Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Constitutionalism" by Wil Waluchow and Dimitrios Kyritsis

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Ackerman, Bruce, 1991, We The People: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, We The People 2: Transformations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “The Living Constitution” Harvard Law Review, 120: 1737. [Available online]. (Scholar)
Adler, Matthew & Kenneth Himma (eds.), 2009, The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Alexy, Robert, 2002, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Allan, T.R.S., 2001, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Alexander, Larry (ed.), 1998, Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “Was Dworkin an Originalist”, in W. Waluchow & S. Sciaraffa (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Alexander, Larry & Kay, Richard, 1988, “Adherence to Original Intentions in Constitutional Adjudication: Three Objections and Responses”, Northwestern University Law Review, 82: 226. (Scholar)
Alexander, Larry & Solum, Larry, 2005, “Popular? Constitutionalism?”, Harvard Law Review, 118(5): 1594–1640. (Scholar)
Altman, Andrew, 1990, Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Austin, J.L., 1995, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Balkin, Jack M., 2011, Living Originalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, “The Roots of the Living Constitution”, Boston University Law Review, 92: 1129–1160. (Scholar)
Barak, A., 2005, Purposive Interpretation in Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Barber, N.W., 2010, The Constitutional State, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Barber, Sotirios & J. Fleming, 2007, Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Barnett, Randy E., 1999, “An Originalism for Nonoriginalists”, Loyola Law Review, 45: 611–54. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, Restoring the Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Interpretation and Construction”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34: 65. (Scholar)
–––, 2016, Our Republican Constitution: Securing The Liberty and Sovereignty of We The People, New York: Broadside Books. (Scholar)
Bellamy, R., 2007, Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Berman, Mitchell, 2009, “Originalism is Bunk”, New York University Law Review, 84: 1–96. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “Constitutional Constructions and Constitutional Decision Rules: Thoughts on the Carving of Implementation”, Constitutional Commentary, 16: 39–69. (Scholar)
Berman, Mitchell & Toh, Kevin, 2014, “On What Distinguishes New Originalism From Old: A Jurisprudential Take,” Fordham Law Review, 82: 545–576. (Scholar)
Bentham, Jeremy, 1838–1843, “Constitutional Code”, in Works of Jeremy Bentham (Volume 9), pp. 119–124, Bowring (ed.), Edinburgh: William Tait. (Scholar)
Bickel, Alexander, 1962, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Blackstone, Sir William, 1765–69, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 volumes, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Blaustein, Albert P. & Gisbert H. Flanz (ed.), 1994, Constitutions of the Countries of the World, Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications. (Scholar)
Bobbit, Philip, 1991, Constitutional Interpretation, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
Bork, Robert, 1971, “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems”, Indiana Law Journal, 47(1): 17. (Scholar)
–––, 1990, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, New York: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Brest, Paul, 1980, “The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding”, Boston University Law Review, 60(2): 204–238;. (Scholar)
Brink, David, 2016, “Originalism and Constructive Interpretation”, in W. Waluchow & S. Sciaraffa (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Christiano, Thomas, 2008, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
de Tocqueville, Alexis, 1835, Democracy in America, Henry Reeve (trans.), New York: Dearborn. (Scholar)
Den Otter, Ronald, 2009, Judicial Review in the Age of Moral Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Dicey, A.V., 1915, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8^th edition, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law’s Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, “The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe and Nerve”, Fordham Law Review, 65: 1249. (Scholar)
Eisgruber, Christopher, 2001, Constitutional Self-Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Elster, John & Rune Slagstad (eds.), 1988, Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Ely, John, 1980, Democracy and Distrust, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Fallon, Richard H. Jr., 2001, Constitutional Implementation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Freeman, Samuel, 1990, “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review”, Law and Philosophy, 9(4): 327–370. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “Original Meaning: Democratic Interpretation and the Constitution”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21: 3. (Scholar)
Gardbaum, Stephen 2013, The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Gargarella, Roberto, 2022, The Law as a Conversation Among Equals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, 2009, “Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism”, Philosophy Compass, 4(4): 682–702. [Available online]. (Scholar)
Gray, John Chipman, 1986, “A Realist Conception of Law”, in Philosophy of Law, Feinberg & Gross (eds.), 3^rd edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Scholar)
Greenberg, Mark, and Littman, Harry, 1998, “The Meaning of ‘Original Meaning’”, Georgetown Law Journal, 86: 569. (Scholar)
Grey, Thomas, 1975, “Do We Have An Unwritten Constitution?”, Stanford Law Review, 27(3): 703–718. (Scholar)
–––, 1979, “Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework”, Nomos, XX (Constitutionalism, R. Pennock & J. Chapman, eds.), 189–209. (Scholar)
Harel, Alon, 2014, “The Case for Robust Constitutionalism ”, in Why Law Matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–230. (Scholar)
Hart, H.L.A., 1994, The Concept of Law, 2^nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Hobbes, Thomas, 1642, De Cive (The Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society), various editions. (Scholar)
–––, 1651, Leviathan, various editions. (Scholar)
Hogg, Peter, 2020, Constitutional Law of Canada, Toronto: Thomson Reuters. (Scholar)
Hohfeld, Wesley, 1919, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Legal Reasoning: And Other Legal Essays, New Haven, Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Huscroft, Grant and I. Brodie (eds.), 2004, Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, Markham, Ontario: Butterworth’s. (Scholar)
Huscroft, G. & Bradley Miller (eds.), 2008, Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Huscroft, Grant & Miller, Bradley & Webber, Grégoire (eds.), 2014, Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Kavanagh, Aileen, 2003, “The Idea of a Living Constitution”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 16: 55. (Scholar)
–––, 2009, Constitutional Review Under the Human Rights Act, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “A Hard Look at the Last Word”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45: 825–847. (Scholar)
Kramer, Larry, 2004, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Kyritsis, Dimitrios, 2017, Where Our Protection Lies: Separation of Powers and Constitutional Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Langvatan, Silje & Kumm Mattias & Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.), 2020, Public Reason and Courts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Leiter, Brian, 2015, “Constitutional Law, Moral Judgment, and the Supreme Court as Super Legislature”, Hastings Law Journal, 66: 1601. (Scholar)
Locke, John, 1690, Two Treatises of Government, various editions, especially Book II, Chapters XI–XIV. (Scholar)
Lyons, David, 1993a, “Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning”, in Moral Aspects of Legal Theory: Essays on Law, Justice and Political Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993b, “A Preface to Constitutional Theory”, in Moral Aspects of Legal Theory: Essays on Law, Justice and Political Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
MacCallum, Gerald, 1970, “Legislative Intent”, in Robert Summers (ed.) Essays in Legal Philosophy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 237. (Scholar)
MacKinnon, Catherine, 1987, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1993, Only Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Marmor, Andrei, 2007, Law in the Age of Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 4 (“Are Constitutions Legitimate”) and Chapter 8 (“The Immorality of Textualism”,). (Scholar)
Marshall, Geoffrey, 1971, Constitutional Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1984, Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
McIlwain, Charles, 1947, Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
Michaels, Walter Benn, 2009, “A New Defense of Old Originalism”, Western New England Law Review, 31: 21. (Scholar)
Michelman, Frank, 1998, “Constitutional Authorship”, in ed. L. Alexander, Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, Constitutional Essentials: On the Constitutional Theory of Political Liberalism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Mill, John Stuart, 1859, On Liberty, various editions. (Scholar)
Möller, Kai, 2012, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Montesquieu, Baron de, 1748/1949, The Spirit of the Laws, Thomas Nugent (trans.), F. Neumann (ed.), New York: Hafner Publishing. (Scholar)
Müller, Jan Werner, 2016, What is Populism?, Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press. (Scholar)
Paine, Tom, 1791/1969, “The Rights of Man”, in The Essential Thomas Paine, New York: New American Library, 1969. (Scholar)
Pennock, R. & J. Chapman (ed.), 1979, Constitutionalism: (Nomos XX), New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
Rakove, Jack (ed.), 1990, Interpreting the Constitution: The Debate Over Original Intent, Boston: Northeastern University Press. (Scholar)
Raz, Joseph, 1996, “Intention in Interpretation”, in R. George, (ed.) The Autonomy of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries”, in ed. L. Alexander, Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Rehnquist, William, 1976, “The Notion of a Living Constitution”, Texas Law Review, 54: 693. (Scholar)
Richards, David, 1986, Toleration and the Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Rosati, Connie 2016, “The Moral Reading of Constitutions ”, in W. Waluchow & S. Sciaraffa (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Rubenfeld, Jed, 1998, “Legitimacy and Interpretation”, in ed. L. Alexander, Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Sager, Lawrence, 2004, Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Justice, New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
Sartori, Giovanni, (1962), “Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion”, The American Political Science Review, 56: 853–64. (Scholar)
Scalia, Antonin, 1989, “Originalism: The Lesser Evil”, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 57: 849. (Scholar)
–––, 1997, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
Shklar, Judith, 1987, Montesquieu, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Smith, Patricia (ed.), 1992, Feminist Jurisprudence, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Solum, Lawrence B., 2008, “Semantic Originalism”,. Illinois Public Research Paper, No. 07–24. [available online] . (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “The Interpretation-Construction Distinction”, Constitutional Commentary, 27: 95–118. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “What is Originalism? The Evolution of Contemporary Originalist Theory”, Social Science Research Network, April 28, 2011, [Available online]. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Originalism and Constitutional Construction”, Fordham Law Review, 82: 453. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, “The Fixation Thesis: The Role of Historical Fact in Original Meaning”, Notre Dame Law Review, 91: 1–78. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Originalist Methodology”, University of Chicago Law Review, 84: 269–295. (Scholar)
–––, 2019, “Originalism Versus Living Constitutionalism: The Conceptual Structure of the Great Debate”, Northwestern University Law Review, 113: 1243–1296. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “The Public Meaning Thesis: An Originalist Theory of Constitutional Meaning”, Boston University Law Review, 101: 1953–2048. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, “Legal Theory Lexicon 019: Originalism”, [available online], last revised June 20, 2021. (Scholar)
Stevens, Katharina, 2017, “Why Constitutional Meaning is Not Necessarily Fixed”, Problema, 11: 177–214. (Scholar)
Strauss, David, 2010, The Living Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Strossen, Nadine, 1995, Defending Pornography, New York: Scribner. (Scholar)
Sunstein, Cass, 1996, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Thayer, J.B., 1893, “The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law”, Harvard Law Review, 7(3): 129–156. (Scholar)
Tribe, Laurence, 1978, American Constitutional Law, New York: Foundation Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1995, “Taking Text and Structure Seriously: Reflections on Free-Form Method in Constitutional Interpretation”, Harvard Law Review, 108(6): 1221–1303. (Scholar)
Tushnet, Mark, 1988, Red, White and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “Constitutional Interpretation, Character and Experience”, Boston University Law Review, 72(4): 747. (Scholar)
–––, 1999, Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2003, “Forms of Judicial Review and Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism”, Law and Philosophy, 22: 353. (Scholar)
Unger, Roberto, 1986, The Critical Legal Studies Movement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Vergara, Camilla, 2020, “Populism as Plebeian Politics: Inequality, Domination, and Popular Empowerment”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 28: 222. (Scholar)
Vermeule, Adrian, 2009, Law and The Limits of Reason, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2022, Common Good Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Polity Press. (Scholar)
Waldron, Jeremy, 1993, “A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1): 18–51. (Scholar)
–––, 1998, “Precommitment and Disagreement”, in Alexander (ed.), Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999a, The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999b, Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2006, “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review”, Yale Law Journal, 115: 1346–1406. (Scholar)
Waluchow, W.J., 2005, “Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 18(2): 207–247. (Scholar)
–––, 2007a, A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007b, “Judicial Review”, Philosophy Compass, 2(2): 258–266. [available online]. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “Democracy and the Living Tree Constitution”, Drake University Law Review, 59: 1001–46. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, “Constitutional Interpretation”, in ed. Marmor Andrei The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, New York: Routledge, Chapter 3.9.2. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “The Living Tree”, in eds. Peter Oliver, Patrick Macklem & Nathalie Des Rosiers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press, 891–909. (Scholar)
Webber, Grégoire, 2009, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitations of Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Whittington, Keith, 1999a, Constitutional Construction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1999b, Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review, Lawrence: Kansas University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2004, “The New Originalism”, Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22: 559. (Scholar)
–––, 2013, “Originalism: A Critical Introduction”, Fordham Law Review, 82(2): 375–409. (Scholar)
–––, 2015, The Powers of Judicial Review, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 11 07:26:55 2025

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...