (Scholar)
Rawls, J., 1951, “Outline for a Decision Procedure in Ethics”, Philosophical Review, 60: 177–97. (Scholar)
–––, 1955, “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review, 64: 3–32. (Scholar)
–––, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Ridge, M., 2006, “Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitariansim”, Philosophical Quarterly, 56: 242–53. (Scholar)
Riley, J., 2000, “Defending Rule Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 40–69. (Scholar)
Ross, J., 2009, “Should Kantians Be Consequentialists?”, Ratio, 22: 126–35. (Scholar)
Ross, W.D., 1930, The Right and the Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1939, Foundations of Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Sayre-McCord, G., 1986, “Coherence and Models for Moral Theorizing”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 170–90. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory”, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong and M. Timmons (eds.), Moral Knowledge?, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–59. (Scholar)
Scanlon, T.M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in Sen and Williams 1982: 103–28. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Sen, A. and B. Williams (eds.), 1982, Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Shaw, W., 1993, “Welfare, Equality, and Distribution: Brandt from the Left”, in B. Hooker (ed.), Rationality, Rules, and Utility: New Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Richard Brandt, Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 165–87. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “Between Act and Rule: The Consequentialism of G.E. Moore”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000: 6–26. (Scholar)
Sidgwick, H., 1907, Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, London: Macmillan; first edition, 1874. (Scholar)
Singer, M., 1955, “Generalization in Ethics”, Mind, 64: 361–75. (Scholar)
–––, 1961, Generalization in Ethics, New York: Knopf. (Scholar)
Singer, P., 1972, “Is Act-utilitarianism Self-defeating?” Philosophical Review, 81: 94–104. (Scholar)
Smart, J.J.C., 1956, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 6: 344–54. (Scholar)
–––, 1973, “Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics”, in J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–74. (Scholar)
Smith, H., 2010, “Measuring the Consequences of Rules”, Utilitas, 22: 413–33. (Scholar)
Sorensen, R., 1996, “Unknowable Obligations”, Utilitas, 7: 247–71. (Scholar)
Stratton-Lake, P., 1997, “Can Hooker’s Rule-Consequentialist Principle Justify Ross’s Prima Facie Duties?”, Mind, 106: 151–58. (Scholar)
Streumer, B., 2003, “Can Consequentialism Cover Everything?”, Utilitas, 15: 237–47. (Scholar)
Suikkanen, J., 2008, “A Dilemma for Rule-consequentialism”, Philosophia, 36: 141–150. (Scholar)
–––, 2014, “Contractualism and the Conditional Fallacy”, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 4: 113–137. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Hooker’s Rule-consequentialism and Scanlon’s Contractualism—A Re-evaluation”, Ratio, 35: 261–74. (Scholar)
Sumner, L. W., 1996, Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Temkin, L., 1993, Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Thomas, A., 2000, “Consequentialism and the Subversion of Pluralism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller 2000, pp. 179–202. (Scholar)
Tobia, K., 2013, “Rule Consequentialism and the Problem of Partial Acceptance”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16: 643–52. (Scholar)
–––, 2018, “Rule-consequentialism’s Assumptions”, Utilitas, 30: 458–471. (Scholar)
Toppinen, T., 2016, “Rule Consequentialism (and Kantian Contractualism) at Top Rates”, Philosophical Quarterly, 66: 122–135. (Scholar)
Toulmin, S., 1950, The Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Urmson, J.O., 1953, “The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J.S. Mill”. Philosophical Quarterly, 10: 33–9. (Scholar)
–––, 1975, “A Defence of Intuitionism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 75: 144–52. (Scholar)
Wall, E., 2009, “Hooker’s Consequentialism and the Depth of Moral Experience”, Dialogue, 48: 337–51 (Scholar)
Williams, B., 1973a, “Egoism and Altruism”, in B. Williams, Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–65. (Scholar)
–––, 1973b, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For & Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–150. (Scholar)
–––, 1982, “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics”, The Cambridge Review, (7 May); reprinted in Williams 1995: 153–71. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, Making Sense of Humanity and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Wolf, S., 2016, “Two Concepts of Rule Utilitarianism”, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 6: 123–144. (Scholar)
Woollard, F., 2015, Doing and Allowing Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Hooker’s Rule-consequentialism, Disasters, Demandingness, and Arbitrary Distinctions”, Ratio, 35: 289–300. (Scholar)
Woodard, C., 2019, Taking Utilitarianism Seriously, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, “Reasons for Rule-consequentialists”, Ratio, 35: 251–60. (Scholar)
Yeo, S., 2017, “Measuring the Consequences of Rules: A Reply to Smith”, Utilitas, 29: 125–31. (Scholar)

Generated Mon Mar 17 13:37:03 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...