Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Consequentialism" by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, R.M., 1976. “Motive Utilitarianism”, Journal of Philosophy, 73: 467–81. (Scholar)
- Adler, M., and Norheim, O. F. (eds.), 2022. Prioritarianism in Practice, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Arneson, R. J., 2022. Prioritarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Bales, R. E., 1971. “Act-utilitarianism: account of right-making characteristics or decision-making procedures?”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8: 257–65. (Scholar)
- Bayles, M. (ed.), 1968. Contemporary Consequentialism,
Garden City, NY; Doubleday. (Scholar)
- Bennett, J., 1989. “Two Departures from Consequentialism”, Ethics, 100: 54–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995. The Act Itself, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bentham, J., 1843. Rationale of Reward, Book 3, Chapter
1, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, J. Bowring (ed.),
Edinburgh: William Tait. (Scholar)
- Bentham, J., 1961. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals
and Legislation, Garden City: Doubleday. Originally published in
1789. (Scholar)
- Bradley, B., 2005. “Virtue Consequentialism”, Utilitas, 17: 282–298. (Scholar)
- Bradley, B., 2006. “Against Satisficing Consequentialism”, Utilitas, 18: 97–108. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R., 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Brink, D., 1986. “Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of View”, Journal of Philosophy, 83: 417–38. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006. “Some Forms and Limits of Consequentialism”, in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, D. Copp (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Broome, J., 1991. Weighing Goods, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Brown, C., 2011. “Consequentialize This”, Ethics, 121: 749–71. (Scholar)
- Carritt, E. F., 1947. Ethical and Political Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chang, R., 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Chappell, T., 2001. “Options Ranges”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(2): 107–118. (Scholar)
- Coakley, M., 2015. “Interpersonal Comparisons of the Good:
Epistemic Not Impossible”, Utilitas, doi:
10.1017/s0953820815000266. (Scholar)
- Cummiskey, D., 1996. Kantian Consequentialism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Darwall, S. (ed.), 2003. Consequentialism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- De Brigard, F., 2010. “If You Like It, Does It Matter If
It’s Real?”, Philosophical Psychology, 23:
43–57. (Scholar)
- Dreier, J., 1993. “Structures of Normative Theories”, Monist, 76: 22ff. (Scholar)
- –––, 2011. “In Defense of Consequentializing”, in Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, M. Timmons (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–119. (Scholar)
- Driver, J., 2001a. Uneasy Virtue, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2001b. Character and
Consequentialism, Special Issue of Utilitas, 13(2). (Scholar)
- –––, 2012. Consequentialism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Feldman, F., 1986. Doing the Best We Can, Boston: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997. Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Foot, P., 1967. “Abortion and the Doctrine of Double
Effect”, Oxford Review, 5: 28–41. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 57(2): 273–83; revised in Mind, 94 (1985): 196–209. (Scholar)
- Frey, R. G. (ed.), 1984. Utility and Rights, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Geach, P., 1956. “Good and Evil”, Analysis, XVII (2): 33–42. (Scholar)
- Gert, B., 2005. Morality: Its Nature and Justification, New York: Oxford University Press, revised edition. (Scholar)
- Gewirth, A., 1978. Reason and Morality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
- Goodin, R. E., 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Greene, J., 2013. Moral Tribes, London: Penguin Press. (Scholar)
- Griffin, J., 1986. Well-Being, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hare, R. M., 1963. Freedom and Reason, London: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981. Moral Thinking, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J. C., 1977. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior”, Social Research, 44(4): 623–56; reprinted in Sen and Williams 1982. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978. “Bayesian Decision Theory and
Utilitarian Ethics”, The American Economic Review, 68:
223–8. (Scholar)
- Hart, H. L. A., and Honoré, T., 1985. Causation in the Law, Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hawkins, J., forthcoming. “The Experience Machine and the Experience Requirement”, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Well-Being. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2000. Ideal Code, Real World, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., Mason, E., and Miller, D. E., 2000. Morality, Rules, and Consequences, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Howard-Snyder, F., 1994. “The Heart of Consequentialism”, Philosophical Studies, 76: 107–29. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996. “A New Argument for Consequentialism? A Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong”, Analysis, 56: 111–115. (Scholar)
- Hurka, T., 1993. Perfectionism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. Virtue, Vice, and Value, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hutcheson, F., 1755 [1965]. A System of Moral Philosophy,
in Selby-Bigge (1965); originally published in 1755.
- Jackson, F., 1991. “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection”, Ethics, 101: 461–82. (Scholar)
- Jamieson, D., 2005. “When Utilitarians Should be Virtue
Theorists”. Utilitas, 19(2): 160–183. (Scholar)
- Jamieson, D., and Elliot, R., 2009. “Progressive Consequentialism”. Philosophical Perspectives, 23: 241–251. (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 1989. The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998. Normative Ethics, Boulder: Westview. (Scholar)
- Kupperman, J. J., 1981. “A Case for Consequentialism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 305–13. (Scholar)
- Lyons, D., 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- McCloskey, H. J., 1965. “A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment”, Inquiry, 8: 239–55. (Scholar)
- McNaughton, D., and Rawling, P., 1991. “Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction”, Philosophical Studies, 63: 167–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. “Honoring and Promoting Values”, Ethics, 102: 835–43. (Scholar)
- Mill, J. S., 1861. Utilitarianism, edited with an introduction by Roger Crisp. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
- Moore, G. E., 1903. Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912. Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Mulgan, T., 2001. The Demands of Consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Murphy, L., 2000. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Norcross, A., 1997. “Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26: 135–67. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006. “The Scalar Approach to Utilitarianism”, in H. West (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 217–232. (Scholar)
- ___, 2020. Morality By Degrees: Reasons Without
Demands, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Nussbaum, Martha C., 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Parfit, D., 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 1984. “Satisficing Consequentialism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58: 165–76. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1993. Consequentialism, Aldershot: Dartmouth. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997. “The Consequentialist Perspective” in Three Methods of Ethics, by M. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., and Brennan, G., 1986. “Restrictive Consequentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64: 438–55. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., and Smith, M., 2000. “Global Consequentialism” in Hooker et al, pp. 121–33. (Scholar)
- Plato, Philebus, trans. D. Frede, Indianapolis: Hackett
Publishing, 1993.
- Portmore, D. W., 2001. “Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory be Agent-Relative?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 38: 363–77. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. “Position-Relative Consequentialism. Agent-Centered Options, and Supererogation”, Ethics, 113: 303–32. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009. “Consequentializing”, Philosophy Compass, 4. (Scholar)
- ___, 2011. Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality
Meets Rationality, New York: Oxford University Press.
- ___ (ed.), 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism.
New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Railton, P., 1984. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13: 134–71; reprinted in Railton 2003. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays toward a Morality of Consequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review, 64: 3–32. (Scholar)
- –––, 1971. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Regan, D., 1980. Utilitarianism and Cooperation, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Roberts, M. A., 2002. “A New Way of Doing the Best That We Can: Person-Based Consequentialism and the Equality Problem”, Ethics, 112(2): 315–50. (Scholar)
- Ross, W. D., 1930. The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Sayre-McCord, G., 2001. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of
the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense”, in
Moral Knowledge, E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller, and J. Paul
(eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 330–60. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T. M., 1982. “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in Sen and Williams (eds.) 1982. (Scholar)
- Scarre, G., 1996. Utilitarianism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Scheffler, S., 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press; revised edition, 1994. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1988. Consequentialism and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Schneewind, Jerome, 1997. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2002. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), 1965. British Moralists, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Sen, A., 1979. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism”, Journal of Philosophy, 76: 463–89. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982. “Rights and Agency”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11(1): 3–39. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985. “Well-Being, Agency, and
Freedom”, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4):
169–221. (Scholar)
- –––. 2002. Rationality and Freedom,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Sen, A., and Williams, B. (eds.), 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Shaw, W. H., 1999. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism, Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Sidgwick, H., 1907. The Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, London: Macmillan; first edition, 1874. (Scholar)
- Singer, M., 1961. Generalization in Ethics, New York: Knopf. (Scholar)
- ––– 1977. “Actual Consequence Utilitarianism”, Mind, 86: 67–77. (Scholar)
- Singer, P., 1974. “Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium”, Monist, 58: 490–517. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993. Practical Ethics, Second
Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005. “Ethics and Intuitions”, The Journal of Ethics, 9(3/4): 331–352. (Scholar)
- Sinhababu, N., 2018. “Scalar Consequentialism the Right Way”, Philosophical Studies, 175: 3131–3144. (Scholar)
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 1988. Moral Dilemmas, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. “An Argument for Consequentialism”, Philosophical Perspectives, 6: 399–421. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. “R. M. Hare”, in A
Companion to Analytic Philosophy, A. P. Martinich and D. Sosa
(eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 326–333. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003a. “For Goodness’
Sake”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 41 (Supplement):
83–91. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b. “Gert Contra
Consequentialism” in Rationality, Rules, and Ideals, W.
Sinnott-Armstrong and R. Audi (eds.), New York: Rowman and
Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005. “You Ought to be Ashamed of Yourself (When you Violate an Imperfect Moral Obligation)”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 193–208. (Scholar)
- ___, 2007. “Preventive War—What is it Good For?”
in Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification, ed.
H. Shue and D. Rodin, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009. “How strong is this obligation?
An argument for consequentialism from concomitant variation”,
Analysis, 69: 438–442. (Scholar)
- Skorupski, J., 1995. “Agent-Neutrality, Consequentialism, Utilitarianism … A Terminological Note,” Utilitas, 7: 49–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999. Ethical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Slote, M., 1984. “Satisficing Consequentialism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 58: 139–63. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Smart, J. J. C., 1956. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 6: 344–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973. “An Outline of a System of
Utilitarian Ethics” in Utilitarianism: For and Against,
by J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 3–74. (Scholar)
- Smart, R. N., 1958. “Negative Utilitarianism”, Mind, 67: 542–3. (Scholar)
- Snedegar, J., 2017. Contrastive Reasons, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Sosa, D., 1993. “Consequences of Consequentialism”, Mind, 102(405): 101–22. (Scholar)
- Sprigge, T. L. S., 1965. “A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey”, Inquiry, 8: 264–91. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988. The Rational Foundations of Ethics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Sumner, L. W., 1987. The Moral Foundations of Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Sverdlik, Steven, 2011. Motives and Rightness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tännsjö, Torbjörn, 1998. Hedonistic Utilitarianism, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Thomson, J. J., 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem”, The Monist, 59: 204–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994. “Goodness and Utilitarianism”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 67(4): 7–21. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. Goodness and Advice, Amy Gutmann (ed.), Princeton; Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Unger, P., 1996. Living High and Letting Die, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Williams, B., 1973. “A Critique of Utilitarianism” in
Utilitarianism: For and Against, by J.J.C. Smart and B.
Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.
77–150. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality”, in B. Williams, Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)